SOBRINA Spanish study-analysing the frequency, cost and adverse events associated with overuse in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cohort study

José Joaquín Mira, Irene Carrillo, María Teresa Gea Velázquez de Castro, Carmen Silvestre, Guadalupe Olivera, Johanna Caro-Mendivelso, Pastora Pérez-Pérez, Yolanda Agra, Ana Mª Fernández, Jesús Maria Aranaz-Andrés, SOBRINA Research Team, Ana María Ariztegui, María Pilar Astier, María Concepción Carratalá, Ana María Cebrián, Javier González, Cristina Mª Nebot, Mª Ángeles Nuin, Ángela Rincón, José María Ruiz, María Luisa Torijano, Julián Vitaller, Elena Zavala, José Joaquín Mira, Irene Carrillo, María Teresa Gea Velázquez de Castro, Carmen Silvestre, Guadalupe Olivera, Johanna Caro-Mendivelso, Pastora Pérez-Pérez, Yolanda Agra, Ana Mª Fernández, Jesús Maria Aranaz-Andrés, SOBRINA Research Team, Ana María Ariztegui, María Pilar Astier, María Concepción Carratalá, Ana María Cebrián, Javier González, Cristina Mª Nebot, Mª Ángeles Nuin, Ángela Rincón, José María Ruiz, María Luisa Torijano, Julián Vitaller, Elena Zavala

Abstract

Introduction: Several institutions and quality national agencies have fostered the creation of recommendations on what not to do to reduce overuse in clinical practice. In primary care, their impact has hardly been studied. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) associated with doing what must not be done has not been analysed, either. The aim of this study is to measure the frequency of overuse and AEs associated with doing what must not be done (commission errors) in primary care and their cost.

Methods and analysis: A coordinated, multicentric, national project. A retrospective cohort study using computerised databases of primary care medical records from national agencies and regional health services will be conducted to analyse the frequency of the overuse due to ignore the do-not-do recommendations, and immediately afterwards, depending on their frequency, a representative random sample of medical records will be reviewed with algorithms (triggers) that determine the frequency of AEs associated with these recommendations. Cost will determine by summation of the direct costs due to the consultation, pharmacy, laboratory and imaging activities according to the cases.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Primary Care Research of the Valencian Community. We aim to disseminate the findings through international peer-reviewed journals and on the website (http://www.nohacer.es/). Outcomes will be used to incorporate algorithms into the electronic history to assist in making clinical decisions.

Trial registration number: NCT03482232; Pre-results.

Keywords: overuse; patient safety; primary care; quality assurance; scientific societies.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps in the design, review and approval of this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram for the SOBRINA study. AEs, adverse events.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overview of methods, data sources, sampling and measures of SOBRINA study. DNDs, do-not-do recommendations; AEs, adverse events.

References

    1. Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA 1998;280:1000–5. 10.1001/jama.280.11.1000
    1. Gibson R. The human cost of overuse. BMJ 2014;348:g2975. 10.1136/bmj.g2975
    1. Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, et al. . Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet 2017;390:156–68. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5
    1. OECD. Tackling wasteful spending on health. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. .
    1. Petron DJ, Greis PE, Aoki SK, et al. . Use of knee magnetic resonance imaging by primary care physicians in patients aged 40 years and older. Sports Health 2010;2:385–90. 10.1177/1941738110377420
    1. Silverstein W, Lass E, Born K, et al. . A survey of primary care patients' readiness to engage in the de-adoption practices recommended by Choosing Wisely Canada. BMC Res Notes 2016;9:301. 10.1186/s13104-016-2103-6
    1. Gidwani R, Sinnott P, Avoundjian T, et al. . Inappropriate ordering of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: are providers Choosing Wisely? Am J Manag Care 2016;22:e68–76.
    1. Segal JB, Bridges JF, Chang HY, et al. . Identifying possible indicators of systematic overuse of health care procedures with claims data. Med Care 2014;52:157–63. 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000052
    1. Rosenberg A, Agiro A, Gottlieb M, et al. . Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations from the Choosing Wisely Campaign. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1913–20. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5441
    1. Sirovich BE, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Too little? too much? primary care physicians' views on US health care: a brief report. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1582–5. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.437
    1. Perry Undem Research/Communication. Unnecessary Tests and Procedures in the Health Care System: What Physicians Say About the Problem, the Causes, and the Solutions: Results from a National Survey of Physicians. ABIM Foundation 2014. .
    1. Cummins RO. Clinicians' reasons for overuse of skull radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980;135:549–52. 10.2214/ajr.135.3.549
    1. Tilburt JC, Wynia MK, Sheeler RD, et al. . Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs. JAMA 2013;310:380–8. 10.1001/jama.2013.8278
    1. Buist DS, Chang E, Handley M, et al. . Primary care clinicians' perspectives on reducing low-value care in an integrated delivery system. Perm J 2016;20:41–6. 10.7812/TPP/15-086
    1. Grady D, Redberg RF. Less is more: how less health care can result in better health. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:749–50. 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.90
    1. Lipitz-Snyderman A, Bach PB. Overuse of health care services: when less is more … more or less. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1277–8. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6181
    1. Elshaug AG, Watt AM, Mundy L, et al. . Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian study. Med J Aust 2012;197:556–60. 10.5694/mja12.11083
    1. ABIM Foundation. Choosing wisely [Internet]. (cited 9 Jun 2017).
    1. NICE. Savings and productivity collection. Do not do recommendations [Internet]. 2007. (cited 10 Jun 2017).
    1. Combs B, Caverly T. The Do No Harm Project. 2014; School of Medicine, Internal Medicine Residency Training Program, University of Colorado. (cited 9 June 2017).
    1. Bonaldi A, Vernero S. [Italy’s Slow Medicine: a new paradigm in medicine]. Recenti Prog Med 2015;106:85–91. 10.1701/1790.19492
    1. Selby K, Cornuz J, Neuner-Jehle S, et al. . «Smarter Medicine» – für mehr Effizienz in der Allgemeinmedizin. Primary Care 2014;14:166–7.
    1. García-Alegría J, Vázquez-Fernández Del Pozo S, Salcedo-Fernández F, et al. . Commitment to quality of the Spanish scientific societies. Rev Clin Esp 2017;217:212–21. 10.1016/j.rceng.2017.02.006
    1. American Medical Association. JAMA Internal Medicine [Internet]. (cited 13 Aug 2018).
    1. The BMJ. Too much medicine [Internet] [. (cited 10 June 2017).
    1. Lancet. Series from the Lancet journals. Right Care [Internet]. 2017. (cited 10 June 2017).
    1. Good Stewardship Working Group. The "top 5" lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1385–90. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.231
    1. Grupo de trabajo de la SEMFyC para el proyecto Recomendaciones «NO HACER». Recomendaciones NO HACER [Do Not Dos recommendations]. Barcelona: SEMFyC ediciones, 2014.
    1. Asociación Española de Pediatría (AEP). Recomendaciones de “no hacer” en Pediatría. [Paediatric Do Not Dos recommendations]. 2014. (cited 10 June 2017).
    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Washington: National Academy Press, 2000.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). More than words. Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety. Final Technical Report. 2009. (accessed 10 June 2017).
    1. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. Compromiso por la Calidad de las Sociedades Científicas en España [Internet] [Scientific Societies Quality Commitment Campaign in Spain]. 2013. (cited 10 June 2017).
    1. Mira JJ, Caro Mendivelso J, Carrillo I, et al. . SOBRINA Research Team. Low-value clinical practices and harm caused by non-adherence to ’do not do' recommendations in primary care in Spain: a Delphi study. Int J Qual Health Care 2018. [Epub ahead of print 25 Sep 2018]. 10.1093/intqhc/mzy203
    1. Aranaz-Andrés JM, Aibar C, Limón R, et al. . A study of the prevalence of adverse events in primary healthcare in Spain. Eur J Public Health 2012;22:921–5. 10.1093/eurpub/ckr168
    1. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. . Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991;324:370–6. 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604
    1. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. . The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991;324:377–84. 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605
    1. Aranaz-Andrés JM, Aibar-Remón C, Vitaller-Murillo J, et al. . Incidence of adverse events related to health care in Spain: results of the Spanish National Study of Adverse Events. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:1022–9. 10.1136/jech.2007.065227
    1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. SIVCEA – Sistema de Información para la Vigilancia y Control de Efectos Adversos [website] [Information system for the surveillance of adverse events]. (cited 10 Jun 2017).
    1. Woods DM, Thomas EJ, Holl JL, et al. . Ambulatory care adverse events and preventable adverse events leading to a hospital admission. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:127–31. 10.1136/qshc.2006.021147
    1. Newton EH, Zazzera EA, Van Moorsel G, et al. . Undermeasuring Overuse--An Examination of National Clinical Performance Measures. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1709–11. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4025
    1. Morgan DJ, Wright SM, Dhruva S. Update on medical overuse. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:120–4. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5444
    1. Quintana JM, Arostegui I, Escobar A, et al. . Prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis and the appropriateness of joint replacement in an older population. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1576–84. 10.1001/archinte.168.14.1576
    1. Strech D, Follmann M, Klemperer D, et al. . When Choosing Wisely meets clinical practice guidelines. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2014;108:601–3. 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.014
    1. Lehmann C, Berner R, Bogner JR, et al. . The “Choosing Wisely” initiative in infectious diseases. Infection 2017;45:263–8. 10.1007/s15010-017-0997-0
    1. Cohidon C, Selby K, Cornuz J, et al. . [Smarter medicine in ambulatory care : beliefs and practices of family doctors and training of future clinicians]. Rev Med Suisse 2017;13:285–7.
    1. Montano N, Costantino G, Casazza G, et al. . The Italian Society of Internal Medicine choosing wisely campaign. Intern Emerg Med 2016;11:1125–30. 10.1007/s11739-016-1560-1
    1. Willemsen AE, Bredie SJ, Lobo CM, et al. . [Choosing wisely when prescribing statins]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2015;159:A8695.
    1. Levinson W, Kallewaard M, Bhatia RS, et al. . ’Choosing Wisely': a growing international campaign. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:167–74. 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003821
    1. Choosing Wisely Canada [website]. Toronto, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada, 2017.
    1. Hong AS, Ross-Degnan D, Zhang F, et al. . Small Decline In Low-Value Back Imaging Associated With The ’Choosing Wisely' Campaign, 2012-14. Health Aff 2017;36:671–9. 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1263
    1. Nassery N, Segal JB, Chang E, et al. . Systematic overuse of healthcare services: a conceptual model. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2015;13:1–6. 10.1007/s40258-014-0126-5
    1. Zapata JA, Lai AR, Moriates C. Is Excessive Resource Utilization an Adverse Event? JAMA 2017;317:849–50. 10.1001/jama.2017.0698

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren