Combined simultaneous FDG-PET/MRI with T1 and T2 mapping as an imaging biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of suspected cardiac sarcoidosis

Edward Cheung, Sarah Ahmad, Matthew Aitken, Rosanna Chan, Robert M Iwanochko, Meyer Balter, Ur Metser, Patrick Veit-Haibach, Filio Billia, Yasbanoo Moayedi, Heather J Ross, Kate Hanneman, Edward Cheung, Sarah Ahmad, Matthew Aitken, Rosanna Chan, Robert M Iwanochko, Meyer Balter, Ur Metser, Patrick Veit-Haibach, Filio Billia, Yasbanoo Moayedi, Heather J Ross, Kate Hanneman

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of combined cardiac 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI with T1/T2 mapping in the evaluation of suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.

Methods: Patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis were prospectively enrolled for cardiac 18F-FDG PET/MRI, including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T1/T2 mapping with calculation of extracellular volume (ECV). The final diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis was established using modified JMHW guidelines. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed as a composite of cardiovascular death, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, bradyarrhythmia, cardiac transplantation or heart failure. Statistical analysis included Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: Forty-two patients (53 ± 13 years, 67% male) were evaluated, 13 (31%) with a final diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. Among patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, 100% of patients had at least one abnormality on PET/MRI: FDG uptake in 69%, LGE in 100%, elevated T1 and ECV in 100%, and elevated T2 in 46%. FDG uptake co-localized with LGE in 69% of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis compared to 24% of those without, p = 0.014. Diagnostic specificity for cardiac sarcoidosis was highest for FDG uptake (69%), elevated T2 (79%), and FDG uptake co-localizing with LGE (76%). Diagnostic sensitivity was highest for LGE, elevated T1 and ECV (100%). After median follow-up duration of 634 days, 13 patients experienced MACE. All patients who experienced MACE had LGE, elevated T1 and elevated ECV. FDG uptake (HR 14.7, p = 0.002), elevated T2 (HR 9.0, p = 0.002) and native T1 (HR 1.1 per 10 ms increase, p = 0.044) were significant predictors of MACE even after adjusting for left ventricular ejection fraction and immune suppression treatment. The presence of FDG uptake co-localizing with LGE had the highest diagnostic performance overall (AUC 0.73) and was the best predictor of MACE based on model goodness of fit (HR 14.9, p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Combined cardiac FDG-PET/MRI with T1/T2 mapping provides complementary diagnostic information and predicts MACE in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.

Keywords: CMR; Cardiac MRI; Cardiac sarcoidosis; FDG PET; PET/MRI; Sarcoidosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Author KH has received a speaker honorarium from Sanofi Genzyme, Amicus and Medscape.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Combined 18F-FDG PET/MRI images in a 67-year-old male with cardiac and extra-cardiac sarcoidosis. Mid-ventricular short-axis native T1 map (A), native T2 map (B), late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) image (C), and fused 18F-FDG PET and LGE image (D) demonstrate high T1 (green arrow), high T2 (black arrow), mid-wall LGE (red arrow) and co-localizing focal FDG uptake (white arrow) at the mid-anterior wall. There was extra-cardiac FDG uptake in mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes (not shown). The study was positive on both PET and MRI, likely reflecting active cardiac sarcoidosis with myocardial inflammation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Combined 18F-FDG PET/MRI images in a 72-year-old male with cardiac and extra-cardiac sarcoidosis. Basal short-axis native T1 map (A), native T2 map (B), late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) image (C), and fused 18F-FDG PET and LGE image (D) demonstrate slightly elevated native T1 (green arrow) and corresponding mid-wall LGE (red arrow) at the basal inferolateral wall. There was no corresponding elevation of native T2 or focal FDG uptake (white arrow). There was extra-cardiac FDG uptake in mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes (not shown) and in the lung parenchyma (blue arrow) in keeping with extra-cardiac sarcoidosis. With respect to the heart, the study was negative on PET and positive on MRI, likely reflecting chronic, burnt-out cardiac sarcoidosis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bar charts for PET and MRI findings by patient group. CMV (A), focal FDG uptake (B), LGE presence (C) and co-localized FDG uptake and LGE presence (D)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan–Meier survival probability curves for the primary end-point of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) demonstrate that patients with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), focal FDG uptake, and co-localized focal FDG uptake and LGE have worse event-free survival compared to patients without those findings. The number of patients at risk is shown at the bottom of the figures. Annualized event rates were higher in patients with LGE, focal FDG uptake, and co-localized focal FDG uptake and LGE

References

    1. Ahmadian A, Brogan A, Berman J, Sverdlov AL, Mercier G, Mazzini M, et al. Quantitative interpretation of FDG PET/CT with myocardial perfusion imaging increases diagnostic information in the evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:925–939. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9901-9.
    1. Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2018;138:e210–e271.
    1. Birnie DH, Nery PB, Ha AC, Beanlands RSB. Cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:411–421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.605.
    1. Blankstein R, Osborne M, Naya M, Waller A, Kim CK, Murthy VL, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography enhances prognostic assessments of patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:329–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.022.
    1. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–42. doi: 10.1161/hc0402.102975.
    1. Chen W, Jeudy J. Assessment of myocarditis: cardiac MR, PET/CT, or PET/MR? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21:76. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1158-0.
    1. Coulden RA, Sonnex EP, Abele JT, Crean AM. Utility of FDG PET and Cardiac MRI in Diagnosis and Monitoring of Immunosuppressive Treatment in Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging. 2020;2:e190140. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020190140.
    1. Cummings KW, Bhalla S, Javidan-Nejad C, Bierhals AJ, Gutierrez FR, Woodard PK. A pattern-based approach to assessment of delayed enhancement in nonischemic cardiomyopathy at MR imaging. Radiographics. 2009;29:89–103. doi: 10.1148/rg.291085052.
    1. Dweck MR, Abgral R, Trivieri MG, Robson PM, Karakatsanis N, Mani V, et al. Hybrid magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose to diagnose active cardiac sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;11:94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.021.
    1. Ferreira VM, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, Kramer CM, Carbone I, Sechtem U, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in nonischemic myocardial inflammation: expert recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:3158–3176. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.072.
    1. Flamée L, Symons R, Degtiarova G, Dresselaers T, Gheysens O, Wuyts W, et al. Prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with biopsy-proven systemic sarcoidosis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:3702–3710. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06765-1.
    1. Grunewald J, Grutters JC, Arkema EV, Saketkoo LA, Moller DR, Müller-Quernheim J. Sarcoidosis. Nat Rev Disease Primers. 2019;5:45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0096-x.
    1. Gutberlet M. Cardiac MRI and FDG PET in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Competitors or Collaborators? Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2:e200347. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200347.
    1. Hanneman K, Kadoch M, Guo HH, Jamali M, Quon A, Iagaru A, et al. Initial experience with simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis and myocarditis. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e328–e334. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001669.
    1. Hulten E, Agarwal V, Cahill M, Cole G, Vita T, Parrish S, et al. Presence of late gadolinium enhancement by cardiac magnetic resonance among patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis is associated with adverse cardiovascular prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e005001.
    1. Hulten E, Aslam S, Osborne M, Abbasi S, Bittencourt MS, Blankstein R. Cardiac sarcoidosis—state of the art review. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016;6:50–63.
    1. Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2153–2165. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071714.
    1. Japanese Ministry Health and Welfare Diagnostic standard and guidelines for sarcoidosis. Jpn J Sarcoidosis Granulomatous Disord. 2007;27:89–102.
    1. Kumar S, Barbhaiya C, Nagashima K, Choi E-K, Epstein LM, John RM, et al. Ventricular tachycardia in cardiac sarcoidosis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:87–93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002145.
    1. Li X, Rosenkrans ZT, Wang J, Cai W. PET imaging of macrophages in cardiovascular diseases. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12:1491–514.
    1. Mehta D, Lubitz SA, Frankel Z, Wisnivesky JP, Einstein AJ, Goldman M, et al. Cardiac involvement in patients with sarcoidosis: diagnostic and prognostic value of outpatient testing. Chest. 2008;133:1426–1435. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2784.
    1. Ohira H, Tsujino I, Yoshinaga K. (1)(8)F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cardiac sarcoidosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1773–1783. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1832-y.
    1. Okada DR, Bravo PE, Vita T, Agarwal V, Osborne MT, Taqueti VR, et al. Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis: a focused review of an under-recognized entity. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25:1136–1146. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0658-1.
    1. Okumura W, Iwasaki T, Toyama T, Iso T, Arai M, Oriuchi N, et al. Usefulness of fasting 18F-FDG PET in identification of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1989–1998.
    1. Patel MR, Cawley PJ, Heitner JF, Klem I, Parker MA, Jaroudi WA, et al. Detection of myocardial damage in patients with sarcoidosis. Circulation. 2009;120:1969–1977. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.851352.
    1. Perry A, Vuitch F. Causes of death in patients with sarcoidosis. A morphologic study of 38 autopsies with clinicopathologic correlations. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119:167–72.
    1. Puntmann VO, Isted A, Hinojar R, Foote L, Carr-White G, Nagel E. T1 and T2 mapping in recognition of early cardiac involvement in systemic sarcoidosis. Radiology. 2017;285:63–72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162732.
    1. Rischpler C, Nekolla SG, Dregely I, Schwaiger M. Hybrid PET/MR imaging of the heart: potential, initial experiences, and future prospects. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:402–415. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.105353.
    1. Robison S, Karur GR, Wald RM, Thavendiranathan P, Crean AM, Hanneman K. Noninvasive hematocrit assessment for cardiovascular magnetic resonance extracellular volume quantification using a point-of-care device and synthetic derivation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20:19. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0443-1.
    1. Rybicki BA, Major M, Popovich JJ, Maliarik MJ, Iannuzzi MC. Racial differences in sarcoidosis incidence: a 5-year study in a health maintenance organization. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:234–241. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009096.
    1. Sanchez Tijmes F, Thavendiranathan P, Udell JA, Seidman MA, Hanneman K. Cardiac MRI assessment of nonischemic myocardial inflammation: state of the art review and update on myocarditis associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021;3:6. doi: 10.1148/ryct.210252.
    1. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020;22:19. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6.
    1. Skali H, Schulman AR, Dorbala S. (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the assessment of myocardial sarcoidosis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15:352–362. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0370-6.
    1. Skali H, Schulman AR, Dorbala S. 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessment of myocardial sarcoidosis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15:352–362. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0370-6.
    1. Slart RHJA, Glaudemans AWJM, Gheysens O, Lubberink M, Kero T, Dweck MR, et al. Procedural recommendations of cardiac PET/CT imaging: standardization in inflammatory-, infective-, infiltrative-, and innervation (4Is)-related cardiovascular diseases: a joint collaboration of the EACVI and the EANM. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:1016–1039. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05066-5.
    1. Smedema J-P, Snoep G, van Kroonenburgh MPG, van Geuns R-J, Dassen WRM, Gorgels APM, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1683–1690. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.047.
    1. Vignaux O. Cardiac sarcoidosis: spectrum of MRI features. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:249–254. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840249.
    1. Wicks EC, Menezes LJ, Barnes A, Mohiddin SA, Sekhri N, Porter JC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of simultaneous hybrid 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:757–767. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex340.
    1. Williams G, Kolodny GM. Suppression of myocardial 18F-FDG uptake by preparing patients with a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:W151–W156. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2409.
    1. Youssef G, Leung E, Mylonas I, Nery P, Williams K, Wisenberg G, et al. The use of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis including the Ontario experience. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:241–248. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.090662.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren