Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML

Jorge E Cortes, Tara L Lin, Geoffrey L Uy, Robert J Ryan, Stefan Faderl, Jeffrey E Lancet, Jorge E Cortes, Tara L Lin, Geoffrey L Uy, Robert J Ryan, Stefan Faderl, Jeffrey E Lancet

Abstract

Background: CPX-351 (United States: Vyxeos®; Europe: Vyxeos® Liposomal), a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar ratio, is approved by the US FDA and the EMA for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes. In a pivotal phase 3 study that evaluated 309 patients aged 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia, CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival versus conventional 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuous infusion for 7 days plus daunorubicin for 3 days), with a comparable safety profile. A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of the phase 3 study was performed to compare survival quality between patients receiving CPX-351 versus conventional 7 + 3 after 5 years of follow-up.

Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 between December 20, 2012 and November 11, 2014 to receive induction with CPX-351 or 7 + 3. Survival time for each patient was partitioned into 3 health states: TOX (time with any grade 3 or 4 toxicity or prior to remission), TWiST (time in remission without relapse or grade 3 or 4 toxicity), and REL (time after relapse). Within each treatment arm, Q-TWiST was calculated by adding the mean time spent in each health state weighted by its respective quality-of-life, represented by health utility. The relative Q-TWiST gain, calculated as the difference in Q-TWiST between treatment arms divided by the mean survival of the 7 + 3 control arm, was determined in order to evaluate results in the context of other Q-TWiST analyses.

Results: The relative Q-TWiST gain with CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 was 53.6% in the base case scenario and 39.8% among responding patients. Across various sensitivity analyses, the relative Q-TWiST gains for CPX-351 ranged from 48.0 to 57.6%, remaining well above the standard clinically important difference threshold of 15% for oncology.

Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrates that CPX-351 improved quality-adjusted survival, further supporting the clinical benefit in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Trial registration This trial was registered on September 28, 2012 at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01696084 ( https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01696084 ) and is complete.

Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Chemotherapy; Quality-of-life; Relapse; Survival; Toxicity.

Conflict of interest statement

J.E.C. has received consulting fees from Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Pfizer, and research funding from Arog, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Pfizer. T.L.L. has received institutional research funding from AbbVie, Aptevo, Astellas Pharma, Bio-Path Holdings, Celgene, Celyad, Genentech-Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Mateon Therapeutics, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Prescient Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Tolero Pharmaceuticals, and Trovagene. G.L.U. has received consulting fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Genentech, and honoraria from Astellas Pharma. R.J.R. and S.F. are employees of and hold stock ownership/options in Jazz Pharmaceuticals. J.E.L. has received consulting fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Agios, Pfizer, and Daiichi Sankyo.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of relative Q-TWiST gains across sensitivity analysis variations. Parameter variations in the Q-TWiST calculation included population (ITT population or safety population), type of toxicity (any grade 3 to 4 AEs or only treatment-related grade 3 to 4 AEs), TOX state health utility weight (0, 0.5, and 1.0), and REL state health utility weight (0, 0.5, and 1.0). For all analyses, TWiST state health utility weight was kept at a constant of 1.0. Across the sensitivity analyses, the relative Q-TWiST gains for CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 were consistently above the clinically important difference of 15% (shown by the yellow line). Q-TWiST, Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity; ITT, intent-to-treat; AE, adverse event; TOX, time with any grade 3 or 4 AE or before relapse; REL, time after relapse; TWiST, time in remission and without relapse or grade 3 or 4 AEs

References

    1. SEER Cancer Stat Facts. Acute myeloid leukemia. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2019. Available from: . Accessed 9 Feb 2021.
    1. Granfeldt Østgård LS, Medeiros BC, Sengeløv H, Nørgaard M, Andersen MK, Dufva IH, et al. Epidemiology and clinical significance of secondary and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia: a national population-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3641–3649. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.0890.
    1. Szotkowski T, Rohon P, Zapletalova L, Sicova K, Hubacek J, Indrak K. Secondary acute myeloid leukemia - a single center experience. Neoplasma. 2010;57:170–178. doi: 10.4149/neo_2010_02_170.
    1. Bertoli S, Tavitian S, Bories P, Luquet I, Delabesse E, Comont T, et al. Outcome of patients aged 60–75 years with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a single-institution experience. Cancer Med. 2019;8:3846–3854. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2020.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Vyxeos liposomal 44 mg/100 mg powder for concentrate for solution for infusion. 2018. . Accessed 9 Feb 2021.
    1. VYXEOS® (daunorubicin and cytarabine) liposome for injection, for intravenous us [package insert]. Palo Alto, CA: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2021.
    1. Lancet JE, Uy GL, Cortes JE, Newell LF, Lin TL, Ritchie EK, et al. CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) liposome for injection versus conventional cytarabine plus daunorubicin in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2684–2692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6112.
    1. Lancet JE, Uy GL, Newell LF, Lin TL, Ritchie EK, Stuart RK, et al. CPX-351 versus 7+3 cytarabine and daunorubicin chemotherapy in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia: 5-year results of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8:E481–E491. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00134-4.
    1. LeBlanc TW, Morris S, Hooks M, Locke SC, El-Jawahri A. Patient experiences with liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) vs conventional induction regimens: an analysis of patient-reported outcomes data from a prospective trial. HemaSphere. 2020;4(suppl):Abstract PB1832.
    1. Matza LS, Deger KA, Howell TA, Koetter K, Yeager AM, Hogge D, et al. Health state utilities associated with treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) J Med Econ. 2019;22:567–576. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1584108.
    1. Ritchie EK, Miah SK, Lee S, Curcio T, Desai P, Ball J, et al. CPX-351 as first intensive therapy for elderly patients with AML. Blood. 2019;134(suppl):Abstract 3858.
    1. Solem CT, Kwon Y, Shah RM, Aly A, Botteman MF. Systematic review and benchmarking of quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) in oncology. Exp Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;18:245–253. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1434414.
    1. Revicki DA, Feeny D, Hunt TL, Cole BF. Analyzing oncology clinical trial data using the Q-TWiST method: clinical importance and sources for health state preference data. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:411–423. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-1579-7.
    1. Solem CT, Bell TJ, Kwon Y, Cappelleri JC, Johnson C, Bhattacharyya H, et al. A quality-adjusted survival time without symptoms or toxicities analysis of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine versus low-dose cytarabine as initial therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in patients who are not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy. Cancer. 2020;126:4315–4321. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33072.
    1. Mamolo CM, Cappelleri JC, Hoang CJ, Kim R, Hadfield A, Middleton C, et al. A real-world, cross-sectional, community survey of symptoms and health-related quality of life of adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Future Oncol. 2019;15:1895–1909. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0842.
    1. Loh KP, Abdallah M, Kumar AJ, Neuendorff NR, Dahiya S, Klepin HD. Health-related quality of life and treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2019;14:523–535. doi: 10.1007/s11899-019-00552-6.
    1. Horvath Walsh LE, Rider A, Piercy J, Pike J, Wilson S, Pandya BJ, et al. Real-world impact of physician and patient discordance on health-related quality of life in US patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Oncol Ther. 2019;7:67–81. doi: 10.1007/s40487-019-0094-x.
    1. Lennmyr EB, Karlsson K, Abrahamsson M, Ebrahim F, Lubking A, Hoglund M, et al. Introducing patient-reported outcome in the acute leukemia quality registries in Sweden. Eur J Haematol. 2020;104:571–580. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13399.
    1. Crawford R, Sully K, Conroy R, Johnson C, Doward L, Bell T, et al. Patient-centered insights on treatment decision making and living with acute myeloid leukemia and other ematologic cancers. Patient. 2020;13:83–102. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00384-9.
    1. Buckley SA, Lee SJ, Walter RB. Measuring quality of life in acute myeloid leukemia: limitations and future directions. Exp Rev Hematol. 2016;9:821–823. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2016.1211006.
    1. Cabarrou B, Gomez-Roca C, Viala M, Rabeau A, Paulon R, Loirat D, et al. Modernizing adverse events analysis in oncology clinical trials using alternative approaches: rationale and design of the MOTIVATE trial. Invest New Drugs. 2020;38:1879–1887. doi: 10.1007/s10637-020-00938-x.
    1. Kim HP, Gerhard B, Harasym TO, Mayer LD, Hogge DE. Liposomal encapsulation of a synergistic molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin enhances selective toxicity for acute myeloid leukemia progenitors as compared to analogous normal hematopoietic cells. Exp Hematol. 2011;39:741–750. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2011.04.001.
    1. Lim WS, Tardi PG, Dos Santos N, Xie X, Fan M, Liboiron BD, et al. Leukemia-selective uptake and cytotoxicity of CPX-351, a synergistic fixed-ratio cytarabine:daunorubicin formulation, in bone marrow xenografts. Leuk Res. 2010;34:1214–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.01.015.
    1. Wang Q, Tardi P, Sadowski N, Xie S, Heller D, Mayer L. Pharmacokinetics, drug metabolism, and tissue distribution of CPX-351 in animals. Nanomedicine. 2020;30:102275. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102275.
    1. Feldman EJ, Kolitz JE, Trang JM, Liboiron BD, Swenson CE, Chiarella MT, et al. Pharmacokinetics of CPX-351; a nano-scale liposomal fixed molar ratio formulation of cytarabine:daunorubicin, in patients with advanced leukemia. Leuk Res. 2012;36:1283–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.07.006.
    1. Lin TL, Rizzieri DA, Ryan DH, Schiller GJ, Kolitz JE, Uy GL, et al. Older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML who achieved remission with CPX-351: phase 3 post hoc analyses. Blood Adv. 2021;5:1719–1728. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003510.
    1. Medeiros B, Lancet J, Cortes J, Newell L, Lin T, Ritchie E, et al. Rates of adverse events per patient-year in a randomized, phase 3 study of CPX-351 versus 7+3 in older adults with newly diagnosed, treatmen-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Blood. 2017;130(suppl):Abstract 1366.
    1. Cortes JE, Ganguly S, Khaled SK, Kramer A, Levis MJ, Martinelli G, et al. Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of quizartinib vs salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood. 2019;134(suppl):Abstract 382.
    1. Kolitz JE, Strickland SA, Cortes JE, Hogge D, Lancet JE, Goldberg SL, et al. Consolidation outcomes in CPX-351 versus cytarabine/daunorubicin-treated older patients with high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61:631–640. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1688320.
    1. Villa KF, Ryan RJ, Chiarella M, Louie AC. Healthcare resource utilization in a phase 3 study of CPX-351 in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia. J Med Econ. 2020;23:714–720. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1744613.
    1. Talati C, Frantz D, Lubas A, Salamanca C, Tobon K, Kubal T. How I treat newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in an outpatient setting: a multidisciplinary team perspective. Future Oncol. 2020;16:281–291. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0781.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren