CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Jeffrey E Lancet, Geoffrey L Uy, Jorge E Cortes, Laura F Newell, Tara L Lin, Ellen K Ritchie, Robert K Stuart, Stephen A Strickland, Donna Hogge, Scott R Solomon, Richard M Stone, Dale L Bixby, Jonathan E Kolitz, Gary J Schiller, Matthew J Wieduwilt, Daniel H Ryan, Antje Hoering, Kamalika Banerjee, Michael Chiarella, Arthur C Louie, Bruno C Medeiros, Jeffrey E Lancet, Geoffrey L Uy, Jorge E Cortes, Laura F Newell, Tara L Lin, Ellen K Ritchie, Robert K Stuart, Stephen A Strickland, Donna Hogge, Scott R Solomon, Richard M Stone, Dale L Bixby, Jonathan E Kolitz, Gary J Schiller, Matthew J Wieduwilt, Daniel H Ryan, Antje Hoering, Kamalika Banerjee, Michael Chiarella, Arthur C Louie, Bruno C Medeiros

Abstract

Purpose CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin that delivers a synergistic 5:1 drug ratio into leukemia cells to a greater extent than normal bone marrow cells. Prior clinical studies demonstrated a sustained drug ratio and exposure in vivo and prolonged survival versus standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy (7+3 regimen) in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Patients and Methods In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, 309 patients age 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk/sAML received one to two induction cycles of CPX-351 or 7+3 followed by consolidation therapy with a similar regimen. The primary end point was overall survival. Results CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival versus 7+3 (9.56 v 5.95 months; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; one-sided P = .003). Overall remission rate was also significantly higher with CPX-351 versus 7+3 (47.7% v 33.3%; two-sided P = .016). Improved outcomes were observed across age-groups and AML subtypes. The incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable between arms, despite a longer treatment phase and prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet count recovery with CPX-351. Early mortality rates with CPX-351 and 7+3 were 5.9% and 10.6% (two-sided P = .149) through day 30 and 13.7% and 21.2% (two-sided P = .097) through day 60. Conclusion CPX-351 treatment is associated with significantly longer survival compared with conventional 7+3 in older adults with newly diagnosed sAML. The safety profile of CPX-351 was similar to that of conventional 7+3 therapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01696084.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram. (*) Patients without confirmation of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML), antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or de novo AML with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities (n = 43; many of these screen failures were in patients with de novo AML without MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities because results of the required bone marrow biopsy specimens were not available at the patients’ initial diagnosis); without pathologic diagnosis of AML according to WHO criteria with ≥ 20% blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow (n = 30); with a history of myeloproliferative neoplasms, except CMML (n = 6); or with acute promyelocytic leukemia (t[15;17]) or favorable cytogenetics (t[8;21] or inv16 if known at the time of random assignment; n = 3). (†) Patients without serum creatinine

Fig 2.

Median overall survival (OS) and…

Fig 2.

Median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) OS…

Fig 2.
Median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) OS and (B) EFS are shown for the overall intention-to-treat population, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of (C) OS landmarked from the date of transplantation are shown for patients in the intention-to-treat population who received a hematopoietic cell transplant. EFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of induction treatment failure, relapse from complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CRi), or death as a result of any cause, whichever came first. Patients alive and not known to have any of these events were censored on the latter of their last dates of disease assessment or hematology assessment. For patients who achieved CR or CRi, duration of remission was measured from the date of remission (CR or CRi) until the date of relapse or death as a result of any cause. Patients not known to have relapsed or died at the last follow-up were censored in a similar fashion as described for EFS. 7+3, standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy; CPX-351, dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin; HR, hazard ratio.

Fig 3.

Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival…

Fig 3.

Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival by (A) age subgroup and (B) baseline patient…

Fig 3.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival by (A) age subgroup and (B) baseline patient characteristics. (*) Includes patients in the prespecified randomization strata of antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) exposure as well as patients in other strata (eg, therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia [AML], antecedent chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML]) who had previously received HMAs. Some patients received HMAs for therapy-related MDS, which then progressed to AML, and these patients may have been classified as having either therapy-related AML or antecedent MDS with prior HMA exposure. 7+3, standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy; CPX-351, dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival.

Fig 4.

Most frequently reported adverse events.…

Fig 4.

Most frequently reported adverse events. The percentage of patients with grade 1 and…

Fig 4.
Most frequently reported adverse events. The percentage of patients with grade 1 and 2 and grade 3 to 5 events are shown for all adverse events that occurred in > 5% of patients in either treatment group as grade 3 to 5 events. 7+3, standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy; CPX-351, dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) OS and (B) EFS are shown for the overall intention-to-treat population, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of (C) OS landmarked from the date of transplantation are shown for patients in the intention-to-treat population who received a hematopoietic cell transplant. EFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of induction treatment failure, relapse from complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CRi), or death as a result of any cause, whichever came first. Patients alive and not known to have any of these events were censored on the latter of their last dates of disease assessment or hematology assessment. For patients who achieved CR or CRi, duration of remission was measured from the date of remission (CR or CRi) until the date of relapse or death as a result of any cause. Patients not known to have relapsed or died at the last follow-up were censored in a similar fashion as described for EFS. 7+3, standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy; CPX-351, dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin; HR, hazard ratio.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival by (A) age subgroup and (B) baseline patient characteristics. (*) Includes patients in the prespecified randomization strata of antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) exposure as well as patients in other strata (eg, therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia [AML], antecedent chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML]) who had previously received HMAs. Some patients received HMAs for therapy-related MDS, which then progressed to AML, and these patients may have been classified as having either therapy-related AML or antecedent MDS with prior HMA exposure. 7+3, standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy; CPX-351, dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Most frequently reported adverse events. The percentage of patients with grade 1 and 2 and grade 3 to 5 events are shown for all adverse events that occurred in > 5% of patients in either treatment group as grade 3 to 5 events. 7+3, standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy; CPX-351, dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin.

References

    1. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. : The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: Rationale and important changes. Blood 114:937-951, 2009
    1. Granfeldt Østgård LS, Medeiros BC, Sengeløv H, et al. : Epidemiology and clinical significance of secondary and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia: A national population-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol 33:3641-3649, 2015
    1. Miesner M, Haferlach C, Bacher U, et al. : Multilineage dysplasia (MLD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) correlates with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities and a prior history of MDS or MDS/MPN but has no independent prognostic relevance: A comparison of 408 cases classified as “AML not otherwise specified” (AML-NOS) or “AML with myelodysplasia-related changes” (AML-MRC). Blood 116:2742-2751, 2010
    1. Hulegårdh E, Nilsson C, Lazarevic V, et al. : Characterization and prognostic features of secondary acute myeloid leukemia in a population-based setting: A report from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Am J Hematol 90:208-214, 2015
    1. Leith CP, Kopecky KJ, Godwin J, et al. : Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: Assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood 89:3323-3329, 1997
    1. Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, et al. : Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: Determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood 116:354-365, 2010
    1. Rai KR, Holland JF, Glidewell OJ, et al. : Treatment of acute myelocytic leukemia: A study by cancer and leukemia group B. Blood 58:1203-1212, 1981
    1. Yates JW, Wallace HJ, Jr, Ellison RR, et al. : Cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878) and daunorubicin (NSC-83142) therapy in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Rep 57:485-488, 1973
    1. Kayser S, Döhner K, Krauter J, et al. : The impact of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on outcome in 2853 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML. Blood 117:2137-2145, 2011
    1. Schoch C, Kern W, Schnittger S, et al. : Karyotype is an independent prognostic parameter in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML): An analysis of 93 patients with t-AML in comparison to 1091 patients with de novo AML. Leukemia 18:120-125, 2004
    1. Dombret H, Gardin C: An update of current treatments for adult acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 127:53-61, 2016
    1. Mayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA, et al. : Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 331:896-903, 1994
    1. Burnett AK, Milligan D, Goldstone A, et al. : The impact of dose escalation and resistance modulation in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome: The results of the LRF AML14 trial. Br J Haematol 145:318-332, 2009
    1. Stone RM, Mandrekar SJ, Sanford BL, et al. : Midostaurin plus chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation. N Engl J Med 377:454-464, 2017
    1. Hills RK, Castaigne S, Appelbaum FR, et al. : Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol 15:986-996, 2014
    1. Lim WS, Tardi PG, Dos Santos N, et al. : Leukemia-selective uptake and cytotoxicity of CPX-351, a synergistic fixed-ratio cytarabine:daunorubicin formulation, in bone marrow xenografts. Leuk Res 34:1214-1223, 2010
    1. Kim HP, Gerhard B, Harasym TO, et al. : Liposomal encapsulation of a synergistic molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin enhances selective toxicity for acute myeloid leukemia progenitors as compared to analogous normal hematopoietic cells. Exp Hematol 39:741-750, 2011
    1. Mayer LD, Harasym TO, Tardi PG, et al. : Ratiometric dosing of anticancer drug combinations: Controlling drug ratios after systemic administration regulates therapeutic activity in tumor-bearing mice. Mol Cancer Ther 5:1854-1863, 2006
    1. Tardi P, Johnstone S, Harasym N, et al. : In vivo maintenance of synergistic cytarabine:daunorubicin ratios greatly enhances therapeutic efficacy. Leuk Res 33:129-139, 2009
    1. Lancet JE, Cortes JE, Hogge DE, et al. : Phase 2 trial of CPX-351, a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine/daunorubicin, vs cytarabine/daunorubicin in older adults with untreated AML. Blood 123:3239-3246, 2014
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R: Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 31:103-115, 1975
    1. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al: Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 21:4642-4649, 2003 [Erratum: J Clin Oncol 22:576, 2004]
    1. Lichtman MA: A historical perspective on the development of the cytarabine (7days) and daunorubicin (3days) treatment regimen for acute myelogenous leukemia: 2013 the 40th anniversary of 7+3. Blood Cells Mol Dis 50:119-130, 2013
    1. Feldman EJ, Kolitz JE, Trang JM, et al. : Pharmacokinetics of CPX-351; a nano-scale liposomal fixed molar ratio formulation of cytarabine:daunorubicin, in patients with advanced leukemia. Leuk Res 36:1283-1289, 2012
    1. Feldman EJ, Lancet JE, Kolitz JE, et al. : First-in-man study of CPX-351: A liposomal carrier containing cytarabine and daunorubicin in a fixed 5:1 molar ratio for the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29:979-985, 2011
    1. Leith CP, Kopecky KJ, Chen IM, et al. : Frequency and clinical significance of the expression of the multidrug resistance proteins MDR1/P-glycoprotein, MRP1, and LRP in acute myeloid leukemia: A Southwest Oncology Group Study. Blood 94:1086-1099, 1999
    1. Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, et al. : Age and acute myeloid leukemia: Real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood 113:4179-4187, 2009
    1. Stone RM, Mazzola E, Neuberg D, et al. : Phase III open-label randomized study of cytarabine in combination with amonafide L-malate or daunorubicin as induction therapy for patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 33:1252-1257, 2015
    1. Willemze R, Suciu S, Meloni G, et al. : High-dose cytarabine in induction treatment improves the outcome of adult patients younger than age 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia: Results of the EORTC-GIMEMA AML-12 trial. J Clin Oncol 32:219-228, 2014
    1. Holowiecki J, Grosicki S, Giebel S, et al. : Cladribine, but not fludarabine, added to daunorubicin and cytarabine during induction prolongs survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A multicenter, randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 30:2441-2448, 2012
    1. Araki D, Wood BL, Othus M, et al. : Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: Time to move toward a minimal residual disease-based definition of complete remission? J Clin Oncol 34:329-336, 2016
    1. Gordon MJ, Tardi P, Loriaux MM, et al. : CPX-351 exhibits potent and direct ex vivo cytotoxicity against AML blasts with enhanced efficacy for cells harboring the FLT3-ITD mutation. Leuk Res 53:39-49, 2017
    1. Walter MJ, Shen D, Ding L, et al. : Clonal architecture of secondary acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 366:1090-1098, 2012
    1. Lindsley RC, Mar BG, Mazzola E, et al. : Acute myeloid leukemia ontogeny is defined by distinct somatic mutations. Blood 125:1367-1376, 2015

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren