Randomized controlled trial of acitretin versus placebo in patients at high-risk for basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study 969251)

Kunal C Kadakia, Debra L Barton, Charles L Loprinzi, Jeff A Sloan, Clark C Otley, Brent B Diekmann, Paul J Novotny, Steven R Alberts, Paul J Limburg, Mark R Pittelkow, Kunal C Kadakia, Debra L Barton, Charles L Loprinzi, Jeff A Sloan, Clark C Otley, Brent B Diekmann, Paul J Novotny, Steven R Alberts, Paul J Limburg, Mark R Pittelkow

Abstract

Background: Chemoprevention with systemic retinoids has demonstrated promise in decreasing the incidence of new primary nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in immunocompromised post-transplantation recipients. There is limited evidence for the use of systemic retinoids in the nontransplantation patient. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of acitretin as a chemopreventive agent in nontransplantation patients at high-risk for NMSC.

Methods: The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. To test the possible skin cancer-preventing effect of a 2-year treatment with acitretin, 70 nontransplantation patients aged ≥18 years who had a history of ≥2 NMSCs within 5 years of trial onset were randomized to receive either placebo or acitretin 25 mg orally 5 days per week. The primary outcome measure was the rate of new NMSC development.

Results: Seventy patients were randomized to receive either acitretin alone (N = 35) or placebo (N = 35). During the 2-year treatment period, the patients who received acitretin did not have a statistically significant reduction in the rate of new primary NMSCs (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.13; 54% vs 74%; P = .13). However, using the incidence of new NMSC, the time to new NMSC, and total NMSC counts, an umbrella test indicated a significant trend that favored the use of acitretin (chi-square statistic, 3.94; P = .047). The patients who received acitretin reported significantly more mucositis and skin toxicities compared with the patients who received placebo.

Conclusions: Although there was not a statistically significant benefit observed with the use of acitretin, this may have been the result of low statistical power.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

The authors made no disclosures.

Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
This Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram illustrates patient participation in the current study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The cumulative incidence of new nonmelanoma skin cancer is illustrated over time for the 2 treatment arms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
This Kaplan-Meier plot illustrates the time to develop a new nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) from the date on study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The distribution of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and total nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is illustrated according to treatment arm.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren