Plasma Cell-free DNA Concentration and Outcomes from Taxane Therapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer from Two Phase III Trials (FIRSTANA and PROSELICA)

Niven Mehra, David Dolling, Semini Sumanasuriya, Rossitza Christova, Lorna Pope, Suzanne Carreira, George Seed, Wei Yuan, Jane Goodall, Emma Hall, Penny Flohr, Gunther Boysen, Diletta Bianchini, Oliver Sartor, Mario A Eisenberger, Karim Fizazi, Stephane Oudard, Mustapha Chadjaa, Sandrine Macé, Johann S de Bono, Niven Mehra, David Dolling, Semini Sumanasuriya, Rossitza Christova, Lorna Pope, Suzanne Carreira, George Seed, Wei Yuan, Jane Goodall, Emma Hall, Penny Flohr, Gunther Boysen, Diletta Bianchini, Oliver Sartor, Mario A Eisenberger, Karim Fizazi, Stephane Oudard, Mustapha Chadjaa, Sandrine Macé, Johann S de Bono

Abstract

Background: Noninvasive biomarkers are needed to guide metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment.

Objective: To clinically qualify baseline and on-treatment cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations as biomarkers of patient outcome following taxane chemotherapy.

Design, setting, and participants: Blood for cfDNA analyses was prospectively collected from 571 mCRPC patients participating in two phase III clinical trials, FIRSTANA (NCT01308567) and PROSELICA (NCT01308580). Patients received docetaxel (75mg/m2) or cabazitaxel (20 or 25mg/m2) as first-line chemotherapy (FIRSTANA), and cabazitaxel (20 or 25mg/m2) as second-line chemotherapy (PROSELICA).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Associations between cfDNA concentration and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response were tested using logistic regression models. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods for cfDNA concentration grouped by quartile. Cox proportional hazard models, within each study, tested for associations with radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS), with multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline prognostic variables. Two-stage individual patient meta-analysis combined results for cfDNA concentrations for both studies.

Results and limitations: In 2502 samples, baseline log10 cfDNA concentration correlated with known prognostic factors, shorter rPFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-2.08; p=0.004), and shorter OS on taxane therapy (HR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.18-1.97; p=0.001). In multivariable analyses, baseline cfDNA concentration was an independent prognostic variable for rPFS and OS in both first- and second-line chemotherapy settings. Patients with a PSA response experienced a decline in log10 cfDNA concentrations during the first four cycles of treatment (per cycle -0.03; 95% CI: -0.044 to -0.009; p=0.003). Study limitations included the fact that blood sample collection was not mandated for all patients and the inability to specifically quantitate tumour-derived cfDNA fraction in cfDNA.

Conclusions: We report that changes in cfDNA concentrations correlate with both rPFS and OS in patients receiving first- and second-line taxane therapy, and may serve as independent prognostic biomarkers of response to taxanes.

Patient summary: In the past decade, several new therapies have been introduced for men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer. Although metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable, these novel agents have extended patient survival and improved their quality of life in comparison with the last decade. To further optimise treatment allocation and individualise patient care, better tests (biomarkers) are needed to guide the delivery of improved and more precise care. In this report, we assessed cfDNA in over 2500 blood samples from men with prostate cancer who were recruited to two separate international studies and received taxane chemotherapy. We quantified the concentration of cfDNA fragments in blood plasma, which partly originates from tumour. We identified that higher concentrations of circulating cfDNA fragments, prior to starting taxane chemotherapy, can be used to identify patients with aggressive prostate cancer. A decline in cfDNA concentration during the first 3-9 wk after initiation of taxane therapy was seen in patients deriving benefit from taxane chemotherapy. These results identified circulating cfDNA as a new biomarker of aggressive disease in metastatic prostate cancer and imply that the study of cfDNA has clinical utility, supporting further efforts to develop blood-based tests on this circulating tumour-derived DNA.

Keywords: Cabazitaxel; Circulating cell-free DNA; Docetaxel; FIRSTANA; PROSELICA; Taxane chemotherapy; cfDNA.

Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation and coefficient of variation (CV) between both baseline samples taken between 1 and 7 d apart. (A) Relationship between log10-transformed cfDNA concentration (ng/ml) at screening and at C1 in 507 paired samples derived from n = 571 patients. Correlation coefficient = 0.84 (Pearson's rho) with p < 0.001. (B) CV of baseline samples depicted in a frequency chart with mean and median CV of 0.12 and 0.08 with 95% CI of 0.11 and 0.13, respectively. Mean CV is shown in solid line. C = cycle; cfDNA = cell-free DNA; CI = confidence interval; CV = coefficient of variation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean log10 cfDNA concentrations and 95% confidence intervals per cycle by PSA response (decrease of 50% at any time). cfDNA = cell-free DNA; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Correlation of baseline cfDNA concentration quartiles with rPFS and OS. (A) Kaplan-Meier curve of rPFS by baseline log10 cfDNA concentration quartiles. (B) Forest plot for rPFS (multivariable analysis model) for baseline log10 cfDNA concentration for each study and combined estimate. (C) Kaplan-Meier curve of OS by baseline cfDNA concentration quartiles. (D) Forest plot for OS (multivariable analysis model) for baseline log10 cfDNA concentration for each study and combined estimate. The multivariable Cox model included baseline log10 cfDNA concentration, ECOG PS at baseline (0 vs 1–2), visceral metastases, bone-only disease, Gleason score, baseline pain, baseline albumin, baseline ALP, baseline haemoglobin, baseline LDH, baseline NLR and baseline PSA. The I2 test displays and tests the level of heterogeneity between the studies, which is nonsignificant for cfDNA. ALP = alkaline phosphatase; cfDNA = cell-free DNA; CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HR, = hazard ratio; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; NLR = Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; OS = overall survival; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; rPFS = radiological progression-free survival.

References

    1. Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Ervik M. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013; Lyon, France: 2016. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC cancer base no. 11.
    1. Tannock I.F., de Wit R., Berry W.R. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1502–1512.
    1. Petrylak D.P., Tangen C.M., Hussain M.H. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1513–1520.
    1. de Bono J.S., Oudard S., Ozguroglu M. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1147–1154.
    1. Sweeney C., Chen Y., Liu G. Long term efficacy and QOL data of chemohormonal therapy (C-HT) in low and high volume hormone naïve metastatic prostate cancer (PrCa): E3805 CHAARTED trial. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(Suppl 6):720PD.
    1. James N.D., Sydes M.R., Clarke N.W. Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1163–1177.
    1. Gillessen S., Attard G., Beer T.M. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: the report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017. Eur Urol. 2018;73:178–211.
    1. Lorente D., Mateo J., Perez-Lopez R., de Bono J.S., Attard G. Sequencing of agents in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e279–e292.
    1. Feng J., Gang F., Li X. Plasma cell-free DNA and its DNA integrity as biomarker to distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with increased serum prostate-specific antigen. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45:1023–1028.
    1. Wroclawski M.L., Serpa-Neto A., Fonseca F.L. Cell-free plasma DNA as biochemical biomarker for the diagnosis and follow-up of prostate cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2921–2927.
    1. Bastian P.J., Palapattu G.S., Yegnasubramanian S. Prognostic value of preoperative serum cell-free circulating DNA in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5361–5367.
    1. Lui Y.Y., Chik K.W., Chiu R.W., Ho C.Y., Lam C.W., Lo Y.M. Predominant hematopoietic origin of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum after sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation. Clin Chem. 2002;48:421–427.
    1. Carreira S., Romanel A., Goodall J. Tumor clone dynamics in lethal prostate cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:254ra125.
    1. Jahr S., Hentze H., Englisch S. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1659–1665.
    1. Romanel A., Gasi Tandefelt D., Conteduca V. Plasma AR and abiraterone-resistant prostate cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:312re10.
    1. Azad A.A., Volik S.V., Wyatt A.W. Androgen receptor gene aberrations in circulating cell-free DNA: biomarkers of therapeutic resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2315–2324.
    1. Wyatt A.W., Azad A.A., Volik S.V. Genomic alterations in cell-free DNA and enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1598–1606.
    1. Perkins G., Yap T.A., Pope L. Multi-purpose utility of circulating plasma DNA testing in patients with advanced cancers. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47020.
    1. Oudard S., Fizazi K., Sengelov L. Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomized phase III trial—FIRSTANA. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3189–3197.
    1. Eisenberger M., Hardy-Bessard A.C., Kim C.S. Phase III study comparing a reduced dose of cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2) and the currently approved dose (25 mg/m2) in postdocetaxel patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer–PROSELICA. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3198–3206.
    1. Uno H., Cai T., Pencina M.J., D’Agostino R.B., Wei L.J. On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Stat Med. 2011;30:1105–1117.
    1. Blanche P., Latouche A., Viallon V. Risk assessment and evaluation of predictions. Springer; New York, NY: 2013. Time-dependent AUC with right-censored data: a survey; pp. 239–251.
    1. Fizazi K., Massard C., Smith M. Bone-related parameters are the main prognostic factors for overall survival in men with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:42–50.
    1. Halabi S., Lin C.Y., Small E.J. Prognostic model predicting metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer survival in men treated with second-line chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1729–1737.
    1. Yin C., Luo C., Hu W., Ding X., Yuan C., Wang F. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of circulating cell-free DNA can be used as an adjuvant tool for prostate cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Dis Markers. 2016;2016:3825819.
    1. Chun F.K., Muller I., Lange I. Circulating tumour-associated plasma DNA represents an independent and informative predictor of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2006;98:544–548.
    1. Kienel A., Porres D., Heidenreich A., Pfister D. cfDNA as a prognostic marker of response to taxane based chemotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2015;194:966–971.
    1. Kwee S., Song M.A., Cheng I., Loo L., Tiirikainen M. Measurement of circulating cell-free DNA in relation to 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT imaging in chemotherapy-treated advanced prostate cancer. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5:65–70.
    1. Prentice R.L. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med. 1989;8:431–440.
    1. Sozzi G., Roz L., Conte D. Effects of prolonged storage of whole plasma or isolated plasma DNA on the results of circulating DNA quantification assays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1848–1850.
    1. Gormally E., Caboux E., Vineis P., Hainaut P. Circulating free DNA in plasma or serum as biomarker of carcinogenesis: practical aspects and biological significance. Mutat Res. 2007;635:105–117.
    1. Stroun M., Lyautey J., Lederrey C., Olson-Sand A., Anker P. About the possible origin and mechanism of circulating DNA apoptosis and active DNA release. Clin Chim Acta. 2001;313:139–142.
    1. Christie E.L., Dawson S.J., Bowtell D.D. Blood worth bottling: circulating tumor DNA as a cancer biomarker. Cancer Res. 2016;76:5590–5591.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren