The relationship between antithrombin administration and inflammation during veno-venous ECMO

Mauro Panigada, Elena Spinelli, Stefano De Falco, Dario Consonni, Cristina Novembrino, Massimo Boscolo Anzoletti, Giovanna Panarello, Giovanna Occhipinti, Claudia C Dos Santos, Antonio Pesenti, Antonio Arcadipane, Giacomo Grasselli, Mauro Panigada, Elena Spinelli, Stefano De Falco, Dario Consonni, Cristina Novembrino, Massimo Boscolo Anzoletti, Giovanna Panarello, Giovanna Occhipinti, Claudia C Dos Santos, Antonio Pesenti, Antonio Arcadipane, Giacomo Grasselli

Abstract

Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is used in the most severe cases of respiratory failure and further exacerbates the patients' inflammatory status. Antithrombin is supplemented during ECMO for its anticoagulant effects, but it also deploys anti-inflammatory properties. In this pre-specified ancillary study of the GATRA trial [NCT03208270] we aimed to evaluate the relationship between antithrombin and inflammation during ECMO. Forty-six patients were included in the study, 23 were randomized to receive antithrombin to maintain a level of 80-120% (study group) and 23 were randomized not to be supplemented (control group). Anticoagulation was provided in both groups with heparin infusion. Six cytokines were measured at 5 timepoints from prior to ECMO start to 7 days after ECMO removal. Cytokines decreased during the study but overall were not very different in the two groups. Testing the interaction between the study group and timepoints suggests that the administration of antithrombin led to a more rapid decrease over time of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-⍺ and Pro-ADM. Plasma levels of antithrombin (either endogenous or exogenous) were negatively associated with all cytokines. Inflammation decreases during ECMO but a causal effect of antithrombin administration on the reduction of inflammation (and its clinical relevance) must be confirmed by appropriately powered studies.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cytokine sampling time during the study. Timepoints: Day 0 (prior to ECMO start), Day 1 (24 h after ECMO start), Day 3 (72 h after ECMO start), Day R (before ECMO removal), Day R + 7 (7 days after ECMO removal or before discharge from the ICU whichever happened first). n number of patients sampled.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cytokine trend in the study groups. Geometric means and standard error of the means of cytokines during the study. Day 0 (prior to ECMO start), Day 1 (24 h after ECMO start), Day 3 (72 h after ECMO start), Day R (before ECMO removal), Day R + 7 (7 days after ECMO removal or before discharge from the ICU whichever happened first). Dashed lines: control group, solid line: treatment group. P values for interaction are from models who treated time (timepoints) as a quantitative variable (i.e., we assigned values from 0 to 4 to the five timepoints).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between cytokines and antithrombin. Pearson’s correlation coefficients, regression slopes and percent change in cytokine for 10% increase in antithrombin plasma level (%) with 95% CI from random-intercept linear regression models.

References

    1. Lequier L, Horton SB, McMullan DM, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuitry. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2013;14:S7–S12. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318292dd10.
    1. Millar JE, Fanning JP, McDonald CI, et al. The inflammatory response to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): A review of the pathophysiology. Crit. Care Lond. Engl. 2016;20:387. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1570-4.
    1. Graulich J, Walzog B, Marcinkowski M, et al. Leukocyte and endothelial activation in a laboratory model of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) Pediatr. Res. 2000;48:679–684. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200011000-00021.
    1. Fortenberry JD, Bhardwaj V, Niemer P, et al. Neutrophil and cytokine activation with neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J. Pediatr. 1996;128:670–678. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(96)80133-8.
    1. McILwain RB, Timpa JG, Kurundkar AR, et al. Plasma concentrations of inflammatory cytokines rise rapidly during ECMO-related SIRS due to the release of preformed stores in the intestine. Lab. Invest. 2010;90:128–139. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.119.
    1. Mildner RJ, Taub N, Vyas JR, et al. Cytokine imbalance in infants receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure. Biol. Neonate. 2005;88:321–327. doi: 10.1159/000087630.
    1. Shen J, Yu W, Shi J, et al. Effect of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on the heart in a healthy piglet model. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2013;8:163. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-163.
    1. Protti A, Iapichino GE, Di Nardo M, et al. Anticoagulation management and antithrombin supplementation practice during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A worldwide survey. Anesthesiology. 2019;132:562–570. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003044.
    1. Roemisch J, Gray E, Hoffmann JN, et al. Antithrombin: a new look at the actions of a serine protease inhibitor. Blood Coagul. Fibrinol. Int. J. Haemost. Thromb. 2002;13:657–670. doi: 10.1097/00001721-200212000-00001.
    1. Schlömmer C, Brandtner A, Bachler M. Antithrombin and its role in host defense and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:4283. doi: 10.3390/ijms22084283.
    1. Uchiba M, Okajima K, Murakami K, et al. Effects of antithrombin III (AT III) and Trp49-modified AT III on plasma level of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha in rats. Thromb. Res. 1995;80:201–208. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(95)00168-Q.
    1. Yamashiro K, Kiryu J, Tsujikawa A, et al. Inhibitory effects of antithrombin III against leukocyte rolling and infiltration during endotoxin-induced uveitis in rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001;42:1553–1560.
    1. Ostrovsky L, Woodman RC, Payne D, et al. Antithrombin III prevents and rapidly reverses leukocyte recruitment in ischemia/reperfusion. Circulation. 1997;96:2302–2310. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.96.7.2302.
    1. Levy JH, Sniecinski RM, Welsby IJ, et al. Antithrombin: anti-inflammatory properties and clinical applications. Thromb. Haemost. 2015;115:712–728.
    1. Wang J, Wang Y, Wang J, et al. Antithrombin is protective against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2013;11:1020–1028. doi: 10.1111/jth.12243.
    1. Isik S, Tuncyurek P, Zengin NI, et al. Antithrombin prevents apoptosis by regulating inflammation in the liver in a model of cold ischemia/warm reperfusion injury. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59:453–457. doi: 10.5754/hge11317.
    1. Panigada M, Cucino A, Spinelli E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of antithrombin supplementation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit. Care Med. 2020;48:1636–1644. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004590.
    1. Panigada M, Spinelli E, Cucino A, et al. Antithrombin supplementation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Study protocol for a pilot randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2019;20:349. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3386-4.
    1. Nelson KM, Hansen LA, Steiner ME, et al. Continuous antithrombin III administration in pediatric veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J. Pediatr. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017;22:266–271.
    1. Taylor FB, Toh CH, Hoots WK, et al. Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb. Haemost. 2001;86:1327–1330. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1616068.
    1. Siddiqui S, Gurung RL, Liu S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and cytokine profile of different ethnicities inseptic shock patients and their association with mortality. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. Peer Rev. 2019;23:135–138. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23136.
    1. Tbahriti HF, Meknassi D, Moussaoui R, et al. Inflammatory status in chronic renal failure: The role of homocysteinemia and pro-inflammatory cytokines. World J. Nephrol. 2013;2:31–37. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v2.i2.31.
    1. Evans JD. Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co; 1996.
    1. Meduri GU, Annane D, Chrousos GP, et al. Activation and regulation of systemic inflammation in ARDS. Chest. 2009;136:1631–1643. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2408.
    1. Levy JH, Connors JM. Heparin resistance: Clinical perspectives and management strategies. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;385:826–832. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2104091.
    1. Risnes I, Wagner K, Ueland T, et al. Interleukin-6 may predict survival in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment. Perfusion. 2008;23:173–178. doi: 10.1177/0267659108097882.
    1. Burrell AJC, Lubnow M, Enger TB, et al. The impact of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on cytokine levels in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective, observational study. Crit. Care Resusc. J. Australas Acad. Crit. Care Med. 2017;19:37–44.
    1. Hayakawa M, Sawamura A, Yanagida Y, et al. The response of antithrombin III activity after supplementation decreases in proportion to the severity of sepsis and liver dysfunction. Shock. 2008;30:649–652. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318173e396.
    1. Warren BL, Eid A, Singer P, et al. High-dose antithrombin III in severe sepsis: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;286:1869. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.15.1869.
    1. Inthorn D, Hoffmann JN, Hartl WH, et al. Effect of antithrombin III supplementation on inflammatory response in patients with severe sepsis. Shock. 1998;10:90–96. doi: 10.1097/00024382-199808000-00002.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren