Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden

Daniel J DeAngelo, Anjali S Advani, David I Marks, Matthias Stelljes, Michaela Liedtke, Wendy Stock, Nicola Gökbuget, Elias Jabbour, Akil Merchant, Tao Wang, Erik Vandendries, Alexander Neuhof, Hagop Kantarjian, Susan O'Brien, Daniel J DeAngelo, Anjali S Advani, David I Marks, Matthias Stelljes, Michaela Liedtke, Wendy Stock, Nicola Gökbuget, Elias Jabbour, Akil Merchant, Tao Wang, Erik Vandendries, Alexander Neuhof, Hagop Kantarjian, Susan O'Brien

Abstract

Adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) have a poor prognosis, especially if disease burden is high. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 INO-VATE trial examined the efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) vs. standard of care chemotherapy (SC) among R/R ALL patients with low, moderate, or high disease burden, respectively, defined as bone marrow blasts (BMB) < 50% (n = 53 vs. 48), 50-90% (n = 79 vs. 83), and >90% (n = 30 vs. 30). Patients in the InO vs. SC arm with low, moderate, and high BMB%, respectively, had improved rates of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (74% vs. 46% [p = 0.0022], 75 vs. 27% [p < 0.0001], and 70 vs. 17% [p < 0.0001]), and improved overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.64 [p = 0.0260], 0.81 [p = 0.1109], and 0.60 [p = 0.0335]). Irrespective of BMB%, cytopenias were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events, and post-transplant veno-occlusive disease was more common with InO vs. SC. Patients with extramedullary disease or lymphoblastic lymphoma showed similar efficacy and safety outcomes. This favorable benefit-to-risk ratio of InO treatment irrespective of disease burden supports its use in challenging and high disease burden subpopulations. INO-VATE is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov : #NCT01564784.

Conflict of interest statement

D.J.D. declares honoraria from Pfizer. A.S.A. declares consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, research funding from Amgen and AbbVie, and honoraria from Kite Pharma. D.I.M. declares consultancy with Pfizer, Amgen, and Novartis. M.S. declares research support and honoraria from Pfizer. M.L. declares honoraria from Pfizer. W.S. declares honoraria from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. N.G. declares research support and honoraria from Amgen and Pfizer. E.J. has received research grants and consultancy fees from Amgen, Pfizer, Takeda, Adaptive Biotechnologies, AbbVie, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. A.M. has received research support from Pfizer. T.W., E.V., and A.N. are employees of and own stock in Pfizer. H.K. declares honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImmunoGen, and Pfizer. S.O. declares research support and honoraria from Pfizer.

Figures

Fig. 1. Progression-free survival by bone marrow…
Fig. 1. Progression-free survival by bone marrow status.
Kaplan–Meier plots show progression-free survival by baseline bone marrow blasts (90%) for patients in the (a) InO arm and (b) SC arm. BMB bone marrow blasts, InO inotuzumab ozogamicin, PFS progression-free survival, SC standard of care chemotherapy.
Fig. 2. Overall survival by bone marrow…
Fig. 2. Overall survival by bone marrow status.
Kaplan–Meier plots show overall survival by baseline bone marrow blasts (90%) for patients in the (a) InO arm and (b) SC arm. BMB bone marrow blasts, InO inotuzumab ozogamicin, OS overall survival, SC standard of care chemotherapy.

References

    1. Gokbuget N, et al. Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;120:2032–2041. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-399287.
    1. Oriol A, et al. Outcome after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adult patients included in four consecutive risk-adapted trials by the PETHEMA Study Group. Haematologica. 2010;95:589–596. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.014274.
    1. Tavernier E, et al. Outcome of treatment after first relapse in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia initially treated by the LALA-94 trial. Leukemia. 2007;21:1907–1914. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404824.
    1. O’Brien S, et al. Outcome of adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia after second salvage therapy. Cancer. 2008;113:3186–3191. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23919.
    1. Topp MS, et al. Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:57–66. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71170-2.
    1. Park JH, et al. Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:449–459. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709919.
    1. Kantarjian HM, et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:740–753. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509277.
    1. Aldoss I, et al. Correlates of resistance and relapse during blinatumomab therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am. J. Hematol. 2017;92:858–865. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24783.
    1. Kantarjian H, et al. Blinatumomab versus chemotherapy for advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:836–847. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609783.
    1. Mueller KT, et al. Cellular kinetics of CTL019 in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2017;130:2317–2325. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-786129.
    1. Pfizer Inc. BESPONSA® (inotuzumab ozogamicin) prescribing information. New York: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals; c2017 [last update Mar 2018]. . Accessed Jan 2020.
    1. European Medicines Agency. BESPONSA® (inotuzumab ozogamicin) summary of product characteristics. London: EMA; c2017 [last update Nov 25, 2019]. . Accessed Jan 2020.
    1. DeAngelo DJ, et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed or refractory CD22-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a phase 1/2 study. Blood Adv. 2017;1:1167–1180. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016001925.
    1. Kantarjian HM, et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: final report and long-term survival follow-up from the randomized, phase 3 INO-VATE study. Cancer. 2019;125:2474–2487. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32116.
    1. Grupp SA, et al. Durable remissions in children with relapsed/refractory ALL treated with T cells engineered with a CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CTL019) Blood. 2015;126:681. doi: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.681.681.
    1. Maude SL, et al. Sustained remissions with CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells in children with relapsed/refractory ALL. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:3011. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.3011.
    1. Jabbour E, et al. Impact of minimal residual disease status in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin in the phase III INO-VATE trial. Leuk. Res. 2020;88:106283. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.106283.
    1. Jabbour E, et al. Differential impact of minimal residual disease negativity according to the salvage status in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2017;123:294–302. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30264.
    1. Eckert C, et al. Minimal residual disease after induction is the strongest predictor of prognosis in intermediate risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia - long-term results of trial ALL-REZ BFM P95/96. Eur. J. Cancer. 2013;49:1346–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.010.
    1. Bertamini L, et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is effective in relapsed/refractory extramedullary B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1117. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5026-x.
    1. Kantarjian HM, et al. Hepatic adverse event profile of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the open-label, randomised, phase 3 INO-VATE study. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e387–e398. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30103-5.
    1. Marks DI, et al. Outcomes of allogeneic stem cell transplantation after inotuzumab ozogamicin treatment for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:1720–1729. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.04.020.
    1. Kebriaei P, et al. Management of important adverse events associated with inotuzumab ozogamicin: expert panel review. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53:449–456. doi: 10.1038/s41409-017-0019-y.
    1. Topp MS, et al. Phase II trial of the anti-CD19 bispecific T cell–engager blinatumomab shows hematologic and molecular remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:4134–4140. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.3247.
    1. Hoelzer D, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:v69–v82. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw025.
    1. Marks DI, et al. Burden of hospitalization in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard chemotherapy treatment. Cancer Med. 2019;8:5959–5968. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2480.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren