Validity and reliability of the Kinovea program in obtaining angles and distances using coordinates in 4 perspectives

Albert Puig-Diví, Carles Escalona-Marfil, Josep Maria Padullés-Riu, Albert Busquets, Xavier Padullés-Chando, Daniel Marcos-Ruiz, Albert Puig-Diví, Carles Escalona-Marfil, Josep Maria Padullés-Riu, Albert Busquets, Xavier Padullés-Chando, Daniel Marcos-Ruiz

Abstract

An objective analysis of the human movement can help both clinical assessment and sports performance. Kinovea is a free 2D motion analysis software that can be used to measure kinematic parameters. This low-cost technology has been used in sports sciences, as well as in the clinical and research fields. One interesting tool is that it can measure an object (or person) passing in front of the camera, taking into account the perspective between the camera and the recorded object. Although it has been validated as a tool to assess time-related variables, few studies assessed its validity compared to a Gold Standard; furthermore, its reliability in different perspectives has not been previously assessed. The main objective of this study is to determine the validity of the Kinovea software compared to AutoCAD, and its intra and inter-rater reliability in obtaining coordinates data; a second objective is to compare their results at 4 different perspectives (90°, 75°, 60° and 45°) and to assess the inter and intra rater reliability at each perspective. For this purpose, a wire structure figure in the shape of a human lower limb was designed and measured in AutoCAD; it was then recorded during a pendular motion with a video-camera placed at distance of 5 m and analyzed with Kinovea in the 4 perspectives (90°, 75°, 60° and 45°). Each frame was examined by three observers who made two attempts. A multiple approach was applied involving the analysis of the systematic error, with a two-way ANOVA 2x4; the relative reliability with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Coefficient of Variance (CV) (95% confidence interval); and the absolute reliability with the Standard Error (SE). The results indicate that the Kinovea software is a valid and reliable tool that is able to measure accurately at distances up to 5 m from the object and at an angle range of 90°-45°. Nevertheless, for optimum results an angle of 90° is suggested.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Geometric figure: Wire structure simulating…
Fig 1. Geometric figure: Wire structure simulating lower limb during gait with the coordinates for each marker using AutoCad.
Fig 2. Setting: Setting used to record…
Fig 2. Setting: Setting used to record in the 4 perspectives.
Fig 3. Setting and recording: Laboratory setting…
Fig 3. Setting and recording: Laboratory setting where the cardboard was recorded during the pendular movement.
Fig 4. Kinovea coordinates: Coordinates were digitized…
Fig 4. Kinovea coordinates: Coordinates were digitized in x-y axis using the Kinovea program.

References

    1. Maas J, Dallmeijer A, Huijing P, Brunstrom-Hernandez J, van KP, Bolster E, et al. A randomized controlled trial studying efficacy and tolerance of a knee-ankle-foot orthosis used to prevent equinus in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(10):1025–38. 10.1177/0269215514542355
    1. Krishnan C, Washabaugh EP, Seetharaman Y. A low cost real-time motion tracking approach using webcam technology. J Biomech. 2015;48(3):544–8. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.048
    1. Macleod CA, Conway BA, Allan DB, Galen SS. Development and validation of a low-cost, portable and wireless gait assessment tool. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36(4):541–6. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.011
    1. Thewlis D, Bishop C, Daniell N, Paul G. Next-generation low-cost motion capture systems can provide comparable spatial accuracy to high-end systems. JApplBiomech. 2013;29(1):112–7.
    1. Ugbolue UC, Papi E, Kaliarntas KT, Kerr A, Earl L, Pomeroy VM, et al. The evaluation of an inexpensive, 2D, video based gait assessment system for clinical use. GaitPosture. 2013;38(3):483–9.
    1. Balsalobre-Fernandez C, Tejero-Gonzalez CM, del Campo-Vecino J, Bavaresco N. The concurrent validity and reliability of a low-cost, high-speed camera-based method for measuring the flight time of vertical jumps. J Strenght Cond Res. 2014;28(2):528–33.
    1. Sañudo B, Rueda D, Pozo-Cruz BD, de Hoyo M, Carrasco L. Validation of a Video Analysis Software Package for Quantifying Movement Velocity in Resistance Exercises. J Strenght Cond Res. 2016;30(10):2934–41.
    1. Dias JA, Pupo JD, Reis DC, Borges L, Santos SG, Moro AR, et al. Validity of Two Methods for Estimation of Vertical Jump Height. J Strenght Cond Res. 2011;25(7):2034–9.
    1. Damsted C, Nielsen RO, Larsen LH. Reliability of video-based quantification of the knee- and hip angle at foot strike during running. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(2):147–54.
    1. Grigore V, Gavojdea AM, Potop V. Analysis on Biomechanical Characteristics of Dismounts in Salto Backward Stretched Landings, in Balance Beam Event. Icpesk. Bucharest, 2015. p. 125–30.
    1. Potop V, Timnea OC, Grigore V. E-learning and technology of transfer based on video computerized analysis of sports technique of acrobatic exercises on floor in women's artistic gymnastics In: Roceanu I, editor. Let's Build the Future through Learning Innovation! eLearning and Software for Education. Carol I Natl Defence Univ Publishing House: Bucharest: 2014. p. 177–82.
    1. Potov V, Boloban V, Timnea OC. Analysis of Biomechanical Characteristics of Yurchenko Vault Sports Technique in Women's Artistic Gymnastics. Icpesk. Bucharest, 2015. p. 477–82.
    1. Ismail SI, Adnan R, Sulaiman N. Moderate Effort Instep Kick in Futsal. Procedia Eng. 2014;72:186–91.
    1. Torres-Luque G, Ramirez A, Cabello-Manrique D, Nikolaidis PT, Alvero-Cruz JR. Match analysis of elite players during paddle tennis competition. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2015;15(3):1135–44.
    1. Torralba Jordán MA, Padullés Riu JM, Losada López JL, López del Amo JL. Alternativa ecológica en la evaluación del salto de longitud de atletas paralímpicos. Cuad Psicol del Deport. 2016;16:69–76.
    1. Rozan M, Rouhollahi V, Rastogi A, Dureha DK. Influence of physiological loading on the lumbar spine of national level athletes in different sports. J Hum Kinet. 2016;50(1):115–23.
    1. Aguilar LM, Torres JP, Jimenes CR, Cabrera DR, Cárdenas MF, Urgirles PF. Analysis of the angles in hip, knee and ankle during the pedaling of a Cross Country Olympic cyclist. Electron Eng Inf Commun Technol Proc: IEEE Chilecon; 2015. p. 205–8.
    1. Ramon Suarez G, Gaviria Alzate S, Teller Carreno DC, Calderon Rojas M, Ruiz Correa V. Evaluation scale of visual and auditive action-reaction times in youth karate athletes of Antioquia, Colombia. Viref Rev Educ Fis. 2016;5(1):1–16.
    1. Guzmán-Valdivia CH, Blanco-Ortega A, Oliver-Salazar MA, Carrera-Escobedo JL. Therapeutic Motion Analysis of Lower Limbs Using Kinovea. Int J Comput Eng. 2013;3(2):359–65.
    1. Damsted C, Larsen LH, Nielsen RO. Reliability of video-based identification of footstrike pattern and video time frame at initial contact in recreational runners. Gait Posture. 2015;42(1):32–5. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.029
    1. Moral-Munoz JA, Esteban-Moreno B, Arroyo-Morales M, Cobo MJ, Herrera-Viedma E. Agreement Between Face-to-Face and Free Software Video Analysis for Assessing Hamstring Flexibility in Adolescents. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(9):2661–5. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000896
    1. Candido PEF, Teixeira JVS, Moro ARP, Gontijo LA. Biomechanical strain of goldsmiths. Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation. 2012;41(SUPPL. 1):2506–9.
    1. Rebolledo Uribe JP, Pincheira Barbé PA, Bittner Schmidt V, Frugone Zambra RE. Occlusal plane inclination in children between 9 and 10 years of age with postural asymmetry. A study on the frontal plane. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia. 2012;24(1):76–84.
    1. Hernández-Gervilla Ó, Escalona-Marfil C, Corbi F. Correlation between foot posture and running kinematics: a pilot study. Apunt Med l’Esport. 2016;51(192):115–22.
    1. Youssef AR. Photogrammetric quantification of forward head posture is side dependant in healthy participants and patients with mechanical neck pain. Int J Physiother. 2016;3(3):326–31.
    1. Padulo J, Vando S, Chamari K, Chaouachi A, Bagno D, Pizzolato F. Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits. Biol Sport. 2015;32(1):53–8. 10.5604/20831862.1127282
    1. Ramos-Ortega J, Dominguez G, Castillo JM, Fernandez-Seguin L, Munuera PV. Angular position of the cleat according to torsional parameters of the cyclist's lower limb. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24(3):251–5. 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000027
    1. Elnahhas A, El-Negmy E, El-Azizi H. Calf Muscle Strength and Standing Efficiency in Children with Spastic Diplegia. Trends Appl Sci Res. 2014;9(9):503.
    1. Quieregatto PR, Hochman B, Furtado F, Machado AF, Sabino Neto M, Ferreira LM. Image analysis software versus direct anthropometry for breast measurements. Acta Cir Bras. 2014;29(10):688–95.
    1. Pontes LF, Cecim RL, Machado SM, Normando D. Tooth angulation and dental arch perimeter-the effect of orthodontic bracket prescription. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(4):435–9. 10.1093/ejo/cju055
    1. Baude M, Hutin E, Gracies JM. A Bidimensional System of Facial Movement Analysis Conception and Reliability in Adults. Biomed Res Int. 2015;1:1–8.
    1. Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Pua YH, McGaw R, Heywood S, et al. Gait assessment using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Concurrent validity and inter-day reliability of spatiotemporal and kinematic variables. J Biomech. 2015;48(10):2166–70. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.021
    1. Northeast L, Gautrey CN, Bottoms L, Hughes G, Mitchell ACS, Greenhalgh A. Full gait cycle analysis of lower limb and trunk kinematics and muscle activations during walking in participants with and without ankle instability. Gait Posture. 2018;64:114–118. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.001
    1. Vitorio R, Lirani-Silva E, Barbieri FA, Raile V, Batistela RA, Stella F, et al. The role of vision in Parkinson's disease locomotion control: Free walking task. Gait Posture. 2012;35(2):175–9. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.002
    1. Nuzzo JL, Anning JH, Scharfenberg JM. The reliability of three devices used for measuring vertical jump height. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(9):2580–5290.34. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181fee650
    1. Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26(4):217–38. 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002
    1. Ditroilo M, Forte R, McKeown D, Boreham C, De Vito G. Intra-and inter-session reliability of vertical jump performance in healthy middle-aged and older men and women. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(15):1675–82. 10.1080/02640414.2011.614270
    1. Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports med. 2000;30(1):1–15. 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001
    1. Webber SC, Porter MM. Reliability of ankle isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic strength and power testing in older women. Phys Ther. 2010;90(8):1165–75. 10.2522/ptj.20090394
    1. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231–40. 10.1519/15184.1
    1. Olper L, Cervi P, De Santi F, Meloni C, Gatti R. Validation of the treadmill six-minute walk test in people following cardiac surgery. Physical Ther. 2011;91(4):566.
    1. Norris BS, Olson SL. Concurrent validity and reliability of two-dimensional video analysis of hip and knee joint motion during mechanical lifting. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;27(7):521–30. 10.3109/09593985.2010.533745
    1. Eltoukhy M, Asfour S, Thompson C, Latta L. Evaluation of the performance of digital video analysis of human motion: Dartfish tracking system. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2012;3:1–6.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren