Combined effects of bevacizumab with erlotinib and irradiation: a preclinical study on a head and neck cancer orthotopic model

A Bozec, A Sudaka, J-L Fischel, M-C Brunstein, M-C Etienne-Grimaldi, G Milano, A Bozec, A Sudaka, J-L Fischel, M-C Brunstein, M-C Etienne-Grimaldi, G Milano

Abstract

Clinical benefit has been demonstrated in patients with head and neck tumours receiving an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agent in combination with radiotherapy (RT). Recent preclinical and clinical studies suggest beneficial effects from combining anti-angiogenic drugs with RT. To investigate the effect of combining these approaches, we evaluated in vivo the anti-tumour efficacy of the anti-angiogenic compound bevacizumab, a highly specific monoclonal antibody directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and irradiation given alone and in combination. Investigations were performed using a VEGF-secreting human head and neck tumour cell line, CAL33, with a high EGFR content, injected as orthotopic xenografts into the mouth floor of nude mice. Three days after tumour cell injection, bevacizumab (5 mg kg(-1), 5 days a week, i.p.), erlotinib (100 mg kg(-1), 5 days a week, orally) and irradiation (6 Gy, 3 days a week) were administered alone and in combination for 10 days. As compared with the control, concomitant administration of drugs produced a marked and significant supra-additive decrease in tumour mass; the addition of irradiation almost completely abolished tumour growth. The drug association markedly reduced the number of metastatic nodes and the triple combination significantly reduced the total number of pathologically positive lymph nodes as compared with controls. The RT-induced proliferation, reflected by Ki67 labelling, was reduced to control level with the triple combination. Radiotherapy induced a strong and very significant increase in tumour angiogenesis, which was no longer observed when combined with erlotinib and bevacizumab. The efficacy of the combination of bevacizumab+erlotinib and RT may be of clinical importance in the management of head and neck cancer patients.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary tumour growth after 10 days of treatment with single agents and combinations (10 mice per treatment group). Bars denote s.d.; NS=nonsignificant (P>0.05); *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. Values above the columns concern comparisons with the controls; other values concern comparisons between two following columns.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of single agents and combinations on pathologically positive lymph nodes (10 mice per treatment group). The only significant differences were for node invasion status (bevacizumab+erlotinib vs control, P=0.03) and for total node number (bevacizumab+erlotinib+RT vs control, P<0.001). An illustrative example of an invaded node without capsular rupture (N+R−) is given.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of the different treatments on Ki67 proliferation marker (10 mice per treatment group). The proportion of primary tumours with labelling less than 50% is shown in white (group 1), between 50 and 70% in grey (group 2) and more than 70% in black (group 3); NS=nonsignificant (P>0.05); *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. Values above the columns concern comparisons with the controls; other values concern comparisons between two following columns. An illustrative example of each labelling group is given.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Impact of the different treatments on the number of tumour vessels labelled by the anti-VEGFR2 antibody measured at the centre. NS=nonsignificant (P>0.05); ***P<0.001. Indications above the columns concern statistical comparisons with the controls; other indications concern statistical comparisons between two following columns. An illustrative example of VEGFR2 labelling of the vessels is given.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Impact of the different treatments on VEGFR2 expression on tumour cells (10 mice per treatment group). NS=nonsignificant (P>0.05); *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. Indications above the columns concern statistical comparisons with the controls; other indications concern statistical comparisons between two following columns. An illustrative example of strong and weak VEGFR2 labelling of tumour cells is given.

References

    1. Arsene D, Galais MP, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Reimund JM (2006) Recent developments in colorectal cancer treatment by monoclonal antibodies. Expert Opin Biol Ther 6: 1175–1192
    1. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, Ove R, Kies MS, Baselga J, Youssoufian H, Amellal N, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354: 567–578
    1. Bozec A, Fischel JL, Milano G (2006) Epidermal growth factor receptor/angiogenesis dual targeting: preclinical experience. Curr Opin Oncol 18: 330–334
    1. Bozec A, Formento P, Ciccolini J, Fanciullino R, Padovani L, Murraciole X, Fischel JL, Milano G (2005) Response of endothelial cells to a dual tyrosine kinase receptor inhibition combined with irradiation. Mol Cancer Ther 4: 1962–1971
    1. Bozec A, Formento P, Lassalle S, Lippens C, Hofman P, Milano G (2007) Dual inhibition of EGFR and VEGFR pathways in combination with irradiation: antitumour supra-additive effects on human head and neck cancer xenografts. Br J Cancer 97: 65–72
    1. Byers LA, Heymach JV (2007) Dual targeting of the vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor pathways: rationale and clinical applications for non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 8: S79–S85
    1. Caponigro F, Formato R, Caraglia M, Normanno N, Iaffaioli RV (2005) Monoclonal antibodies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor with a focus on head and neck tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 17: 212–217
    1. Ciardiello F, Bianco R, Damiano V, Fontanini G, Caputo R, Pomatico G, De Placido S, Bianco AR, Mendelsohn J, Tortora G (2000) Antiangiogenic and antitumor activity of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor C225 monoclonal antibody in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor antisense oligonucleotide in human GEO colon cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 6: 3739–3747
    1. Ciardiello F, Caputo R, Bianco R, Damiano V, Fontanini G, Cuccato S, De Placido S, Bianco AR, Tortora G (2001) Inhibition of growth factor production and angiogenesis in human cancer cells by ZD1839 (Iressa), a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 7: 1459–1465
    1. Dassonville O, Formento JL, Francoual M, Ramaioli A, Santini M, Demard F, Milano G (1993) Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and survival in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. J Clin Oncol 11: 1873–1878
    1. Forastiere AA, Burtness BA (2007) Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in head and neck cancer – more insights, but more questions. J Clin Oncol 25: 2152–2155
    1. Goldman CK, Kim J, Wong WL, King V, Brock T, Gillespie GY (1993) Epidermal growth factor stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor production by human malignant glioma cells: a model of glioblastoma multiforme pathophysiology. Mol Biol Cell 4: 121–133
    1. Harari PM, Huang S (2006) Radiation combined with EGFR signal inhibitors: head and neck cancer focus. Semin Radiat Oncol 16: 38–44
    1. Herbst RS, Mininberg E, Henderson T, Kim E, Hong WK, Mass R, Novotny W, Garcia B, Johnson D, Sandler A (2003) Phase I/II trial evaluating blockade of tumour blood supply and tumour cell proliferation with combined bevacizumab and erlotinib HCI as targeted cancer therapy in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 1: S293
    1. Hirata A, Ogawa S, Kometani T, Kuwano T, Naito S, Kuwano M, Ono M (2002) ZD1839 (Iressa) induces antiangiogenic effects through inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Cancer Res 62: 2554–2560
    1. Jung YD, Mansfield PF, Akagi M, Takeda A, Liu W, Bucana CD, Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM (2002) Effects of combination anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies on the growth of gastric cancer in a nude mouse model. Eur J Cancer 38: 1133–1140
    1. Le QT, Giaccia AJ (2003) Therapeutic exploitation of the physiological and molecular genetic alterations in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9: 4287–4295
    1. Maione P, Gridelli C, Troiani T, Ciardiello F (2006) Combining targeted therapies and drugs with multiple targets in the treatment of NSCLC. Oncologist 11: 274–284
    1. Meyerhardt J, Stuart K, Fuchs C, Zhu A, Earle C, Bhargava P, Blaszkowsky L, Enzinger P, Mayer R, Battu S, Lawrence C, Ryan D (2007) Phase II study of FOLFOX, bevacizumab and erlotinib as first-line therapy for patients with metastastic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 18: 1185–1189
    1. Myers JN, Holsinger Fc, Jasser SA, Bekele BN, Fidler IJ (2002) An orthotopic nude mouse model of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 8: 293–298
    1. Neuchrist C, Erovic BM, Handisurya A, Steiner GE, Rockwell P, Gedlicka C, Burian M (2001) Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 111: 1834–1841
    1. Newton HB (2007) Small-molecule and antibody approaches to molecular therapy of primary brain tumors. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 8: 1009–1021
    1. Nieder C, Wiedenmann N, Andratschke N, Molls M (2006) Current status of angiogenesis inhibitors combined with radiation therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 32: 348–364
    1. O'Reilly MS (2006) Radiation combined with antiangiogenic and antivascular agents. Semin Radiat Oncol 16: 45–50
    1. Pentenero M, Gandolfo S, Carrozzo M (2005) Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature. Head Neck 27: 1080–1091
    1. Perrotte P, Matsumoto T, Inoue K, Kuniyasu H, Eve BY, Hicklin DJ, Radinsky R, Dinney CP (1999) Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody C225 inhibits angiogenesis in human transitional cell carcinoma growing orthotopically in nude mice. Clin Cancer Res 5: 257–265
    1. Prewett MC, Hooper AT, Bassi R (2002) Enhanced antitumour activity of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody IMC-C225 in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) against human colorectal tumour xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 8: 994–1003
    1. Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Valerie K, Fogleman PB, Walters J (1996) Radiation-induced autophosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor in human malignant mammary and squamous epithelial cells. Radiat Res 145: 81–85
    1. Siu LL, Soulieres D, Chen EX, Pond GR, Chin SF, Francis P, Harvey L, Klein M, Zhang W, Dancey J, Eisenhauer EA, Winquist E, Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study (2007) Phase I/II trial of erlotinib and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Princess Margaret Hospital phase II consortium and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25: 2178–2183
    1. Wachsberger PR, Burd R, Marero N, Daskalakis C, Ryan A, McCue P, Dicker AP (2005) Effect of the tumor vascular-damaging agent, ZD6126, on the radioresponse of U87 glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 11: 835–842
    1. Woodburn JR (1999) The epidermal growth factor receptor and its inhibition in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther 82: 241–250
    1. Workman P, Twentyman P, Balkwill F, Balmain A, Chaplin D, Double J, Embleton J, Newell D, Raymond R, Stables J, Stephens T, Wallace J (1998) United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) guidelines for the welfare of animals in experimental neoplasia (second edition). Br J Cancer 77: 1–10

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren