Long-Term Follow-up of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

Robert A Kyle, Dirk R Larson, Terry M Therneau, Angela Dispenzieri, Shaji Kumar, James R Cerhan, S Vincent Rajkumar, Robert A Kyle, Dirk R Larson, Terry M Therneau, Angela Dispenzieri, Shaji Kumar, James R Cerhan, S Vincent Rajkumar

Abstract

Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) occurs in approximately 3% of persons 50 years of age or older.

Methods: We studied 1384 patients who were residing in southeastern Minnesota and in whom MGUS was diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic in the period from 1960 through 1994; the median follow-up was 34.1 years (range, 0.0 to 43.6). The primary end point was progression to multiple myeloma or another plasma-cell or lymphoid disorder.

Results: During 14,130 person-years of follow-up, MGUS progressed in 147 patients (11%), a rate that was 6.5 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 7.7) as high as the rate in the control population. The risk of progression without accounting for death due to competing causes was 10% at 10 years, 18% at 20 years, 28% at 30 years, 36% at 35 years, and 36% at 40 years. Among patients with IgM MGUS, the presence of two adverse risk factors - namely, an abnormal serum free light-chain ratio (ratio of kappa to lambda free light chains) and a high serum monoclonal protein (M protein) level (≥1.5 g per deciliter) - was associated with a risk of progression at 20 years of 55%, as compared with 41% among patients who had one adverse risk factor and 19% among patients who had neither risk factor. Among patients with non-IgM MGUS, the risk of progression at 20 years was 30% among those who had the two risk factors, 20% among those who had one risk factor, and 7% among those who had neither risk factor. Patients with MGUS had shorter survival than was expected in the control population of Minnesota residents of matched age and sex (median, 8.1 vs. 12.4 years; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Significant differences were noted in the risk of progression between patients with IgM MGUS and those with non-IgM MGUS. Overall survival was shorter among patients with MGUS than was expected in a matched control population. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute.).

Figures

Figure 1. Rate of Progression of Monoclonal…
Figure 1. Rate of Progression of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) per 100 Person-Years in the Entire Cohort
The primary end point of the study was progression to multiple myeloma or other plasma-cell or lymphoid disorders among patients with MGUS in a cohort of 1384 patients. Subgroups involving follow-up were analyzed with the use of a person-year approach, so patients may have been counted in both categories. Data on immunoglobulin type were excluded for 45 patients with biclonal status, data on the monoclonal protein (M protein) level were missing for 11, and data on the free light-chain ratio were missing for 236. The normal immunoglobulin type was IgG, with types other than IgG considered to be abnormal; the normal M protein level was less than 1.5 g per deciliter, with higher values considered to be abnormal.
Figure 2. Cumulative Incidence of Progression of…
Figure 2. Cumulative Incidence of Progression of MGUS, with Death Accounted for as a Competing Risk
I bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3. Observed Survival Rate in the…
Figure 3. Observed Survival Rate in the Cohort versus the Expected Survival Rate in the Control Population
The numerical values are the observed rates of survival at 10, 20, 30, 35, and 40 years among the patients in the study and the expected rates in the age-and sex-matched control population.

References

    1. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1362–9.
    1. Kyle RA. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: natural history in 241 cases. Am J Med. 1978;64:814–26.
    1. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Melton LJ., III Long-term follow-up of 241 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: the original Mayo Clinic series 25 years later. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:859–66.
    1. Blade J, Lopez-Guillermo A, Rozman C, et al. Malignant transformation and life expectancy in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Br J Haematol. 1992;81:391–4.
    1. van de Poel MH, Coebergh JW, Hillen HF. Malignant transformation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among out-patients of a community hospital in southeastern Netherlands. Br J Haematol. 1995;91:121–5.
    1. Baldini L, Guffanti A, Cesana BM, et al. Role of different hematologic variables in defining the risk of malignant transfor mation in monoclonal gammopathy. Blood. 1996;87:912–8.
    1. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538–e548.
    1. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:564–9.
    1. Dispenzieri A, Katzmann JA, Kyle RA, et al. Prevalence and risk of progression of light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2010;375:1721–8.
    1. Melton LJ., III The threat to medical-records research. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1466–70.
    1. Melton LJ., III History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Mayo Clin Proc. 1996;71:266–74.
    1. Kyle R, Katzmann JA. Immunochemical characterization of immunoglobulins. In: Rose NR, Conway de Macario E, Folds JD, Lane HC, Nakamura RM, editors. Manual of clinical laboratory immunology. 5th. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1997. pp. 156–76.
    1. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.
    1. Peto R, Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc [Ser A] 1972;135:185–207.
    1. Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB. Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med. 2007;26:2389–430.
    1. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187–220.
    1. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: Incidence — SEER 9 Regs Research Data. 2014 Nov; Sub (1973-2012) <Rita Population Adjustment> — Linked To County Attributes – Total U.S., 1969–2013 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2015, based on the November 2014 submission ( ).
    1. Kyle RA, Linos A, Beard CM, et al. Incidence and natural history of primary systemic amyloidosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1950 through 1989. Blood. 1992;79:1817–22.
    1. Berry G. The analysis of mortality by the subject-years method. Biometrics. 1983;39:173–84.
    1. Schemper M, Smith TL. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:343–6.
    1. Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, et al. Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2005;106:812–7.
    1. Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2582–90.
    1. Katzmann JA, Clark R, Kyle RA, et al. Suppression of uninvolved immunoglobulins defined by heavy/light chain pair suppression is a risk factor for progression of MGUS. Leukemia. 2013;27:208–12.
    1. Cesana C, Klersy C, Barbarano L, et al. Prognostic factors for malignant transformation in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1625–34.
    1. Turesson I, Kovalchik SA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of lymphoid and myeloid malignancies: 728 cases followed up to 30 years in Sweden. Blood. 2014;123:338–45.
    1. Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia. 2010;24:1121–7.
    1. Mangiacavalli S, Cocito F, Pochintesta L, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a new proposal of workup. Eur J Haematol. 2013;91:356–60.
    1. Kyle RA, San-Miguel JF, Mateos MV, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2014;28:775–90.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren