3D Virtual Reality Smartphone Training for Chemotherapy Drug Administration by Non-oncology Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Chin-Yun Wang, Chi-Yu Lu, Su-Yueh Yang, Shu-Chun Tsai, Tsai-Wei Huang, Chin-Yun Wang, Chi-Yu Lu, Su-Yueh Yang, Shu-Chun Tsai, Tsai-Wei Huang

Abstract

Chemotherapy agents are cytotoxic materials. Thus, there is a need for the operators to be familiar with the knowledge and procedures before operation. We conducted a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of an immersive 3D VR teaching of chemotherapy administration operated in a smartphone coupled with a visual and audio device. We adopted a two-arm single-blind design and recruited 83 nurses, and they were randomized using a cluster approach. The VR group learned chemotherapy administration through VR, while the controlled group learned through document reading. The Knowledge and Attitude of Chemotherapy Administration (KACA) was administrated before the intervention, while the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and the Checklist of Action Accomplishment (CAA) were administrated one month after the intervention. The VR group scored higher than the controlled group in the CAA (95.69 ± 5.37 vs. 91.98 ± 9.31, p = 0.02) and the OSCE (73.07 ± 10.99 vs. 67.44 ±10.65, p = 0.02). Stepwise regression demonstrated that service years, an education level of undergraduate or above, and VR exposure contributed positively to the OSCE score (adjusted R2 = 0.194, p = 0.028). The use of VR improves the learning efficacy of chemotherapy administration in non-oncology nurses. We recommend using VR as a teaching tool for chemotherapy administration and other chemotherapy-related skills in a VR learning group with senior nurses with higher education levels as advisors. The study provides an approach to online training, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. (CONSORT 2010 guidelines, registry number: NCT04840732).

Keywords: OSCE; administration; chemotherapy; objective structured clinical examination; virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Wang, Lu, Yang, Tsai and Huang.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Educational content and environment settings for the VR group. (A) Smartphone and VR goggles; (B) Before chemotherapy, you can use the select button to view the contents of the documents that need to be confirmed; (C) Check the blood draw report to see if chemotherapy can be performed. If the wrong selection is made, the next step cannot be performed; (D) If the correct answer is selected, proceed to the next step; (E) To practice and to record the double check medication process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Knowledge and Attitude of Chemotherapy Administration before intervention (maximum score 50), Checklist of Action Accomplishment after intervention (maximum score 100), and OSCE score (maximum score 100) after intervention among the participants (N = 83). Error bars = 95 % confidence interval. KA, Knowledge and Attitude; OSCE, Objective Structured Clinical Examination score; VR, virtual reality.

References

    1. Valanis BG, Vollmer WM, Labuhn KT, Glass AG. Acute symptoms associated with antineoplastic drug handling among nurses. Cancer Nurs. (1993) 16:288–95. 10.1097/00002820-199308000-00005
    1. Valanis BG, Vollmer WM, Labuhn KT, Glass AG. Association of antineoplastic drug handling with acute adverse effects in pharmacy personnel. Am J Hosp Pharm. (1993) 50:455–62. 10.1093/ajhp/50.3.455
    1. Skov T, Maarup B, Olsen J, Rørth M, Winthereik H, Lynge E. Leukaemia and reproductive outcome among nurses handling antineoplastic drugs. Br J Ind Med. (1992) 49:855–61. 10.1136/oem.49.12.855
    1. National Institute for Occupational Safety Health (NIOSH) . NIOSH List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Health Care Settings. (2010). Available online at: (accessed June 21, 2021).
    1. American cancer society . How is Chemotherapy Used to Treat Cancer? (2016). Available online at: (accessed August 18, 2021).
    1. Liberati EG, Peerally MF, Dixon-Woods M. Learning from high risk industries may not be straightforward: a qualitative study of the hierarchy of risk controls approach in healthcare. Int J Qual Health Care. (2018) 30:39–43. 10.1093/intqhc/mzx163
    1. Mikropoulos TA, Natsis A. Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Comput Educ. (2011) 56:769–80. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020
    1. Gallagher AG, Cates CU. Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Lancet. (2004) 364:1538–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17278-4
    1. Nassar AK, Al-Manaseer F, Knowlton LM, Tuma F. Virtual reality (VR) as a simulation modality for technical skills acquisition. Ann Med Surg (Lond). (2021) 71:102945. 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102945
    1. Padilha JM, Machado PP, Ribeiro A, Ramos J, Costa P. Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. (2019) 21:e11529. 10.2196/11529
    1. Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ. (2012) 46:636–47. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04243.x
    1. Bayram SB, Caliskan N. Effect of a game-based virtual reality phone application on tracheostomy care education for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Today. (2019) 79:25–31. 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.010
    1. Rennie D, CONSORT . Revised—improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA. (2001) 285:2006–7. 10.1001/jama.285.15.2006
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. (2013). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    1. Harden RM. Revisiting “Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)”. Med Educ. (2016) 50:376–9. 10.1111/medu.12801
    1. Walsh M, Bailey PH, Koren I. Objective structured clinical evaluation of clinical competence: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs. (2009) 65:1584–95. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05054.x
    1. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. (2005) 39:309–17. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x
    1. Zarifsanaiey N, Amini M, Saadat F. A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student's performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies). BMC Med Educ. (2016) 16:294. 10.1186/s12909-016-0812-0
    1. Ross M, Carroll G, Knight J, Chamberlain M, Fothergill-Bourbonnais F, Linton J. Using the OSCE to measure clinical skills performance in nursing. J Adv Nurs. (1988) 13:45–56. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1988.tb01390.x
    1. Boiano JM, Steege AL, Sweeney MH. Adherence to safe handling guidelines by health care workers who administer antineoplastic drugs. J Occup Environ Hyg. (2014) 11:728–40. 10.1080/15459624.2014.916809
    1. Lin C-Y, Chu Y-L, Chiou Y-G, Chiang M-C. [Improving nursing staff accuracy in administering chemotherapy]. Hu Li Za Zhi. (2009) 56:63–70.
    1. National Institute for Occupational Safety Health (NIOSH) . Workplace Solutions: Personal Protective Equipment for Health Care Workers Who Work with Hazardous Drugs. (2009). Available online at: (accessed August 18, 2021).
    1. Choi K-S. Virtual reality in nursing: nasogastric tube placement training simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. (2017) 245:1298.
    1. White R, Ewan C. Foundations of Clinical Teaching and Learning. (1991). Boston, MA: Springer.
    1. Huang H-M, Rauch U, Liaw S-S. Investigating learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Comput Educ. (2010) 55:1171–82. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014
    1. Bradford HM, Farley CL, Escobar M, Heitzler ET, Tringali T, Walker KC. Rapid Curricular Innovations During COVID-19 Clinical Suspension: Maintaining Student Engagement with Simulation Experiences. J Midwifery Womens Health. (2021) 66:366–71. 10.1111/jmwh.13246

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren