Training dual-task walking in community-dwelling adults within 1 year of stroke: a protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Prudence Plummer-D'Amato, Anastasia Kyvelidou, Dagmar Sternad, Bijan Najafi, Raymond M Villalobos, David Zurakowski, Prudence Plummer-D'Amato, Anastasia Kyvelidou, Dagmar Sternad, Bijan Najafi, Raymond M Villalobos, David Zurakowski

Abstract

Background: Community ambulation is a highly complex skill requiring the ability to adapt to increased environmental complexity and perform multiple tasks simultaneously. After stroke, individuals demonstrate a diminished ability to perform dual-tasks. Current evidence suggests that conventional rehabilitation does not adequately address gait-related dual-task impairments after stroke, which may be contributing to low levels of participation and physical inactivity in community-dwelling stroke survivors. The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of dual-task gait training in community-dwelling adults within 1 year of stroke. Specifically, we will compare the effects of dual-task gait training and single-task gait training on cognitive-motor interference during walking at preferred speed and at fastest comfortable speed (Aim 1), locomotor control during obstacle negotiation (Aim 2), and spontaneous physical activity (Aim 3).

Methods/design: This single-blind randomized controlled trial will involve 44 individuals within 12 months of stroke. Following baseline evaluation, participants will be randomly allocated to single- or dual-task gait training. Both groups will receive 12, 30-minute sessions provided one-on-one over 4-6 weeks in an outpatient therapy setting. Single-task gait training involves practice of gait activities incorporating motor relearning principles. Dual-task gait training involves an identical gait training protocol; the critical difference being that the dual-task gait training group will practice the gait activities while simultaneously performing a cognitive task for 75% of the repetitions. Blinded assessors will measure outcomes at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion of the intervention. The primary outcome measure will be dual-task effects on gait speed and cognition during unobstructed walking. Secondary outcomes include spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters during unobstructed single- and dual-task walking at preferred and fastest comfortable walking speeds, gait parameters during high and low obstacle crossing, spontaneous physical activity, executive function, lower extremity motor function, Timed Up and Go, balance self-efficacy, number of falls, and stroke-related disability. Hypotheses for each aim will be tested using an intention-to-treat analysis with repeated measures ANOVA design.

Discussion: This trial will provide evidence to help clinicians make decisions about the types of activities to include in rehabilitation to improve dual-task walking after stroke.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01568957.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of trial.

References

    1. Aström M, Adolfsson R, Asplund K. Major depression in stroke patients: a 3-year longitudinal study. Stroke. 1993;24(7):976–982.
    1. Bond M, Clark M, Smith D, Harris R. Lifestyle activities of the elderly: composition and determinants. Disabil Rehabil. 1995;17(2):63–69.
    1. Rittman M, Boylstein C, Hinojosa R, Hinojosa MS, Haun J. Transition experiences of stroke survivors following discharge home. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(2):21–31.
    1. Patla AE, Shumway-Cook A. Dimensions of mobility: defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. J Aging Phys Act. 1999;7:7–19.
    1. Plummer-D’Amato P, Altmann LJP, Saracino D, Fox E, Behrman AL, Marsiske M. Interactions between cognitive tasks and gait after stroke: a dual task study. Gait Posture. 2008;27:683–688.
    1. Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Yardley L, Stack E. Interference between balance, gait and cognitive task performance among people with stroke living in the community. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(13–14):849–856.
    1. Bowen A, Wenman R, Mickelborough J, Foster J, Hill E, Tallis R. Dual-task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. Age Ageing. 2001;30:319–323.
    1. Haggard P, Cockburn J, Cock J, Fordham C, Wade D. Interference between gait and cognitive tasks in a rehabilitating neurological population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69:479–486.
    1. Cockburn J, Haggard P, Cock J, Fordham C. Changing patterns of cognitive-motor interference (CMI) over time during recovery from stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:167–173.
    1. Plummer-D’Amato P, Altmann LJP, Behrman AL, Marsiske M. Interference between cognition, double-limb support, and swing during gait in community-dwelling individuals poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(6):542–549.
    1. Kemper S, McDowd J, Pohl P, Herman R, Jackson S. Revealing language deficits following stroke: the cost of doing two things at once. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 2006;13(1):115–139.
    1. Kramer AF, Larish JF, Strayer DL. Training attentional control in dual task settings: a comparison of young and older adults. J Exp Psychol Appl. 1995;1(1):50–76.
    1. Silsupadol P, Lugade V, Shumway-Cook A. et al.Training-related changes in dual-task walking performance of elderly persons with balance impairment: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2009;29:634–639.
    1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754.
    1. French B, Thomas L, Leathley M. et al.Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006073.
    1. Silsupadol P, Shumway-Cook A, Lugade V. et al.Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:381–387.
    1. Yang Y-R, Wang R-Y, Chen Y-C, Kao M-J. Dual-task exercise improves walking ability in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1236–1240.
    1. Plummer-D’Amato P, Villalobos R, Vayda M. et al.Feasibility of training dual task walking after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(10):1717–1718.
    1. Said CM, Goldie PA, Culham E, Sparrow WA, Patla AE, Morris ME. Control of Lead and Trail Limbs During Obstacle Crossing Following Stroke. Phys Ther. 2005;85(5):413–427.
    1. Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE, Culham E, Sparrow WA, Morris ME. Balance during obstacle crossing following stroke. Gait Posture. 2008;27(1):23–30.
    1. Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE, Sparrow WA. Effect of stroke on the step characteristics of obstacle crossing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1712–1719.
    1. Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE, Sparrow WA, Martin KE. Obstacle crossing in subjects with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1054–1059.
    1. Den Otter AR, Geurts ACH, de Haart M, Mulder T, Duysens J. Step characteristics during obstacle avoidance in hemiplegic stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2005;161:180–192.
    1. Stroke -- 1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO task force on stroke and cerebrovascular disorders. Stroke. 1989;20:1407–1431.
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V. et al.The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
    1. Luis C, Keegan A, Mullan M. Cross validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community dwelling older adults residing in the Southeastern US. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24(2):197–201.
    1. Gentile AM. In: Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy Rehabilitation. 2. Carr J, Shepherd R, editor. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc; 2000. Skill acquisition: action, movement, and neuromotor processes.
    1. Carr J, Shepherd R. A Motor Relearning Program for Stroke. 2. London: William Heinemann Medical Books; 1987.
    1. McDowd J. The effects of age and extended practice on divided attention performance. J Gerontol. 1986;41(6):764–769.
    1. Siu K-C, Catena R, Chou L-S, van Donkelaar P, Woollacott M. Effects of a secondary task on obstacle avoidance in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res. 2008;184(1):115–120.
    1. Vaughan CL, Davis BL, O’Connor JC. Dynamics of Human Gait. 2. Cape Town, South Africa: Kiboho Publishers; 1999.
    1. Nigg BM, Cole GK, Nachbauer W. Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J Biomech. 1993;26:909–916.
    1. Najafi B, Aminian K, Loew F, Blanc Y, Robert P. Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2002;49:843–851.
    1. Najafi B, Aminian K, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Loew F, Bula C, Robert P. Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: Monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2003;50:711–723.
    1. Najafi B, Wrobel J, Armstrong D. A Novel Ambulatory Device For Continuous 24-H Monitoring Of Physical Activity In Daily Life. Michigan: North American Congress on Biomechanics (NACOB); 2008.
    1. Assef ECS, Capovilla AGS, Capovilla FC. Computerized Stroop test to assess selective attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Span J Psychol. 2007;10(1):33–40.
    1. Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Seglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient, I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The time “Up and Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–148.
    1. Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 1995;A(1):M28–M34.
    1. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0: Evaluation of Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity to Change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131k–2140k.
    1. Smith A. Symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 1982.
    1. Reynolds CR. Comprehensive Trail Making Test. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2002.
    1. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioural Inattention Test. Titchfield, Hants: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987.
    1. Brott T, Adams H, Olinger C. et al.Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–870.
    1. Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284(6329):1607–1608.
    1. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski S. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:743–749.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren