Delivering clinical trials at home: protocol, design and implementation of a direct-to-family paediatric lupus trial

Rachel L Randell, Lindsay Singler, Anthony Cunningham, Laura E Schanberg, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez, Christoph P Hornik, Stephen J Balevic, with the CARRA Registry investigators

Abstract

Introduction: Direct-to-family clinical trials efficiently provide data while reducing the participation burden for children and their families. Although these trials can offer significant advantages over traditional clinical trials, the process of designing and implementing direct-to-family studies is poorly defined, especially in children with rheumatic disease. This paper provides lessons learnt from the design and implementation of a self-controlled, direct-to-family pilot trial aimed to evaluate the effects of a medication management device on adherence to hydroxychloroquine in paediatric SLE.

Methods: Several design features accommodate a direct-to-family approach. Participants meeting eligibility criteria from across the USA were identified a priori through a disease registry, and all outcome data are collected remotely. The primary outcome (medication adherence) is evaluated using electronic medication event-monitoring, plasma drug levels, patient questionnaires and pill counts. Secondary and exploratory endpoints include (1) lupus disease activity measured by a remote SLE Disease Activity Index examination and the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire; and (2) hydroxychloroquine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Recruitment of the initial target of 20 participants was achieved within 10 days. Due to initial recruitment success, enrolment was increased to 26 participants. Additional participants who were interested were placed on a waiting list in case of dropouts during the study.

Discussion and dissemination: Direct-to-family trials offer several advantages but present unique challenges. Lessons learnt from the protocol development, design, and implementation of this trial will inform future direct-to-family trials for children and adults with rheumatic diseases. Additionally, the data collected remotely in this trial will provide critical information regarding the accuracy of teleresearch in lupus, the impact of adherence to hydroxychloroquine on disease activity and a pharmacokinetic analysis to inform paediatric-specific dosing of hydroxychloroquine.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04358302).

Keywords: antirheumatic agents; autoimmune diseases; systemic lupus erythematosus.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RR’s spouse has current or prior employment and/or stock ownership in Merck & Co, and Biogen. LES has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from UCB, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb and Sobi (less than $10 000 each), and research support from CARRA. LES serves on the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Sanofi (sarilumab). Sanofi is a maker of hydroxychloroquine. LES is a former board chair and currently sits on the Registry and Research Oversight Committee for CARRA. CPH receives salary support for research from sponsors for drug development in adults and children (https://dcri.org/about-us/conflict-of-interest/). SB consults for UCB.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant recruitment and enrolment. CARRA, Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance.

References

    1. Fogel DB. Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: a review. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018;11:156–64. 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001
    1. Joseph PD, Craig JC, Caldwell PHY. Clinical trials in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015;79:357–69. 10.1111/bcp.12305
    1. Weiner DL, Balasubramaniam V, Shah SI, et al. . COVID-19 impact on research, lessons learned from COVID-19 research, implications for pediatric research. Pediatr Res 2020;88:148–50. 10.1038/s41390-020-1006-3
    1. Marquis-Gravel G, Roe MT, Robertson HR, et al. . Rationale and design of the aspirin Dosing-A Patient-Centric trial assessing benefits and long-term effectiveness (adaptable) trial. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:598–607. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0116
    1. Orri M, Lipset CH, Jacobs BP, et al. . Web-Based trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolterodine ER 4 Mg in participants with overactive bladder: remote trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2014;38:190–7. 10.1016/j.cct.2014.04.009
    1. Sommer C, Zuccolin D, Arnera V, et al. . Building clinical trials around patients: evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018;11:120–6. 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.008
    1. Khozin S, Coravos A. Decentralized trials in the age of real-world evidence and inclusivity in clinical investigations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019;106:25–7. 10.1002/cpt.1441
    1. Shore CKE, Alper J. Virtual clinical trials: challenges and opportunities: proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2019.
    1. Ali Z, Zibert JR, Thomsen SF. Virtual clinical trials: perspectives in dermatology. Dermatology 2020;236:375–82. 10.1159/000506418
    1. Rosa C, Campbell ANC, Miele GM, et al. . Using e-technologies in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2015;45:41–54. 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.007
    1. Hansen TVO, Simonsen MK, Nielsen FC, et al. . Collection of blood, saliva, and buccal cell samples in a pilot study on the Danish nurse cohort: comparison of the response rate and quality of genomic DNA. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:2072–6. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0611
    1. Randell RL, Gulati AS, Cook SF, et al. . Collecting biospecimens from an internet-based prospective cohort study of inflammatory bowel disease (CCFA Partners): a feasibility study. JMIR Res Protoc 2016;5:e3. 10.2196/resprot.5171
    1. Carlisle BG. Clinical trials stopped by Covid-19, 2020. Available:
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration . FDA guidance on conduct of clinical trials of medical products during the COVID-19 public health emergency: guidance for industry, Investigators, and institutional review boards. Guidance document, 2020. Available:
    1. Young M. IRB experts offer advice for changing research landscape: how to enter next research era [published 2020 Jun 1]. Available: [Accessed 23 Sep 2020].
    1. Garris C, Jhingran P, Bass D, et al. . Healthcare utilization and cost of systemic lupus erythematosus in a US managed care health plan. J Med Econ 2013;16:667–77. 10.3111/13696998.2013.778270
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Dunogué B, Morel N, et al. . Hydroxychloroquine: a multifaceted treatment in lupus. Presse Med 2014;43:e167–80. 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.03.007
    1. Alarcón GS, McGwin G, Bertoli AM, et al. . Effect of hydroxychloroquine on the survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: data from LUMINA, a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA L). Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:1168–72. 10.1136/ard.2006.068676
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Pouchot J, Guettrot-Imbert G, et al. . Adherence to treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2013;27:329–40. 10.1016/j.berh.2013.07.001
    1. Mehat P, Atiquzzaman M, Esdaile JM, et al. . Medication nonadherence in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res 2017;69:1706–13. 10.1002/acr.23191
    1. Mok CC, Penn HJ, Chan KL, et al. . Hydroxychloroquine serum concentrations and flares of systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal cohort analysis. Arthritis Care Res 2016;68:1295–302. 10.1002/acr.22837
    1. Joo YB, Park S-Y, Won S, et al. . Differences in clinical features and mortality between childhood-onset and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective single-center study. J Rheumatol 2016;43:1490–7. 10.3899/jrheum.151129
    1. Sadun RE, Schanberg LE. Transition and transfer of the patient with paediatric-onset lupus: a practical approach for paediatric and adult rheumatology practices. Lupus Sci Med 2018;5:e000282. 10.1136/lupus-2018-000282
    1. National Institutes of Health . Best pharmaceuticals for children act. priority list of pediatric therapeutic needs as of March 1, 2019, 2019. Available: [Accessed 18 Oct 2020].
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Galicier L, Aumaître O, et al. . Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a French multicentre controlled trial (PLUS Study). Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1786–92. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202322
    1. Ponticelli C, Moroni G. Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Expert Opin Drug Saf 2017;16:411–9. 10.1080/14740338.2017.1269168
    1. Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol 2002;29:288–91.
    1. O'Rourke JA, Ravichandran C, Howe YJ, et al. . Accuracy of self-reported history of autoimmune disease: a pilot study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0216526. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216526
    1. . 21St century cures act, HR 34, 114th Cong (2015-2016). Available: [Accessed 12 Nov 2020].
    1. Balevic SJ, Singler L, Randell R, et al. . Bringing research directly to families in the era of COVID-19. Pediatr Res 2021;89:404–6. 10.1038/s41390-020-01260-1

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren