Effects of Cervical Flexion on the Flexion-relaxation Ratio during Smartphone Use

HyeonHui Shin, KyeongMi Kim, HyeonHui Shin, KyeongMi Kim

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to measure the cervical flexion-relaxation ratio (FRR) and intensity of neck pain and identify the differences according to postures adopted while using smartphones. [Subjects] Fifteen healthy adults with no neck pain, spinal trauma, or history cervical surgery participated in this study. [Methods] The activity of the cervical erector spinae muscle was recorded while performing a standardized cervical flexion-extension movement in three phases (flexion, sustained full flexion, extension). And neck pain intensity was recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS) with values between 0 and 10. Postures held while using a smartphone are distinguished between desk postures and lap postures. The FRR was calculated by dividing the maximal muscle activation during the extension phase by average activation during the complete flexion phase. [Results] No significant differences were found in the FRR between desk posture, lap posture, and baseline, though the intensity of the neck pain increased in the lap posture. [Conclusion] The FRR could be a significant criterion of neuromuscular impairment in chronic neck pain or lumbar pain patients, but it is impossible to distinguish neck pain that is caused by performing task for a short time. Prolonged lap posture might cause neck pain, so the use of smartphones for a long time in this posture should be avoided.

Keywords: Cervical flexion-relaxation ratio; Electromyography; Smartphone.

References

    1. Rainie L: Internet, Broadband, and Cell Phone Statistics. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2010, 5.
    1. Jonsson P, Johnson PW, Hagberg M: Accuracy and feasibility of using an electrogoniometer for measuring simple thumb movements. Ergonomics, 2007, 50: 647–659.
    1. Berolo S, Wells RP, Amick BC., 3rdMusculoskeletal symptoms among mobile hand-held device users and their relationship to device use: A preliminary study in a Canadian university population. Appl Ergon, 2011, 42: 371–378.
    1. Villanueva MB, Jonai H, Sotoyama M, et al. : Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal. Ind Health, 1997, 35: 330–336.
    1. Floyd WF, Silver PH: The function of the erectores spinae muscles in certain movements and postures in man. J Physiol, 1955, 129: 184–203.
    1. Colloca CJ, Hinrichs RN: The biomechanical and clinical significance of the lumbar erector spinae flexion-relaxation phenomenon: a review of literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2005, 28: 623–631.
    1. Pialasse JP, Dubois JD, Choquette MH, et al. : Kinematic and electromyographic parameters of the cervical flexion-relaxation phenomenon: the effect of trunk positioning. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2009, 52: 49–58.
    1. Marshall PW, Murphy BA: Evaluation of functional and neuromuscular changes after exercise rehabilitation for low back pain using a Swiss ball: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2006, 29: 550–560.
    1. Murphy BA, Marshall PW, Taylor HH: The cervical flexion-relaxation ratio: reproducibility and comparison between chronic neck pain patients and controls. Spine, 2010, 35: 2103–2108.
    1. Yoo WG, Park SY, Lee MR: Relationship between active cervical range of motion and flexion-relaxation ratio in asymptomatic computer workers. J Physiol Anthropol, 2011, 30: 203–207.
    1. Kim MH, Yoo WG: Comparison of the hamstring muscle activity and flexion-relaxation ratio between asymptomatic persons and computer work-related low back pain sufferers. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 535–536.
    1. Indahl A, Kaigle AM, Reikeräs O, et al. : Interaction between the porcine lumbar intervertebral disc, zygapophysial joints, and paraspinal muscles. Spine, 1997, 22: 2834–2840.
    1. Watson PJ, Booker CK, Main CJ, et al. : Surface electromyography in the identification of chronic low back pain patients: the development of the flexion relaxation ratio. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 1997, 12: 165–171.
    1. Greig AM, Straker LM, Briggs AM: Cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius muscle activity in children using different information technologies. Physiotherapy, 2005, 91: 119–126.
    1. Lee TH, Liu TY: Postural and muscular responses while viewing different heights of screen. Int J Occup Saf Ergon, 2013, 19: 251–258.
    1. Bonney RA, Corlett EN: Head posture and loading of the cervical spine. Appl Ergon, 2002, 33: 415–417.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren