Avelumab Dose Selection for Clinical Studies in Pediatric Patients with Solid Tumors

Yulia Vugmeyster, Ana-Marija Grisic, Brigitte Brockhaus, Peter Rueckert, Mary Ruisi, Haiqing Dai, Akash Khandelwal, Yulia Vugmeyster, Ana-Marija Grisic, Brigitte Brockhaus, Peter Rueckert, Mary Ruisi, Haiqing Dai, Akash Khandelwal

Abstract

Background and objective: A phase I/II trial evaluated the safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of avelumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) in pediatric patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumors (NCT03451825). This study aimed to inform avelumab dose selection in pediatric populations using population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations.

Methods: Patients aged < 18 years with refractory/relapsed solid tumors enrolled in phase I received avelumab 10 or 20 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. A pediatric population pharmacokinetic model was developed via the frequentist prior approach.

Results: Pharmacokinetic parameters from 21 patients who received avelumab 10 mg/kg (n = 6) or 20 mg/kg (n = 15) were analyzed. Patients had a wide range of weights and ages (medians, 37.3 kg and 12 years). Exposures with 10-mg/kg dosing were lower vs adult dosing, particularly in patients weighing < 40 kg, whereas 20-mg/kg dosing achieved or exceeded adult exposures, irrespective of body weight. A two-compartment linear model with time-varying clearance using body weight as a covariate, with the frequentist prior approach, best described pediatric data. In this model, optimal overlap in exposure with adult data was achieved with 800 mg every 2 weeks for patients aged ≥ 12 years and weighing ≥ 40 kg, and 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks for patients aged < 12 years or weighing < 40 kg.

Conclusions: Based on exposure matching, the recommended doses for further avelumab studies, including combination studies, are 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks for pediatric patients aged < 12 years or weighing < 40 kg and the adult flat dose of 800 mg every 2 weeks for pediatric patients aged ≥ 12 years and weighing ≥ 40 kg.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03451825.

Conflict of interest statement

YV is an employee of EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA. AMG and PR are employees of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. MR was an employee of EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA at the time of the study, and holds stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. BB and AK are employees of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and hold stock in Merck. HD was an employee of EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA at the time of the study.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dose-normalized, noncompartmental-derived pharmacokinetic parameters following first infusion of avelumab (10- or 20-mg/kg dose), by body weight (A Maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax). B Area under the concentration–time curve (AUC0–τ). C Trough concentration (Ctrough). Boxes represent interquartile range, solid lines within the box are arithmetic means, whereas the dotted lines are medians. Individual values beyond the interquartile range tails are shown as outlying dots
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Simulations with the pediatric population pharmacokinetic model vs observations after a single dose of avelumab at 10 or 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w). A Serum concentration. B Trough concentration (Ctrough). C Area under the concentration–time curve (AUC). D Clearance (CL). In Apink dots are individual observations, and the shaded blue areas represent predicted concentrations at each dose. In BD, boxes represent interquartile range; horizontal lines within the box are medians; whiskers extend to the most extreme point, which is no more than 1.5 times the length of the box away from the box; pink dots are observations; and blue dots are observations that are outside 1.5 times the length of the box away from the box
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Simulations of A trough concentration (Ctrough) and B area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) in subgroups defined by age and body weight and CCtrough, and D AUC in subgroups defined by body weight after a single dose of avelumab at different doses in pediatric patients. Boxes represent interquartile range; horizontal lines are medians; whiskers extend to the most extreme point, which is no more than 1.5 times the length of the box away from the box; points are observations that are outside 1.5 times the length of the box away from the box. The pink dashed line represents the median for adult 800-mg data. For C and D, ages ranged from 2 to 9 years for the 10–20 kg 15-mg/kg subgroup, 3–12 years for the 20–30 kg 15-mg/kg subgroup, and 5–15 years for the 30–40 kg 15-mg/kg subgroup
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Simulations of A concentration–time profiles and B population fractions that achieved trough concentration (Ctrough) associated with maximal PD-L1 target occupancy with avelumab recommended doses after a single dose. Lines are medians, shaded areas are 90% prediction intervals, and dashed horizontal lines are target concentrations of 6 µg/mL

References

    1. Geoerger B, Kang HJ, Yalon-Oren M, Marshall LV, Vezina C, Pappo A, et al. Pembrolizumab in paediatric patients with advanced melanoma or a PD-L1-positive, advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumour or lymphoma (KEYNOTE-051): interim analysis of an open-label, single-arm, phase 1–2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):121–133. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30671-0.
    1. Geoerger B, Zwaan CM, Marshall LV, Michon J, Bourdeaut F, Casanova M, et al. Atezolizumab for children and young adults with previously treated solid tumours, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma (iMATRIX): a multicentre phase 1–2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):134–144. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30693-X.
    1. Davis KL, Fox E, Merchant MS, Reid JM, Kudgus RA, Liu X, et al. Nivolumab in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory solid tumours or lymphoma (ADVL1412): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1–2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(4):541–550. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30023-1.
    1. Shemesh CS, Chanu P, Jamsen K, Wada R, Rossato G, Donaldson F, et al. Population pharmacokinetics, exposure-safety, and immunogenicity of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adult patients with cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0791-x.
    1. Novakovic AM, Wilkins JJ, Dai H, Wade JR, Neuteboom B, Brar S, et al. Changing body weight-based dosing to a flat dose for avelumab in metastatic Merkel cell and advanced urothelial carcinoma. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;107(3):588–596. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1645.
    1. Kelly K, Infante JR, Taylor MH, Patel MR, Wong DJ, Iannotti N, et al. Safety profile of avelumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: a pooled analysis of data from the phase 1 JAVELIN Solid Tumor and phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 clinical trials. Cancer. 2018;124(9):2010–2017. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31293.
    1. Loeb DM, Lee JW, Morgenstern DA, Samson Y, Uyttebroeck A, Lyu CJ, et al. Avelumab in paediatric patients with refractory or relapsed solid tumours: dose-escalation results from an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022. 10.1007/s00262-022-03159-8.
    1. Edlund H, Melin J, Parra-Guillen ZP, Kloft C. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of monoclonal antibodies in children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54(1):35–80. doi: 10.1007/s40262-014-0208-4.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Center for Health Statistics. Clinical growth charts. 2017. Available from: . Accessed 27 Oct 2021.
    1. Wilkins JJ, Brockhaus B, Dai H, Vugmeyster Y, White JT, Brar S, et al. Time-varying clearance and impact of disease state on the pharmacokinetics of avelumab in Merkel cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2019;8(6):415–427. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12406.
    1. Gisleskog PO, Karlsson MO, Beal SL. Use of prior information to stabilize a population data analysis. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2002;29(5–6):473–505. doi: 10.1023/a:1022972420004.
    1. Chan Kwong AH-XP, Calvier EA, Fabre D, Gattacceca F, Khier S. Prior information for population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis: overview and guidance with a focus on the NONMEM PRIOR subroutine. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020;47(5):431–446. doi: 10.1007/s10928-020-09695-z.
    1. Temrikar ZH, Suryawanshi S, Meibohm B. Pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology of monoclonal antibodies in pediatric patients. Paediatr Drugs. 2020;22(2):199–216. doi: 10.1007/s40272-020-00382-7.
    1. Heery CR, O'Sullivan Coyne GH, Marte JL, Singh H, Cordes LM, Madan RA, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile and receptor occupancy of avelumab (MSB0010718C), an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, in a phase I, open-label, dose escalation trial in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(15 Suppl.):Abstract 3055. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.3055.
    1. Heery CR, O'Sullivan-Coyne G, Madan RA, Cordes L, Rajan A, Rauckhorst M, et al. Avelumab for metastatic or locally advanced previously treated solid tumours (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): a phase 1a, multicohort, dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(5):587–598. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30239-5.
    1. Deng R, Bumbaca D, Pastuskovas CV, Boswell CA, West D, Cowan KJ, et al. Preclinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tissue distribution, and tumor penetration of anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. MAbs. 2016;8(3):593–603. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2015.1136043.
    1. Francisco LM, Sage PT, Sharpe AH. The PD-1 pathway in tolerance and autoimmunity. Immunol Rev. 2010;236:219–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00923.x.
    1. Netterberg I, Li CC, Molinero L, Budha N, Sukumaran S, Stroh M, et al. A PK/PD analysis of circulating biomarkers and their relationship to tumor response in atezolizumab-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(2):486–495. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1198.
    1. Vugmeyster Y, Manitz J, Xiong J, Rosen G, Sharma V, Novakovic A, et al. Exposure–response analysis of avelumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma via a full-model approach. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018;45(Suppl 1):S129.
    1. Gulley JL, Spigel DR, Kelly K, Aisner J, Chand VK, Koenig A, et al. Exposure-response and PD-L1 expression analysis of second-line avelumab in patients with advanced NSCLC: data from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15 Suppl.):abstract 9086. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.9086.
    1. Morrissey KM, Marchand M, Patel H, Zhang R, Wu B, Chan HP, et al. Alternative dosing regimens for atezolizumab: an example of model-informed drug development in the postmarketing setting. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019;84(6):1257–1267. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03954-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren