Surgical strategy, methods of reconstruction, surgical margins and postoperative complications in oncoplastic breast surgery

Michael Rose, Jonas Manjer, Anita Ringberg, Henry Svensson, Michael Rose, Jonas Manjer, Anita Ringberg, Henry Svensson

Abstract

Background: Oncoplastic breast surgery is an evolving discipline in the surgical treatment of breast cancer aimed to improve the outcome.

Methods: Oncoplastic breast surgery was performed between January 2008 and December 2010 on 72 women with 74 breast cancers selected from a population of 1,018 primary breast cancer patients. Careful preoperative planning revealed the possibility of partial breast reconstruction with volume reduction, volume displacement or volume replacement depending on breast size as well as tumour size and location. Data were registered consecutively.

Results: The surgical plan was successful in all but one case, where a mastectomy had to be performed during the primary surgery. In 53 cases, a contralateral mammoplasty was performed during the operation to achieve symmetry. During the follow-up period until November 2011, only one patient needed corrective surgery. Final histopathological examination indicated that seven cases required extended resection and three cases required a mastectomy. Five patients experienced delayed wound healing, although complications requiring further surgery occurred for the reconstructed breast in four cases, the contralateral breast in three cases and the axilla after exaeresis in two cases because of haematoma. Such complications led to slight delay in adjuvant therapy for four patients.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that it is feasible to implement oncoplastic breast surgery into daily clinical practice as a supplement to conventional breast cancer surgery. As such, oncoplastic breast surgery may provide a markedly better outcome than breast-conserving surgery in terms of shape and symmetry without compromising the surgical margins. Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic/risk study.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Methods of reconstruction; Oncoplastic surgery; Partial breast reconstruction; Postoperative complications; Surgical margins.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of the distribution of zones in the breast described by McCulley and MacMillan [14]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient with medium to large breasts from group I. A 42-year-old woman with a 15-mm invasive ductal carcinoma located in the lower central region of the left breast (zone III). Weight of lumpectomy at 80 g, reconstruction with volume reduction technique and contralateral reduction mammoplasty. Preoperative photos (a, b) and results after radiotherapy 2 years post-surgery (c, d)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient with medium to large breasts from group II. A 59-year-old woman with a 17-mm invasive ductal carcinoma in the upper region (zone VII) of the left breast. Weight of lumpectomy at 41 g, reconstruction with volume displacement technique with inferior-based extended flap with skin island and contralateral reduction mammoplasty. Photos preoperative (a, b), peroperative (c) and 3 months postoperative (d, e)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient with medium to large breasts from group III. A 63-year-old woman with a 19-mm invasive ductal carcinoma located in the central region of the right breast (zone I). Weight of lumpectomy at 124 g, which included the nipple-areola complex, reconstruction with volume displacement technique with inferior-based flap and immediate nipple reconstruction and contralateral reduction mammoplasty. Photos taken preoperative (a, b), peroperative (c) and 2 years postoperative (d, e)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Patient with small breasts from group IV. A 46-year-old woman with a 25-mm invasive ductal carcinoma in the lateral region (zone VI) of the left breast. Weight of lumpectomy at 40 g, reconstruction with volume replacement technique with tunnelled thoracodorsal flap with skin island and no contralateral surgery. Pre- (a, b) and postoperative photos after 3 months (c, d)

References

    1. Asgeirsson KS. Does oncoplastic surgery have a future in Scandinavia? Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):152–154. doi: 10.1080/02841860802430617.
    1. Malycha PL, Gough IR, Margaritoni M, Deo SV, Sandelin K, Buccimazza I, Agarwal G. Oncoplastic breast surgery: a global perspective on practice, availability, and training. World J Surg. 2008;32:2570–2577. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9635-4.
    1. Dua SM, Smith S. Therapeutic mammoplasty: a fusion of oncological and aesthetic breast surgery. Adv Oncol. 2010;5:1–4.
    1. Lebovic GS, Anderson B. Oncoplastic breast surgery: current status and best candidates for treatment. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2009;1:118–123. doi: 10.1007/s12609-009-0017-1.
    1. Cataliotti L. Surgical principles in oncoplastic surgery. European Breast Cancer Conference. EJC Suppl. 2008;6(7):15–16. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6349(08)70299-4.
    1. Urban C, Lima R, Schunemann E, Spautz C, Rabinovich I, Anselmi K. Oncoplastic principles in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2011;20:92–95. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(11)70302-2.
    1. Baildam AD. Breast reconstruction—state of art. Breast. 2006;15:S27–S30. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(07)70014-0.
    1. Berry MG, Fitoussi AD, Curnier A, Couturaud B, Salmon RJ. Oncoplastic breast surgery: a review and systematic approach. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1233–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.05.006.
    1. Pillarisette RR, della Rovere GQ. Oncoplastic breast surgery. Indian J Surg. 2012;74(3):255–263. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0590-9.
    1. Losken A, Nahabedian MY. Oncoplastic breast surgery: past, present, and future directions in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:969–972. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b038ec.
    1. Meretoja TJ, Svarvar C, Jahkola TA. Outcome of oncoplastic breast surgery in 90 prospective patients. Am J Surg. 2010;200(2):224–228. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.09.026.
    1. McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Therapeutic mammaplasty—analysis of 50 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(7):902–907. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.03.007.
    1. da Silva AV, Claudinei D, Wilhermo T. Oncoplastic surgery of the breast: rationale and experience of 30 cases. Breast. 2007;4:411–419. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.014.
    1. McCulley SJ, Macmillan R. Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty—Nottingham approach. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(7):889–901. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.03.008.
    1. Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-dsiplacement techniques. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(3):145–157. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01765-1.
    1. McCulley SJ, Durani P, Macmillan RD. Therapeutic mammaplasty for centraly located breast tumours. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:366–373. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000200874.31320.c2.
    1. Kaur N, Petit JY, Rietjens M, Maffini F, Luini A, Gatti G, Rey PC, Urban C, De Lorenzi F. Compararive study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(7):539–545. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.12.046.
    1. McIntosh J, O’Donoghue JM. Therapeutic mammoplasty—a systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(3):196–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.004.
    1. Asgeirsson KS, Rasheed T, McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31(8):817–823. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.05.010.
    1. Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC, Mazzarol G, Maisonneuve P, Garusi C, Intra M, Yamaguchi S, Kaur N, De Lorenzi F, Matthes AG, Zurrida S, Petit JY. Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast. 2007;16(4):387–395. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.008.
    1. Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S, Kaufman G, Massey E, Nos C. Oncoplastic surgery for the breast cancer beased on tumuor location and quadrant- per-quadran atlas. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1389–1395. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8877.
    1. Losken A, Schaefer TG, Newell M, Styblo TM. The impact of partial breast reconstruction using reduction techniques on postoperative cancer surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(1):9–17. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10e5.
    1. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(6):571–573. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0708.
    1. Pontes R, Pontes GH, Serpa NP, Monte AR, Collado CL, Silva FN. Modified lateral thoracodorsal flap: a way out of a difficult problem. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30(3):363–368. doi: 10.1007/s00266-005-0077-1.
    1. Kijima Y, Yoshinaka H, Funasako Y, Kaneko K, Hirata M, Ishigami S, Natsugoe S. Immediate reconstruction using thoracodorsal adiposal flap after partial mastectomy. Breast. 2009;18(2):126–129. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.02.006.
    1. Rose M, Henry S. Tunnelled lateral fasciocutaneous thoracodorsal flap with skin island in breast reconstruction in oncoplastic breast surgery. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46:404–409. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2012.722095.
    1. Schwabegger AH, Bodner G, Ninković M, Piza-Katzer H. Thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flap: report ofour experience and review of literature. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55(5):390–395. doi: 10.1054/bjps.2002.3878.
    1. Wong C, Saint-Cyr M. The pedicled descending branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap for thrunk and upper extremity reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(4):623–632. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.059.
    1. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperation Group, DBCG. National Danish Guidelines. Avaible from
    1. Munshi A, Kakkar S, Bhutani R, Jalali R, Budrukkar A, Dinshaw KA. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome in breast conservation. Clin Oncol. 2009;21(4):285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.02.001.
    1. Pleijhuis RG, Graafland M, de Vries J, Bart J, de Jong JS, van Dam GM. Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future direction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2717–2730. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0609-z.
    1. Regionalt cancercentrum Stockholm – Gotland, . Accessed Nov 18 2013

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren