Protocol for a quasiexperimental study testing the effectiveness of strengthening growth monitoring and promotion in community clinics for improving the nutritional status of under-two children in rural Bangladesh

Muttaquina Hossain, Tarana-E- Ferdous, Ziaul Islam, Sk Masum Billah, Md M Islam Bulbul, Md Mezanur Rahman, Tahmeed Ahmed, Muttaquina Hossain, Tarana-E- Ferdous, Ziaul Islam, Sk Masum Billah, Md M Islam Bulbul, Md Mezanur Rahman, Tahmeed Ahmed

Abstract

Introduction: The Government of Bangladesh is implementing growth monitoring and promotion (GMP) through community clinics (CC) to improve the nutritional status of children. However, little primary evidence is available on the effectiveness of GMP when delivered through CCs. We aim to examine the effectiveness of GMP activities strengthened in CCs to improve the nutritional status of children under 2 years of age.

Methods and analysis: This is a quasiexperimental, two-arm, mixed methods study. In the intervention arm, a non-governmental organisation is providing support to strengthen GMP implementation in the 30 CCs. The comparison arm has no intervention to strengthen GMP implementation in the 30 CCs. Study participants will be under-two children and their caregivers, and CC service providers (community healthcare provider, CHCP). We will collect quantitative information on children and mothers' anthropometry, sociodemographic condition, food security, children's feeding practices, morbidity and vaccination history at baseline, and follow them up every third month thereafter for 12 months. We will collect qualitative information on (1) knowledge, skill and practice of CHCPs to implement GMP; (2) mothers/caregivers' perception, knowledge and experience of GMP from CCs; (3) experience and suggestions of programme managers about operational challenges and for improving quality of GMP service delivery; and (4) views of the concerned policy planners to strengthen GMP at the CC level. Qualitative information will be collected through key informant and in-depth interviews at baseline and endline. The primary outcome will be the change observed in length-for-age Z-score of children. A difference-in-difference and linear mixed effects analysis of quantitative data will be done. Thematic analysis will be conducted for qualitative information. Triangulation of data derived from different methods will be carried out.

Ethics and dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, and results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT03824756.

Keywords: Bangladesh; children; community clinics; growth monitoring and promotion; nutritional status; protocol.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework of the study (adapted from UNICEF’s Report of the Technical Consultation on Growth Monitoring and Promotion2). CC, community clinic; GMP, growth monitoring and promotion; IYCF, infant and young child feeding.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention and control area.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow of participant diagram. NGO, non-governmental organisation.

References

    1. National Institute of Population ResearchTraining - NIPORT/Bangladesh, Mitra and Associates, ICF International Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2014. Dhaka, Bangladesh: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International, 2016.
    1. UNICEF Revisiting growth monitoring and its evolution to promoting growth as a strategic program approach: building consensus for future program guidance. Report of the technical consultation on growth monitoring and promotion. UNICEF Headquarters New York, USA: UNICEF, 2007.
    1. Bilal SM, Moser A, Blanco R, et al. . Practices and challenges of growth monitoring and promotion in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. J Health Popul Nutr 2014;32:441–51.
    1. Hossain SMM, Duffield A, Taylor A. An evaluation of the impact of a US$60 million nutrition programme in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan 2005;20:35–40. 10.1093/heapol/czi004
    1. Charlton KE, Kawana BM, Hendricks MK. An assessment of the effectiveness of growth monitoring and promotion practices in the Lusaka district of Zambia. Nutrition 2009;25:1035–46. 10.1016/j.nut.2009.03.008
    1. Feleke FW, Adole AA, Bezabih AM. Utilization of growth monitoring and promotion services and associated factors among under two years of age children in southern Ethiopia. PLoS One 2017;12:e0177502 10.1371/journal.pone.0177502
    1. de Onis M, Wijnhoven TMA, Onyango AW. Worldwide practices in child growth monitoring. J Pediatr 2004;144:461–5. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.12.034
    1. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, et al. . Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 2008;371:243–60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0
    1. Roberfroid D, Kolsteren P, Hoerée T, et al. . Do growth monitoring and promotion programs answer the performance criteria of a screening program? A critical analysis based on a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health 2005;10:1121–33. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01498.x
    1. Ashworth A, Shrimpton R, Jamil K. Growth monitoring and promotion: review of evidence of impact. Matern Child Nutr 2008;4 Suppl 1:86–117. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2007.00125.x
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191–4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Panpanich R, Garner P, Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group . Growth monitoring in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1999;342 10.1002/14651858.CD001443
    1. Ivd T. Sample size determination. Netherlands: dept. Biostatistics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 2006.
    1. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group Who child growth standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006;450:76–85.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren