Effects of 8-hour time restricted feeding on body weight and metabolic disease risk factors in obese adults: A pilot study

Kelsey Gabel, Kristin K Hoddy, Nicole Haggerty, Jeehee Song, Cynthia M Kroeger, John F Trepanowski, Satchidananda Panda, Krista A Varady, Kelsey Gabel, Kristin K Hoddy, Nicole Haggerty, Jeehee Song, Cynthia M Kroeger, John F Trepanowski, Satchidananda Panda, Krista A Varady

Abstract

Background: Time restricted feeding decreases energy intake without calorie counting and may be a viable option for weight loss. However, the effect of this diet on body weight in obese subjects has never been examined.

Objective: This study investigated the effects of 8-h time restricted feeding on body weight and metabolic disease risk factors in obese adults.

Design: Obese subjects (n = 23) participated in an 8-h time restricted feeding intervention (ad libitum feeding between 10:00 to 18:00 h, water fasting between 18:00 to 10:00 h) for 12 weeks. Weight loss and other outcomes were compared to a matched historical control group (n = 23).

Results: Body weight and energy intake decreased in the time restricted group (-2.6% ± 0.5; -341 ± 53 kcal/d) relative to controls over 12 weeks (P < 0.05). Systolic blood pressure decreased in the time restricted feeding group (-7 ± 2 mm Hg) versus controls (P < 0.05). Fat mass, lean mass, visceral fat mass, diastolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and homocysteine were not significantly different from controls after 12 weeks (no group×time interaction).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that 8-h time restricted feeding produces mild caloric restriction and weight loss, without calorie counting. It may also offer clinical benefits by reducing blood pressure.

Keywords: Time restricted feeding; body weight; intermittent fasting; metabolic disease risk factors; obese adults.

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
Study flow chart.
Fig.2
Fig.2
Weekly adherence to the 8-hour feeding window by the time restricted feeding group. All values reported as mean ± SEM. Each bar indicates the mean number of days per week that the time restricted feeding subjects were compliant with the 8-hour feeding window. On average, the time restricted feeding group was compliant with the prescribed eating window (10:00 to 18:00 h) on 5.6 ± 0.3 d/week, and this level of adherence did not change over the course of the trial (P = 0.86, repeated measures ANOVA).
Fig.3
Fig.3
Weight loss by the time restricted feeding group versus controls 1. 1All values reported as mean ± SEM. Data were included for 46 participants; means were estimated using an intention-to-treat analysis using last observation carried forward. Body weight remained stable during the 2-week baseline period (week B1 and week B2). Body weight decreased in the time restricted feeding group relative to controls during the 12-week intervention period (P < 0.001 for time × group interaction).

References

    1. Longo VD, Mattson MP. Fasting: Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications. Cell Metab. 2014;19(2):181–92.
    1. Longo VD, Panda S. Fasting, Circadian Rhythms, and Time-Restricted Feeding in Healthy Lifespan. Cell Metab. 2016;23(6):1048–59.
    1. Chaix A, et al. Time-restricted feeding is a preventative and therapeutic intervention against diverse nutritional challenges. Cell Metab. 2014;20(6):991–1005.
    1. Bhutani S, et al. Alternate day fasting and endurance exercise combine to reduce body weight and favorably alter plasma lipids in obese humans. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(7):1370–9.
    1. Catenacci VA, et al. A randomized pilot study comparing zero-calorie alternate-day fasting to daily caloric restriction in adults with obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(9):1874–83.
    1. Harvie MN, et al. The effects of intermittent or continuous energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers: A randomized trial in young overweight women. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(5):714–27.
    1. Heilbronn LK, et al. Alternate-day fasting in nonobese subjects: Effects on body weight, body composition, and energy metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(1):69–73.
    1. Hoddy KK, et al. Meal timing during alternate day fasting: Impact on body weight and cardiovascular disease risk in obese adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(12):2524–31.
    1. Klempel MC, Kroeger CM, Varady KA. Alternate day fasting (ADF) with a high-fat diet produces similar weight loss and cardio-protection as ADF with a low-fat diet. Metabolism. 2013;62(1):137–43.
    1. Trepanowski JF, et al. Effect of Alternate-Day Fasting on Weight Loss, Weight Maintenance, and Cardioprotection Among Metabolically Healthy Obese Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2017.
    1. Gill S, Panda S. A Smartphone App Reveals Erratic Diurnal Eating Patterns in Humans that Can Be Modulated for Health Benefits. Cell Metab. 2015;22(5):789–98.
    1. Moro T, et al. Effects of eight weeks of time-restricted feeding (16/8) on basal metabolism, maximal strength, body composition, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk factors in resistance-trained males. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):290.
    1. Tinsley GM, et al. Time-restricted feeding in young men performing resistance training: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17(2):200–07.
    1. Jensen MD, et al. AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2985–3023.
    1. Magkos F, et al. Effects of Moderate and Subsequent Progressive Weight Loss on Metabolic Function and Adipose Tissue Biology in Humans with Obesity. Cell Metab. 2016;23(4):591–601.
    1. Klempel MC, et al. Dietary and physical activity adaptations to alternate day modified fasting: Implications for optimal weight loss. Nutr J. 2010;9:35.
    1. Burke TM, et al. Effects of caffeine on the human circadian clock in vivo and in vitro. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(305):305ra146.
    1. Garaulet M, et al. Timing of food intake predicts weight loss effectiveness. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(4):604–11.
    1. Jakubowicz D, et al. High caloric intake at breakfast vs. dinner differentially influences weight loss of overweight and obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(12):2504–12.
    1. Ryan DH, Yockey SR. Weight Loss and Improvement in Comorbidity: Differences at 5%, 10%, 15%, and Over. Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6(2):187–94.
    1. Janiszewski PM, Ross R. Effects of weight loss among metabolically healthy obese men and women. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):1957–9.
    1. Kantartzis K, et al. Effects of a lifestyle intervention in metabolically benign and malign obesity. Diabetologia. 2011;54(4):864–8.
    1. Barnosky AR, et al. Intermittent fasting vs daily calorie restriction for type 2 diabetes prevention: A review of human findings. Transl Res. 2014;164(4):302–11.
    1. Harvie M, Howell A. Potential Benefits and Harms of Intermittent Energy Restriction and Intermittent Fasting Amongst Obese, Overweight and Normal Weight Subjects-A Narrative Review of Human and Animal Evidence. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017;7(1).
    1. Black AE, Cole TJ. Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: Implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(5):386–94.
    1. Lichtman SW, et al. Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(27):1893–8.
    1. Ortega RM, P.-R.C., Lopez-Sobaler AM. Dietary assessment methods: Dietary records. Nutr Hos. 2015;31:38–45.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren