Oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) following third molar surgery in Sub-Saharan Africans: an observational study

Ramat Oyebunmi Braimah, Kizito Chioma Ndukwe, Foluso John Owotade, Stephen Babatunde Aregbesola, Ramat Oyebunmi Braimah, Kizito Chioma Ndukwe, Foluso John Owotade, Stephen Babatunde Aregbesola

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical extraction of the impacted third molar is one of the commonest minor oral surgical procedures carried out in oral surgery. Problems created by the disturbances in post-extraction wound healing and physiologic sequelae of third molar surgery can significantly affect the patient's quality of life.

Methods: The study population consisted of 135 subjects that required surgical extraction of mandibular third molar under local anesthesia and met the inclusion criteria. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively on days 1,3,5,7, and 14 using the United Kingdom Oral Health related Quality of Life questionnaire (UK-OHRQoL).

Results: This study also showed that surgical removal of impacted teeth exerted a negative influence on patient's Quality of life (QoL) across various physical, social, psychological aspects of life. UK-OHRQoL-16 mean scores showed that severe difficulty in eating was experienced by 106 (78%) patients on postoperative day (POD) 1. The symptom however improved within the first week with only 16 (11.9%) experiencing this symptom by POD 7 and none by POD 14.

Conclusion: There was a deterioration in oral health related quality of life in the immediate postoperative period particularly POD 1 and 3 following third molar surgery, which slowly returned to preoperative level by 7th day. Routines such as eating, laughing and smiling, work and speech were also affected. Patients need to be informed of these symptoms after third molar removal so as to enable them prepare very well for the procedure and its sequelae.

Keywords: Eating; oral health; physical; psychological; quality of life; social; surgicalextraction; symptom; third molar surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Colorado BE, Valmaseda CE, Berini AL, Gay EC. Quality of life following lower third molar removal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(4):343–47.
    1. Mc Grath C, Bedi R. A review of influences of oral health on the quality of life. Int J Health Educ. 1999;37(4):116–19.
    1. Hennessy CH, Moriarty DG, Zac MM, Scherr PA, Brackbill R. Measuring health-related quality of life for public health survillence. Public Health Rep. 1994;109(5):665–72.
    1. Flick W. The third molar controversy: Framing the controversy as a public health issue. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57(4):438–44.
    1. Larsen PE. Alveolar osteitis after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: identification of patients at risk. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;73(4):393–97.
    1. Piecuch JF, Arzadon J, Lieblich SE. Prophylactic antibiotic for third molar surgery: a supporting opinion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(1):53–60.
    1. Chiapasco M, Cicco LD, Marrone G. Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;76(4):412–20.
    1. Wofford DT, Miller RI. Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45(1):15–19.
    1. Savin J, Ogden G. Third molar surgery- A preliminary report on aspects affecting quality of life in the early postoperative period. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;35(4):246–53.
    1. Cerqueira PR, Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV. Comparative Study of the Effect of a Tube Drain in Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(1):57–61.
    1. Chukwuneke FN, Oji C, Saheeb DB. A comparative study of the effect of using a rubber drain on postoperative discomfort following lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(4):341–44.
    1. Osborn T, Fredrickson B, Small I. A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43(10):767–69.
    1. Brickley MR, Shepherd JP. Justification for the minor oral surgery outcome scale. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(3):362–63.
    1. McGrath C, Bedi R. An evaluation of a new measure of oral health related quality of life Ohio-UK. Commun Dent Health. 2001;18(3):138–43.
    1. Fisher LD, Dixon DO. Intention-to-Treat in clinical trials. In: Peace KE, editor. Statistical Issues in Drug Research and Development. Marcel Dekker; 1990.
    1. McGrath C, Comfort MB, Lo EC. Changes in life quality following third molar surgery-The immediate postoperative period. Br Dent J. 2003;194(5):265–68.
    1. White RP, Shugars DA, Shafer DM. Recovery after third molar surgery: clinical and health related quality of life outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(5):535–44.
    1. Berge TI. Inability to work after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Od Actaontol Scand. 1997;55(1):64–69.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren