Recompression in new levels after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty compared with conservative treatment

Xiaodong Yi, Hailin Lu, Fei Tian, Yu Wang, Chunde Li, Hong Liu, Xianyi Liu, Hong Li, Xiaodong Yi, Hailin Lu, Fei Tian, Yu Wang, Chunde Li, Hong Liu, Xianyi Liu, Hong Li

Abstract

Study design: A prospective clinical study assessing new vertebral compression fracture after previous treatment.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and associated risk factors of new symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in patients treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and kyphoplasty (PKP) versus conservative treatment, and to elucidate our findings. There are a lot of reports concerning the feasibility and efficacy of this minimally invasive procedure compared with conservative treatment, especially in pain soothing. However, it is still unclear whether the risk of subsequent fracture has increased among operative treatment patients in the long term.

Methods: From November 2005 to July 2009, 290 consecutive patients with 363 OVCFs were randomly selected for PVP/PKP or conservative treatment and evaluated with a mean follow-up of 49.4 months (36-80 months). Some parameters were characterized and statistically compared in this study. Telephone questionnaires, clinical reexamine, and plain radiographs were performed in the follow-up.

Results: Thirty-one of 290 (10.7%) patients had experienced 42 newly developed symptomatic secondary OVCFs. Among 169 operation (53.3% vertebroplasty, 46.7% kyphoplasty) and 121 comparison patients, there is no significant statistical difference of new OVCFs incidence between the two groups calculated by patient proportion. However, in separate, the rate of secondary adjacent fractures calculated by vertebral refracture number is significantly higher than non-adjacent levels in PVP/PKP group but no significant statistical difference was observed in conservative group. The time interval of recompression after operative procedure was much shorter than that for comparison group (9.7 ± 17.8 versus 22.4 ± 7.99 months, p = 0.017). In addition, older age, gender, fracture times, location of original fracture segment, the amount of cement, cement leakage, operation modality (PVP or PKP),and initial number of OVCFs were documented, but these were not the influencing factors in this study (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Patients who had experienced PVP/PKP were not associated with an increased risk of recompression in new levels. However, recompression in new levels of PVP/PKP group occurred much sooner than that of conservative group in the follow-up period. The incidence of new vertebral fractures observed at adjacent levels was substantially higher but no sooner than at distant levels in PVP/PKP group. No major risk factors involving new OVCFs have been found in this study and augmentation for sandwich situation is not necessary.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Sagittal T1, T2-weighted MR and plain images show T10, T12–L2 OVCF of a 73-year-old man treated by PKP in February, 2008. T11 was treated prophylactically. b Ten months later, a new compression fracture at T6 was subjected to repeated PKP
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
New OVCFs occurred sooner after PVP/PKP than after conservative treatment. Same level refractures received conservative treatment occurred much sooner than any other units

References

    1. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie. 1987;33:166–168.
    1. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001;285:320–323. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.3.320.
    1. Ross PD, Genant HK, Davis JW, et al. Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int. 1993;3(3):120–126. doi: 10.1007/BF01623272.
    1. Pflugmacher R, Schroeder RJ, Klostermann CK. Incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures in patients treated with balloon kyphoplasty: two years’ prospective follow-up. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:830–840. doi: 10.1080/02841850600854928.
    1. Uppin AA, Hirsch JA, Centenera LV, et al. Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology. 2003;226:119–124. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2261011911.
    1. Lin WC, Lee YC, Lee CH. Refractures in cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective analysis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:592–599. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0564-y.
    1. Komemushi A, Tanigawa N, Kariya S. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fracture: multivariate study of predictors of new vertebral body fracture. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:580–585. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0138-5.
    1. Johannes H, Heiko F, Kerstin W, et al. Incidence of symptomatic vertebral fractures in patients after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:92–96. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0097-x.
    1. Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine. 2006;31:1983–2001. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000229254.89952.6b.
    1. Mazzantini M, Carpeggiani P, d’Ascanio A, et al. Long-term prospective study of osteoporotic patients treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty after fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:1599–1607. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1341-z.
    1. Tseng YY, Yang TC, Tu PH, et al. Repeated and multiple new vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty. Spine. 2009;34:1917–1922. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac8f07.
    1. Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Kaufmann TJ. New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:217–223.
    1. Rikke R, Karina LH, Mikkel OA, et al. Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine. 2010;35:478–482. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b71bd1.
    1. Klazen CA, Venmans A, de Vries J, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is not a risk factor for new osteoporotic compression fractures: results from VERTOS II. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1447–1450. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2148.
    1. Kim YY, Rhyu KW. Recompression of vertebral body after balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1907–1912. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1479-6.
    1. Tanigawa N, Komemushi A, Kariya S, et al. Radiological follow-up of new compression fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:92–96. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0097-x.
    1. Michael NT, Susan MR, Frank MP, et al. Altered disc pressure profile after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a risk factor for adjacent vertebral body fracture. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1522–1530. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0775-x.
    1. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G, et al. Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1255–1264. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0018-3.
    1. Berlemann U, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, et al. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:748–752. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B5.11841.
    1. Boger A, Heini P, Windolf M, et al. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty:a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:2118–2125. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0473-0.
    1. Shinya N, Seiji T, Akihiro K, et al. Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement. Spine. 2009;34:2613–2618. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abc150.
    1. Pitton MB, Herber S, Bletz C, et al. Ct-guided vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: incidence of secondary fractures and impact of intradiscal cement leakages during follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:43–50. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0694-y.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren