Physiologic and other effects and compliance with long-term respirator use among medical intensive care unit nurses

Terri Rebmann, Ruth Carrico, Jing Wang, Terri Rebmann, Ruth Carrico, Jing Wang

Abstract

Background: Long-term use of respiratory protection may be necessary, but compliance may be low, and physiologic effects have not been well evaluated.

Methods: Ten nurses participated; physiologic effects, subjective symptoms, and compliance with wearing an N95 alone or with a surgical mask overlay were assessed. Longitudinal analysis based on multivariate linear regression models assessed changes in outcome variables (CO2, O2, heart rate, perceived comfort items, compliance measures, and others). Analyses compared changes over time, and compared wearing only an N95 to wearing an N95 with a surgical mask overlay.

Results: Most nurses (90%, n = 9) tolerated wearing respiratory protection for two 12-hour shifts. CO(2) levels increased significantly compared with baseline measures, especially when comparing an N95 with a surgical mask to only an N95, but changes were not clinically relevant. Perceived exertion; perceived shortness of air; and complaints of headache, lightheadedness, and difficulty communicating also increased over time. Almost one-quarter (22%) of respirator removals were due to reported discomfort. N95 adjustments increased over time, but other compliance measures did not vary by time. Compliance increased on day 2, except for adjustments, touching under the N95, and eye touches.

Conclusion: Long-term use of respiratory protection did not result in any clinically relevant physiologic burden for health care personnel, although many subjective symptoms were reported. N95 compliance was fairly high.

Keywords: Disaster; Filtering face piece respirator; Influenza; N95 respirator; Pandemic; Preparedness.

Copyright © 2013 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Rebmann T, Alexander S, Cain T, Citarella B, Cloughessy M, Coll B, et al. APIC position paper: extending the use and/or reusing respiratory protection in health care settings during disasters. 2009. Available from: . Accessed October 11, 2009.
    1. Radonovich L.J., Magalian P.D., Hollingsworth M.K., Baracco G. Stockpiling supplies for the next influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:e1.
    1. Rebmann T., Wagner W. Infection preventionists’ experience during the first months of the 2009 novel H1N1 influenza A pandemic. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:e5–16.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim guidance on planning for the use of surgical masks and respirators in health care settings during an influenza pandemic. 2006. Available from: . Accessed August 10, 2009.
    1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Pandemic influenza preparedness and response guidance for healthcare workers and healthcare employers. 2007. Available from: . Accessed October 15, 2010.
    1. Goldfrank L.R., Liverman C.T. Institute of Medicine; Washington [DC]: 2007. Preparing for an influenza pandemic: personal protective equipment for healthcare workers.
    1. Roberge R.J., Coca A., Williams W.J., Palmiero A.J., Powell J.B. Surgical mask placement over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: physiological effects on healthcare workers. Resp. 2010;15:516–521.
    1. Roberge R.J., Coca A., Williams W.J., Powell J.B., Palmiero A.J. Physiological impact of the N95 filtering facepiece respirator on healthcare workers. Respir Care. 2010;55:569–577.
    1. Mardimae A., Slessarev M., Han J., Sasano H., Sasano N., Azami T. Modified N95 mask delivers high inspired oxygen concentrations while effectively filtering aerosolized microparticles. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:391–399. e1-2.
    1. Johnson A.T., Scott W.H., Lausted C.G., Coyne K.M., Sahota M.S., Johnson M.M. Effect of external dead volume on performance while wearing a respirator. AIHAJ. 2000;61:678–684.
    1. Radonovich L.J., Jr., Cheng J., Shenal B.V., Hodgson M., Bender B.S. Respirator tolerance in health care workers. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301:36–38.
    1. Lim E.C., Seet R.C., Lee K.H., Wilder-Smith E.P., Chuah B.Y., Ong B.K. Headaches and the N95 face-mask amongst healthcare providers. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2006;113:199–202.
    1. Nickell L.A., Crighton E.J., Tracy C.S., Al-Enazy H., Bolaji Y., Hanjrah S. Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution. Can Med Assoc J. 2004;170:793–798.
    1. Ofner M., Lem M., Sarwal S., Vearncombe M., Simor A. Cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome cases among protected health-care workers, Toronto, Canada, April 2003. Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2003;52:433–436.
    1. Nichol K., McGeer A., Bigelow P., O’Brian-Pallas L., Scott J., Holness L. Behind the mask: determinants of nurse’s adherence to facial protective equipment. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41:8–13.
    1. Seale H., Corbett S., Dwyer D.E., MacIntyre C.R. Feasibility exercise to evaluate the use of particulate respirators by emergency department staff during the 2007 influenza season. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:710–712.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Selected health conditions and risk factors: United States, selected years 1988-1994 through 2009-2010. 2011. Available from:. Accessed October 4, 2012.
    1. Carter R., Banham S.W. Use of transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions for assessing indices of gas exchange during exercise testing. Respir Med. 2000;94:350–355.
    1. Sridhar M.K., Carter R., Moran F., Banham S.W. Use of a combined oxygen and carbon dioxide transcutaneous electrode in the estimation of gas exchange during exercise. Thorax. 1993;48:643–647.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren