Tobacco cessation quitlines in North America: a descriptive study

Sharon E Cummins, Linda Bailey, Sharon Campbell, Carrie Koon-Kirby, Shu-Hong Zhu, Sharon E Cummins, Linda Bailey, Sharon Campbell, Carrie Koon-Kirby, Shu-Hong Zhu

Abstract

Background: Quitlines have become an integral part of tobacco control efforts in the United States and Canada. The demonstrated efficacy and the convenience of telephone based counselling have led to the fast adoption of quitlines, to the point of near universal access in North America. However, information on how these quitlines operate in actual practice is not often readily available.

Objectives: This study describes quitline practice in North America and examines commonalities and differences across quitlines. It will serve as a source of reference for practitioners and researchers, with the aim of furthering service quality and promoting continued innovation.

Design: A self administered questionnaire survey of large, publicly funded quitlines in the United States and Canada. A total of 52 US quitlines and 10 Canadian quitlines participated. Descriptive statistics are provided regarding quitline operational structures, clinical services, quality assurance procedures, funding sources and utilisation rates.

Results: Clinical services for the 62 state/provincial quitlines are supplied by a total of 26 service providers. Nine providers operate multiple quitlines, creating greater consistency in operation than would otherwise be expected. Most quitlines offer services over extended hours (mean 96 hours/week) and have multiple language capabilities. Most (98%) use proactive multisession counselling-a key feature of protocols tested in previous experimental trials. Almost all quitlines have extensive training programmes (>60 hours) for counselling staff, and over 70% conduct regular evaluation of outcomes. About half of quitlines use the internet to provide cessation information. A little over a third of US quitlines distribute free cessation medications to eligible callers. The average utilisation rate of the US state quitlines in the 2004-5 fiscal year was about 1.0% across states, with a strong correlation between the funding level of the quitlines and the smokers' utilisation of them (r = 0.74, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Quitlines in North America display core commonalities: they have adopted the principles of multisession proactive counselling and they conduct regular outcome evaluation. Yet variations, tested and untested, exist. Standardised reporting procedures would be of benefit to the field. Shared discussion of the rationale behind variations can inform future decision making for all North American quitlines.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2598516/bin/tc20370.f1.jpg

References

    1. Lichtenstein E, Glasgow R E, Lando H al Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: rationales and meta‐analytic review of evidence. Health Educ Res 199611243–257.
    1. Stead L F, Perera R, Lancaster T. A systematic review of interventions for smokers who contact quitlines. Tobacco Control 200716(Suppl I)i3–i8.
    1. Orleans C T, Schoenbach V J, Wagner E al Self‐help quit smoking interventions: effects of self‐help materials, social support instructions, and telephone counselling. J Consult Clin Psychol 199159439–448.
    1. Zhu S H, Stretch V, Balabanis al Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: effects of single‐session and multiple‐session interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol 199659439–448.
    1. Ossip‐Klein D J, Giovino G A, Megahed al Effects of a smoker's hotline: results of a 10‐county self‐help trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 199159325–332.
    1. Anderson C M, Zhu S H. Tobacco quitlines: looking back and looking ahead. Tobacco Control 200716(Suppl I)i81–i86.
    1. Fiore M C, Bailey W C, Cohen S alTreating tobacco use and dependence: a clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000
    1. Hopkins D P, Briss P A, Ricard C J, Task Force on Community Preventive Services et al Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med 200120(suppl 2)16–66.
    1. Fiore M C, Croyle R T, Curry S J. Preventing 3 million premature deaths and helping 5 million smokers quit: a national action plan for tobacco cessation. Am J Public Health 200494205–210.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services HHS announces national smoking cessation quitline network. Available at . Accessed 5 Jun 2007
    1. Zhu S H.A survey of quitlines in North America. Presented at the Northern American Conference of Smoking Cessation Quitlines, May 2002. Phoenix, Arizona, USA
    1. North American Quitline Consortium NAQC Survey of Quitlines. 2004. Available at = 5&dbsection = research . Accessed 5 Jun 2007
    1. Keller P A, Bailey L A, Koss K al Organization, financing, promotion, and cost of U.S. quitlines, 2004. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:32–7. Epub 20 Dec 2006
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Telephone quitlines: a resource for development, implementation, and evaluation. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, final ed, Sept, 2004
    1. Ossip‐Klein D J, McIntosh S. Quitlines in North America: evidence base and applications. Am J Med Sci 2003326201–205.
    1. Borland R, Segan C J. The potential of quitlines to increase smoking cessation. Drug Alcohol Rev 20062573–78.
    1. National Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences Tobacco use supplement to the Current Population Survey. 2003. Available at Accessed 29 Nov 2006
    1. SAS Institute Inc SAS 9.1 Language reference: concepts. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc, 2004
    1. Zhu S H, Tedeschi G, Anderson C al Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: What's in a call? JCD 19967593–102.
    1. McAlister A L, Rabius V, Geiger al Telephone assistance for smoking cessation: one year cost effectiveness estimations. Tobacco Control 20041385–86.
    1. American Legacy Foundation and American Cancer Society Great Start quitline counseling protocol. Available at = True&MyPath = /downloads/topics/&MyFile = 9_great_start_protocol.doc . Accessed 3 Jan 2007
    1. Campbell S H, Ossip‐Klein D, Bailey al Minimal dataset for quitlines: a best practice. Tobacco Control 200716(Suppl I)i16–i20.
    1. Zhu S H, Anderson C M, Johnson C al A centralised telephone service for tobacco cessation: the California experience. Tobacco Control 2000948–55.
    1. Miller C L, Wakefield M, Roberts L. Uptake and effectiveness of the Australian telephone Quitline service in the context of a mass media campaign. Tobacco Control 200312(Suppl 2)53–58.
    1. Owen L. Impact of a telephone helpline for smokers who called during a mass media campaign. Tobacco Control 20009148–154.
    1. Chin N P, Ossip‐Klein D J, Padmore al Quitline counselors' perspectives on engaging underserved smokers in telephone counseling. Poster presented at the 13th Annual Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 21–24 Feb 2007. Austin, TX, USA
    1. An L C, Schillo B A, Kavanaugh A al Increased reach and effectiveness of a statewide tobacco quitline after the addition of access to free nicotine replacement therapy. Tobacco Control 200615286–293.
    1. Grigg M, Waa A. Improving effectiveness of smoking cessation helplines through the provision of subsidised nicotine replacement therapy: a longitudinal study. Conference presentation. Wellington New Zealand: The Quit Group and Health Sponsorship Council 2003
    1. Cummings K M, Fix B, Celestino al Reach, efficacy, and cost‐effectiveness of free nicotine medication giveaway programs. J Public Health Management and Practice 20061237–43.
    1. Fellows J L, Bush T, McAfee al Cost effectiveness of the Oregon quitline “free patch initiative”. Tobacco Control 200716(Suppl I)i47–i52.
    1. Rabius V, Pike K J, Geiger al American Cancer Society's QUITLINK: A randomized trial of Internet assistance for smoking cessation. Paper presented at the 13th World Conference on Tobacco or Health, 12–15 Jul 2006. Washington DC, USA

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren