Broccoli consumption interacts with GSTM1 to perturb oncogenic signalling pathways in the prostate

Maria Traka, Amy V Gasper, Antonietta Melchini, James R Bacon, Paul W Needs, Victoria Frost, Andrew Chantry, Alexandra M E Jones, Catharine A Ortori, David A Barrett, Richard Y Ball, Robert D Mills, Richard F Mithen, Maria Traka, Amy V Gasper, Antonietta Melchini, James R Bacon, Paul W Needs, Victoria Frost, Andrew Chantry, Alexandra M E Jones, Catharine A Ortori, David A Barrett, Richard Y Ball, Robert D Mills, Richard F Mithen

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological studies suggest that people who consume more than one portion of cruciferous vegetables per week are at lower risk of both the incidence of prostate cancer and of developing aggressive prostate cancer but there is little understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In this study, we quantify and interpret changes in global gene expression patterns in the human prostate gland before, during and after a 12 month broccoli-rich diet.

Methods and findings: Volunteers were randomly assigned to either a broccoli-rich or a pea-rich diet. After six months there were no differences in gene expression between glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1) positive and null individuals on the pea-rich diet but significant differences between GSTM1 genotypes on the broccoli-rich diet, associated with transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFbeta1) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) signalling pathways. Comparison of biopsies obtained pre and post intervention revealed more changes in gene expression occurred in individuals on a broccoli-rich diet than in those on a pea-rich diet. While there were changes in androgen signalling, regardless of diet, men on the broccoli diet had additional changes to mRNA processing, and TGFbeta1, EGF and insulin signalling. We also provide evidence that sulforaphane (the isothiocyanate derived from 4-methylsuphinylbutyl glucosinolate that accumulates in broccoli) chemically interacts with TGFbeta1, EGF and insulin peptides to form thioureas, and enhances TGFbeta1/Smad-mediated transcription.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that consuming broccoli interacts with GSTM1 genotype to result in complex changes to signalling pathways associated with inflammation and carcinogenesis in the prostate. We propose that these changes may be mediated through the chemical interaction of isothiocyanates with signalling peptides in the plasma. This study provides, for the first time, experimental evidence obtained in humans to support observational studies that diets rich in cruciferous vegetables may reduce the risk of prostate cancer and other chronic disease.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00535977.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Richard Mithen is a co-inventor on patents (US:6340784 and Europe P1069819B1) associated with high glucosinolate broccoli.

Figures

Figure 1. Metabolism of 4-methylsulphinylbutyl glucosinolate and…
Figure 1. Metabolism of 4-methylsulphinylbutyl glucosinolate and sulforaphane.
Upon entry into enterocytes sulforaphane (SF) is rapidly conjugated to glutathione, exported into the systemic circulation and metabolized through the mercapturic acid pathway. Within the low glutathione environment of the plasma the SF-glutathione conjugate may be cleaved, possibly mediated by GSTM1, leading to circulation of free SF in the plasma. This free SF can modify plasma proteins including signalling molecules, such as TGFβ, EGF and insulin.
Figure 2. LDA of an independent prostate…
Figure 2. LDA of an independent prostate microarray data set.
Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) using the benign (B) and malignant (M) TURP prostate tissue for this study as training samples to classify the laser-capture microdissected (LCD) epithelial prostate cell samples (GEO Accession:GDS1439), consisting of benign (Be), primary cancer (PCa) and metastatic cancer (MCa) samples. LDA was performed on a gene list that distinguished the benign and malignant TURP samples as described in Methods. Here, the first linear discriminant (LD1) is shown.
Figure 3. Effect of dietary intervention on…
Figure 3. Effect of dietary intervention on gene transcription.
a, Number of probes that differ between GSTM1 positive and null genotypes (P≤0.005, Welch modified two-sample t-test) in TURP tissue from benign (Ben) and malignant (Mal) prostates, and TRUS-guided biopsy tissue from volunteers at pre-intervention (Pre), post 6 months broccoli-rich diet (Broc) and post 6 months pea-rich diet (Peas). b, Number of probes that differ between pre-intervention TRUS-guided biopsy samples and after 6 months broccoli (6B)-, 6 month pea (6P)-, 12 month broccoli (12B)- and 12 month pea (12 P)-rich diets (P≤0.005, Welch modified two-sample paired t-test). Shading correspond to different fold cutoffs applied. See Table 2 for full details of probe numbers, P-values and median false discovery rates.
Figure 4. LC-MS of insulin incubated with…
Figure 4. LC-MS of insulin incubated with and without SF in human plasma.
Extracted ion LC-MS chromatograms (m/z 1183.6–1184.1) of insulin-SF MH5 5+ in (A) unmodified insulin (20 µg/ml) in human plasma control and (B) human plasma incubated with insulin (20 µg/ml) and 50 µM SF for 4 h at 37°C, showing the appearance of two different insulin-SF conjugates at retention times of 6.46 and 7.08 min. The enhanced product ion (EPI)-MS spectra of these two insulin-SF conjugates are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Enhanced product ion (EPI)-MS spectra…
Figure 5. Enhanced product ion (EPI)-MS spectra of the two insulin-SF conjugates.
MS2 product ion spectra of (A) 6.46 min and (B) 7.08 min retention time peaks from LC-MS analysis of human plasma incubated with bovine insulin and 50 µM SF for 4 h at 37°C. In (A) and (B) m/z 1183.9 corresponds to insulin-SF MH5 5+ and in (A) m/z 235.0 corresponds to Gly-SF, the N-terminal amino acid of insulin A chain and in (B) m/z 325.2 corresponds to Phe-SF, the N-terminal amino acid of insulin B chain.
Figure 6. LC-MS of TGFβ1 incubated with…
Figure 6. LC-MS of TGFβ1 incubated with and without SF.
Extracted ion chromatograms (MS) of precursor masses representing the unmodified N-terminal peptide of TGFβ1 (m/z 768.5) and the modified N-terminal peptide (m/z 877.2) A of m/z 768.2–769.2 from DMSO treated TGFβ1, B of m/z 768.2–769.2 from SF treated TGFβ1, C of m/z 876.7–877.7 DMSO treated TGFβ1 and D of m/z 876.7–877.7 SF treated TGFβ1.
Figure 7. N-terminal modification of TGFβ1 by…
Figure 7. N-terminal modification of TGFβ1 by SF.
MS/MS spectra of m/z 768.7 representing the unmodified N-terminal peptide of TGFβ1 at retention time 23.43 min (A) and m/z 877.2 representing a modified form of TGFβ1 seen only in SF treated samples at retention time 30.85 minutes (B). Note that the y ion series remains the same while the b ion series shifts (Δ) indicating an N-terminal modification of mass 217±0.8 Da. Figure S2 provides an explanation of the mass addition of 217, as opposed to 177.
Figure 8. Activation of TGFβ1/Smad mediated transcription…
Figure 8. Activation of TGFβ1/Smad mediated transcription by SF.
NIH3T3 cells containing a CAGA12-luc plasmid were treated with TGFβ1 alone, TGFβ1 and 10 mM DTT, which disrupts the active TGFβ1 dimer, or TGFβ1 and 2 µM SF. All samples were pre-incubated for 30 minutes and further dialyzed for 4 h so that the final concentration of SF was 34 nM. As an additional negative control cells received no treatment or only 34 nM SF, both of which failed to induce luciferase. Chemiluminescence was normalized to the protein concentration of each sample (for details see Methods). This is a representative experiment of a total of four similar experiments performed. Data shown are mean (s.e.m) of three replicates.

References

    1. Fleshner N, Zlotta AR. Prostate cancer prevention: past, present, and future. Cancer. 2007;110:1889–1899.
    1. Kristal AR, Lampe JW. Brassica vegetables and prostate cancer risk: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer. 2002;42:1–9.
    1. Lin HJ, Probst-Hensch NM, Louie AD, Kau IH, Witte JS, et al. Glutathione transferase null genotype, broccoli, and lower prevalence of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:647–652.
    1. Spitz MR, Duphorne CM, Detry MA, Pillow PC, Amos CI, et al. Dietary intake of isothiocyanates: evidence of a joint effect with glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms in lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:1017–1020.
    1. Wang LI, Giovannucci EL, Hunter D, Neuberg D, Su L, et al. Dietary intake of Cruciferous vegetables, Glutathione S-transferase (GST) polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in a Caucasian population. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:977–985.
    1. Ambrosone CB, McCann SE, Freudenheim JL, Marshall JR, Zhang Y, et al. Breast cancer risk in premenopausal women is inversely associated with consumption of broccoli, a source of isothiocyanates, but is not modified by GST genotype. J Nutr. 2004;134:1134–1138.
    1. Fowke JH, Chung FL, Jin F, Qi D, Cai Q, et al. Urinary isothiocyanate levels, brassica, and human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3980–3986.
    1. van Poppel G, Verhoeven DT, Verhagen H, Goldbohm RA. Brassica vegetables and cancer prevention. Epidemiology and mechanisms. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;472:159–168.
    1. Moore LE, Brennan P, Karami S, Hung RJ, Hsu C, et al. Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms, cruciferous vegetable intake and cancer risk in the Central and Eastern European Kidney Cancer Study. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:1960–1964.
    1. Cornelis MC, El-Sohemy A, Campos H. GSTT1 genotype modifies the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and the risk of myocardial infarction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:752–758.
    1. Joseph MA, Moysich KB, Freudenheim JL, Shields PG, Bowman ED, et al. Cruciferous vegetables, genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases M1 and T1, and prostate cancer risk. Nutr Cancer. 2004;50:206–213.
    1. Kirsh VA, Peters U, Mayne ST, Subar AF, Chatterjee N, et al. Prospective study of fruit and vegetable intake and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1200–1209.
    1. Conaway CC, Getahun SM, Liebes LL, Pusateri DJ, Topham DKW, et al. Disposition of glucosinolates and sulforaphane in humans after ingestion of steamed and fresh broccoli. Nutrition and Cancer-an International Journal. 2000;38:168–178.
    1. Gasper AV, Al-Janobi A, Smith JA, Bacon JR, Fortun P, et al. Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism and metabolism of sulforaphane from standard and high-glucosinolate broccoli. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:1283–1291.
    1. Juge N, Mithen RF, Traka M. Molecular basis for chemoprevention by sulforaphane: a comprehensive review. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:1105–1127.
    1. Zhang Y. Role of glutathione in the accumulation of anticarcinogenic isothiocyanates and their glutathione conjugates by murine hepatoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:1175–1182.
    1. Zhang Y, Callaway EC. High cellular accumulation of sulphoraphane, a dietary anticarcinogen, is followed by rapid transporter-mediated export as a glutathione conjugate. Biochem J. 2002;364:301–307.
    1. Gasper AV, Traka M, Bacon JR, Smith JA, Taylor MA, et al. Consuming broccoli does not induce genes associated with xenobiotic metabolism and cell cycle control in human gastric mucosa. J Nutr. 2007;137:1718–1724.
    1. Mithen R, Faulkner K, Magrath R, Rose P, Williamson G, et al. Development of isothiocyanate-enriched broccoli, and its enhanced ability to induce phase 2 detoxification enzymes in mammalian cells. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;106:727–734.
    1. Sarikamis G, Marquez J, MacCormack R, Bennett RN, Roberts J, et al. High glucosinolate broccoli: a delivery system for sulforaphane. Molecular Breeding. 2006;18:219–228.
    1. Covault J, Abreu C, Kranzler H, Oncken C. Quantitative real-time PCR for gene dosage determinations in microdeletion genotypes. Biotechniques. 2003;35:594–596, 598.
    1. Varambally S, Yu J, Laxman B, Rhodes DR, Mehra R, et al. Integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of prostate cancer reveals signatures of metastatic progression. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:393–406.
    1. Dennler S, Itoh S, Vivien D, ten Dijke P, Huet S, et al. Direct binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to critical TGF beta-inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 gene. Embo J. 1998;17:3091–3100.
    1. R_Development_Core_Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2007. . [accessed Aug 6, 2007]
    1. Joniau S, Goeman L, Roskams T, Lerut E, Oyen R, et al. Effect of nutritional supplement challenge in patients with isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Urology. 2007;69:1102–1106.
    1. Rawel HM, Kroll J, Schroder I. In vitro enzymatic digestion of benzyl- and phenylisothiocyanate-derivatized food proteins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1998;46:5103–5109.
    1. Rawel HM, Kroll J, Riese-Schneider B, Haebel S. Physicochemical and enzymatic properties of benzyl isothiocyanate derivatized proteinases. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1998;46:5043–5051.
    1. Siegel PM, Massague J. Cytostatic and apoptotic actions of TGF-beta in homeostasis and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:807–821.
    1. Bhowmick NA, Chytil A, Plieth D, Gorska AE, Dumont N, et al. TGF-beta signaling in fibroblasts modulates the oncogenic potential of adjacent epithelia. Science. 2004;303:848–851.
    1. Inman GJ, Nicolas FJ, Hill CS. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Smads 2, 3, and 4 permits sensing of TGF-beta receptor activity. Mol Cell. 2002;10:283–294.
    1. Bello-DeOcampo D, Tindall DJ. TGF-betal/Smad signaling in prostate cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 2003;4:197–207.
    1. Zhu B, Kyprianou N. Transforming growth factor beta and prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 2005;126:157–173.
    1. Lorenzo GD, Bianco R, Tortora G, Ciardiello F. Involvement of growth factor receptors of the epidermal growth factor receptor family in prostate cancer development and progression to androgen independence. Clin Prostate Cancer. 2003;2:50–57.
    1. Mimeault M, Batra SK. Recent advances on multiple tumorigenic cascades involved in prostatic cancer progression and targeting therapies. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:1–22.
    1. Monti S, Proietti-Pannunzi L, Sciarra A, Lolli F, Falasca P, et al. The IGF axis in prostate cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:719–727.
    1. Normanno N, De Luca A, Bianco C, Strizzi L, Mancino M, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene. 2006;366:2–16.
    1. Pollak MN, Schernhammer ES, Hankinson SE. Insulin-like growth factors and neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:505–518.
    1. Bujak M, Frangogiannis NG. The role of TGF-beta signaling in myocardial infarction and cardiac remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;74:184–195.
    1. Hinman A, Chuang HH, Bautista DM, Julius D. TRP channel activation by reversible covalent modification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:19564–19568.
    1. Macpherson LJ, Dubin AE, Evans MJ, Marr F, Schultz PG, et al. Noxious compounds activate TRPA1 ion channels through covalent modification of cysteines. Nature. 2007;445:541–545.
    1. Ao M, Williams K, Bhowmick NA, Hayward SW. Transforming growth factor-beta promotes invasion in tumorigenic but not in nontumorigenic human prostatic epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8007–8016.
    1. Ao M, Franco OE, Park D, Raman D, Williams K, et al. Cross-talk between paracrine-acting cytokine and chemokine pathways promotes malignancy in benign human prostatic epithelium. Cancer Res. 2007;67:4244–4253.
    1. Kim JH, Xu C, Keum YS, Reddy B, Conney A, et al. Inhibition of EGFR signaling in human prostate cancer PC-3 cells by combination treatment with beta-phenylethyl isothiocyanate and curcumin. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:475–482.
    1. Agalliu I, Langeberg WJ, Lampe JW, Salinas CA, Stanford JL. Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in middle-aged men. Prostate. 2005;66:146–156.
    1. Srivastava DS, Mandhani A, Mittal B, Mittal RD. Genetic polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase genes (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) and susceptibility to prostate cancer in Northern India. BJU Int. 2005;95:170–173.
    1. Komiya Y, Tsukino H, Nakao H, Kuroda Y, Imai H, et al. Human glutathione S-transferase A1, T1, M1, and P1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to prostate cancer in the Japanese population. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005;131:238–242.
    1. Ntais C, Polycarpou A, Ioannidis JP. Association of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms with the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:176–181.
    1. Zhang Y, Kolm RH, Mannervik B, Talalay P. Reversible conjugation of isothiocyanates with glutathione catalyzed by human glutathione transferases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;206:748–755.
    1. Nijhoff WA, Mulder TP, Verhagen H, van Poppel G, Peters WH. Effects of consumption of brussels sprouts on plasma and urinary glutathione S-transferase class-alpha and -pi in humans. Carcinogenesis. 1995;16:955–957.
    1. Lampe JW, Chen C, Li S, Prunty J, Grate MT, et al. Modulation of human glutathione S-transferases by botanically defined vegetable diets. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:787–793.
    1. Meyer DJ, Crease DJ, Ketterer B. Forward and reverse catalysis and product sequestration by human glutathione S-transferases in the reaction of GSH with dietary aralkyl isothiocyanates. Biochem J. 1995;306:565–569.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren