The Impact of Low-dose Gliclazide on the Incretin Effect and Indices of Beta-cell Function

Ruth L M Cordiner, Andrea Mari, Andrea Tura, Ewan R Pearson, Ruth L M Cordiner, Andrea Mari, Andrea Tura, Ewan R Pearson

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Studies in permanent neonatal diabetes suggest that sulphonylureas lower blood glucose without causing hypoglycemia, in part by augmenting the incretin effect. This mechanism has not previously been attributed to sulphonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We therefore aimed to evaluate the impact of low-dose gliclazide on beta-cell function and incretin action in patients with T2DM.

Methods: Paired oral glucose tolerance tests and isoglycemic infusions were performed to evaluate the difference in the classical incretin effect in the presence and absence of low-dose gliclazide in 16 subjects with T2DM (hemoglobin A1c < 64 mmol/mol, 8.0%) treated with diet or metformin monotherapy. Beta-cell function modeling was undertaken to describe the relationship between insulin secretion and glucose concentration.

Results: A single dose of 20 mg gliclazide reduced mean glucose during the oral glucose tolerance test from 12.01 ± 0.56 to 10.82 ± 0.5mmol/l [P = 0.0006; mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)]. The classical incretin effect was augmented by 20 mg gliclazide, from 35.5% (lower quartile 27.3, upper quartile 61.2) to 54.99% (34.8, 72.8; P = 0.049). Gliclazide increased beta-cell glucose sensitivity by 46% [control 22.61 ± 3.94, gliclazide 33.11 ± 7.83 (P = 0.01)] as well as late-phase incretin potentiation [control 0.92 ± 0.05, gliclazide 1.285 ± 0.14 (P = 0.038)].

Conclusions/interpretation: Low-dose gliclazide reduces plasma glucose in response to oral glucose load, with concomitant augmentation of the classical incretin effect. Beta-cell modeling shows that low plasma concentrations of gliclazide potentiate late-phase insulin secretion and increase glucose sensitivity by 50%. Further studies are merited to explore whether low-dose gliclazide, by enhancing incretin action, could effectively lower blood glucose without risk of hypoglycemia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03705195.

Keywords: GIP; GLP-1; KATP channel; beta-cell modeling; beta-cell physiology; gliclazide; incretin effect; incretins; sulphonylureas; type 2 diabetes.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design comprising paired OGTT and IIGI in the presence (blue) and absence (red) of low-dose gliclazide.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean (SEM) plasma glucose (A) and gliclazide (B) and median (interquartile range) insulin (C) and C-peptide (D) concentrations during OGTT (solid lines) and IIGI (dashed lines) in control (red lines) and gliclazide intervention visits (blue lines) in phase 2 (n = 16). For interventions involving gliclazide (B), low-dose gliclazide suspension was administered 60 min prior to the start of the OGTT and IIGI.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Linear regression analysis of mean insulin secretion against mean plasma glucose levels from phase 2 (n = 16) shows insulin secretion to be significantly augmented in response to oral glucose load (A) compared to intravenous glucose (B) following the addition of low-dose gliclazide (blue lines) vs control (red lines). (A) Slope increased from 33.6 to 80.97 (P < 0.0001), and (B) slope increased from 13.63 to 25.2 (P < 0.01).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Incretin secretion profiles 0 to 240 min in response to (A) oral glucose and (B) intravenous glucose (mean ± SEM) in phase 2 (n = 16).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Incretin potentiation profiles from 0 to 240 min for control (red) and gliclazide intervention (blue) in phase 2 (n = 16).

References

    1. Nauck M, Stöckmann F, Ebert R, Creutzfeldt W. Reduced incretin effect in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. Diabetologia. 1986;29(1):46-52.
    1. Holst JJ. The incretin system in healthy humans: The role of GIP and GLP-1. Metabolism. 2019;96:46-55.
    1. Nauck MA, Meier JJ. Incretin hormones: their role in health and disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(Suppl 1):5-21.
    1. Henquin JC. Regulation of insulin secretion: a matter of phase control and amplitude modulation. Diabetologia. 2009;52(5):739-751.
    1. Gribble FM, Tucker SJ, Seino S, Ashcroft FM. Tissue specificity of sulfonylureas: studies on cloned cardiac and beta-cell K(ATP) channels. Diabetes. 1998;47(9):1412-1418.
    1. Holst JJ, Vilsbøll T, Deacon CF. The incretin system and its role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;297(1-2):127-136.
    1. Gloyn AL, Hashim Y, Ashcroft SJ, Ashfield R, Wiltshire S, Turner RC; UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 53) . Association studies of variants in promoter and coding regions of beta-cell ATP-sensitive K-channel genes SUR1 and Kir6.2 with type 2 diabetes mellitus (UKPDS 53). Diabet Med. 2001;18(3):206-212.
    1. Gloyn AL, Pearson ER, Antcliff JF, et al. . Activating mutations in the gene encoding the ATP-sensitive potassium-channel subunit Kir6.2 and permanent neonatal diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(18):1838-1849.
    1. Hattersley AT, Ashcroft FM. Activating mutations in Kir6.2 and neonatal diabetes: new clinical syndromes, new scientific insights, and new therapy. Diabetes. 2005;54(9):2503-2513.
    1. Christensen AS, Hædersdal S, Storgaard H, et al. . GIP and GLP-1 potentiate sulfonylurea-induced insulin secretion in hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α Mutation carriers. Diabetes. 2020;69(9):1989-2002.
    1. Pearson ER, Flechtner I, Njølstad PR, et al. ; Neonatal Diabetes International Collaborative Group . Switching from insulin to oral sulfonylureas in patients with diabetes due to Kir6.2 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(5):467-477.
    1. Pearson ER. Diabetes: is there a future for pharmacogenomics guided treatment? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;106(2):329-337.
    1. Kolligs F, Fehmann HC, Göke R, Göke B. Reduction of the incretin effect in rats by the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor antagonist exendin (9-39) amide. Diabetes. 1995;44(1):16-19.
    1. Knop FK. The incretin effect, how to measure it?
    1. Nauck MA, Homberger E, Siegel EG, et al. . Incretin effects of increasing glucose loads in man calculated from venous insulin and C-peptide responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63(2):492-498.
    1. Tura A, Muscelli E, Gastaldelli A, Ferrannini E, Mari A. Altered pattern of the incretin effect as assessed by modelling in individuals with glucose tolerance ranging from normal to diabetic. Diabetologia. 2014;57(6):1199-1203.
    1. Mari A, Tura A, Gastaldelli A, Ferrannini E. Assessing insulin secretion by modeling in multiple-meal tests: role of potentiation. Diabetes. 2002;51(Suppl 1):S221-S226.
    1. Aaboe K, Knop FK, Vilsboll T, et al. . KATP channel closure ameliorates the impaired insulinotropic effect of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(2):603-608.
    1. Mari A, Schmitz O, Gastaldelli A, Oestergaard T, Nyholm B, Ferrannini E. Meal and oral glucose tests for assessment of beta-cell function: modeling analysis in normal subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002;283(6):E1159-E1166.
    1. Mari A, Ferrannini E. Beta-cell function assessment from modelling of oral tests: an effective approach. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10 Suppl 4:77-87.
    1. Mari A, Bagger JI, Ferrannini E, Holst JJ, Knop FK, Vilsbøll T. Mechanisms of the incretin effect in subjects with normal glucose tolerance and patients with type 2 diabetes. PloS One. 2013;8(9):e73154.
    1. Pearson ER, Starkey BJ, Powell RJ, Gribble FM, Clark PM, Hattersley AT. Genetic cause of hyperglycaemia and response to treatment in diabetes. Lancet. 2003;362(9392):1275-1281.
    1. Miwa S, Watada H, Ohmura C, Tanaka Y, Kawamori R. Efficacy and safety of once daily gliclazide (20 mg/day) compared with nateglinide. Endocr J. 2004;51(4):393-398.
    1. de Heer J, Holst JJ. Sulfonylurea compounds uncouple the glucose dependence of the insulinotropic effect of glucagon-like peptide 1. Diabetes. 2007;56(2):438-443.
    1. Rorsman P, Ashcroft FM. Pancreatic β-cell electrical activity and insulin secretion: of mice and men. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(1):117-214.
    1. Grespan E, Giorgino T, Arslanian S, Natali A, Ferrannini E, Mari A. Defective amplifying pathway of β-cell secretory response to glucose in type 2 diabetes: integrated modeling of in vitro and in vivo evidence. Diabetes. 2018;67(3):496-506.
    1. An Z, Prigeon RL, D’Alessio DA. Improved glycemic control enhances the incretin effect in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(12):4702-4708.
    1. Højberg PV, Vilsbøll T, Zander M, et al. . Four weeks of near-normalization of blood glucose has no effect on postprandial GLP-1 and GIP secretion, but augments pancreatic B-cell responsiveness to a meal in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2008;25(11):1268-1275.
    1. Rojanasthien N, Autsavakitipong T, Kumsorn B, Manorot M, Teekachunhatean S. Bioequivalence study of modified-release gliclazide tablets in healthy volunteers. ISRN Pharmacol. 2012;2012:375134.
    1. McGavin JK, Perry CM, Goa KL. Gliclazide modified release. Drugs. 2002;62(9):1357-1364; discussion 1365-1356.
    1. Satoh J, Takahashi K, Takizawa Y, et al. . Secondary sulfonylurea failure: comparison of period until insulin treatment between diabetic patients treated with gliclazide and glibenclamide. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;70(3):291-297.
    1. Schernthaner G, Grimaldi A, Di Mario U, et al. . GUIDE study: double-blind comparison of once-daily gliclazide MR and glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2004;34(8):535-542.
    1. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Glibenclamide 5 mg tablets. Published 2015. Accessed July 2020.
    1. Taylor PJ, Thompson CH, Brinkworth GD. Effectiveness and acceptability of continuous glucose monitoring for type 2 diabetes management: a narrative review. J Diabetes Investig. 2018;9(4):713-725.
    1. Knop FK, Vilsbøll T, Højberg PV, et al. . Reduced incretin effect in type 2 diabetes: cause or consequence of the diabetic state? Diabetes. 2007;56(8):1951-1959.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren