Impact of a stepwise introduction of smoke-free legislation on the rate of preterm births: analysis of routinely collected birth data

Bianca Cox, Evelyne Martens, Benoit Nemery, Jaco Vangronsveld, Tim S Nawrot, Bianca Cox, Evelyne Martens, Benoit Nemery, Jaco Vangronsveld, Tim S Nawrot

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the incidence of preterm delivery in the Belgian population after implementation of smoke-free legislation in three phases (in public places and most workplaces January 2006, in restaurants January 2007, and in bars serving food January 2010).

Design: Logistic regression analyses on routinely collected birth data from January 2002 to December 2011.

Setting: Flanders, Belgium.

Population: All live born singleton births delivered at 24-44 weeks of gestation (n = 606,877, with n = 448,520 spontaneous deliveries).

Main outcome measures: Preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks).

Results: We found reductions in the risk of preterm birth after the introduction of each phase of the smoking ban. No decreasing trend was evident in the years or months before the bans. We observed a step change in the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery of -3.13% (95% CI -4.37% to -1.87%; P<0.01) on 1 January 2007 (ban on smoking in restaurants), and an annual slope change of -2.65% (-5.11% to -0.13%; P=0.04) after 1 January 2010 (ban on smoking in bars serving food). The analysis for all births gave similar results: a step change of -3.18% (-5.38% to -0.94%; P<0.01) on 1 January 2007, and an annual slope change of -3.50% (-6.35% to -0.57%; P=0.02) after 1 January 2010. These changes could not be explained by personal factors (infant sex, maternal age, parity, socioeconomic status, national origin, level of urbanisation); time related factors (underlying trends, month of the year, day of the week); or population related factors (public holidays, influenza epidemics, and short term changes in apparent temperature and particulate air pollution).

Conclusion: Our study shows a consistent pattern of reduction in the risk of preterm delivery with successive population interventions to restrict smoking. This finding is not definitive but it supports the notion that smoking bans have public health benefits from early life.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4790817/bin/coxb004746.f1_default.jpg
Time trend in rate of spontaneous preterm deliveries (with 95% confidence interval) in Flanders, 2002–11, with vertical lines indicating stepwise implementation of smoke-free legislation

References

    1. Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 1987;65:663-737.
    1. Windham GC, Hopkins B, Fenster L, Swan SH. Prenatal active or passive tobacco smoke exposure and the risk of preterm delivery or low birth weight. Epidemiology 2000;11:427-33.
    1. Fantuzzi G, Aggazzotti G, Righi E, Facchinetti F, Bertucci E, Kanitz S, et al. Preterm delivery and exposure to active and passive smoking during pregnancy: a case-control study from Italy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:194-200.
    1. Shah NR, Bracken MB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on the association between maternal cigarette smoking and preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:465-72.
    1. Ahluwalia IB, Grummer-Strawn L, Scanlon KS. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and birth outcome: increased effects on pregnant women aged 30 years or older. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:42-7.
    1. Crane JMG, Keough M, Murphy P, Burrage L, Hutchens D. Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2011;118:865-71.
    1. El-Mohandes AAE, Kiely M, Blake SM, Gantz MG, El-Khorazaty MN. An intervention to reduce environmental tobacco smoke exposure improves pregnancy outcomes. Pediatrics 2010;125:721-8.
    1. Hanke W, Kalinka J, Florek E, Sobala W. Passive smoking and pregnancy outcome in central Poland. Hum Exp Toxicol 1999;18:265-71.
    1. Jaakkola JJ, Jaakkola N, Zahlsen K. Fetal growth and length of gestation in relation to prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke assessed by hair nicotine concentration. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109:557-61.
    1. Kharrazi M, DeLorenze GN, Kaufman FL, Eskenazi B, Bernert JTJ, Graham S, et al. Environmental tobacco smoke and pregnancy outcome. Epidemiology 2004;15.
    1. Leonardi-Bee J, Smyth A, Britton J, Coleman T. Environmental tobacco smoke and fetal health: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:F351-F361.
    1. Lee BE, Hong YC, Park H, Lee JT, Kim YJ, Kim JY, et al. Maternal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and pregnancy outcomes in prospective cohort study: Isee-264. Epidemiology 2003;14.
    1. Ashford K, Hahn E, Hall L, Rayens M, Noland M, Ferguson J. The effects of prenatal secondhand smoke exposure on preterm birth and neonatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010;39:525-35.
    1. Barker DJP, Godfrey KM, Gluckman PD, Harding JE, Owens JA, Robinson JS. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 1993;341:938-41.
    1. McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med 1985;312:82-90.
    1. Crump C, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Winkleby MA. Gestational age at birth and mortality in young adulthood. JAMA 2011;306:1233-40.
    1. Engle WA, Tomashek KM, Wallman C, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. “Late-preterm” infants: a population at risk. Pediatrics 2007;120:1390-401.
    1. McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Neonatal mortality and morbidity rates in late preterm births compared with births at term. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:35-41.
    1. Barone-Adesi F, Vizzini L, Merletti F, Richiardi L. Short-term effects of Italian smoking regulation on rates of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal 2006;27:2468-72.
    1. Meyers DG, Neuberger JS, He J. Cardiovascular effect of bans on smoking in public places: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1249-55.
    1. Sargent R, Shepard R, Glantz S. Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: before and after study. BMJ 2004;328:977-80.
    1. Sims M, Maxwell R, Bauld L, Gilmore A. Short term impact of smoke-free legislation in England: retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction. BMJ 2010;340:c2161.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reduced hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction after implementation of a smoke-free ordinance-City of Pueblo, Colorado, 2002-2006. JAMA 2009;301:480-3.
    1. Kabir Z, Clarke V, Conroy R, McNamee E, Daly S, Clancy L. Low birthweight and preterm birth rates 1 year before and after the Irish workplace smoking ban. BJOG 2009;116:1782-7.
    1. Mackay DF, Nelson SM, Haw SJ, Pell JP. Impact of Scotland’s smoke-free legislation on pregnancy complications: retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001175.
    1. Vlaamse Liga tegen Kanker. Gedwongen meeroken—De wet [Passive smoking—the law]. 2011. .
    1. Keirse MJNC, Hanssens M, Devlieger H. Trends in preterm births in Flanders, Belgium, from 1991 to 2002. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009;23:522-32.
    1. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:240-4.
    1. Van Hecke E, Halleux JM, Decroly JM, Mérenne-Schoumaker B. Woonkernen en stadsgewesten in een verstedelijkt België. Sociaal-economische enquête 2001 monografieën. [Residential and urban areas in an urbanized Belgium. Socioeconomic survey 2001 monographs]. 2009. .
    1. Dexia Bank NV. Sociaaleconomische typologie van de gemeenten [Socioeconomic typology of the municipalities]. 2007. .
    1. Van Casteren V, Mertens K, Antoine J, Wanyama S, Thomas I, Bossuyt N. Clinical surveillance of the Influenza A(H1N1)2009 pandemic through the network of sentinel general practitioners. Arch Public Health 2010;68:62-7.
    1. Kalkstein LS, Valimont KM. An evaluation of summer discomfort in the United States using a relative climatological index. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 1986;7:842-8.
    1. Janssen S, Dumont G, Fierens F, Mensink C. Spatial interpolation of air pollution measurements using CORINE land cover data. Atmos Environ 2008;42:4884-903.
    1. Harrel FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer, 2001.
    1. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:295-300.
    1. Lang J, Lieberman E, Cohen A. A comparison of risk factors for preterm labor and term small-for-gestational-age birth. Epidemiology 1996;7:369-76.
    1. Villar J, Khoury MJ, Finucane FF, Delgado HL. Differences in the epidemiology of prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1986;14:307-20.
    1. Basu R, Malig B, Ostro BD. High ambient temperature and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol 2010;172:1108-17.
    1. Dadvand P, Basagaña X, Sartini C, Figueras F, Vrijheid M, de Nazelle A, et al. Climate extremes and the length of gestation. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119:1449-53.
    1. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, Burnett R. Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:1773-8.
    1. Sagiv S, Mendola P, Loomis D, Herring A, Neas L, Savitz D, et al. A time series analysis of air pollution and preterm birth in Pennsylvania, 1997-2001. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:602-6.
    1. Xu X, Ding H, Wang X. Acute effects of total suspended particles and sulfur dioxides on preterm delivery: a community-based cohort study. Arch Environ Health 1995;50:407-15.
    1. Nawrot TS, Perez L, Künzli N, Munters E, Nemery B. Public health importance of triggers of myocardial infarction: a comparative risk assessment. Lancet 2011;377:732-40.
    1. Mackay D, Haw S, Ayres JG, Fischbacher C, Pell JP. Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for childhood asthma. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1139-45.
    1. Schick S, Glantz S. Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke. Tob Control 2005;14:396-404.
    1. Haw SJ, Gruer L. Changes in exposure of adult non-smokers to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey. BMJ 2007;335:549..
    1. Mons U, Nagelhout GE, Allwright S, Guignard R, van den Putte B, Willemsen MC, et al. Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys. Tob Control 2012;[epub ahead of print].
    1. Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ 2002;325:188.
    1. Gallus S, Zuccaro P, Colombo P, Apolone G, Pacifici R, Garattini S, et al. Smoking in Italy 2005-2006: Effects of a comprehensive National Tobacco Regulation. Prev Med 2007;45:198-201.
    1. Cancer Research UK Press release. Smoking ban triggered the biggest fall in smoking ever seen in England. 30-6-2008. .
    1. Charrier L, Serafini P, Giordano L, Zotti CM. Smoking habits in Italian pregnant women: any changes after the ban? J Public Health Policy 2010;31:51-8.
    1. Charafeddine R, Demarest S, Drieskens S, Gisle L, Tafforeau J, Van der Heyden J. Health Interview Survey, Belgium, 1997 - 2001 - 2004 - 2008. Health interview survey interactive analysis. Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium. 2012. .
    1. Hoppenbrouwers K, Roelants M, Guérin C, Van Leeuwen K, Desoete A, Wiersema R. Als mama rookt, rookt de baby mee: sociaaleconomische indicatoren en perinatale gezondheidseffecten van gedwongen blootstelling van een Vlaamse geboortecohorte aan tabaksrook tijdens de zwangerschap in de eerste levensweken [If mom smokes, the baby smokes: socio-economic indicators and perinatal health effects of exposure to tobacco smoke from a Flemish birth cohort during pregnancy in the first weeks of life]. Steunpunt beleidsrelevant onderzoek SWVG: feiten en cijfers 2011;7.
    1. Sheldon T. Dutch groups appeal against irresponsible plan to exempt small cafés from smoking ban. BMJ 2010;341:c5503.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren