Serum cystatin C predicts vancomycin trough levels better than serum creatinine in hospitalized patients: a cohort study

Erin N Frazee, Andrew D Rule, Sandra M Herrmann, Kianoush B Kashani, Nelson Leung, Abinash Virk, Nikolay Voskoboev, John C Lieske, Erin N Frazee, Andrew D Rule, Sandra M Herrmann, Kianoush B Kashani, Nelson Leung, Abinash Virk, Nikolay Voskoboev, John C Lieske

Abstract

Introduction: Serum cystatin C can improve glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation over creatinine alone, but whether this translates into clinically relevant improvements in drug dosing is unclear.

Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled adults receiving scheduled intravenous vancomycin while hospitalized at the Mayo Clinic in 2012. Vancomycin dosing was based on weight, serum creatinine with the Cockcroft-Gault equation, and clinical judgment. Cystatin C was later assayed from the stored serum used for the creatinine-based dosing. Vancomycin trough prediction models were developed by using factors available at therapy initiation. Residuals from each model were used to predict the proportion of patients who would have achieved the target trough with the model compared with that observed with usual care.

Results: Of 173 patients enrolled, only 35 (20%) had a trough vancomycin level within their target range (10 to 15 mg/L or 15 to 20 mg/L). Cystatin C-inclusive models better predicted vancomycin troughs than models based upon serum creatinine alone, although both were an improvement over usual care. The optimal model used estimated GFR by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborative (CKD-EPI) creatinine-cystatin C equation (R(2) = 0.580). This model is expected to yield 54% (95% confidence interval 45% to 61%) target trough attainment (P <0.001 compared with the 20% with usual care).

Conclusions: Vancomycin dosing based on standard care with Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance yielded poor trough achievement. The developed dosing model with estimated GFR from CKD-EPIcreatinine-cystatin C could yield a 2.5-fold increase in target trough achievement compared with current clinical practice. Although this study is promising, prospective validation of this or similar cystatin C-inclusive dosing models is warranted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient enrollment flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the study protocol. Factors available at baseline, prior to the first vancomycin dose, were used to develop vancomycin trough level prediction models. Steady-state vancomycin trough adequacy, prior to the fourth dose, was determined according to individualized target ranges based on suspected or documented source(s) of infection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graphical representation of the expected improvement in vancomycin trough target levels with application of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborative models. Predicted trough for each model (x-axis) versus actual trough or versus the expected trough when targeting 15 mg/L with the model (y-axis) for model 5 (a,b), model 6 (c,d), and model 7 (e,f). The improvement in the proportion that would have an expected trough of 10 to 20 mg/L for each model is also shown. The more refined analysis targeting a trough of 10 to 15 or 15 to 20 mg/L (depending on the clinical indication for treatment) is presented in the text and tables.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association between vancomycin trough concentrations and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with CKD-EPIcreatinine-cystatin C. A significant inverse relationship exists between GFR and vancomycin troughs (P <0.0001). Patients with a GFR of more than 120 mL/min rarely reached the minimum acceptable trough of 10 mg/L. CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborative.

References

    1. Levine DP. Vancomycin: a history. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:S5–S12.
    1. Kirst HA, Thompson DG, Nicas TI. Historical yearly usage of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1303–1304.
    1. Ena J, Dick RW, Jones RN, Wenzel RP. The epidemiology of intravenous vancomycin usage in a university hospital. A 10-year study. JAMA. 1993;269:598–602.
    1. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Kaplan SL, Karchmer AW, Levine DP, Murray BE, Rybak MJ, Talan DA, Chambers HF. Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:285–292.
    1. Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R Jr, Craig W, Billeter M, Dalovisio JR, Levine DP. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.
    1. Wunderink RG, Niederman MS, Kollef MH, Shorr AF, Kunkel MJ, Baruch A, McGee WT, Reisman A, Chastre J. Linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, controlled study. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:621–629.
    1. Rybak MJ. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:S35–S39.
    1. Kullar R, Leonard SN, Davis SL, Delgado G Jr, Pogue JM, Wahby KA, Falcione B, Rybak MJ. Validation of the effectiveness of a vancomycin nomogram in achieving target trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L suggested by the vancomycin consensus guidelines. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31:441–448.
    1. Moellering RC Jr, Krogstad DJ, Greenblatt DJ. Vancomycin therapy in patients with impaired renal function: a nomogram for dosage. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94:343–346.
    1. Wilson J, Estes L. Mayo Clinic Antimicrobial Therapy: Quick Guide. 2. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2012.
    1. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.
    1. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, Kusek JW, Manzi J, Van Lente F, Zhang YL, Coresh J, Levey AS. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. [Erratum appears in N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 16;367:681] N Engl J Med. 2012;367:20–29.
    1. Lameire N, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R. Acute renal problems in the critically ill cancer patient. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:635–646.
    1. Doi K, Yuen PS, Eisner C, Hu X, Leelahavanichkul A, Schnermann J, Star RA. Reduced production of creatinine limits its use as marker of kidney injury in sepsis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1217–1221.
    1. Bucaloiu ID, Perkins RM, DiFilippo W, Yahya T, Norfolk E. Acute kidney injury in the critically ill, morbidly obese patient: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in a unique patient population. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26:607–624.
    1. Salazar DE, Corcoran GB. Predicting creatinine clearance and renal drug clearance in obese patients from estimated fat-free body mass. Am J Med. 1988;84:1053–1060.
    1. Sherman DS, Fish DN, Teitelbaum I. Assessing renal function in cirrhotic patients: problems and pitfalls. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:269–278.
    1. Rule AD, Bailey KR, Schwartz GL, Khosla S, Lieske JC, Melton LJ 3rd. For estimating creatinine clearance measuring muscle mass gives better results than those based on demographics. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1071–1078.
    1. Cocchetto DM, Tschanz C, Bjornsson TD. Decreased rate of creatinine production in patients with hepatic disease: implications for estimation of creatinine clearance. Ther Drug Monit. 1983;5:161–168.
    1. Eriksen BO, Mathisen UD, Melsom T, Ingebretsen OC, Jenssen TG, Njolstad I, Solbu MD, Toft I. The role of cystatin C in improving GFR estimation in the general population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59:32–40.
    1. Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Bergert J, Larson TS. Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations. Kidney Int. 2006;69:399–405.
    1. Schaeffner ES, Ebert N, Delanaye P, Frei U, Gaedeke J, Jakob O, Kuhlmann MK, Schuchardt M, Tolle M, Ziebig R, van der Giet M, Martus P. Two novel equations to estimate kidney function in persons aged 70 years or older. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:471–481.
    1. Anderson AH, Yang W, Hsu CY, Joffe MM, Leonard MB, Xie D, Chen J, Greene T, Jaar BG, Kao P, Kusek JW, Landis JR, Lash JP, Townsend RR, Weir MR, Feldman HI. Estimating GFR among participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60:250–261.
    1. Delanaye P, Cavalier E, Morel J, Mehdi M, Maillard N, Claisse G, Lambermont B, Dubois BE, Damas P, Krzesinski JM, Lautrette A, Mariat C. Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:9.
    1. Hermida J, Tutor JC. Serum cystatin C for the prediction of glomerular filtration rate with regard to the dose adjustment of amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, and vancomycin. Ther Drug Monit. 2006;28:326–331.
    1. Tanaka A, Aiba T, Otsuka T, Suemaru K, Nishimiya T, Inoue T, Murase M, Kurosaki Y, Araki H. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin using serum cystatin C as a marker of renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:778–782.
    1. Tanaka A, Suemaru K, Otsuka T, Ido K, Nishimiya T, Sakai I, Hasegawa H, Inoue T, Murase M, Yasukawa M, Araki H. Estimation of the initial dose setting of vancomycin therapy with use of cystatin C as a new marker of renal function. Ther Drug Monit. 2007;29:261–264.
    1. Tanaka A, Suemaru K, Otsuka T, Ido K, Nishimiya T, Sakai I, Hasegawa H, Yasukawa M, Inoue T, Murase M, Araki H. Hoek’s formula, a cystatin C-based prediction formula for determining the glomerular filtration rate, is the most effective method for original adjusting the dosage of vancomycin. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;45:592–597.
    1. Okamoto G, Sakamoto T, Kimura M, Ukishima Y, Sonoda A, Mori N, Kato Y, Maeda T, Kagawa Y. Serum cystatin C as a better marker of vancomycin clearance than serum creatinine in elderly patients. Clin Biochem. 2007;40:485–490.
    1. Kees MG, Hilpert JW, Gnewuch C, Kees F, Voegeler S. Clearance of vancomycin during continuous infusion in intensive care unit patients: correlation with measured and estimated creatinine clearance and serum cystatin C. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36:545–548.
    1. Schuck O, Teplan V, Sibova J, Stollova M. Predicting the glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine, serum cystatin C and the Cockcroft and Gault formula with regard to drug dosage adjustment. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;42:93–97.
    1. Melton LJ 3rd. The threat to medical-records research. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1466–1470.
    1. Kellum JA, Lameire N. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–138.
    1. Grace E. Altered vancomycin pharmacokinetics in obese and morbidly obese patients: what we have learned over the past 30 years. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:1305–1310.
    1. Vancomycin Full Prescribing Information. Lake Forest, IL: Hospira, Inc; 2011. pp. 1–8.
    1. Blirup-Jensen S, Grubb A, Lindstrom V, Schmidt C, Althaus H. Standardization of Cystatin C: development of primary and secondary reference preparations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2008;241:67–70.
    1. Du Bois D, Du Bois E. Clinical calorimetry: Tenth paper. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med. 1916;17:863–871.
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:1–150.
    1. Chung JY, Jin SJ, Yoon JH, Song YG. Serum cystatin C is a major predictor of vancomycin clearance in a population pharmacokinetic analysis of patients with normal serum creatinine concentrations. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28:48–54.
    1. Minkute R, Briedis V, Steponaviciute R, Vitkauskiene A, Maciulaitis R. Augmented renal clearance - an evolving risk factor to consider during the treatment with vancomycin. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013;38:462–467.
    1. Truong J, Levkovich BJ, Padiglione AA. Simple approach to improving vancomycin dosing in intensive care: a standardised loading dose results in earlier therapeutic levels. Intern Med J. 2012;42:23–29.
    1. Inker LA, Okparavero A. Cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate: prospects and limitations. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2011;20:631–639.
    1. Rule AD, Bailey KR, Lieske JC, Peyser PA, Turner ST. Estimating the glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine is better than from cystatin C for evaluating risk factors associated with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;83:1169–1176.
    1. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Li L, Beck GJ, Joffe MM, Froissart M, Kusek JW, Zhang YL, Coresh J, Levey AS. Factors other than glomerular filtration rate affect serum cystatin C levels. Kidney Int. 2009;75:652–660.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren