Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis

Ola Rolfson, Eric Bohm, Patricia Franklin, Stephen Lyman, Geke Denissen, Jill Dawson, Jennifer Dunn, Kate Eresian Chenok, Michael Dunbar, Søren Overgaard, Göran Garellick, Anne Lübbeke, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries, Ola Rolfson, Eric Bohm, Patricia Franklin, Stephen Lyman, Geke Denissen, Jill Dawson, Jennifer Dunn, Kate Eresian Chenok, Michael Dunbar, Søren Overgaard, Göran Garellick, Anne Lübbeke, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries

Abstract

- The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group have evaluated and recommended best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty registries. The 2 generic PROMs in common use are the Short Form health surveys (SF-36 or SF-12) and EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D). The Working Group recommends that registries should choose specific PROMs that have been appropriately developed with good measurement properties for arthroplasty patients. The Working Group recommend the use of a 1-item pain question ("During the past 4 weeks, how would you describe the pain you usually have in your [right/left] [hip/knee]?"; response: none, very mild, mild, moderate, or severe) and a single-item satisfaction outcome ("How satisfied are you with your [right/left] [hip/knee] replacement?"; response: very unsatisfied, dissatisfied, neutral, satisfied, or very satisfied). Survey logistics include patient instructions, paper- and electronic-based data collection, reminders for follow-up, centralized as opposed to hospital-based follow-up, sample size, patient- or joint-specific evaluation, collection intervals, frequency of response, missing values, and factors in establishing a PROMs registry program. The Working Group recommends including age, sex, diagnosis at joint, general health status preoperatively, and joint pain and function score in case-mix adjustment models. Interpretation and statistical analysis should consider the absolute level of pain, function, and general health status as well as improvement, missing data, approaches to analysis and case-mix adjustment, minimal clinically important difference, and minimal detectable change. The Working Group recommends data collection immediately before and 1 year after surgery, a threshold of 60% for acceptable frequency of response, documentation of non-responders, and documentation of incomplete or missing data.

References

    1. Ayers D C, Li W, Oatis C, Rosal M C, Franklin P D.. Patient-reported outcomes after total knee replacement vary on the basis of preoperative coexisting disease in the lumbar spine and other nonoperatively treated joints: the need for a musculoskeletal comorbidity index. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95(20): 1833–7.
    1. Baker P N, van der Meulen J H, Lewsey J, Gregg P J, National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(7): 893–900.
    1. Baker P N, Rushton S, Jameson S S, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D. J. Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: a cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(10): 1359–65.
    1. Barton G R, Sach T H, Avery A J, Doherty M, Jenkinson C, Muir K R.. Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D when measuring the benefits of alleviating knee pain. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2009; 7: 12. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-7-12.
    1. Bellamy N, Buchanan W W, Goldsmith C H, Campbell J, Stitt L W.. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15(12): 1833–40.
    1. Bijlsma J W, Berenbaum F, Lafeber F P.. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet 2011; 377(9783): 2115–26.
    1. Bjorgul K, Novicoff W M, Saleh K J.. Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol 2010; 11(4): 203–9.
    1. Boston University School of Public Health. VR-36, VR-12 and VR-6D. Boston University School of Public Health Web site. . 2015.
    1. Bourne R B, Chesworth B M, Davis A M, Mahomed N N, Charron K D.. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(1): 57–63.
    1. Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg S D.. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464: 21–6.
    1. Breivik E K, Björnsson G A, Skovlund E.. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 2000; 16(1): 22–8.
    1. Browne J, Jamieson L, Lewsey J, van der Meulen J, Copley L, Black N.. Case-mix & patients’ reports of outcome in Independent Sector Treatment Centres: comparison with NHS providers. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 78.
    1. Browne J P, Bastaki H, Dawson J.. What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 128.
    1. Clement N D, Macdonald D, Burnett R.. Predicting patient satisfaction using the Oxford knee score: where do we draw the line? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133(5): 689–94.
    1. Davis A M, Perruccio A V, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker G A, Conaghan P G, Roos E M, Jordan J M, Maillefert J F, Dougados M, Lohmander L S.. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16(5): 551–9.
    1. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D.. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996a; 78(2): 185–90.
    1. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A.. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 1996b; 5(2): 81–8.
    1. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A.. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(1): 63–9.
    1. Dawson J, Rogers K, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Cooper C, Carr A.. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) routinely: an example in the context of elective shoulder surgery. Open Epidemiology Journal 2010; 3: 42–53.
    1. Devane P, Horne G, Gehling D J.. Oxford hip scores at 6 months and 5 years are associated with total hip revision within the subsequent 2 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(12): 3870–4.
    1. Dieppe P A, Lohmander L S.. Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. Lancet 2005; 365(9463): 965–73.
    1. Dieppe P, Lim K, Lohmander S.. Who should have knee joint replacement surgery for osteoarthritis? Int J Rheum Dis 2011; 14(2): 175–80.
    1. Dunbar M J, Robertsson O, Ryd L.. What’s all that noise? The effect of co-morbidity on health outcome questionnaire results after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75(2): 119–26.
    1. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I.. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002; 324(7347): 1183.
    1. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R.. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 2: MR000008.
    1. EuroQol Group. EQ-5D. EuroQol Group Web site. . 2015.
    1. EuroQol Group. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199–208.
    1. Franklin PD, Li W, Ayers DC.. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award. Functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11): 2597–604.
    1. Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P.. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, annual report 2008, shortened version. Gothenburg, Sweden: Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Ortopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 2009.
    1. Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P.. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, annual report 2009, shortened version. Gothenburg, Sweden: Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Ortopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 2010.
    1. Gliklich R E, Dreyer N A, Leavy M B, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide, 3rd edition Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
    1. Gordon M, Paulsen A, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Pedersen A B, Rolfson O.. Factors influencing health-related quality of life after total hip replacement – a comparison of data from the Swedish and Danish hip arthroplasty registries. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 316.
    1. Gordon M, Greene M, Frumento P, Rolfson O, Garellick G, Stark A.. Age- and health-related quality of life after total hip replacement: decreasing gains in patients above 70 years of age. Acta Orthop 2014a; 85(3): 244–9.
    1. Gordon M, Frumento P, Sköldenberg O, Greene M, Garellick G, Rolfson O.. Women in Charnley class C fail to improve in mobility to a higher degree after total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 2014b; 85(4): 335–41.
    1. Graham J W. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol 2009; 60: 549–76.
    1. Greene M E. Who should have total hip replacement? Use of patient-reported outcome measures in identifying the indications for and assessment of total hip replacement [thesis]. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg; , 2015.
    1. Greene M E, Rolfson O, Nemes S, Gordon M, Malchau H, Garellick G.. Education attainment is associated with patient-reported outcomes: findings from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014a; 472(6): 1868–76.
    1. Greene M E, Rader K A, Garellick G, Malchau H, Freiberg A A, Rolfson O.. The EQ-5D-5L improves on the EQ-5D-3L for health-related quality-of-life assessment in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014b. Dec 9 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Greene M E, Rolfson O, Gordon M, Garellick G, Nemes S.. Standard comorbidity measures do not predict patient-reported outcomes 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015. Feb 21 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Hamilton D F, Lane J V, Gaston P, Patton J T, Macdonald D, Simpson A H, Howie C R.. What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open 2013; 3(4).
    1. Hawker G A, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M.. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (suppl 11): S240–S52.
    1. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X.. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011; 20(10): 1727–36.
    1. Hernán M A, Hernández-Díaz S, Werler M M, Mitchell A A.. Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155(2): 176–84.
    1. Hjermstad M J, Fayers P M, Haugen D F, Caraceni A, Hanks G W, Loge J H, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S, European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). . Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41(6): 1073–93.
    1. Hooper G J, Rothwell A G, Hooper N M, Frampton C.. The relationship between the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical rating and outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94(12): 1065–70.
    1. International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. Hip and Knee Osteoarthistis Standard Set. . 2015
    1. International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. Bylaws (revised March 2013). International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Web site. . 2015.
    1. Jameson S S, Mason J, Baker P, Gregg P J, McMurtry I A, Deehan D J, Reed M R.. A comparison of surgical approaches for primary hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and early revision using linked national databases. J Arthroplasty 2014a; 29(6): 1248–55 e1.
    1. Jameson S S, Mason J M, Baker P N, Elson D W, Deehan D J, Reed M R.. The impact of body mass index on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications following primary hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014b; 29(10): 1889–98.
    1. Jenkins P J, Duckworth A D, Robertson F P, Howie C R, Huntley J S.. Profiles of biomarkers of excess alcohol consumption in patients undergoing total hip replacement: correlation with function. ScientificWorldJournal 2011; 11: 1804–11.
    1. Jones C A, Voaklander D C, Johnston D W, Suarez-Almazor M E.. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161(3): 454–60.
    1. Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA Instructions For Authors. JAMA Network Web site. . 2015.
    1. Judge A, Cooper C, Williams S, Dreinhoefer K, Dieppe P.. Patient-reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62(4): 480–8.
    1. Judge A, Arden N K, Price A, Glyn-Jones S, Beard D, Carr A J, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Field R E.. Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(12): 1660–4.
    1. Judge A, Arden NK, Kiran A, Price A, Javaid MK, Beard D, Murray D, Field RE.. Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012a; 94(3): 412–8.
    1. Judge A, Arden N K, Cooper C, Kassim Javaid M, Carr A J, Field R E, Dieppe P A.. Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012b; 51(10): 1804–13.
    1. Judge A, Batra R N, Thomas G E, Beard D, Javaid M K, Murray D W, Dieppe P A, Dreinhoefer K E, Peter-Guenther K, Field R, Cooper C, Arden N K.. Body mass index is not a clinically meaningful predictor of patient reported outcomes of primary hip replacement surgery: prospective cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22(3): 431–9.
    1. Kay A, Davison B, Badley E, Wagstaff S.. Hip arthroplasty: patient satisfaction. Br J Rheumatol 1983; 22(4): 243–9.
    1. Kennedy D M, Stratford P W, Wessel J, Gollish J D, Penney D.. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005; 6: 3.
    1. King M T. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 11(2): 171–84.
    1. Kosinski M, Keller S D, Hatoum H T, Kong S X, Ware J E Jr.. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability. Med Care 1999; 37(5 suppl): MS10–22.
    1. Kovacs F M, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Tomás M, Mir M A, Cano A, Muriel A, Zamora J, Del Real M T, Gestoso M, Mufraggi N, Spanish Back Pain Research Network. . Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 43.
    1. Le Q A. Probabilistic mapping of the health status measure SF-12 onto the health utility measure EQ-5D using the US-population-based scoring models. Qual Life Res 2014; 23(2): 459–66.
    1. Liao C Y, Chan H T, Chao E, Yang C M, Lu T C.. Comparison of total hip and knee joint replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: a nationwide, population-based study. Singapore Med J 2015; 56(1): 58–64.
    1. Lindgren J V, Wretenberg P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Rolfson O.. Patient-reported outcome is influenced by surgical approach in total hip replacement: a study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 42,233 patients. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(5): 590–6.
    1. Little R J A, Rubin D B.. Statistical analysis with missing data, 2nd ed Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons: 2002.
    1. Lübbeke A, Stern R, Garavaglia G, Zurcher L, Hoffmeyer P.. Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57(2): 327–34.
    1. Lübbeke A, Gonzalez A, Garavaglia G, Roussos C, Bonvin A, Stern R, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P.. A comparative assessment of small-head metal-on-metal and ceramic-on- polyethylene total hip replacement. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(7): 868–75.
    1. Lurie J D, Weinstein J N.. Shared decision-making and the orthopaedic workforce. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 385: 68–75.
    1. Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz J N.. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis 2011; 2011: 591253.
    1. Makoul G, Clayman M L.. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 60(3): 301–12.
    1. Mancuso C A, Salvati E A, Johanson N A, Peterson M G, Charlson M E.. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12(4): 387–96.
    1. Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P.. Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A(7): 1005–12.
    1. Maratt J D, Lee Y Y, Lyman S, Westrich G H.. Predictors of satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(7):1142–5.
    1. MarketingCharts. Generational Differences in Consumers’ Screen Preferences. MarketingCharts Web site. . 2015.
    1. McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis A M.. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45(5): 453–61.
    1. Merle-Vincent F, Couris C M, Schott A M, Conrozier T, Piperno M, Mathieu P, Vignon E, Osteoarthritis Section of the French Society for Rheumatology. . Factors predicting patient satisfaction 2 years after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2011; 78(4): 383–6.
    1. Mourão A F, Amaral M, Caetano-Lopes J, Isenberg D.. An analysis of joint replacement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2009; 18(14): 1298–302.
    1. Murray D W, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard D J, Carr A J, Dawson J.. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(8): 1010–4.
    1. Neuburger J, Hutchings A, Allwood D, Black N, van der Meulen J H.. Sociodemographic differences in the severity and duration of disease amongst patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012; 34(3): 421–9.
    1. Neuburger J, Hutchings A, Black N, van der Meulen J H.. Socioeconomic differences in patient-reported outcomes after a hip or knee replacement in the English National Health Service. J Public Health (Oxf) 2013; 35(1): 115–24.
    1. NHS England Analytical Team. Patient reported outcome measures: update to reporting and case-mix adjusting hip and knee procedure data. London: National Health Service England; 2013.
    1. Nicholl J. Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61(11): 1010–3.
    1. Nilsdotter A K, Lohmander L S, Klässbo M, Roos E M.. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) – validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10.
    1. Noble P C, Conditt M A, Cook K F, Mathis K B.. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 35–43.
    1. Obradovic M, Lal A, Liedgens H.. Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 110.
    1. Optum Inc. : a community for measuring health outcomes using SF tools. Optum Inc. Web site. . 2015.
    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Classifying educational programmes: manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD; 1999.
    1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. PROMIS Overview. PROMIS Web site. . 2015
    1. Perruccio A V, Stefan Lohmander L, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker G A, Conaghan P G, Roos E M, Jordan J M, Maillefert J F, Dougados M, Davis A M.. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS) – an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16(5): 542–50.
    1. Riddle D L, Wade J B, Jiranek W A, Kong X.. Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(3): 798–806.
    1. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L.. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(3): 262–7.
    1. Robertsson O, Dunbar M J.. Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(4): 476–82.
    1. Rolfson O, Dahlberg L E, Nilsson J A, Malchau H, Garellick G.. Variables determining outcome in total hip replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(2): 157–61.
    1. Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg L E, Garellick G.. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011a; 93(7): 867–75.
    1. Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok K E, Bohm E, Bozic K J, Garellick G.. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011b; 93 (suppl 3): 66–71.
    1. Rolfson O, Salomonsson R, Dahlberg L E, Garellick G.. Internet-based follow-up questionnaire for measuring patient-reported outcome after total hip replacement surgery –reliability and response rate. Value Health 2011c; 14(2): 316–21.
    1. Rolfson O, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, Denissen G, Dunn J, Lyman S, Franklin P, Dunbar M, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Dawson J; the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. . Part I. Overview and rationale for patient-reported outcome measures. Acta Orthop 2016; (Suppl 362):
    1. Roos E M, Roos H P, Lohmander L S, Ekdahl C, Beynnon B D.. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28(2): 88–96.
    1. Schrama J C, Fenstad AM, Dale H, Havelin L, Hallan G, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä K, Engesæter L B, Fevang B T.. Increased risk of revision for infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients with total hip replacements. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(4): 469–76.
    1. SooHoo N F, Li Z, Chenok K E, Bozic K J.. Responsiveness of patient reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(2): 176–91.
    1. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 1997. Paris: UNESCO; 2006.
    1. Vogl M, Wilkesmann R, Lausmann C, Hunger M, Plötz W.. The impact of preoperative patient characteristics on health states after total hip replacement and related satisfaction thresholds: a cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014; 12: 108.
    1. Ware J. E Jr, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473–83.
    1. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller S D.. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34(3): 220–33.
    1. Weinstein J N, Clay K, Morgan T S.. Informed patient choice: patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefits. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26(3): 726–30.
    1. Wewers M E, Lowe N K.. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13(4): 227–36.
    1. Whitehouse S L, Lingard E A, Katz J N, Learmonth I D.. Development and testing of a reduced WOMAC function scale. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85(5): 706–11.
    1. Williams D P, Price A J, Beard D J, Hadfield S G, Arden N K, Murray D W, Field R E.. The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(1): 38–44.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren