Skin self-examination education for early detection of melanoma: a randomized controlled trial of Internet, workbook, and in-person interventions

June K Robinson, Rikki Gaber, Brittney Hultgren, Steven Eilers, Hanz Blatt, Jerod Stapleton, Kimberly Mallett, Rob Turrisi, Jenna Duffecy, Mark Begale, Mary Martini, Karl Bilimoria, Jeffrey Wayne, June K Robinson, Rikki Gaber, Brittney Hultgren, Steven Eilers, Hanz Blatt, Jerod Stapleton, Kimberly Mallett, Rob Turrisi, Jenna Duffecy, Mark Begale, Mary Martini, Karl Bilimoria, Jeffrey Wayne

Abstract

Background: Early detection of melanoma improves survival. Since many melanoma patients and their spouses seek the care of a physician after discovering their melanoma, an ongoing study will determine the efficacy of teaching at-risk melanoma patients and their skin check partner how to conduct skin self-examinations (SSEs). Internet-based health behavior interventions have proven efficacious in creating behavior change in patients to better prevent, detect, or cope with their health issues. The efficacy of electronic interactive SSE educational intervention provided on a tablet device has not previously been determined.

Objective: The electronic interactive educational intervention was created to develop a scalable, effective intervention to enhance performance and accuracy of SSE among those at-risk to develop melanoma. The intervention in the office was conducted using one of the following three methods: (1) in-person through a facilitator, (2) with a paper workbook, or (3) with a tablet device used in the clinical office. Differences related to method of delivery were elucidated by having the melanoma patient and their skin check partner provide a self-report of their confidence in performing SSE and take a knowledge-based test immediately after receiving the intervention.

Methods: The three interventions used 9 of the 26 behavioral change techniques defined by Abraham and Michie to promote planning of monthly SSE, encourage performing SSE, and reinforce self-efficacy by praising correct responses to knowledge-based decision making and offering helpful suggestions to improve performance. In creating the electronic interactive SSE educational intervention, the educational content was taken directly from both the scripted in-person presentation delivered with Microsoft PowerPoint by a trained facilitator and the paper workbook training arms of the study. Enrollment totaled 500 pairs (melanoma patient and their SSE partner) with randomization of 165 pairs to the in-person, 165 pairs to the workbook, and 70 pairs to electronic interactive SSE educational intervention.

Results: The demographic survey data showed no significant mean differences between groups in age, education, or income. The tablet usability survey given to the first 30 tablet pairs found that, overall, participants found the electronic interactive intervention easy to use and that the video of the doctor-patient-partner dialogue accompanying the dermatologist's examination was particularly helpful in understanding what they were asked to do for the study. The interactive group proved to be just as good as the workbook group in self-confidence of scoring moles, and just as good as both the workbook and the in-person intervention groups in self-confidence of monitoring their moles. While the in-person intervention performed significantly better on a skill-based quiz, the electronic interactive group performed significantly better than the workbook group. The electronic interactive and in-person interventions were more efficient (30 minutes), while the workbook took longer (45 minutes).

Conclusions: This study suggests that an electronic interactive intervention can deliver skills training comparable to other training methods, and the experience can be accommodated during the customary outpatient office visit with the physician. Further testing of the electronic interactive intervention's role in the anxiety of the pair and pair-discovered melanomas upon self-screening will elucidate the impact of these tools on outcomes in at-risk patient populations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01013844; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01013844 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LvGGSTKK).

Keywords: behavioral research; early detection of cancer; educational techniques; electronic interactive education; health education; melanoma; online education.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interactive education on borders of moles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Teaching about normal growths.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Video component of education program.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sample questions from the skills quiz.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Flow chart of study recruitment.

References

    1. Brady MS, Oliveria SA, Christos PJ, Berwick M, Coit DG, Katz J, Halpern AC. Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2000 Jul 15;89(2):342–7.
    1. Berwick M, Begg CB, Fine JA, Roush GC, Barnhill RL. Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Jan 3;88(1):17–23.
    1. Robinson JK, Stapleton J, Turrisi R. Relationship and partner moderator variables increase self-efficacy of performing skin self-examination. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 May;58(5):755–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.12.027.
    1. Robinson JK, Turrisi R. Skills training to learn discrimination of ABCDE criteria by those at risk of developing melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2006 Apr;142(4):447–52. doi: 10.1001/archderm.142.4.447.
    1. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376.
    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991 Dec;50(2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
    1. Titus-Ernstoff L, Perry AE, Spencer SK, Gibson J, Ding J, Cole B, Ernstoff MS. Multiple primary melanoma: two-year results from a population-based study. Arch Dermatol. 2006 Apr;142(4):433–8. doi: 10.1001/archderm.142.4.433.
    1. Robinson JK, Turrisi R, Mallett K, Stapleton J, Pion M. Comparing the efficacy of an in-person intervention with a skin self-examination workbook. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Jan;146(1):91–4. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.350.
    1. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379–87. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379.
    1. US Social Security Administration National average wage index. 2012. [2013-08-12]. .
    1. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren