Changes in insulin sensitivity in response to troglitazone do not differ between subjects with and without the common, functional Pro12Ala peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 gene variant: results from the Troglitazone in Prevention of Diabetes (TRIPOD) study

Abstract

Objective: We have tested whether the Pro12Ala variant of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma nuclear receptor involved in thiazolidinedione (TZD) action accounted for the failure of troglitazone to increase insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic Hispanic women with previous gestational diabetes treated in the Troglitazone in Prevention of Diabetes (TRIPOD) study.

Research design and methods: Ninety-three women assigned to troglitazone had intravenous glucose tolerance tests at randomization and after 3 months of treatment with troglitazone, 400 mg/day, and were genotyped for the Pro12Ala variant of the PPAR-gamma gene. Subjects were divided into tertiles based on their change in minimal model insulin sensitivity (S(i)) during the first 3 months of troglitazone treatment.

Results: The mean changes in S(i) in the bottom, middle, and top tertiles of S(i) response were -0.21 +/- 0.57, 0.91 +/- 0.26, and 2.58 +/- 1.32 min(-1) per microU/ml. 10(-4), respectively. Frequencies of the Ala/- genotype were 30, 22, and 26% in the same three tertiles (P = 0.77). Analysis of phenotypes by genotype revealed only small differences between the Pro/Pro and Ala/- groups, respectively, in baseline S(i) (2.76 +/- 0.19 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.33 x 10(-4) min(-1) per microU/ml; P = 0.27), the change in S(i) after 3 months of troglitazone treatment (1.19 +/- 0.17 vs. 0.93 +/- 0.30; P = 0.46), and the cumulative incidence of diabetes during a median follow-up of 30 months (13 vs. 17%; P = 0.66).

Conclusions: Among young Hispanic women at high risk for type 2 diabetes, the Pro12Ala variant of the PPAR-gamma receptor gene did not explain the failure of approximately 1/3 of subjects to increase their insulin sensitivity when placed on troglitazone at a dose of 400 mg/day.

Figures

Figure 1

Cumulative incidence of diabetes after a median follow-up of 30 months, in percentages. Data from subjects in the non-troglitazone-treated control group are also shown. The fractional cumulative incidences among those treated with troglitazone were 9/69 (Pro/Pro) and 4/24 (Ala/−). Among the control subjects, they were 12/41 (Pro/Pro) and 5/14 (Ala/−). There was no effect of genotype on the incidence of diabetes between Pro/Pro and Ala/− subjects treated with troglitazone (P = 0.66) or overall (P = 0.54).