Multicenter Phase II Study of Panitumumab in Platinum Pretreated, Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

Marco Siano, Francesca Molinari, Vittoria Martin, Nicolas Mach, Martin Früh, Stefania Freguia, Irene Corradino, Michele Ghielmini, Milo Frattini, Vittoria Espeli, Marco Siano, Francesca Molinari, Vittoria Martin, Nicolas Mach, Martin Früh, Stefania Freguia, Irene Corradino, Michele Ghielmini, Milo Frattini, Vittoria Espeli

Abstract

Lessons learned: Panitumumab shows activity in terms of disease control rate and preventing disease progression but not for tumor shrinkage in head and neck squamous cell cancer for second-line treatment. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number gain, a property of tumor cells that theoretically could identify patients more likely to experience disease response, was common among patients having disease control.Our trial, given the lower toxicity with an every-2-week schedule, provides guidance for future trials, for example, in combinations of immune therapies and anti-EGFR-antibodies.

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] antibody) given as a single agent in platinum-pretreated head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC).

Methods: Patients with advanced HNSCC previously treated with platinum-containing therapy were included. Panitumumab was administered intravenously every 2 weeks at a dose of 6 mg/kg. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. A Simon's two-step design was chosen; 4 partial remissions (PR) in the first 32 patients were required for continuing to step two. An exploratory biomarker analysis was performed.

Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Two patients obtained a PR for an ORR of 6%, and 15 (45%) showed stable disease (SD) for at least 2 months, resulting in a 51% disease control rate. Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-3.7), while median OS was 9.7 months (95% CI: 6.3-17.2). The most frequent adverse drug reactions were cutaneous rash (64%) and hypomagnesemia (55%). Overall, 30% of patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. No infusion-related reactions occurred. EGFR copy number gain (CNG) was more frequent in patients who benefitted from panitumumab. Two uncommon KRAS mutations (G48E, T50I) and 3 canonical PIK3CA mutations (all E545K) were detected. High-risk HPV16 was found in 10 patients and EGFR CNG in 13 treated patients. EGFR CNG seems to be more frequent in individuals with at least SD compared with patients with progressive disease (59% vs. 30%). PFS for patients with EGFR CNG was 4.6 months (95% CI: 1.0-9.2 months) and 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.0-3.2 months) for patients without CNG (p = .02).

Conclusion: Panitumumab monotherapy in pretreated HNSCC patients was well tolerated but moderately active. We observed a considerable disease control rate. Future strategies with this agent comprise right patient selection through the identification of reliable biomarkers and gene signatures predicting response and, considering good tolerability and convenience, combination strategies with novel agents and immune therapeutic agents.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02643056.

© AlphaMedPress; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Best change in overall tumor burden from baseline (n = 33).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Progression‐free survival (A) and overall survival (B); n = 33. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Progression‐free (A) and overall (B) survival of patients with EGFR copy number gain versus patients without EGFR copy number gain (n = 29). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CNG, copy number gain; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; neg, negative; pos, positive.

References

    1. Vincenzi B, Galluzzo S, Santini D et al. Early magnesium modifications as a surrogate marker of efficacy of cetuximab‐based anticancer treatment in KRAS wild‐type advanced colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2011;22:1141–1146.
    1. Abdel‐Rahman O, Fouad M. Correlation of cetuximab‐induced skin rash and outcomes of solid tumor patients treated with cetuximab: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015;93:127–135.
    1. Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R et al. Open‐label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum‐based therapy. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2171–2177.
    1. Rischin D, Spigel DR, Adkins D et al. PRISM: Phase 2 trial with panitumumab monotherapy as second‐line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2016;38(suppl 1):E1756–E1761.
    1. Seiwert TY, Haddad RI, Gupta S et al. Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): Preliminary results from KEYNOTE‐012 expansion cohort. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:LBA6008a.
    1. Ferris RL, Blumenschein GR, Fayette J et al. Further evaluations of nivolumab (nivo) versus investigator's choice (IC) chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): CheckMate 141. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:6009a.
    1. Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S et al. Panitumumab‐FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1023–1034.
    1. Pirker R, Pereira JR, von Pawel J et al. EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first‐line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer: Analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:33–42.
    1. Licitra L, Mesia R, Rivera F et al. Evaluation of EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in the first‐line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EXTREME study. Ann Oncol 2011;22:1078–1087.
    1. Bossi P, Bergamini C, Siano M et al. Functional genomics uncover the biology behind the responsiveness of head and neck squamous cell cancer patients to cetuximab. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:3961–3970.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren