Reduction of ureteral stent encrustation by modulating the urine pH and inhibiting the crystal film with a new oral composition: a multicenter, placebo controlled, double blind, randomized clinical trial

Carlos Torrecilla, Jaime Fernández-Concha, José R Cansino, Juan A Mainez, José H Amón, Simbad Costas, Oriol Angerri, Esteban Emiliani, Miguel A Arrabal Martín, Miguel A Arrabal Polo, Ana García, Manuel C Reina, Juan F Sánchez, Alberto Budía, Daniel Pérez-Fentes, Félix Grases, Antonia Costa-Bauzá, Jordi Cuñé, Carlos Torrecilla, Jaime Fernández-Concha, José R Cansino, Juan A Mainez, José H Amón, Simbad Costas, Oriol Angerri, Esteban Emiliani, Miguel A Arrabal Martín, Miguel A Arrabal Polo, Ana García, Manuel C Reina, Juan F Sánchez, Alberto Budía, Daniel Pérez-Fentes, Félix Grases, Antonia Costa-Bauzá, Jordi Cuñé

Abstract

Background: Encrustation of ureteral double J stents is a common complication that may affect its removal. The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new oral composition to prevent double J stent encrustation in indwelling times up to 8 weeks.

Methods: A double-blinded, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 105 patients with indwelling double J stents enrolled across 9 public hospitals in Spain. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) into intervention (53 patients) or placebo (52 patients) groups for 3 to 8 weeks and both groups self-monitored daily their morning urine pH levels. The primary outcome of analysis was the degree of stent ends encrustation, defined by a 4-point score (0 - none; 3 - global encrustation) using macroscopic and electron microscopy analysis of crystals, after 3 to 8-w indwelling period. Score was exponentially transformed according to calcium levels. Secondary endpoints included urine pH decrease, stent removal, and incidence of adverse events.

Results: The intervention group benefits from a lower global encrustation rate of stent ends than placebo group (1% vs 8.2%; p < 0.018). Mean encrustation score was 85.12 (274.5) in the placebo group and 18.91 (102.27) in the intervention group (p < 0.025). Considering the secondary end points, treated patients reported greater urine pH decreases (p = 0.002). No differences in the incidence of adverse events were identified between the groups.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that the use of this new oral composition is beneficial in the context of ureteral double J indwelling by decreasing mean, as well as global encrustation.

Trial registration: This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under the name "Combined Use of a Medical Device and a Dietary Complement in Patient Urinary pH Control in Patients With an Implanted Double J Stent" with date 2nd November 2017, code NCT03343275, and URL.

Keywords: Double J stent; Encrustation; L-methionine; Nutraceutical; Phytin; pH.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Felix Grases certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript is the following: Dr. Jordi Cuñé is a full-time employee at Devicare S.L. collaborating in the conception, design and revision of the manuscript.

The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow chart and allocation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Encrustation measurement from 0 (nothing) to 4 (global encrustation) measured by radiographic image, microscopic view and electron microscope of the stent
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Multivariate model of Double J ureteral stent encrustation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Surface of a stent covered by an organic matter layer (conditioning film) in which colonies of bacteria have developed (encrustation classified as 1)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Surface of a stent covered by dihydrate uric acid deposits, classified as 2. (A) Optical image, (B) Scanning electron microscopy image
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Surface of a stent covered by ammonium magnesium phosphate + hydroxyapatite deposits (A) Optical image, (B) Scanning electron microscopy image. Surface of a stent covered by brushite + hydroxyapatite deposits (C) Optical image, (B) Scanning electron microscopy image

References

    1. Finney RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol. 1978;120(6):678–681.
    1. González-Ramírez M, Méndez-Probst C, Feria-Bernal G. Factores de riesgo y manejo en la calcificación del catéter doble. J Rev Mex Urol. 2009;69(0155):7–12.
    1. Saltzman B. Ureteral stents. Indications, variations, and complications. Uro Clin North Am. 1988;15(3):481–491.
    1. Stickler DJ. Clinical complications of urinary catheters caused by crystalline biofilms: something needs to be done. J Intern Med. 2014;276(2):120–129.
    1. Beysens M, Tailly TO Ureteral stents in urolithiasis. Asian J Urol. 2018;5(4):274–286.
    1. Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K, et al. Urolithiasis EAU Guidelines on. 2018.
    1. Acosta-Miranda AM, Milner J, Turk TMT. The FECal double-J: a simplified approach in the Management of Encrusted and Retained Ureteral Stents. J Endourol. 2009;23(3):409–415.
    1. Angel M, Polo A, Nogueras M. CALCIFICACIÓN GIGANTE EN EXTREMO DISTAL DE STENT URETERAL. Arch Esp Urol. 2010:873–6.
    1. Sighinolfi MC, Sighinolfi GP, Galli E, Micali S, Ferrari N, Mofferdin A, et al. Chemical and mineralogical analysis of ureteral stent encrustation and associated risk factors. Urology. 2015;86(4):703–706.
    1. Burr RG, Nuseibeh IM. Urinary catheter blockage depends on urine pH, calcium and rate of flow. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(8):521–525.
    1. Zumstein V, Betschart P, Albrich W, Buhmann M, Ren Q, Schmid H, et al. Biofilm formation on ureteral stents - Incidence, clinical impact, and prevention. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017. pp. 1–10.
    1. Mosayyebi A, Manes C, Carugo D, Somani BK. Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:5.
    1. HEDELIN H, BRATT C. G, ECKERDAL G, LINCOLN K. relationship between urease-producing Bacteria, urinary pH and encrustation on indwelling urinary catheters. Br J Urol. 1991;67(5):527–531.
    1. Kohler-Ockmore J, Feneley R. Long-term catheterization of the bladder : prevalence and morbidity. Br J Urol. 1996;77(3):347–351.
    1. Siener R, Struwe F, Hesse A. Effect of L-methionine on the risk of phosphate stone formation Corresponding author : Phone : phosphate , urinary stones. Urology. 2016; Available from:. 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.007.
    1. Passaro M, Mainini G, Ambrosio F, Sgambato RBG. Effect of a food supplement containing L-methionine on urinary tract infections in Pregnancy : a prospective, multicenter observational study. J Altern Complement Med. 2017;00(00):1–8.
    1. Grases F, Isern B, Sanchis P, Perello J, Torres JJC-BA. Phytate acts as an inhibitor in formation of renal calculi. Front Biosci. 2007;12(1):2580.
    1. del Valle EE, Spivacow FRNAL. CITRATO Y LITIASIS RENAL Metabolismo renal del citrato. Med (Buenos Aires) 2013;73:363–368.
    1. Gul Z, Monga M. Medical and dietary therapy for kidney stone prevention. Korean J Urol. 2014;55(12):775–779.
    1. Grases F, Rodriguez A, Berga F, Costa-Bauza A, Prieto RM, Burdallo I, et al. A new device for simple and accurate urinary pH testing by the stone-former patient. Springerplus. 2014;3(1):1–5.
    1. De Coninck V, Keller EX, Rodríguez-Monsalve M, Doizi S, Audouin M, Haymann J-P, et al. Evaluation of a portable urinary pH meter and reagent strips. J Endourol. 2018;32(7):647–652.
    1. Yang L, Wang K, Li H, Denstedt J, Cadieux P. The influence of urinary pH on antibiotic efficacy against bacterial uropathogens. J Urol. 2014;84(3):731e1–731e7.
    1. Nakanishi N, Fukui M, Tanaka M, Toda H, Imai S, Yamazaki M, et al. Low urine pH is a predictor of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2012;35(2):77–81.
    1. Carlsson S, Wiklund NP, Engstrand L, Weitzberg E, Lundberg JON. Effects of pH, nitrite, and ascorbic acid on nonenzymatic nitric oxide generation and bacterial growth in urine. Nitric Oxide - Biol Chem. 2001;5(6):580–586.
    1. Hesse A, Heimbach D. Causes of phosphate stone formation and the importance of metaphylaxis by urinary acidification: a review. World J Urol. 1999;17(5):308–315.
    1. el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, OM KAH, H I. Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol. 1991:1487–91.
    1. Bultitude MF, Tiptaft RC, Glass JM, Dasgupta P. Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper tract. Urology. 2003;62(4):622–626.
    1. Kamberi M, Tsutsumi K, Kotegawa T, Kawano K, Nakamura K, Niki Y, et al. Influences of urinary pH on ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in humans and antimicrobial activity in vitro versus those of sparfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43(3):525–529.
    1. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Matsuzaki J. Ureteral stent encrustation, incrustation, and coloring: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Endourol. 2012;27(4):506.
    1. Kadihasanoglu M, Kilciler M, Atahan O. Luminal obstruction of double J stents due to encrustation depends on indwelling time: a pilot study. Aktuelle Urol. 2017;48(3):248–251.
    1. Perez-Fentes D. Complications of double j catheters and their endourological management. Arch Esp Urol. 2016;69(8):527–543.
    1. Bonkat G, Rieken M, Müller G, Roosen A, Siegel FP, Frei R, et al. Microbial colonization and ureteral stent-associated storage lower urinary tract symptoms: the forgotten piece of the puzzle? World J Urol. 2013;31(3):541–546.
    1. Grases F, Söhnel O, Costa-Bauzá A, Ramis M, Wang Z. Study on concretions developed around urinary catheters and mechanisms of renal calculi development. Nephron. 2001;88(4):320–328.
    1. Grases F, Costa-Bauzá A, Ramis M, Montesinos V, Conte A. Simple classification of renal calculi closely related to their micromorphology and etiology. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;322(1–2):29–36.
    1. Cox AJ, Hukins DWL. Morphology of mineral deposits on encrusted urinary catheters investigated by scanning electron microscopy. J Urol. 1989;142(5):1347–1350.
    1. Stickler DJ. Bacterial biofilms in patients with indwelling urinary catheters. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5(11):598–608.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren