A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study

William O'Riordan, Alison McManus, Juri Teras, Ivan Poromanski, Maria Cruz-Saldariagga, Megan Quintas, Laura Lawrence, ShuJui Liang, Sue Cammarata, PROCEED Study Group, Gustavo Jorge Chaparro Sr, Natalia Elizabeth Frassone, Graciana Morera, Antônio Tarcisio de Faria Freire Sr, Júlio César Stobbe, Rossen Stoyanov Dimov, Borislav Tzvetanov Ninov Sr, Ivan Poromanski, Petar Rusev, Simeon Simeonov, Georgi Vasilev Todorov, Jorge Manuel Perez Godoy Sr, Jaak Lind, Andres Tein, Jüri Teras, Andrei Uksov, Roland Akhalaia, Erekle Gotsadze, Kakhaber Kashibadze, Jano Vashadze, Katalin Egyud, Zsolt Horváth, Lajos Kemény, Levente Kövágó, Tibor Olah, Yong Kyun Cho Sr, Seong-Ho Choi, Won Seok Choi, Yong Pill Chong, Min Ja Kim, Shin-Woo Kim, Yeon Sook Kim Sr, Janis Gardovskis, Viktors Lovcinovskis, Maris Nalivaiko, Guntars Pupelis, Eduardo Rodriguez Noriega, Nora Patricia Quintero Pérez, Adrian Camacho Ortiz, Eugen Gutu, Sergiu Revencu, Sergiu Ungureanu, Luis A Camacho Cosavalente, Jaime Ismael Soria Medina, Maria Edelmira Cruz, Oscar Guillermo Pamo Reyna, Pedro Esteban Legua Leiva, Marius Eugen Ciurea, Ion Florea, Carmen Giuglea, Silviu Adrian Marinescu, Silviu Horia Morariu, Remus Ioan Orasan, Petrisor Z Crainiceanu, Yen-Hsu Chen, Yin-Ching Chuang, Sinikka Liisa Green, Alison J McManus, Jeffrey K Kingsley, Loren Miller, Robert Houghton, Verne Leroy Willits, Steven Hugh Mannis, Sheri Stucke, Peter Rives, Eric Hansen, Pietro Giuseppe Pecci, Hermilito L Villar, Richard Beasley, Philip A Giordano, John Pullman, Chok Ping Wan, Shaukat Shah, Godson I Oguchi, Thomas M Birch, Sadi M Dar, Barr L Baynton, Melanie Hoppers, William O'Riordan, Alison McManus, Juri Teras, Ivan Poromanski, Maria Cruz-Saldariagga, Megan Quintas, Laura Lawrence, ShuJui Liang, Sue Cammarata, PROCEED Study Group, Gustavo Jorge Chaparro Sr, Natalia Elizabeth Frassone, Graciana Morera, Antônio Tarcisio de Faria Freire Sr, Júlio César Stobbe, Rossen Stoyanov Dimov, Borislav Tzvetanov Ninov Sr, Ivan Poromanski, Petar Rusev, Simeon Simeonov, Georgi Vasilev Todorov, Jorge Manuel Perez Godoy Sr, Jaak Lind, Andres Tein, Jüri Teras, Andrei Uksov, Roland Akhalaia, Erekle Gotsadze, Kakhaber Kashibadze, Jano Vashadze, Katalin Egyud, Zsolt Horváth, Lajos Kemény, Levente Kövágó, Tibor Olah, Yong Kyun Cho Sr, Seong-Ho Choi, Won Seok Choi, Yong Pill Chong, Min Ja Kim, Shin-Woo Kim, Yeon Sook Kim Sr, Janis Gardovskis, Viktors Lovcinovskis, Maris Nalivaiko, Guntars Pupelis, Eduardo Rodriguez Noriega, Nora Patricia Quintero Pérez, Adrian Camacho Ortiz, Eugen Gutu, Sergiu Revencu, Sergiu Ungureanu, Luis A Camacho Cosavalente, Jaime Ismael Soria Medina, Maria Edelmira Cruz, Oscar Guillermo Pamo Reyna, Pedro Esteban Legua Leiva, Marius Eugen Ciurea, Ion Florea, Carmen Giuglea, Silviu Adrian Marinescu, Silviu Horia Morariu, Remus Ioan Orasan, Petrisor Z Crainiceanu, Yen-Hsu Chen, Yin-Ching Chuang, Sinikka Liisa Green, Alison J McManus, Jeffrey K Kingsley, Loren Miller, Robert Houghton, Verne Leroy Willits, Steven Hugh Mannis, Sheri Stucke, Peter Rives, Eric Hansen, Pietro Giuseppe Pecci, Hermilito L Villar, Richard Beasley, Philip A Giordano, John Pullman, Chok Ping Wan, Shaukat Shah, Godson I Oguchi, Thomas M Birch, Sadi M Dar, Barr L Baynton, Melanie Hoppers

Abstract

Background: Delafloxacin is an intravenous (IV)/oral anionic fluoroquinolone with activity against gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]), gram-negative, atypical, and anaerobic organisms. It is approved in the United States for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) caused by designated susceptible gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, and is in development for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of 850 adults with ABSSSI compared delafloxacin 300 mg IV every 12 hours for 3 days with a switch to 450 mg oral delafloxacin, to vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV with aztreonam for 5-14 days. The primary endpoint was objective response at 48-72 hours. Investigator-assessed response based on resolution of signs and symptoms at follow-up (day 14 ± 1), and late follow-up (day 21-28) were secondary endpoints.

Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis set, the objective response was 83.7% in the delafloxacin arm and 80.6% in the comparator arm. Investigator-assessed success was similar at follow-up (87.2% vs 84.4%) and late follow-up (83.5% vs 82.2%). Delafloxacin was comparable to vancomycin + aztreonam in eradication of MRSA at 96.0% vs 97.0% at follow-up. Frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events between the groups was similar. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation was higher in the vancomycin + aztreonam group (1.2% vs 2.4%).

Conclusions: In ABSSSI patients, IV/oral delafloxacin monotherapy was noninferior to IV vancomycin + aztreonam combination therapy for both the objective response and the investigator-assessed response at follow-up and late follow-up. Delafloxacin was well tolerated as monotherapy in treatment of ABSSSIs.

Clinical trials registration: NCT01984684.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram of patient disposition. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment. Clinically evaluable (CE) analysis set included all patients in the ITT population who (1) received ≥80% of the total expected doses of the assigned study drug or experienced clinical failure and received ≥4 doses of study drug; (2) did not receive any concomitant, systemic antibacterial therapy with activity against the identified pathogen; and (3) had no major protocol deviations. Microbiological ITT (MITT) analysis set consisted of all patients in the ITT analysis set who had bacterial pathogens known to cause acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections at baseline. Microbiologically evaluable analysis set included all patients in the MITT population who met the criteria established for the CE analysis set. Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CE, clinically evaluable; FU, follow-up; ITT, intent-to-treat; LFU, late follow-up; ME, microbiologically evaluable; MITT, microbiological intent-to-treat; SAF, safety; TC, telephone call.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Objective response and investigator-assessed response at follow-up and late follow-up by analysis set, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection at baseline. *Primary endpoint. **The primary efficacy endpoint for the European Medicines Agency submission, and a secondary efficacy endpoint for the US Food and Drug Administration submission. Cure = no remaining signs and symptoms; Improved = some remaining signs and symptoms but no further antibiotics required; Success = Cure + Improved. Abbreviations: CE, clinically evaluable (patients who completed activities as defined in the protocol); CI, confidence interval; DLX, delafloxacin; FU, follow-up; IA, investigator assessed; ITT, intent-to-treat (all patients randomized); LFU, late follow-up; ME, microbiologically evaluable (clinically evaluable patients with eligible pathogen); MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Van/AZ, vancomycin/aztreonam.

References

    1. Garau J, Blasi F, Medina J, McBride K, Ostermann H; REACH Study Group Early response to antibiotic treatment in European patients hospitalized with complicated skin and soft tissue infections: analysis of the REACH study. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:78.
    1. Ektare V, Khachatryan A, Xue M, Dunne M, Johnson K, Stephens J. Assessing the economic value of avoiding hospital admissions by shifting the management of gram+ acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections to an outpatient care setting. J Med Econ 2015; 18:1092–101.
    1. Guillamet CV, Kollef MH. How to stratify patients at risk for resistant bugs in skin and soft tissue infections?Curr Opin Infect Dis 2016; 29:116–23.
    1. Lipsky BA, Napolitano LM, Moran GJ, et al. . Economic outcomes of inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment for complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a multicenter prospective observational study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 79:266–72.
    1. Russo A, Concia E, Cristini F, et al. . Current and future trends in antibiotic therapy of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22(Suppl 2):S27–36.
    1. Itani KM, Merchant S, Lin SJ, Akhras K, Alandete JC, Hatoum HT. Outcomes and management costs in patients hospitalized for skin and skin-structure infections. Am J Infect Control 2011; 39:42–9.
    1. Berger A, Oster G, Edelsberg J, Huang X, Weber DJ. Initial treatment failure in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013; 14:304–12.
    1. Edelsberg J, Taneja C, Zervos M, et al. . Trends in US hospital admissions for skin and soft tissue infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15:1516–8.
    1. Halilovic J, Heintz BH, Brown J. Risk factors for clinical failure in patients hospitalized with cellulitis and cutaneous abscess. J Infect 2012; 65:128–34.
    1. Van Bambeke F. Delafloxacin, a non-zwitterionic fluoroquinolone in phase III of clinical development: evaluation of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy. Future Microbiol 2015; 10:1111–23.
    1. McCurdy S, Lawrence L, Quintas M, et al. . In vitro activity of delafloxacin and microbiological response against fluoroquinolone susceptible and non-susceptible S. aureus isolates from two phase 3 studies of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61. doi:10.1128/AAC.00772-17.
    1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for industry. acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: developing drugs for treatment 2013. Available at: . Accessed 18 March 2018.
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on the evaluation of medicinal products indicated for treatment of bacterial infections Available at: . Accessed 18 March 2018.
    1. Miettinen O, Nurminen M. Comparative analysis of two rates. Stat Med 1985; 4:213–26.
    1. Remy JM, Tow-Keogh CA, McConnell TS, Dalton JM, Devito JA. Activity of delafloxacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: resistance selection and characterization. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67:2814–20.
    1. McCurdy S, Lawrence L, Quintas M, et al. . In vitro activity of delafloxacin and microbiological response against fluoroquinolone susceptible and non-susceptible S. aureus isolates from two phase 3 studies of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61:e00772–17.
    1. Litwin JS, Benedict MS, Thorn MD, Lawrence LE, Cammarata SK, Sun E. A thorough QT study to evaluate the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of delafloxacin on cardiac repolarization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59:3469–73.
    1. Ferguson J, Lawrence L, Paulson S, et al. . Assessment of phototoxicity potential of delafloxacin in healthy male and female subjects: a phase 1 study [abstract F-1198a]. In: 55th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Diego, CA, 17–21 September 2015.
    1. Paulson SK, Wood-Horral RN, Hoover R, et al. . The pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A substrate midazolam after steady-state dosing of delafloxacin. Clin Ther 39:1182–90.
    1. Pullman J, Gardovskis J, Farley B, et al. . Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72:3471–80.
    1. Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, et al. . Hospitalizations with healthcare-associated complicated skin and skin structure infections: impact of inappropriate empiric therapy on outcomes. J Hosp Med 2010; 5:535–40.
    1. Lipsky BA, Napolitano LM, Moran GJ, Vo L, Nicholson S, Kim M. Inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment for complicated skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized patients: incidence and associated factors. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 79:273–9.
    1. Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, et al. . Epidemiology and outcomes of hospitalizations with complicated skin and skin-structure infections: implications of healthcare-associated infection risk factors. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009; 30:1203–10.
    1. Eagye KJ, Kim A, Laohavaleeson S, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Surgical site infections: does inadequate antibiotic therapy affect patient outcomes?Surg Infect 2009; 10:323–31.
    1. Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Vazquez-Guillamet C, Kollef MH. Multi-drug resistance, inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy and mortality in gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care 2014; 18:596.
    1. Kingsley J, Mehra P, Lawrence LE,, et al.A randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 study to evaluate subjective and objective outcomes in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections treated with delafloxacin, linezolid or vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71:821–9.
    1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for industry: acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: developing drugs for treatment. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration, 2013. Available at: . Accessed 4 November 2017.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: FDA updates warnings for oral and injectable fluoroquinolone antibiotics due to disabling side effects Available at: . Accessed 8 March 2017.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. 2017. Summary basis of approval – Baxdela™ (delafloxacin). Application number 208610Orig1s000 Available at: . Accessed 18 March 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren