Gall Bladder Empyema: Early Cholecystectomy during the Index Admission Improves Outcomes

Hisham El Zanati, Ahmad H M Nassar, Samer Zino, Tarek Katbeh, Hwei Jene Ng, Ayman Abdellatif, Hisham El Zanati, Ahmad H M Nassar, Samer Zino, Tarek Katbeh, Hwei Jene Ng, Ayman Abdellatif

Abstract

Objectives: We aim to evaluate our policy of index admission management of gall bladder empyema and the effect of the timing of surgery on the outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed a series of 5400 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Data were collected prospectively over 26 y. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, intervention within 72 h, and group 2, intervention after 72 h of admission. We had a policy of intention to treat during the index admission, but delays sometimes occurred because of late referral, a need to optimize patients, availability of theater time, or the biliary surgeon being on leave. The groups were then compared with regard to the duration of surgery, the difficulty grading, complications, hospital stay, and conversion rate.

Results: A total of 372 patients were included; 160 (43%) operated on within 72 h (group 1) and 212 (57%) after 72 h (group 2). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to the operation time, conversion rate, and complications rate. The difference in total hospital stay was, however, statistically significant.

Conclusion: Surgical management of empyema should be offered as soon as possible after admission as with any acute cholecystitis. Surgery carried out after 72 h of admission is only associated with longer hospital stay but no statistically significant differences in other outcome parameters. In the presence of specialist expertise, fitness for surgery should be the determining factor of whether or not to offer surgery to these patients, regardless of the interval since their admission.

Keywords: Nassar scale; difficulty grading; gallbladder empyema; intraopertative cholangiography; laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

© 2020 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.

References

    1. Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Scovill WA, Zucker KA. The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 1991;161:388–392.
    1. SAGES. Guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery (Internet). 2010. Available from: Accessed August 3, 2019.
    1. Kim H, Ho Son B, Yoo C, Ho Shin J. Impact of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with complicated acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:20–24.
    1. Nassar AHM, Ashkar KA, Mohamed AY, Hafiz AA. Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy possible without video technology? Min Invas Ther. 1995;4:63–65.
    1. Griffiths E, Hodson J, Vohra R, et al. Utilisation of an operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:110–121.
    1. Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahamson J. Matter laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the various types of gall bladder inflammation: a prospective trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:200–207.
    1. Masood R, Samillah Afridi Z, Masood K, Khan BA, Khurshied F. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute gall bladder. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2012;26:212–217.
    1. Ambe P, Jansen S, Macher-Heidrich S, Zirngibl H. Surgical management of empyematous cholecystitis: a register study of over 12,000 cases from a regional quality control database in Germany. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5319–5324.
    1. Al-Jaberi T, Gharaibeh K, Khammash M. Empyema of the gall bladder: reappraisal in the laparoscopy era. Ann Saudi Med. 2003;23:140–142.
    1. Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai ECS, Wong J. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1998;227:461–467.
    1. Lai PBS, Kwong KH, Leung KI, et al. Randomised trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:764–767.
    1. Johanson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:642–645.
    1. Al-Mulhim AA. Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2008;12:282–287.
    1. Han IW, Jang JY, Kang MJ, Lee KB, Lee SE, Kim SW. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:187–193.
    1. Kwon Y, Ahn B, Park H, Lee K, Lee K. What is the optimal time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallbladder empyema? Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3776–3780.
    1. Gallstone disease: diagnosis and initial management. Recommendations, guidance and guidelines (NICE) (Internet). 2014. Available from: Accessed August 10, 2019.
    1. Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:91–97.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren