Dimensions of sustainability for a health communication intervention in African American churches: a multi-methods study

Mary Ann Scheirer, Sherie Lou Z Santos, Erin K Tagai, Janice Bowie, Jimmie Slade, Roxanne Carter, Cheryl L Holt, Mary Ann Scheirer, Sherie Lou Z Santos, Erin K Tagai, Janice Bowie, Jimmie Slade, Roxanne Carter, Cheryl L Holt

Abstract

Background: Sustainability of evidence-based health promotion interventions has received increased research attention in recent years. This paper reports sustainability data from Project HEAL (Health through Early Awareness and Learning) a cancer communication implementation trial about early detection, based in African American churches. In this paper, we used a framework by Scheirer and Dearing (Am J Publ Health 101:2059-2067, 2011) to evaluate multiple dimensions of sustainability from Project HEAL.

Methods: We examined the following dimensions of sustainability: (a) continued benefits for intervention recipients, (b) continuation of intervention activities, c) maintaining community partnerships, (d) changes in organizational policies or structures, (e) sustained attention to the underlying issues, (f) diffusion to additional sites, or even (g) unplanned consequences of the intervention. Project HEAL provided a three-workshop cancer educational series delivered by trained lay peer community health advisors (CHAs) in their churches. Multiple sources of sustainability were collected at 12 and 24 months after the intervention that reflect several levels of analysis: participant surveys; interviews with CHAs; records from the project's management database; and open-ended comments from CHAs, staff, and community partners.

Results: Outcomes differ for each dimension of sustainability. For continued benefit, 39 and 37% of the initial 375 church members attended the 12- and 24-month follow-up workshops, respectively. Most participants reported sharing the information from Project HEAL with family or friends (92% at 12 months; 87% at 24 months). For continuation of intervention activities, some CHAs reported that the churches held at least one additional cancer educational workshop (33% at 12 months; 24% at 24 months), but many more CHAs reported subsequent health activities in their churches (71% at 12 months; 52% at 24 months). No church replicated the original series of three workshops. Additional data confirm the maintenance of community partnerships, some changes in church health policies, and continued attention to health issues by churches and CHAs.

Conclusions: The multiple dimensions of sustainability require different data sources and levels of analysis and show varied sustainability outcomes in this project. The findings reinforce the dynamic nature of evidence-based health interventions in community contexts.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02076958.

References

    1. Altman DG. Sustaining interventions in community systems: on the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychol. 1995;14:526–536. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.14.6.526.
    1. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38:65–76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
    1. Proctor E, Luke D, Calhoun A, McMillen C, Brownson R, McCrary S, Padek M. Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support. Implement Sci. 2015;10:88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0274-5.
    1. Scheirer MA, Dearing JW. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2059–2067. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193.
    1. Stirman SW, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.
    1. Luke DA, Calhoun A, Robichaux CB, Elliott MB, Moreland-Russell S. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: a new instrument for public health programs. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:130184. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130184.
    1. Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci. 2013;8:117–128. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117.
    1. Scheirer MA. Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. Am J Eval. 2005;26:320–347. doi: 10.1177/1098214005278752.
    1. Scheirer MA, Hartling GT, Hagerman DB. Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: illustrations from an on-line survey. Eval Program Plann. 2008;31:335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.08.004.
    1. Shediac-Rizkallah MC, Bone LR. Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res. 1998;13:87–108. doi: 10.1093/her/13.1.87.
    1. Bowman CC, Sobo EJ, Asch SM, Gifford AL. Measuring persistence of implementation: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-21.
    1. Gruen RL, Elliott JH, Nolan ML, Lawton PD, Parkhill A, McLaren CJ, Lavis JN. Sustainability science: an integrated approach for health-programme planning. Lancet. 2008;372:1579–1589. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61659-1.
    1. Green LW. Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? Am J Public Health. 2006;96:406–409. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066035.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1274–1281. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755.
    1. Williams DR. Miles to go before we sleep: racial inequities in health. J Health Soc Behav. 2012;53:279–295. doi: 10.1177/0022146512455804.
    1. Schell SF, Luke DA, Schooley MW, Elliott MB, Herbers SH, Mueller NB, Bunger AC. Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework. Implement Sci. 2013;8:15. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-15.
    1. Johnson K, Hays C, Center H, Daley C. Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: a sustainability planning model. Eval Program Plann. 2004;27:135–149. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.002.
    1. Pluye P, Potvin L, Denis JL. Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability. Eval Program Plann. 2004;27:121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.001.
    1. Campbell MK, Hudson MA, Resnicow K, Blakeney N, Paxton A, Baskin M. Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:213–234. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144016.
    1. Darnell JS, Chang CH, Calhoun EA. Knowledge about breast cancer and participation in a faith-based breast cancer program and other predictors of mammography screening among African American women and Latinas. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7:201S–212S. doi: 10.1177/1524839906288693.
    1. Holt CL, Litaker MS, Scarinci IC, Debnam KJ, McDavid C, McNeal SF, Eloubeidi MA, Crowther M, Bolland J, Martin MY. Spiritually based intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: screening and theory-based outcomes from a randomized trial. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40:458–468. doi: 10.1177/1090198112459651.
    1. Husaini BA, Reece MC, Emerson JS, Scales S, Hull PC, Levine RS. A church-based program on prostate cancer screening for African American men: reducing health disparities. Ethn Dis. 2008;18:179–184.
    1. Sauaia A, Sung-joon M, Lack D, Apodaca C, Osuna D, Stowe A, McGinnis GF, Latts L, Byers T. Church-based breast cancer screening education: impact of two approaches on Latinas enrolled in public and private health insurance plans. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4:A99.
    1. Zahuranec DB, Morgenstern LB, Garcia NM, Conley KM, Lisabeth LD, Rank GS, Smith MA, Meurer WJ, Resnicow K, Brown DL. Stroke health and risk education (SHARE) pilot project: feasibility and need for church-based stroke health promotion in a bi-ethnic community. Stroke. 2008;39:1583–1585. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.503557.
    1. Holt CL, Tagai EK, Scheirer MA, Santos SL, Bowie J, Haider M, Slade JL, Wang MQ, Whitehead T. Translating evidence-based interventions for implementation: experiences from Project HEAL in African American churches. Implement Sci. 2014;9.
    1. Santos SLZ, Tagai EK, Scheirer MA, Bowie J, Haider M, Slade J, Wang MQ, Holt CL. Adoption, reach, and implementation of a cancer education intervention in African American churches. Implement Sci. 2017;12:36. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0566-z.
    1. Holt CL, Klem PR. As you go, spread the word: spiritually based breast cancer education for African American women. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:S141–S142. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.066.
    1. Holt CL, Wynn TA, Southward P, Litaker MS, Jeames S, Schulz E. A comparison of a spiritually-based and a non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African American men. Urol Nurs. 2009;29:249–258.
    1. Santos SLZ, Tagai EK, Wang MQ, Scheirer MA, Slade JL, Holt CL. Feasibility of a web-based training system for peer community Health advsiors in cancer early detection among African Americans. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:2282–2289. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302237.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–1327. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322.
    1. Budd RW, Thorp RK, Donohew L. Content analysis of communications. New York: MacMillian Company; 1967.
    1. Neta G, Glasgow RE, Carpenter CR, Grimshaw JM, Rabin BA, Fernandez ME, Brownson RC. A framework for enhancing the value of research for dissemination and implementation. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:49–57. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302206.
    1. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, Moser RP, Henton MD, Proctor EK, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE. Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci. 2012;7:119. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-119.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren