Effects of Strength Training Using Unstable Surfaces on Strength, Power and Balance Performance Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

David G Behm, Thomas Muehlbauer, Armin Kibele, Urs Granacher, David G Behm, Thomas Muehlbauer, Armin Kibele, Urs Granacher

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus stable surfaces (STS) or a control condition (CON; i.e., no training or regular training only) for strength, power and balance performance across the lifespan has not yet been investigated in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to determine the general effects of STU versus STS or CON on muscle strength, power and balance in healthy individuals across the lifespan and to investigate whether performance changes following STU are age specific.

Data sources: A computerized systematic literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science from January 1984 up to February 2015.

Study eligibility criteria: Initially, 209 articles were identified for review. Only controlled trials were included if they investigated STU in healthy individuals and tested at least one measure of maximal strength, strength endurance, muscle power, or static/dynamic balance. In total, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: The included studies were coded for the following criteria: age, sex, training status, training modality, exercise and test modality. Effect size measures included within-subject standardized mean differences (SMDw) and weighted between-subject standardized mean differences (SMDb). Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I2 and χ2 statistics. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale.

Results: Our search failed to identify studies that examined the effects of STU versus STS or CON in children and middle-aged adults. However, four studies were identified that investigated the effects of STU versus CON or STS in adolescents, 15 studies were identified in young adults and three studies were identified in old adults. Compared with CON, STU produced medium effects on maximal strength in young adults and no effects to medium effects in old adults. In addition, large effects were detected on strength endurance in adolescents and in young adults; in old adults, a small effect was found. With regard to muscle power, medium effects were observed in young adults and small effects were observed in old adults. Further, large effects were found for static and dynamic balance in old adults, but only a small effect was found for dynamic balance in young adults. The comparison of STU and STS revealed inconsistent results as indicated by training-induced changes in favour of STU, as well as STS. Small to medium effects were found for maximal strength in adolescents in favour of STS, and small effects were found in young adults in favour of STU. With regard to strength endurance, large effects were found in adolescents in favour of STS and small effects were found in favour of STU. Additionally, we detected small effects in young adults in favour of STU. In terms of muscle power, no effects were observed in adolescents but medium effects were found in favour of STS in young adults. With regard to balance, small effects were detected in adolescents for static and dynamic balance in favour of STU. In young adults, small effects were found for static balance in favour of STS. With regard to dynamic balance, the analysis revealed small effects in young adults in favour of STU.

Limitations: The quality of the included studies was rather low, with mean PEDro scores of 5.8, 4.0 and 5.0 for studies including adolescents, young adults and old adults, respectively. Further, trivial to considerable heterogeneity between studies (i.e., 0% ≤ I2 ≤ 96%) was detected.

Conclusions: Compared with CON, STU is effective in improving muscle strength, power and balance in adolescents, young adults and old adults. However, inconsistent results were particularly found in adolescents and young adults when the specific effects of STU were compared with those of STS. We conclude that the performance of STU compared with STS has limited extra effects on muscle strength, power and balance performance in healthy adolescents and young adults. Given that our systematic search did not identify studies that examined the effects of STU versus STS in children, middle-aged adults and old adults, further research of high methodological quality is needed to determine whether there are additive effects of STU as compared with STS in those age groups.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart illustrating the different phases of the search and study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus control condition (CON; i.e. no training or regular training only) on measures of strength (a) and balance (b). CI confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, IV inverse variance, SE standard error, Std. standard
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus control condition (CON; i.e. no training or regular training only) on measures of maximal strength (a) and strength endurance (b) in healthy young adults. CI confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, IV inverse variance, SE standard error, Std. standard
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus control condition (CON; i.e. no training or regular training only) on measures of static balance (a) and dynamic balance (b) in healthy old adults. CI confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, IV inverse variance, SE standard error, Std. standard
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus stable surfaces (STS) on measures of strength (a) and balance (b). CI confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, IV inverse variance, SE standard error, Std. standard
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus stable surfaces (STS) on measures of maximal strength (a) and strength endurance (b) in healthy young adults. CI confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, IV inverse variance, SE standard error, Std. standard
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus stable surfaces (STS) on measures of muscle power in healthy adolescents (a) and young adults (b). CI confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, IV inverse variance, SE standard error, Std. standard
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus stable surfaces (STS) on measures of static balance in healthy adolescents (a) and young adults (b). CI confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, IV inverse variance, SE standard error, Std. standard
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus stable surfaces (STS) on measures of dynamic balance in healthy adolescents (a) and young adults (b). CI confidence interval, df degrees of freedom, IV inverse variance, SE standard error, Std. standard

References

    1. Behm DG, Drinkwater EJ, Willardson JM, et al. The use of instability to train the core musculature. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(1):91–108. doi: 10.1139/H09-127.
    1. Behm DG, Colado Sanchez JC. Instability resistance training across the exercise continuum. Sports Health. 2013;5(6):500–503. doi: 10.1177/1941738113477815.
    1. Behm DG. Neuromuscular implications and applications of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 1995;9(4):264–274.
    1. Behm DG, Sale DG. Velocity specificity of resistance training. Sports Med. 1993;15(6):374–388. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199315060-00003.
    1. Willardson JM. The effectiveness of resistance exercises performed on unstable equipment. Strength Cond J. 2004;26(5):70–74. doi: 10.1519/00126548-200410000-00015.
    1. Schmidtbleicher D. Training for power events. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004. pp. 381–395.
    1. Behm DG, Drinkwater EJ, Willardson JM, et al. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position stand: the use of instability to train the core in athletic and nonathletic conditioning. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(1):109–112. doi: 10.1139/H09-128.
    1. Behm D, Colado JC. The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(2):226–241.
    1. Behm DG, Drinkwater EJ, Willardson JM, et al. The role of instability rehabilitative resistance training for core musculature. Strength Cond J. 2011;33(3):72–81. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e318213af91.
    1. Hamlyn N, Behm DG, Young WB. Trunk muscle activation during dynamic weight-training exercises and isometric instability activities. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1108–1112.
    1. Chek P. Physioball exercise for swimming, soccer, and basketball. Sports Coach. 1999;21:30–33.
    1. Verstegen M, Williams P. Physioball routine. In: Verstegen M, Williams P, editors. Core performance. New York: Rodale; 2004. pp. 73–88.
    1. Kibele A, Behm DG. Seven weeks of instability and traditional resistance training effects on strength, balance and functional performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(9):2443–2450.
    1. Viru A, Loko J, Harro M, et al. Critical periods in the development of performance capacity during childhood and adolescence. Eur J Phys Edu. 1999;4(1):75–119. doi: 10.1080/1740898990040106.
    1. Landow L, Haff GG. Use of stability balls in strength and conditioning. Strength Cond J. 2012;34(1):48–50. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e3182441b9f.
    1. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
    1. Faigenbaum AD, Westcott WL, Loud RL, et al. The effects of different resistance training protocols on muscular strength and endurance development in children. Pediatrics. 1999;104(1):e5. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.1.e5.
    1. Granacher U, Lacroix A, Muehlbauer T, et al. Effects of core instability strength training on trunk muscle strength, spinal mobility, dynamic balance and functional mobility in older adults. Gerontology. 2013;59(2):105–113. doi: 10.1159/000343152.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.
    1. Anderson K, Behm DG. The impact of instability resistance training on balance and stability. Sports Med. 2005;35(1):43–53. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535010-00004.
    1. Behm DG, Anderson KG. The role of instability with resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(3):716–722.
    1. Sparkes R, Behm DG. Training adaptations associated with an 8-week instability resistance training program with recreationally active individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(7):1931–1941. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181df7fe4.
    1. Sukalinggam CL, Sukalinggam GL, Kasim F, et al. Stability ball training on lower back strength has greater effect in untrained female compared to male. J Hum Kinet. 2012;33:133–141. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0052-2.
    1. Cosio-Lima LM, Reynolds KL, Winter C, et al. Effects of physioball and conventional floor exercises on early phase adaptations in back and abdominal core stability and balance in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(4):721–725.
    1. Romero-Franco N, Martinez-Lopez E, Lomas-Vega R, et al. Effects of proprioceptive training program on core stability and center of gravity control in sprinters. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2071–2077. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823b06e6.
    1. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro Scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–721.
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT. Statistical algorithms in Review Manager 5. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2010. Available from URL: . Accessed 29 Aug 2015.
    1. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press; 1985.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Chapter 9: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Bognor Regis: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
    1. Stanforth D, Stanforth PR, Hahn SR, et al. A 10-week training study comparing Resistaball and traditional trunk training. J Dance Med Sci. 1998;2(4):134–140.
    1. Marinkovic M, Bratic M, Ignjatovic A, et al. Effects of 8-week instability resistance training on maximal strength in inexperienced young individuals. Serb J Sports Sci. 2012;6(1):17–21.
    1. Premkumar M, Alagesan J, Vaidya N. Effect of instability resistance training of abdominal muscles in healthy young females—an experimental study. Int J Pharm Sci Health Care. 2012;2(3):91–97.
    1. Seo B-D, Yun Y-D, Kim H-R, et al. Effect of 12-week swiss ball exercise program on physical fitness and balance ability of elderly women. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24(1):11–15. doi: 10.1589/jpts.24.11.
    1. Stanton R, Reaburn PR, Humphries B. The effect of short-term Swiss ball training on core stability and running economy. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):522–528.
    1. Prieske O, Muehlbauer T, Borde R, et al. Neuromuscular and athletic performance following core strength training in elite youth soccer: role of instability. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015
    1. Granacher U, Schellbach J, Klein K, et al. Effects of core strength training using stable versus unstable surfaces on physical fitness in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014;6:40. doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-6-40.
    1. Granacher U, Prieske O, Majewski M, et al. The role of instability with plyometric training in sub-elite adolescent soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2015;36(5):386–394. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395519.
    1. Cressey EM, West CA, Tiberio DP, et al. The effects of ten weeks of lower-body unstable surface training on markers of athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(2):561–567.
    1. Oberacker LM, Davis SE, Haff GG, et al. The Yo-Yo IR2 test: physiological response, reliability, and application to elite soccer. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(10):2734–2740. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318242a32a.
    1. Sato K, Mokha M. Does core strength training influence running kinetics, lower-extremity stability, and 5000-M performance in runners? J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):133–140. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818eb0c5.
    1. Carter JM, Beam WC, McMahan SG, et al. The effects of stability ball training on spinal stability in sedentary individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(2):429–435.
    1. Cowley PM, Swensen T, Sforzo GA. Efficacy of instability resistance training. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28(10):829–835. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-964893.
    1. Kibele A, Classen C, Muehlbauer T, et al. Metastability in plyometric training on unstable surfaces: a pilot study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014;6:30. doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-6-30.
    1. Chulvi-Medrano I, Martinez-Ballester E, Masia-Tortosa L. Comparison of the effects of an eight-week push-up program using stable versus unstable surfaces. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(6):586–594.
    1. Cug M, Ak E, Özdemir RA, et al. The effect of instability training on knee joint proprioception and core strength. J Sports Sci Med. 2012;11(3):468–474.
    1. Mate-Munoz JL, Monroy AJ, Jodra Jimenez P, et al. Effects of instability versus traditional resistance training on strength, power and velocity in untrained men. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(3):460–468.
    1. Chulvi-Medrano I, Colado JC, Pablos C, et al. A lower-limb training program to improve balance in healthy elderly women using the T-bow device. Phys Sportsmed. 2009;37(2):127–135. doi: 10.3810/psm.2009.06.1719.
    1. Anderson KG, Behm DG. Maintenance of EMG activity and loss of force output with instability. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):637–640.
    1. Drinkwater EJ, Pritchett EJ, Behm DG. Effect of instability and resistance on unintentional squat-lifting kinetics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007;2(4):400–413.
    1. Saeterbakken AH, Fimland MS. Muscle force output and electromyographic activity in squats with various unstable surfaces. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(1):130–136. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182541d43.
    1. Saeterbakken AH, Fimland MS. Electromyographic activity and 6RM strength in bench press on stable and unstable surfaces. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(4):1101–1107. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182606d3d.
    1. Goodman CA, Pearce AJ, Nicholes CJ, et al. No difference in 1 RM strength and muscle activation during the barbell chest press on a stable and unstable surface. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(1):88–94. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815ef6b3.
    1. Koshida S, Urabe Y, Miyashita K, et al. Muscular outputs during dynamic bench press under stable versus unstable conditions. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(5):1584–1588. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817b03a1.
    1. ACSM . ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2013.
    1. Kanehisa H, Nagareda H, Kawakami Y, et al. Effects of equivolume isometric training programs comprising medium or high resistance on muscle size and strength. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;87:112–119. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0604-6.
    1. Tanimoto M, Sanada K, Yamamoto K, et al. Effects of whole-body low-intensity resistance training with slow movement and tonic force generation on muscular size and strength in young men. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(6):1926–1938. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318185f2b0.
    1. Anderson K, Behm DG. Trunk muscle activity increases with unstable squat movements. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005;30(1):33–45. doi: 10.1139/h05-103.
    1. Blimkie CJ. Age- and sex-associated variation in strength during childhood: anthropometric, morphologic, neurologic, biomechanical, endocrinologic, genetic, and physical activity correlates. In: Gisolfi CV, Lamb DR, editors. Perspectives in exercise science and sports medicine: youth, exercise, and sport. Indianapolis: Benchmark; 1989. pp. 99–163.
    1. Round JM, Jones DA, Honour JW, et al. Hormonal factors in the development of differences in strength between boys and girls during adolescence: a longitudinal study. Ann Hum Biol. 1999;26(1):49–62. doi: 10.1080/030144699282976.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren