Electrical stimulation for chronic non-specific low back pain in a working-age population: a 12-week double blinded randomized controlled trial

Matthew S Thiese, Matthew Hughes, Jeremy Biggs, Matthew S Thiese, Matthew Hughes, Jeremy Biggs

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive electrotherapy is commonly used for treatment of chronic low back pain. Evidence for efficacy of most electrotherapy modalities is weak or lacking. This study aims to execute a high-quality, double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial comparing 1) H-Wave(®) Device stimulation plus usual care with 2) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) plus usual care, and 3) Sham electrotherapy plus usual care to determine comparative efficacy for treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain patients.

Patients: Chronic non-specific low back pain patients between ages of 18-65 years, with pain of at least 3 months duration and minimal current 5/10 VAS pain. Patients will have no significant signs or symptoms of lumbosacral nerve impingement, malignancy, spinal stenosis, or mood disorders.

Study design: Double blind RCT with 3 arms and 38 subjects per arm. Randomization by permuted blocks of random length, stratified by Workers Compensation claim (yes vs. no), and use of opioids. The null hypothesis of this study is that there are no statistically significant differences in functional improvement between treatment types during and at the end of a 12-week week treatment period.

Data collection: Subjective data will be collected using Filemaker Pro™ database management collection tools. Objective data will be obtained through functional assessments. Data will be collected at enrollment and at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks for each participant by a blinded assessor.

Interventions: H-Wave(®) device stimulation (Intervention A) plus usual care, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) (Intervention B) plus usual care, and sham electrotherapy plus usual care (control). Each treatment arm will have identical numbers of visits (4) and researcher contact time (approximately 15 hours).

Primary outcome measure: Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary measures include: Rowland Morris Instrument, VAS pain score, functional evaluation including strength when pushing and pulling, pain free range of motion in flexion and extension. Outcome measures assessed at baseline, 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Treatment failure will be defined if patient terminates assigned treatment arm for non-efficacy or undergoes invasive procedure or other excluded cointerventions. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat analysis and adjusted for covariates related to LBP (e.g. age) as needed.

Discussion: Study strengths include complex randomization, treatment group allocation concealment, double blinding, controlling for co-interventions, rigorous inclusion criteria, assessment of compliance, plans for limiting dropout, identical assessment methods and timing for each treatment arm, and planned intention-to-treat analyses.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial design, procedures, stages and data collection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Shoulder height push assessment using BTE EvalTech system.

References

    1. Deyo RA. Promises and limitations of the Patient Outcome Research Teams: the low-back pain example. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1995;107(3):324–328.
    1. Friedman BW. Diagnostic testing and treatment of low back pain in United States emergency departments: a national perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(24):E1406–E1411. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d952a5.
    1. Licciardone JC. The epidemiology and medical management of low back pain during ambulatory medical care visits in the United States. Osteopath Med Prim Care. 2008;2:11. doi: 10.1186/1750-4732-2-11.
    1. Gore M. The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37(11):E668–E677. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318241e5de.
    1. Pai S, Sundaram LJ. Low back pain: an economic assessment in the United States. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00101-9.
    1. Maetzel A, Li L. The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;16(1):23–30. doi: 10.1053/berh.2001.0204.
    1. Fourney DR. Chronic low back pain: a heterogeneous condition with challenges for an evidence-based approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(21 Suppl):S1–S9.
    1. Hegmann KT, Thiese MS, Hughes MA, Edwards H, Ott U, Robertson D, Russo R, Srisukhumbowornchai S, Frischknecht M, Ording JA, Turner GE, Machata N. In: American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines. 2. Hegmann K, editor. Elk Grove Village, IL: ; 2008. Update. Chapter 6: Chronic Pain.
    1. Arnau JM. A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(5):543–553. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1027-y.
    1. Schnitzer TJ. Update on guidelines for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25:22–29. doi: 10.1007/s10067-006-0203-8.
    1. Kamper SJ. Treatment-based subgroups of low back pain: a guide to appraisal of research studies and a summary of current evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(2):181–191. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.003.
    1. Brosseau L. Efficacy of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis. Spine. 2002;27(6):596–603. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203150-00007.
    1. van Middelkoop M. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(1):19–39. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1518-3.
    1. Buchmuller A. Value of TENS for relief of chronic low back pain with or without radicular pain. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(5):656–65. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00061.x.
    1. Furlan AD. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011;2012
    1. Khadilkar A. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine. 2005;30(23):2657–2666. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000188189.21202.0f.
    1. Milne S. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low back pain (Cochrane Review) The Cochrane Library. 2002;2
    1. Khadilkar A. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low‐back pain. The Cochrane Library. 2008. p. CD003008.
    1. Milne S. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low‐back pain. The Cochrane Library. 2001. p. CD003008.
    1. Poitras S, Brosseau L. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential current, electrical muscle stimulation, ultrasound, and thermotherapy. Spine J. 2008;8(1):226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.022.
    1. Williams CM. Low back pain and best practice care: A survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(3):271. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.507.
    1. Smith TL. H-Wave induces arteriolar vasodilation in rat striated muscle via nitric oxide-mediated mechanisms. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(9):1248–1251. doi: 10.1002/jor.20851.
    1. Blum K. The H-Wave((R)) Device Induces NODependent Augmented Microcirculation and Angiogenesis, Providing Both Analgesia and Tissue Healing in Sports Injuries. Phys Sportsmed. 2008;36(1):103–114. doi: 10.3810/psm.2008.12.18.
    1. Harris JS. Methodology to update the practice recommendations in the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50(3):282–295. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181651613.
    1. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–2953. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
    1. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25(24):3115–3124. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006.
    1. Gronblad M. Intercorrelation and Test—Retest Reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability. Clin J Pain. 1993;9(3):189–195. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199309000-00006.
    1. Smeets R. Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S158–S173. doi: 10.1002/acr.20542.
    1. McCormick JD, Werner BC, Shimer AL. Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Spine Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(2):99–107. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-02-99.
    1. Bassett DR Jr. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2 Suppl):S30–S36.
    1. Brage S. Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1447–1454. doi: 10.1249/.
    1. Crouter SE, Clowers KG, Bassett DR Jr. A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100(4):1324–1331.
    1. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777–781. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021.
    1. Fudge BW. Estimation of Oxygen Uptake during Fast Running Using Accelerometry and Heart Rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(1):192–198. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000235884.71487.21.
    1. Hendelman D. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S442–S449.
    1. Matthews CE. Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(8):1376–1381. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00021.
    1. Swartz AM. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S450–S456.
    1. Yngve A. Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(2):320–326. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048829.75758.A0.
    1. Jarzem PF. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS] for short-term treatment of low back pain- randomized double blind crossover study of sham versus conventional TENS. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. 2005;13(2):11–17.
    1. Khadilkar A. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD003008.
    1. Wright S. Adjusted p-values for simultaneous inference. Biometrics. 1992;48(4):1005–1013. doi: 10.2307/2532694.
    1. Little RJA. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data Second Ed. New York: Wiley & Sons; 2002.
    1. Tukey JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977.
    1. Brinkhaus B. Acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(4):450–457.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren