Treatment of Severe Adult Traumatic Brain Injury Using Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells

Charles S Cox Jr, Robert A Hetz, George P Liao, Benjamin M Aertker, Linda Ewing-Cobbs, Jenifer Juranek, Sean I Savitz, Margaret L Jackson, Anna M Romanowska-Pawliczek, Fabio Triolo, Pramod K Dash, Claudia Pedroza, Dean A Lee, Laura Worth, Imoigele P Aisiku, Huimahn A Choi, John B Holcomb, Ryan S Kitagawa, Charles S Cox Jr, Robert A Hetz, George P Liao, Benjamin M Aertker, Linda Ewing-Cobbs, Jenifer Juranek, Sean I Savitz, Margaret L Jackson, Anna M Romanowska-Pawliczek, Fabio Triolo, Pramod K Dash, Claudia Pedroza, Dean A Lee, Laura Worth, Imoigele P Aisiku, Huimahn A Choi, John B Holcomb, Ryan S Kitagawa

Abstract

Preclinical studies using bone marrow derived cells to treat traumatic brain injury have demonstrated efficacy in terms of blood-brain barrier preservation, neurogenesis, and functional outcomes. Phase 1 clinical trials using bone marrow mononuclear cells infused intravenously in children with severe traumatic brain injury demonstrated safety and potentially a central nervous system structural preservation treatment effect. This study sought to confirm the safety, logistic feasibility, and potential treatment effect size of structural preservation/inflammatory biomarker mitigation in adults to guide Phase 2 clinical trial design. Adults with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 5-8) and without signs of irreversible brain injury were evaluated for entry into the trial. A dose escalation format was performed in 25 patients: 5 controls, followed 5 patients in each dosing cohort (6, 9, 12 ×106 cells/kg body weight), then 5 more controls. Bone marrow harvest, cell processing to isolate the mononuclear fraction, and re-infusion occurred within 48 hours after injury. Patients were monitored for harvest-related hemodynamic changes, infusional toxicity, and adverse events. Outcome measures included magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of supratentorial and corpus callosal volumes as well as diffusion tensor imaging-based measurements of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of the corpus callosum and the corticospinal tract at the level of the brainstem at 1 month and 6 months postinjury. Functional and neurocognitive outcomes were measured and correlated with imaging data. Inflammatory cytokine arrays were measured in the plasma pretreatment, posttreatment, and at 1 and 6 month follow-up. There were no serious adverse events. There was a mild pulmonary toxicity of the highest dose that was not clinically significant. Despite the treatment group having greater injury severity, there was structural preservation of critical regions of interest that correlated with functional outcomes. Key inflammatory cytokines were downregulated. Treatment of severe, adult traumatic brain injury using an intravenously delivered autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell infusion is safe and logistically feasible. There appears to be a treatment signal as evidenced by central nervous system structural preservation, consistent with previous pediatric trial data. Inflammatory biomarkers are downregulated after cell infusion. Stem Cells 2016 Video Highlight: https://youtu.be/UiCCPIe-IaQ Stem Cells 2017;35:1065-1079.

Keywords: adult human bone marrow; adult stem cells; bone marrow stromal cells; cellular therapy; clinical trials; diffusion tensor imaging; traumatic brain injury.

© 2016 AlphaMed Press.

Figures

Figure 1. CONSORT Diagram for Trial Enrollment/Participation
Figure 1. CONSORT Diagram for Trial Enrollment/Participation
Patients were screened with a 10-15X ratio of screened to enrolled. This has logistical implications for trial design. Long term follow-up was exceptionally strong for an acute trauma study (normally approximately30-50%). The Flow diagram shows how patients are identified, enrolled and treated within 48 hours, with a measured mean of approximately 36 hours.
Figure 2. Global Change in White Matter…
Figure 2. Global Change in White Matter Volume
These data graphically represent the changes in WM volume by treatment group (Panel A), the individual patients in the high dose group with their corresponding computed tomography images explaining their outlier status (Panel B) and the pooled comparisons of treated vs. controls (Panel C). Supra-tentorial White Matter Volume is demonstrated with and without the outlier patients 19 and 20. Treated patients show greater supra-tentorial WM volume preservation compared to Controls.
Figure 3. Corpus Callosum Fractional Anisotropy and…
Figure 3. Corpus Callosum Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity
These data graphically display the changes in FA and MD in the Control and Treated groups in a dose dependent manner (Panels A), High dose individual patients (Panel B) and pooled comparisons (Panel C). FA is a summary measure of microstructural integrity. Oversimplified, High FA values are a surrogate measure of coherent, tightly packed and myelinated fibers. Mean diffusivity is an inverse measure of cell membrane density and is sensitive to edema and necrosis (higher FA is “good”, and lower MD is “good”). FA is higher in the treated groups except in the outliers as demonstrated in Panel B. MD is lower in the low and medium dose groups, and again the higher dose outliers skew those results.
Figure 4. Corticospinal tract Fractional Anisotropy, Mean…
Figure 4. Corticospinal tract Fractional Anisotropy, Mean Diffusivity and Radial Diffusivity
These data demonstrate the increase in FA over time in the treated group compared to the decrease over time in the control group. Conversely, the diffusivity measurements show progression in the control group and improvement in the treated group.
Figure 5. Inflammatory Cytokine Array
Figure 5. Inflammatory Cytokine Array
A panel of pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines were measured in plasma. Peak levels within the first 96 hours post-injury were considered the physiological maximal response, and the 6 month follow-up levels were considered “baseline”. True un-injured baseline/pre-treatment cytokine data cannot be obtained. Pre-treatment and peak levels were also analyzed and presented. The data show a significant decrease in IL-1β, and IFN-γ in the high dose group and an apparent dose-dependent downward trend in those cytokines as well as TNF-α. The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was decreased in the high dose group with a dose dependent downward trend in IL-4.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Report to Congress on Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Epidemiology and Rehabilitation. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention; Atlanta, GA.: 2015.
    1. Kraus JF, McArthur DL. Epidemiologic aspects of brain injury. NEUROL CLIN. 1996;14:435–50.
    1. Savitz SI, Cox CS., Jr. Concise review: Cell therapies for stroke and traumatic brain injury: Targeting microglia. Stem Cells. 2016;34:537–42.
    1. Sharma S, Yang B, Strong R, et al. Bone marrow mononuclear cells protect neurons and modulate microglia in cell culture models of ischemic stroke. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88:2869–76.
    1. Suda S, Yang B, Schaar K, et al. Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Exert Broad Effects on Short- and Long-Term Biological and Functional Outcomes in Rodents with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24:2756–66.
    1. Bedi SS, Walker PA, Shah SK, et al. Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells therapy attenuates activated microglial/macrophage response and improves spatial learning after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:410–6.
    1. Yang B, Strong R, Sharma S, et al. Therapeutic time window and dose response of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for ischemic stroke. J Neurosci Res. 2011;89:833–9.
    1. Cox CS, Jr, Baumgartner JE, Harting MT, et al. Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy for severe traumatic brain injury in children. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:588–600.
    1. Brenneman M, Sharma S, Harting M, et al. Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells enhance recovery after acute ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:140–9.
    1. Savitz SI, Misra V, Kasam M, et al. Intravenous autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2011;70:59–69.
    1. Fischer UM, Harting MT, Jimenez F, et al. Pulmonary passage is a major obstacle for intravenous stem cell delivery: The pulmonary first-pass effect. Stem Cells Dev. 2009;18:683–91.
    1. Teasdale G, Jennett B. ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS. A Practical Scale. Lancet. 1974;304:81–4.
    1. Brain Trauma Foundation B, AANS, CNS, Care ACJSoNaC Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. (3rd edition.) 2007;24:S1–S106.
    1. Antonelli M, Moreno R, Vincent JL, et al. Application of SOFA score to trauma patients. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:389–94.
    1. Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR. An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. AM REV RESPIR DIS. 1988;138:720–3.
    1. Adams JH, Doyle D, Ford I, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI, McLellan DR. Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: Definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology. 1989;15:49–59.
    1. Salamon N, Sicotte N, Alger J, et al. Analysis of the brain-stem white-matter tracts with diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:895–902.
    1. Wilde EA, Hunter JV, Newsome MR, et al. Frontal and temporal morphometric findings on MRI in children after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:333–44.
    1. Bagiella E, Novack TA, Ansel B, et al. Measuring outcome in traumatic brain injury treatment trials: Recommendations from the traumatic brain injury clinical trials network. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25:375–82.
    1. Ewing-Cobbs L, Prasad MR, Swank P, et al. Arrested development and disrupted callosal microstructure following pediatric traumatic brain injury: Relation to neurobehavioral outcomes. NeuroImage. 2008;42:1305–15.
    1. Harting MT, Jimenez F, Xue H, et al. Intravenous mesenchymal stem cell therapy for traumatic brain injury: Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:1189–97.
    1. Walker PA, Shah SK, Jimenez F, et al. Intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cell therapy for traumatic brain injury: Preserving the blood brain barrier via an interaction with splenocytes. Exp Neurol. 2010;225:341–52.
    1. Anbari F, Khalili MA, Bahrami AR, et al. Intravenous transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promotes neural regeneration after traumatic brain injury. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9:919–23.
    1. Arien-Zakay H, Gincberg G, Nagler A, et al. Neurotherapeutic effect of cord blood derived CD45+ hematopoietic cells in mice after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:1405–16.
    1. Jiang J, Bu X, Liu M, Cheng P. Transplantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for traumatic brain injury. Neural Regen Res. 2012;7:46–53.
    1. Kim HJ, Lee JH, Kim SH. Therapeutic effects of human mesenchymal stem cells on traumatic brain injury in rats: secretion of neurotrophic factors and inhibition of apoptosis. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:131–8.
    1. Li L, Jiang Q, Qu CS, et al. Transplantation of marrow stromal cells restores cerebral blood flow and reduces cerebral atrophy in rats with traumatic brain injury: in vivo MRI study. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:535–45.
    1. Lu D, Sanberg PR, Mahmood A, et al. Intravenous administration of human umbilical cord blood reduces neurological deficit in the rat after traumatic brain injury. Cell Transplant. 2002;11:275–81.
    1. Mahmood A, Lu D, Chopp M. Marrow stromal cell transplantation after traumatic brain injury promotes cellular proliferation within the brain. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:1185–93.
    1. Mahmood A, Lu D, Lu M, Chopp M. Treatment of traumatic brain injury in adult rats with intravenous administration of human bone marrow stromal cells. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:697–702. discussion -3.
    1. Osanai T, Kuroda S, Sugiyama T, et al. Therapeutic effects of intra-arterial delivery of bone marrow stromal cells in traumatic brain injury of rats--in vivo cell tracking study by near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:435–44. discussion 44.
    1. Pischiutta F, D'Amico G, Dander E, et al. Immunosuppression does not affect human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell efficacy after transplantation in traumatized mice brain. Neuropharmacology. 2014;79:119–26.
    1. Turtzo LC, Budde MD, Dean DD, et al. Failure of intravenous or intracardiac delivery of mesenchymal stromal cells to improve outcomes after focal traumatic brain injury in the female rat. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126551.
    1. Watanabe J, Shetty AK, Hattiangady B, et al. Administration of TSG-6 improves memory after traumatic brain injury in mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2013;59:86–99.
    1. Zanier ER, Montinaro M, Vigano M, et al. Human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells protect mice brain after trauma. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:2501–10.
    1. Zhang R, Liu Y, Yan K, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:106.
    1. Moll G, Rasmusson-Duprez I, Von Bahr L, et al. Are therapeutic human mesenchymal stromal cells compatible with human blood? Stem Cells. 2012;30:1565–74.
    1. Cotton BA, Minei KM, Radwan ZA, et al. Admission rapid thrombelastography predicts development of pulmonary embolism in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1470–7.
    1. François M, Copland IB, Yuan S, Romieu-Mourez R, Waller EK, Galipeau J. Cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells display impaired immunosuppressive properties as a result of heat-shock response and impaired interferon-γ licensing. Cytotherapy. 2012;14:147–52.
    1. Xu Y, McArthur DL, Alger JR, et al. Early nonischemic oxidative metabolic dysfunction leads to chronic brain atrophy in traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:883–94.
    1. Ohtaki H, Ylostalo JH, Foraker JE, et al. Stem/progenitor cells from bone marrow decrease neuronal death in global ischemia by modulation of inflammatory/immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:14638–43.
    1. Sanberg PR, Park D, Kuzmin-Nichols N, et al. Monocyte transplantation for neural and cardiovascular ischemia repair. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:553–63.
    1. Loane DJ, Kumar A, Stoica BA, Cabatbat R, Faden AI. Progressive neurodegeneration after experimental brain trauma: Association with chronic microglial activation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2014;73:14–29.
    1. Sidaros A, Skimminge A, Liptrot MG, et al. Long-term global and regional brain volume changes following severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study with clinical correlates. NeuroImage. 2009;44:1–8.
    1. Brezova V, Gøran Moen K, Skandsen T, et al. Prospective longitudinal MRI study of brain volumes and diffusion changes during the first year after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. NeuroImage Clin. 2014;5:128–40.
    1. Trivedi MA, Ward MA, Hess TM, et al. Longitudinal changes in global brain volume between 79 and 409 days after traumatic brain injury: Relationship with duration of coma. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:766–71.
    1. Ding K, De La Plata CM, Wang JY, et al. Cerebral atrophy after traumatic white matter injury: Correlation with acute neuroimaging and outcome. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:1433–40.
    1. Vahidy FS, Rahbar MH, Zhu H, Rowan PJ, Bambhroliya AB, Savitz SI. Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cells in Animal Models of Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2016;47:1632–9.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren