Designing assisted living technologies 'in the wild': preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology

Joseph Wherton, Paul Sugarhood, Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield, Guy Dewsbury, Sue Hinder, Trisha Greenhalgh, Joseph Wherton, Paul Sugarhood, Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield, Guy Dewsbury, Sue Hinder, Trisha Greenhalgh

Abstract

Background: There is growing interest in assisted living technologies to support independence at home. Such technologies should ideally be designed 'in the wild' i.e. taking account of how real people live in real homes and communities. The ATHENE (Assistive Technologies for Healthy Living in Elders: Needs Assessment by Ethnography) project seeks to illuminate the living needs of older people and facilitate the co-production with older people of technologies and services. This paper describes the development of a cultural probe tool produced as part of the ATHENE project and how it was used to support home visit interviews with elders with a range of ethnic and social backgrounds, family circumstances, health conditions and assisted living needs.

Method: Thirty one people aged 60 to 98 were visited in their homes on three occasions. Following an initial interview, participants were given a set of cultural probe materials, including a digital camera and the 'Home and Life Scrapbook' to complete in their own time for one week. Activities within the Home and Life Scrapbook included maps (indicating their relationships to people, places and objects), lists (e.g. likes, dislikes, things they were concerned about, things they were comfortable with), wishes (things they wanted to change or improve), body outline (indicating symptoms or impairments), home plan (room layouts of their homes to indicate spaces and objects used) and a diary. After one week, the researcher and participant reviewed any digital photos taken and the content of the Home and Life Scrapbook as part of the home visit interview.

Findings: The cultural probe facilitated collection of visual, narrative and material data by older people, and appeared to generate high levels of engagement from some participants. However, others used the probe minimally or not at all for various reasons including limited literacy, physical problems (e.g. holding a pen), lack of time or energy, limited emotional or psychological resources, life events, and acute illness. Discussions between researchers and participants about the materials collected (and sometimes about what had prevented them completing the tasks) helped elicit further information relevant to assisted living technology design. The probe materials were particularly helpful when having conversations with non-English speaking participants through an interpreter.

Conclusions: Cultural probe methods can help build a rich picture of the lives and experiences of older people to facilitate the co-production of assisted living technologies. But their application may be constrained by the participant's physical, mental and emotional capacity. They are most effective when used as a tool to facilitate communication and development of a deeper understanding of older people's needs.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example ‘places map’ by participant (Rhoda).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example ‘people map’ by a participant (Colin) with members of his social support network (names anonymised).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example ‘body outline’ by a participant (Rhoda).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example ‘body outline’ by a participant (George). The text reads “I feel tired and worn out”.

References

    1. van Dieren S, Beulens JW, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE, Neal B. The global burden of diabetes and its complications: an emerging pandemic. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(Suppl 1):S3–S8.
    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Franco A, Sommer P, Baevens JP, Jankowska E, Maggi A, Ponikowski P, Rys A, Szczerbinska K, Michel JP, Milewicz A. Silver paper: the future of health promotion and preventive actions, basic research, and clinical aspects of age-related disease-a report of the European Summit on Age-Related Disease. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009;21:376–385.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Hinder S, Stramer K, Bratan T, Russell J. Adoption, non-adoption and abandonment of an internet-accessible personal health organiser. BMJ. 2010;341:c5814. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5814.
    1. Takahashi PY, Pecina JL, Upatising B, Chaudhry R, Shah ND, Van Houten H, Cha S, Croghan I, Naessens JM, Hanson GJ. A randomized controlled trial of telemonitoring in older adults with multiple health issues to prevent hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:773–779. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.256.
    1. Steventon A. et al.Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the whole system demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e3874. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3874.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Dewsbury G. Proceedings of the digital economy All hands meeting, 15-17 Nov. UK: Newcastle-Upon-Tyne; 2011. ATHENE: Assistive technologies for healthy living in elders: needs assessment by ethnography.
    1. Dewsbury G, Clarke K, Hughes J, Rouncefield M, Sommerville I. Extending home technology design: depending on digital design. Hous Stud. 2004;19:811–825. doi: 10.1080/0267303042000249224.
    1. Hartswood M, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Voss A. Resources, Co-evolution and artefacts. 2008th. Germany: Springer, Berlin; 2008. Co-realisation: evolving IT artefacts by design.
    1. Gaver W, Dunne A, Pacenti E. Design: cultural probes. Interactions. 1999;6:21–29. doi: 10.1145/291224.291235.
    1. Boehner K, Vertesi J, Sengers P, Dourish P. Proceedings of CHI’07: 28 April – 3 May. San Jose, USA: ACM; 2007. How HCI interprets the probes; pp. 1077–1086.
    1. Graham C, Roucefield M, Gibbs M, Vetere F, Cheverst C. Proceedings of OZCHI 2007. Adelaide, Australia: ACM; 2007. How probes work; pp. 29–37.
    1. Graham C, Rouncefield M. Proceedings of participatory design conference. Indiana, USA: ACM; 2008. Probes and participation.
    1. Dourish P, Bell G. Divining a digital future: mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press; 2011.
    1. Leonardi C, Mennecozzi C, Not E, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M, Gennai F, Cristoforetti A. Proceedings of CHI’09. Boston, USA: ACM; 2009. Knocking on elders’ door: investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space.
    1. Christoforetti A, Gennai F, Rodeschini G. Home sweet home: the emotional construction of places. J Aging Stud. 2011;25:225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.006.
    1. Bernhaupt R, Obrist M, Weiss A, Beck E, Tscheligi M. Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing. Comput Entertainment. 2008;6 doi: 10.1145/1350843.1350848.
    1. Buchmuller S, Joost G. In: The Good, the Bad and the Challenging: The user and the future of information and communication technologies, Conference Proceedings of the Cost Conference 298, 13th – 15th May, Koper. Sapio B, Haddon L, Mante-Meijer E, Fortunati L, Turk T, Loos E, editor. Slovenia: ABS Center; 2009. Design for elderly people: a methodological case study about the development of a dect phone; pp. 710–719.
    1. Riche Y, Mackay W. PeerCare: supporting awareness of rhythms and routines for better aging in place. CSCW. pp. 73–104.
    1. Pedell S, Vetere F, Kulik L, Ozanne E, Gruner A. Proceedings of OZCHI’10. Australia: Brisbane; 2010. Social isolation of older people: the role of domestic technologies.
    1. Hutchinson H, Mackay W, Westerlund B, Bederson B, Druin A, Plaisant C, Beaudouin-Lafon M, Conversy S, Evans H, Hansen H, Roussel N, Eiderbäck B, Lindquist S, Sundblad Y. Proceedings of CHI’03. Florida, USA: ACM; 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families.
    1. Crabtree A, Hemmings T, Rodden T, Cheverst K, Clarke K, Dewsbury G, Hughes J, Rouncefield M. Proceedings of OzCHI’03. Brisbane, Australia: Ergonomics Society of Australia; 2003. Designing with care: adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings.
    1. Axelrod L, Fitzpatrick G, Balaam M, Mawson S, Burridge J, Ricketts I, Smith P, Rodden T. Proceedings of PervasiveHealth 2011. Dublin, Ireland; 2011. A toolkit to explore lived experience of motivation: when words are not enough.
    1. Newell A. In: Inclusive design: design for the whole population. Clackson J, Coleman R, Keates S, Lebbon C, editor. London: Springer Verlag; Inclusive design or assistive technology; pp. 172–181.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren