Chest compression quality, exercise intensity, and energy expenditure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using compression-to-ventilation ratios of 15:1 or 30:2 or chest compression only: a randomized, crossover manikin study
Se-Jung Kwak, Young-Min Kim, Hee Jin Baek, Se Hong Kim, Hyeon Woo Yim, Se-Jung Kwak, Young-Min Kim, Hee Jin Baek, Se Hong Kim, Hyeon Woo Yim
Abstract
Objective: Our aim was to compare the compression quality, exercise intensity, and energy expenditure in 5-minute single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using 15:1 or 30:2 compression-to-ventilation (C:V) ratios or chest compression only (CCO).
Methods: This was a randomized, crossover manikin study. Medical students were randomized to perform either type of CPR and do the others with intervals of at least 1 day. We measured compression quality, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) score, heart rate, maximal oxygen uptake, and energy expenditure during CPR.
Results: Forty-seven students were recruited. Mean compression rates did not differ between the 3 groups. However, the mean percentage of adequate compressions in the CCO group was significantly lower than that of the 15:1 or 30:2 group (31.2±30.3% vs. 55.1±37.5% vs. 54.0±36.9%, respectively; P<0.001) and the difference occurred within the first minute. The RPE score in each minute and heart rate change in the CCO group was significantly higher than those of the C:V ratio groups. There was no significant difference in maximal oxygen uptake between the 3 groups. Energy expenditure in the CCO group was relatively lower than that of the 2 C:V ratio groups.
Conclusion: CPR using a 15:1 C:V ratio may provide a compression quality and exercise intensity comparable to those obtained using a 30:2 C:V ratio. An earlier decrease in compression quality and increase in RPE and heart rate could be produced by CCO CPR compared with 15:1 or 30:2 C:V ratios with relatively lower oxygen uptake and energy expenditure.
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Chest compression; Energy metabolism; Exercise; Ventilation.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
- American Heart Association 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2005;112(24 Suppl):IV1–203.
- Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S685–705.
- Sayre MR, Berg RA, Cave DM, et al. Hands-only (compression-only) cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a call to action for bystander response to adults who experience out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: a science advisory for the public from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Circulation. 2008;117:2162–7.
- Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2001;104:2465–70.
- Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation. 2002;105:645–9.
- Hostler D, Guimond G, Callaway C. A comparison of CPR delivery with various compression-to-ventilation ratios during two-rescuer CPR. Resuscitation. 2005;65:325–8.
- Hightower D, Thomas SH, Stone CK, Dunn K, March JA. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:300–3.
- Ashton A, McCluskey A, Gwinnutt CL, Keenan AM. Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min. Resuscitation. 2002;55:151–5.
- Ochoa FJ, Ramalle-Gomara E, Lisa V, Saralegui I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation. 1998;37:149–52.
- Greingor JL. Quality of cardiac massage with ratio compression-ventilation 5/1 and 15/2. Resuscitation. 2002;55:263–7.
- Yang HB, Yang YM, Kim JW, et al. The study of rescuer’s fatigue by changes of compression-vetilation ratio using manikin model of the one-rescuer CPR. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2006;21:116–25.
- Odegaard S, Saether E, Steen PA, Wik L. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins. Resuscitation. 2006;71:335–40.
- Trowbridge C, Parekh JN, Ricard MD, Potts J, Patrickson WC, Cason CL. A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation. BMC Nurs. 2009;8:6.
- Yannopoulos D, Tang W, Roussos C, Aufderheide TP, Idris AH, Lurie KG. Reducing ventilation frequency during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Respir Care. 2005;50:628–35.
- Hwang SO, Kim SH, Kim H, et al. Comparison of 15:1, 15:2, and 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratios for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a canine model of a simulated, witnessed cardiac arrest. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:183–9.
- Kim YS, Cho JH, Shin MC, et al. Comparison of quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in manikins with a change in the compression to ventilation ratio from 30:2 to 15:1. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2009;20:510–4.
- Norton K, Norton L, Sadgrove D. Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:496–502.
- Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2:92–8.
- Yannopoulos D, Aufderheide TP, Gabrielli A, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of 15:2 and 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratios for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1444–9.
- Deschilder K, De Vos R, Stockman W. The effect on quality of chest compressions and exhaustion of a compression: ventilation ratio of 30:2 versus 15:2 during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised trial. Resuscitation. 2007;74:113–8.
- Betz AE, Callaway CW, Hostler D, Rittenberger JC. Work of CPR during two different compression to ventilation ratios with real-time feedback. Resuscitation. 2008;79:278–82.
- Bjorshol CA, Soreide E, Torsteinbo TH, Lexow K, Nilsen OB, Sunde K. Quality of chest compressions during 10min of single-rescuer basic life support with different compression: ventilation ratios in a manikin model. Resuscitation. 2008;77:95–100.
- Vaillancourt C, Midzic I, Taljaard M, Chisamore B. Performer fatigue and CPR quality comparing 30:2 to 15:2 compression to ventilation ratios in older bystanders: a randomized crossover trial. Resuscitation. 2011;82:51–6.
- Hostler D, Rittenberger JC, Roth R, Callaway CW. Increased chest compression to ventilation ratio improves delivery of CPR. Resuscitation. 2007;74:446–52.
- Rea TD, Helbock M, Perry S, et al. Increasing use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest: survival implications of guideline changes. Circulation. 2006;114:2760–5.
- Sayre MR, Cantrell SA, White LJ, Hiestand BC, Keseg DP, Koser S. Impact of the 2005 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care guidelines on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:469–77.
- Steinmetz J, Barnung S, Nielsen SL, Risom M, Rasmussen LS. Improved survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using new guidelines. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:908–13.
- Aufderheide TP, Yannopoulos D, Lick CJ, et al. Implementing the 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines improves outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:1357–62.
- Hinchey PR, Myers JB, Lewis R, et al. Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival after the sequential implementation of 2005 AHA guidelines for compressions, ventilations, and induced hypothermia: the Wake County experience. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:348–57.
- Kim YB, Choi SM, Kim YM, et al. Effect of single-rescuer fatigue on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with 30:2 and 15:2 compression-toventilation ratios. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2006;17:519–27.
- Babbs CF, Kern KB. Optimum compression to ventilation ratios in CPR under realistic, practical conditions: a physiological and mathematical analysis. Resuscitation. 2002;54:147–57.
- Turner I, Turner S. Optimum cardiopulmonary resuscitation for basic and advanced life support: a simulation study. Resuscitation. 2004;62:209–17.
- Lucia A, de las Heras JF, Perez M, et al. The importance of physical fitness in the performance of adequate cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest. 1999;115:158–64.
- Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:71–80.
- Pescatello LS, Riebe D, Arena R, American College of Sports Medicine . ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
- Gianotto-Oliveira R, Gianotto-Oliveira G, Gonzalez MM, et al. Quality of continuous chest compressions performed for one or two minutes. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015;70:190–5.
- Pierce EF, Eastman NW, McGowan RW, Legnola ML. Metabolic demands and perceived exertion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Percept Mot Skills. 1992;74:323–8.
- Stiell IG, Brown SP, Nichol G, et al. What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients? Circulation. 2014;130:1962–70.
Source: PubMed