Antibiotic Prescription Rates After eVisits Versus Office Visits in Primary Care: Observational Study

Artin Entezarjou, Susanna Calling, Tapomita Bhattacharyya, Veronica Milos Nymberg, Lina Vigren, Ashkan Labaf, Ulf Jakobsson, Patrik Midlöv, Artin Entezarjou, Susanna Calling, Tapomita Bhattacharyya, Veronica Milos Nymberg, Lina Vigren, Ashkan Labaf, Ulf Jakobsson, Patrik Midlöv

Abstract

Background: Direct-to-consumer telemedicine is an increasingly used modality to access primary care. Previous research on assessment using synchronous virtual visits showed mixed results regarding antibiotic prescription rates, and research on assessment using asynchronous chat-based eVisits is lacking.

Objective: The goal of the research was to investigate if eVisit management of sore throat, other respiratory symptoms, or dysuria leads to higher rates of antibiotic prescription compared with usual management using physical office visits.

Methods: Data from 3847 eVisits and 759 office visits for sore throat, dysuria, or respiratory symptoms were acquired from a large private health care provider in Sweden. Data were analyzed to compare antibiotic prescription rates within 3 days, antibiotic type, and diagnoses made. For a subset of sore throat visits (n=160 eVisits, n=125 office visits), Centor criteria data were manually extracted and validated.

Results: Antibiotic prescription rates were lower following eVisits compared with office visits for sore throat (169/798, 21.2%, vs 124/312, 39.7%; P<.001) and respiratory symptoms (27/1724, 1.6%, vs 50/251, 19.9%; P<.001), while no significant differences were noted comparing eVisits to office visits for dysuria (1016/1325, 76.7%, vs 143/196, 73.0%; P=.25). Guideline-recommended antibiotics were prescribed similarly following sore throat eVisits and office visits (163/169, 96.4%, vs 117/124, 94.4%; P=.39). eVisits for respiratory symptoms and dysuria were more often prescribed guideline-recommended antibiotics (26/27, 96.3%, vs 37/50, 74.0%; P=.02 and 1009/1016, 99.3%, vs 135/143, 94.4%; P<.001, respectively). Odds ratios of antibiotic prescription following office visits compared with eVisits after adjusting for age and differences in set diagnoses were 2.94 (95% CI 1.99-4.33), 11.57 (95% CI 5.50-24.32), 1.01 (95% CI 0.66-1.53), for sore throat, respiratory symptoms, and dysuria, respectively.

Conclusions: The use of asynchronous eVisits for the management of sore throat, dysuria, and respiratory symptoms is not associated with an inherent overprescription of antibiotics compared with office visits.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03474887; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03474887.

Keywords: antibiotics; cystitis; eVisit; respiratory tract infection; streptococcal tonsillitis; telemedicine; virtual; virtual visit.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: AL is a cofounder of Doctrin AB. AE is currently employed by Capio AB. LV has previously been employed by Capio AB. Other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

©Artin Entezarjou, Susanna Calling, Tapomita Bhattacharyya, Veronica Milos Nymberg, Lina Vigren, Ashkan Labaf, Ulf Jakobsson, Patrik Midlöv. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 15.03.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient recruitment. PHYSI: primary care office visits; DIGI: eVisits; PHYSI-T: office visits with a chief complaint of sore throat; PHYSI-R: office visits with a chief complaint of common cold/influenza or cough; PHYSI-U: office visits with a chief complaint of dysuria; DIGI-T: eVisits with a chief complaint of sore throat; DIGI-R: eVisits with a chief complaint of common cold/influenza or cough; DIGI-U: eVisits with a chief complaint of dysuria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prescription rates for various antibiotics following chief complaint of sore throat.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prescription rates for various antibiotics following chief complaint of dysuria.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prescription rates for various antibiotics following chief complaint of respiratory symptoms.

References

    1. Ekman B. Cost analysis of a digital health care model in Sweden. Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Sep;2(3):347–354. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0059-7. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0059-7.10.1007/s41669-017-0059-7
    1. Mehrotra A. The convenience revolution for treatment of low-acuity conditions. JAMA. 2013 Jul 03;310(1):35–36. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6825. 1707731
    1. Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A. The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 01;20(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4. 10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4
    1. Gordon AS, Adamson WC, DeVries AR. Virtual visits for acute, nonurgent care: a claims analysis of episode-level utilization. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6783. v19i2e35
    1. O'Neill J. Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations. London: Wellcome Trust; 2014.
    1. Lee GC, Reveles KR, Attridge RT, Lawson KA, Mansi IA, Lewis JS, Frei CR. Outpatient antibiotic prescribing in the United States: 2000 to 2010. BMC Med. 2014 Jun 11;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-96. 1741-7015-12-96
    1. Foster CB, Martinez KA, Sabella C, Weaver GP, Rothberg MB. Patient satisfaction and antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections by telemedicine. Pediatrics. 2019 Sep;144(3):e20190844. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0844. peds.2019-0844
    1. Davis CB, Marzec LN, Blea Z, Godfrey D, Bickley D, Michael SS, Reno E, Bookman K, Lemery JJ. Antibiotic prescribing patterns for sinusitis within a direct-to-consumer virtual urgent care. Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jun;25(6):519–522. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0100.
    1. Halpren-Ruder D, Chang AM, Hollander JE, Shah A. Quality assurance in telehealth: adherence to evidence-based indicators. Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jul;25(7):599–603. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0149.
    1. Johnson K, Dumkow L, Burns K, Yee M, Egwuatu N. Comparison of diagnosis and prescribing practices between virtual visits and office visits for adults diagnosed with sinusitis within a primary care network. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;6(9):ofz393. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz393. ofz393
    1. Mehrotra A, Paone S, Martich GD, Albert SM, Shevchik GJ. A comparison of care at e-visits and physician office visits for sinusitis and urinary tract infection. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 14;173(1):72–74. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.305. 1392490
    1. Murray MA, Penza KS, Myers JF, Furst JW, Pecina JL. Comparison of eVisit management of urinary symptoms and urinary tract infections with standard care. Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):639–644. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0044.
    1. Penza KS, Murray MA, Myers JF, Furst JW, Pecina JL. Management of acute sinusitis via e-Visit. Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jun 10; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0047.
    1. Ray KN, Shi Z, Gidengil CA, Poon SJ, Uscher-Pines L, Mehrotra A. Antibiotic prescribing during pediatric direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits. Pediatrics. 2019 Apr 08;143(5):e20182491. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2491.
    1. Shi Z, Mehrotra A, Gidengil CA, Poon SJ, Uscher-Pines L, Ray KN. Quality Of care for acute respiratory infections during direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits for adults. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018 Dec;37(12):2014–2023. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05091.
    1. Smith K, Tran D, Westra B. Sinusitis treatment guideline adherence in the e-visit setting: a performance improvement project. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7(2):299–307. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-10-CR-0143.
    1. Tan LF, Mason N, Gonzaga WJ. Virtual visits for upper respiratory tract infections in adults associated with positive outcome in a Cox model. Telemed J E Health. 2017 Mar;23(3):200–204. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0018.
    1. Uscher-Pines L, Mulcahy A, Cowling D, Hunter G, Burns R, Mehrotra A. Access and quality of care in direct-to-consumer telemedicine. Telemed J E Health. 2016 Apr;22(4):282–287. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0079.
    1. Swedes-Svarm: consumption of antibiotics and occurrence of antibiotic resistance in Sweden—2016. Public Health Agency of Sweden. [2021-02-26]. .
    1. Tyrstrup M, Beckman A, Mölstad S, Engström S, Lannering C, Melander E, Hedin K. Reduction in antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in Swedish primary care: a retrospective study of electronic patient records. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2018-9. 10.1186/s12879-016-2018-9
    1. Wändell P, Carlsson AC, Wettermark B, Lord G, Cars T, Ljunggren G. Most common diseases diagnosed in primary care in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2011. Fam Pract. 2013 Oct;30(5):506–513. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt033.cmt033
    1. Tell D, Engström S, Mölstad S. Adherence to guidelines on antibiotic treatment for respiratory tract infections in various categories of physicians: a retrospective cross-sectional study of data from electronic patient records. BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 15;5(7):e008096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008096. bmjopen-2015-008096
    1. Dekker ARJ, Verheij TJM, van der Velden AW. Antibiotic management of children with infectious diseases in Dutch Primary Care. Fam Pract. 2017 Apr 01;34(2):169–174. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw125.cmw125
    1. Gröndal H, Hedin K, Strandberg EL, André M, Brorsson A. Near-patient tests and the clinical gaze in decision-making of Swedish GPs not following current guidelines for sore throat: a qualitative interview study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jul 04;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0285-y. 10.1186/s12875-015-0285-y
    1. Schoenfeld AJ, Davies JM, Marafino BJ, Dean M, DeJong C, Bardach NS, Kazi DS, Boscardin WJ, Lin GA, Duseja R, Mei YJ, Mehrotra A, Dudley RA. Variation in quality of urgent health care provided during commercial virtual visits. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr 4;176(5):635–642. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8248.2511324
    1. Hickson R, Talbert J, Thornbury WC, Perin NR, Goodin AJ. Online medical care: the current state of “eVisits” in acute primary care delivery. Telemed J E Health. 2015 Feb;21(2):90–96. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0022.
    1. Liddy C, Drosinis P, Keely E. Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care: a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):274–285. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw024.cmw024
    1. Larsen J, Neighbour R. Five cards: a simple guide to beginning the consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Mar;64(620):150–151. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677662. 64/620/150
    1. Centor RM, Witherspoon JM, Dalton HP, Brody CE, Link K. The diagnosis of strep throat in adults in the emergency room. Med Decis Making. 1981;1(3):239–246. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8100100304.
    1. Handläggning av faryngotonsilliter i öppenvård: ny rekommendation [Management of pharyngotonsillitis in ambulatory care—new recommendation] Swedish Medical Products Agency. 2012. Dec 14, [2021-03-01]. .
    1. Ashwood JS, Mehrotra A, Cowling D, Uscher-Pines L. Direct-To-consumer telehealth may increase access to care but does not decrease spending. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017 Dec 01;36(3):485–491. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1130.36/3/485
    1. Uscher-Pines L, Mulcahy A, Cowling D, Hunter G, Burns R, Mehrotra A. Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1234–1235. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2024.2296013
    1. Skånér Y, Arrelöv B, Backlund LG, Fresk M, Aström AW, Nilsson GH. Quality of sickness certification in primary health care: a retrospective database study. BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Apr 12;14:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-48. 1471-2296-14-48
    1. Holte M, Holmen J. Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice? BMC Res Notes. 2020 Jan 10;13(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-4887-7. 10.1186/s13104-020-4887-7
    1. Fine AM, Nizet V, Mandl KD. Large-scale validation of the Centor and McIsaac scores to predict group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jun 11;172(11):847–852. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.950. archinternmed.2012.950
    1. Rubin MA, Bateman K, Donnelly S, Stoddard GJ, Stevenson K, Gardner RM, Samore MH. Use of a personal digital assistant for managing antibiotic prescribing for outpatient respiratory tract infections in rural communities. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(6):627–634. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2029. M2029
    1. Entezarjou A, Bolmsjö BB, Calling S, Midlöv P, Milos Nymberg V. Experiences of digital communication with automated patient interviews and asynchronous chat in Swedish primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e036585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036585. bmjopen-2019-036585
    1. Rekommendationer för kvalitetsindikatorer vid digitala vårdmöten [Recommendations for quality indicators in digital care visits] Swedish Strategic Programme Against Antibiotic Resistance. 2019. [2021-03-01]. .
    1. Razai M, Hussain K. Improving antimicrobial prescribing practice for sore throat symptoms in a general practice setting. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017;6(1) doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u211706.w4738. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u211706.w4738.bmjquality_uu211706.w4738
    1. Hersh AL, Stenehjem E, Daines W. RE: antibiotic prescribing during pediatric direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits. Pediatrics. 2019 Aug;144(2):e20191786B. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1786B. peds.2019-1786B

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren