Does time taken by paediatric critical care transport teams to reach the bedside of critically ill children affect survival? A retrospective cohort study from England and Wales

Sarah E Seaton, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, Patrick Davies, Emma Hudson, Stephen Morris, Christina Pagel, Fatemah Rajah, Jo Wray, Elizabeth S Draper, DEPICT Study Team, Sarah E Seaton, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, Patrick Davies, Emma Hudson, Stephen Morris, Christina Pagel, Fatemah Rajah, Jo Wray, Elizabeth S Draper, DEPICT Study Team

Abstract

Background: Reaching the bedside of a critically ill child within three hours of agreeing the child requires intensive care is a key target for Paediatric Critical Care Transport teams (PCCTs) to achieve in the United Kingdom. Whilst timely access to specialist care is necessary for these children, it is unknown to what extent time taken for the PCCT to arrive at the bedside affects clinical outcome.

Methods: Data from transports of critically ill children who were admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) in England and Wales from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 were extracted from the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) and linked with adult critical care data and Office for National Statistics mortality data. Logistic regression models, adjusted for pre-specified confounders, were fitted to investigate the impact of time-to-bedside on mortality within 30 days of admission and other key time points. Negative binomial models were used to investigate the impact of time-to-bedside on PICU length of stay and duration of invasive ventilation.

Results: There were 9116 children transported during the study period, and 645 (7.1%) died within 30 days of PICU admission. There was no evidence that 30-day mortality changed as time-to-bedside increased. A similar relationship was seen for mortality at other pre-selected time points. In children who waited longer for a team to arrive, there was limited evidence of a small increase in PICU length of stay (expected number of days increased from: 7.17 to 7.58).

Conclusion: There is no evidence that reducing the time-to-bedside target for PCCTs will improve the survival of critically ill children. A shorter time to bedside may be associated with a small reduction in PICU length of stay.

Keywords: Critical care transport; Paediatric intensive care; Paediatric transport.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for the primary analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Probability of mortality within 30 days of PICU admission by time taken to reach the bedside whilst holding other variables in the model at the mean value
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Expected PICU length of stay and length of ventilation in PICU (days) by time taken to arrive at the bedside whilst holding other variables in the model at the mean value

References

    1. Pearson G, Shann F, Barry P, Vyas J, Thomas D, Powell C, et al. Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria. Lancet. 1997;349(9060):1213–1217. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)12396-5.
    1. Department of Health . Report from the National Coordinating Group on Paediatric Intensive Care to the Chief Executive of the NHS Executive. Wetherby: Department of Health; 1997. Paediatric intensive care: A framework for the future.
    1. Gemke R. Centralisation of paediatric intensive care to improve outcome. Lancet. 1997;349(9060):1187–1188. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62407-5.
    1. Pollack M, Alexander S, Clarker N, Ruttumann U, Tesselaar H, Bachulis A. Improved outcomes from tertiary center pediatric intensive care: a statewide comparison of tertiary and nontertiary care facilities. Crit Care Med. 1991;19(2):150–159. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199102000-00007.
    1. Ramnarayan P, Polke E. The state of paediatric intensive care retrieval in Britain. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(2):145–149. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.204503.
    1. PICANet. Annual Report 2018. Online at: [Last accessed: 20/6/2019].
    1. Ramnarayan P, Thiru K, Parslow RC, Harrison DA, Draper ES, Rowan KM. Effect of specialist retrieval teams on outcomes in children admitted to paediatric intensive care units in England and Wales: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):698–704. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61113-0.
    1. Moynihan K, McSharry B, Reed P, Buckley D. Impact of retrieval, distance traveled, and referral center on outcomes in unplanned admissions to a national PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(2):e34–e42. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000586.
    1. Orr RA, Felmet KA, Han Y, McCloskey KA, Dragotta MA, Bills DM, et al. Pediatric Specialized Transport Teams Are Associated With Improved Outcomes. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):40–48. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0515.
    1. Paediatric Intensive Care Society . Quality standards for the care of critically ill children. 2015.
    1. NHS England. PICU Quality Dashboard. [Last accessed: 3/9/19].
    1. Bigham MT, Schwartz HP. Quality metrics in neonatal and pediatric critical care transport: a consensus statement. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(5):518–524. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31828a7fc1.
    1. Schwartz HP, Bigham MT, Schoettker PJ, Meyer K, Trautman MS, Insoft RM. Quality metrics in neonatal and pediatric critical care transport: a National Delphi Project. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(8):711–717. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000477.
    1. Rollin A. Working together for the sick or injured child: the Tanner report. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(12):1135–1137. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04876.x.
    1. Ramnarayan P, Evans R, Draper ES, Seaton SE, Wray J et al. Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e028000. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028000.
    1. Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G. PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric index of mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(2):278–285. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1601-2.
    1. Zou KH, O'Malley AJ, Mauri L. Receiver-Operating Characteristic Analysis for Evaluating Diagnostic Tests and Predictive Models. Circulation. 2007;115(5):654–657. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594929.
    1. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 3. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
    1. Brier GW. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon Weather Rev. 1950;78(1):1–3. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>;2.
    1. Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, Deymann AJ, Lin JC, Nguyen TC, et al. The American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: executive summary. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(9):884–890. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001259.
    1. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, Totten AM, Adelson PD, Selden NR, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, third edition: update of the brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, Executive Summary. Pediatric Critical Care Med. 2019;20(3):280–289. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001736.
    1. Vos GD, Nissen AC, Nieman FHM, Meurs MM, van Waardenburg DA, Ramsay G, et al. Comparison of interhospital pediatric intensive care transport accompanied by a referring specialist or a specialist retrieval team. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(2):302–308. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2066-7.
    1. King M, Ramnarayan P, Seaton SE, Pagel C. Modelling the allocation of paediatric intensive care retrieval teams in England and Wales. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(10):962–966. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316056.
    1. Ramnarayan P, Patel K, Pappachan J, Purday J, Davis P, Harrison D, et al. Characteristics and outcome of children admitted to adult intensive care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (1996–2011) Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(11):2020–2027. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3010-0.
    1. Borrows EL, Lutman DH, Montgomery MA, Petros AJ, Ramnarayan P. Effect of patient- and team-related factors on stabilization time during pediatric intensive care transport. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(4):451–456.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren