HX008, an anti-PD1 antibody, plus irinotecan as second-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial

Yan Song, Ning Li, Qun Li, Xinjun Liang, Shu Zhang, Qingxia Fan, Xianli Yin, Zhixiang Zhuang, Yunpeng Liu, Jingdong Zhang, Xiaoge Kou, Haijun Zhong, Xiaofei Wang, Yiwei Dou, Jing Huang, Yan Song, Ning Li, Qun Li, Xinjun Liang, Shu Zhang, Qingxia Fan, Xianli Yin, Zhixiang Zhuang, Yunpeng Liu, Jingdong Zhang, Xiaoge Kou, Haijun Zhong, Xiaofei Wang, Yiwei Dou, Jing Huang

Abstract

Background: Irinotecan is used as second-line treatment in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. The role of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody plus irinotecan, in this setting and population is unclear.

Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted in 11 Chinese hospitals. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed advanced G/GEJ cancer that refractory to, or intolerant of, first-line chemotherapy with a platinum and/or fluoropyrimidine. Subjects received HX008 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks plus irinotecan 160 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors V.1.1.

Results: Between October 2018 and September 2019, a total of 58 patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer were enrolled in this study. Median follow-up was 10.5 months (range 7.4-18.9) months. Confirmed ORR was observed in 16 patients, for an ORR of 27.6% (95% CI 16.1% to 39.1%); 19 patients experienced stable disease, leading to a disease control rate of 60.3% (95% CI 46.4% to 73.0%). ORR in patients with PD-ligand 1 (L1) positive (Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥1) and negative (CPS<1) tumors was 38.5% (5/13) and 37.5% (3/8), respectively. Median duration of response was 8.0 months (range 1.5-12.5), 6 of 16 (37.5%) responses were ongoing. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI 2.2 to 5.5). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR) (95% CI 8.7 to NR). Patients with PD-L1 positive tumors tended to have longer OS than those with PD-L1 negative tumors, but the difference was not statistically significant (NR vs 8.7 months, p=0.1858).The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (32.8%), leukopenia (31.0%), anemia (17.2%), decreased appetite (8.6%), vomit (6.9%), nausea (6.9%) and fatigue (5.2%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion: The combination of HX008 and irinotecan demonstrated promising activity and manageable safety as second-line treatment in patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer, which warrants further study.

Trial registration number: NCT03704246.

Keywords: clinical trials; gastrointestinal neoplasms; phase II as topic.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: XW and YD are employees of Taizhou Hanzhong Biomedical. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall tumor responses of HX008 plus irinotecan as assessed by site investigators. (A) Best change from baseline in the size of target tumor lesion. Color code defines the best of response of target tumor lesion. Seven patients (indicated by star) had a new lesion were evaluated as disease progression. (B) Percent change in the size of target tumor lesion from baseline in each patient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B).

References

    1. Taieb J, Moehler M, Boku N, et al. . Evolution of checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancers: current status and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2018;66:104–13. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.04.004
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492
    1. Zaanan A, Bouché O, Benhaim L, et al. . Gastric cancer: French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO). Dig Liver Dis 2018;50:768–79. 10.1016/j.dld.2018.04.025
    1. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, et al. . Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016;27:v38–49. 10.1093/annonc/mdw350
    1. Wagner AD, Syn NL, Moehler M, et al. . Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;8:CD004064. 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4
    1. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, et al. . Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 trial. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:e180013. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0013
    1. Kang Y-K, Boku N, Satoh T, et al. . Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017;390:2461–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31827-5
    1. Shitara K, Özgüroğlu M, Bang Y-J, et al. . Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018;392:123–33. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31257-1
    1. Tabernero J, Van Cutsem E, Bang Y-J, et al. . Pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma: the phase III KEYNOTE-062 study. JCO 2019;37:LBA4007 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.18_suppl.LBA4007
    1. Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, et al. . Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (rainbow): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1224–35. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6
    1. Horn L, Mansfield AS, Szczęsna A, et al. . First-Line Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2220–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1809064
    1. Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. . Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous Non–Small-Cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2018;379:2040–51. 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865
    1. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. . Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2288–301. 10.1056/NEJMoa1716948
    1. Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. . Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet 2019;394:1915–28. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32591-7
    1. Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. . Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382:810–21. 10.1056/NEJMoa1910549
    1. Zitvogel L, Galluzzi L, Smyth MJ, et al. . Mechanism of action of conventional and targeted anticancer therapies: reinstating immunosurveillance. Immunity 2013;39:74–88. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.014
    1. Hato SV, Khong A, de Vries IJM, et al. . Molecular pathways: the immunogenic effects of platinum-based chemotherapeutics. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:2831–7. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3141
    1. Kon E, Benhar I. Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations: current efforts and important aspects for success. Drug Resist Updat 2019;45:13–29. 10.1016/j.drup.2019.07.004
    1. Zhang J, Huang Y, Xi G, et al. . HX008: a humanized PD-1 blocking antibody with potent antitumor activity and superior pharmacologic properties. MAbs 2020;12:1724751. 10.1080/19420862.2020.1724751
    1. Higuchi K, Tanabe S, Shimada K, et al. . Biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III trial (TCOG GI-0801/BIRIP trial). Eur J Cancer 2014;50:1437–45. 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.020
    1. Satoh T, Lee KH, Rha SY, et al. . Randomized phase II trial of Nimotuzumab plus irinotecan versus irinotecan alone as second-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2015;18:824–32. 10.1007/s10120-014-0420-9
    1. Hironaka S, Ueda S, Yasui H, et al. . Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:4438–44. 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5805
    1. Tanabe K, Fujii M, Nishikawa K, et al. . Phase II/III study of second-line chemotherapy comparing irinotecan-alone with S-1 plus irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer refractory to first-line treatment with S-1 (JACCRO GC-05). Ann Oncol 2015;26:1916–22. 10.1093/annonc/mdv265
    1. Bang Y-J, Ruiz EY, Van Cutsem E, et al. . Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: primary analysis of javelin gastric 300. Ann Oncol 2018;29:2052–60. 10.1093/annonc/mdy264
    1. Wainberg ZA, Fuchs CS, Tabernero J, et al. . Efficacy of pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy versus chemotherapy for PD-L1–positive (CPS ≥10) advanced G/GEJ cancer in the phase II KEYNOTE-059 (cohort 1) and phase III KEYNOTE-061 and KEYNOTE-062 studies. JCO 2020;38(4_suppl):427 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.4_suppl.427
    1. Janjigian YY, Bendell J, Calvo E, et al. . CheckMate-032 study: efficacy and safety of nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:2836–44. 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.6212
    1. Xu J, Zhang Y, Jia R, et al. . Anti-PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 combined with apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric, or esophagogastric junction cancer: an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study. Clin Cancer Res 2019;25:515–23. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2484
    1. Fukuoka S, Hara H, Takahashi N, et al. . Regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or colorectal cancer: an open-label, dose-escalation, and Dose-Expansion phase Ib trial (REGONIVO, EPOC1603). J Clin Oncol 2020;38:2053–61. 10.1200/JCO.19.03296
    1. Guimbaud R, Louvet C, Ries P, et al. . Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French intergroup (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie digestive, Fédération Nationale des centres de Lutte Contre Le cancer, and Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3520–6. 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.1011
    1. Makiyama A, Arimizu K, Hirano G, et al. . Irinotecan monotherapy as third-line or later treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2018;21:464–72. 10.1007/s10120-017-0759-9
    1. Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-Related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med 2018;378:158–68. 10.1056/NEJMra1703481

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren