Drug overdose in the ED: a record linkage study examining emergency department ICD-10 coding practices in a cohort of people who inject drugs

Rehana Di Rico, Dhanya Nambiar, Mark Stoové, Paul Dietze, Rehana Di Rico, Dhanya Nambiar, Mark Stoové, Paul Dietze

Abstract

Background: Drug overdose is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity amongst people who inject drugs (PWID). Drug overdose surveillance typically relies on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) coding system, however its real world utilisation and the implications for surveillance have not been well characterised. This study examines the patterns of ICD-10 coding pertaining to drug overdoses within emergency departments for a cohort of known PWID.

Methods: Cohort data from 688 PWID was linked to statewide emergency department administrative data between January 2008 and June 2013. ICD-10 diagnostic codes pertaining to poisonings by drugs, medicaments and biological substances (T-codes T36-T50) as well as mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use (F-codes F10-F19) were examined.

Results: There were 449 unique ED presentations with T or F code mentions contributed by 168 individuals. Nearly half of the T and F codes used were non-specific and did not identify either a drug class (n = 160, 36%) or clinical reaction (n = 46, 10%) and 8% represented withdrawal states. T and F codes could therefore be used to reasonably infer an illicit drug overdose in only 42% (n = 188) of cases. Majority of presentations with T or F overdose codes recorded only one diagnostic code per encounter (83%) and representing multiple-drug overdose (F19.- = 18%) or unidentified substances (T50.9 = 17%) using a single, broad diagnostic code was common.

Conclusions: Reliance on diagnoses alone when examining ED data will likely significantly underestimate incidence of specific drug overdose due to frequent use of non-specific ICD-10 codes and the use of single diagnostic codes to represent polysubstance overdose. Measures to improve coding specificity should be considered and further work is needed to determine the best way to use ED data in overdose surveillance.

Keywords: Australia; Cohort; Emergency services; ICD-10; Overdose; People who inject drugs; Poisoning; Record linkage; Surveillance.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent, including consent to access Medicare information, was obtained from all participants during enrolment in the MIX study and MIX was approved by the Victorian Department of Human Services (now Department of Health) and Monash University Human Research Ethics Committees. The present study was approved by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Bucello C, Lemon J, Wiessing L, Hickman M. Mortality among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:102–123. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.108282.
    1. Warner-Smith M, Darke S, Day C. Morbidity associated with non-fatal heroin overdose. Addiction. 2002;97:963–967. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00132.x.
    1. Darke S, Ross J, Hall W. Overdose among heroin users in Sydney, Australia: I. prevalence and correlates of non-fatal overdose. Addiction. 1996;91:405–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02289.x.
    1. Karlsson T, Butler K, Uporova J, Roxburgh A. Australian drug trends 2017. Preliminary findings from the illicit drugs reporting system (IDRS). 2017. . Accessed 19 Dec 2017.
    1. Horyniak D, Higgs P, Jenkinson R, Degenhardt L, Stoové M, Kerr T, et al. Establishing the Melbourne injecting drug user cohort study (MIX): rationale, methods, and baseline and twelve-month follow-up results. Harm Reduct J. 2013;10:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-10-11.
    1. Fatovich D, Bartu A, Davis G, Atrie J, Daly F. Morbidity associated with heroin overdose presentations to an emergency department: a 10-year record linkage study. Emerg Med Australas. 2010;22:240–245.
    1. Stoové MA, Dietze PM, Jolley D. Overdose deaths following previous non-fatal heroin overdose: record linkage of ambulance attendance and death registry data. Drug Acohol Rev. 2009;28:347–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00057.x.
    1. Caudarella A, Dong H, Milloy M, Kerr T, Wood E, Hayashi K. Non-fatal overdose as a risk factor for subsequent fatal overdose among people who inject drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;1:51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.024.
    1. Ising A, Proescholdbell S, Harmon KJ, Sachdeva N, Marshall SW, Waller AE. Use of syndromic surveillance data to monitor poisonings and drug overdoses in state and local public health agencies. Inj Prev. 2016;22(Suppl 1):i43–i49. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041821.
    1. Mccormick M, Koziol J, Development SK. Use of a new opioid overdose surveillance system, 2016. Rhode Island Medical Journal. 2017;100(4):37–39.
    1. Nambiar Dhanya, Spelman Tim, Stoové Mark, Dietze Paul. Are People Who Inject Drugs Frequent Users of Emergency Department Services? A Cohort Study (2008–2013) Substance Use & Misuse. 2017;53(3):457–465. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1341921.
    1. Backmund M, Schuetz C, Meyer K, Edlin B, Reimer J. The risk of emergency room treatment due to overdose in injection drug users. J Addict Dis. 2009;28:68–73. doi: 10.1080/10550880802545192.
    1. World Health Organization. Programme on substance abuse. Deaths related to drug abuse: report on a WHO consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993. . Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
    1. World Health Organization. Subst Abus Department . Opioid Overdose - Trends, Risk Factors, Interventions and Priorities for Action. 1998.
    1. Wood DM, Conran P, Dargan PI. ICD-10 coding: poor identification of recreational drug presentations to a large emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2011;28:387–389. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.088344.
    1. Shah AD, Wood DM, Dargan PI. Survey of ICD-10 coding of hospital admissions in the UK due to recreational drug toxicity. QJM - Mon J Assoc Physicians. 2011;104:779–784. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr074.
    1. Reardon JM, Harmon KJ, Schult GC, Staton CA, Waller AE. Use of diagnosis codes for detection of clinically significant opioid poisoning in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis of a surveillance case definition. BMC Emerg Med. 2016;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0075-4.
    1. Rowe C, Vittinghoff E, Santos GM, Behar E, Turner C, Coffin PO. Performance measures of diagnostic codes for detecting opioid overdose in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24:475–483. doi: 10.1111/acem.13121.
    1. Scott N, Caulkins JP, Ritter A, Dietze P. Patterns of drug preference and use among people who inject drugs in Melbourne, Australia. Addict Res Theory. 2015;23:459–468. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2015.1031118.
    1. Nambiar D, Stoové M, Dietze P. Frequent emergency department presentations among people who inject drugs: a record linkage study. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;44:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.03.010.
    1. Department of Health & Human Services. Victoria State Government Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD). (2017). Accessed 9 Aug 2017.
    1. Marson R, McD Taylor D, Ashby K, Cassell E. Victorian emergency minimum dataset: factors that impact upon the data quality. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:104–112.
    1. Injury Surveillance Workgroup 7. Consensus recommendations for national and state poisoning surveillance. The safe states Alliance. Atlanta, GA. 2012. . Accessed 2 Dec 2017.
    1. West E, Cameron P, O’Reilly G, Drummer OH, Bystrzycki A. Accuracy of current clinical diagnosis in recreational drug-related attendance to the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2008;20:333–338.
    1. Boyer EW. Management of Opioid Analgesic Overdose. N Engl J Med. 2013;367:146–155. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1202561.
    1. Wu AHB, McKay C, Broussard LA, Hoffman RS, Kwong TC, Moyer TP, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory medicine practice guidelines: recommendations for the use of laboratory tests to support poisoned patients who present to the emergency department. Clin Chem. 2003;49:357–379. doi: 10.1373/49.3.357.
    1. Dietze PM, Cvetkovski S, Rumbold G, Miller P. Ambulance attendance at heroin overdose in Melbourne: the establishment of a database of ambulance service records. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2000;19:27–33. doi: 10.1080/09595230096110.
    1. Dietze P, Jolley D, Cvetkovski S, Cantwell K, Jacobs I, Indig D. Characteristics of non-fatal opioid overdoses attended by ambulance services in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2004;28:569–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00049.x.
    1. Willman MW, Liss DB, Schwarz ES, Mullins ME. Do heroin overdose patients require observation after receiving naloxone? Clin Toxicol. 2017;55:81–87. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2016.1253846.
    1. Ambulance Victoria Clinical Practice Guidelines. (2016). Accessed 11 Nov 2017.
    1. World Health Organization. Browse ICD-10 Version: 2008. (2016). Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
    1. Slavova S, Bunn TL, Talbert J. Drug overdose surveillance using hospital discharge data. Public Health Rep. 2014;129:437–445. doi: 10.1177/003335491412900507.
    1. Jackson T, Moje C, Shepheard J, McMillan A. Asia Pacific journal of health management. Australasian college of health service management. 2017. Monitoring sentinel events using routine inpatient data.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren