Bridging the Gap Between the Classroom and the Clerkship: A Clinical Reasoning Curriculum for Third-Year Medical Students

Nicholas S Duca, Susan Glod, Nicholas S Duca, Susan Glod

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical reasoning is the complex cognitive process that drives the diagnosis of disease and treatment of patients. There is a national call for medical educators to develop clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education. To address this need, we developed a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum for internal medicine clerkship students.

Methods: We delivered six 1-hour sessions to approximately 40 students over the 15-week combined medicine-surgery clerkship at Penn State College of Medicine. We developed the content using previous work in clinical reasoning, including the American College of Physicians' Teaching Medicine Series book Teaching Clinical Reasoning. Students applied a clinical reasoning diagnostic framework to written cases during each workshop. Each session followed a scaffold approach and built upon previously learned clinical reasoning skills. We administered a pre- and postsurvey to assess students' baseline knowledge of clinical reasoning concepts and perceived confidence in performing clinical reasoning skills. Students also provided open-ended responses regarding the effectiveness of the curriculum.

Results: The curriculum was well received by students and led to increased perceived knowledge of clinical reasoning concepts and increased confidence in applying clinical reasoning skills. Students commented on the usefulness of practicing clinical reasoning in a controlled environment while utilizing a framework that could be deliberately applied to patient care.

Discussion: The longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum was effective in reinforcing key concepts of clinical reasoning and allowed for deliberate practice in a controlled environment. The curriculum is generalizable to students in both the preclinical and clinical years.

Keywords: Case-Based Teaching; Clinical Reasoning; Diagnostic Error.

Conflict of interest statement

None to report.

References

    1. Trowbridge RL, Rencic JJ, Durning SJ, eds. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians; 2015.
    1. Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(suppl 2):ii22–ii27.
    1. The Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for entering residency. Association of American Medical Colleges website. Published 2014. Accessed December 17, 2017.
    1. Audétat M-C, Laurin S, Dory V, Charlin B, Nendaz MR. Diagnosis and management of clinical reasoning difficulties: Part I. Clinical reasoning supervision and educational diagnosis. Med Teach. 2017;39(8):792–796.
    1. Rencic J, Trowbridge RL Jr, Fagan M, Szauter K, Durning S. Clinical reasoning education at US medical schools: results from a national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(11):1242–1246.
    1. van Gessel E, Nendaz MR, Vermeulen B, Junod A, Vu NV. Development of clinical reasoning from the basic sciences to the clerkships: a longitudinal assessment of medical students’ needs and self‐perception after a transitional learning unit. Med Educ. 2003;37(11):966–974.
    1. Weinstein A, Pinto-Powell R. Introductory clinical reasoning curriculum. MedEdPORTAL. 2016;12:10370
    1. Levin M, Cennimo D, Chen S, Lamba S. Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students: a case-based illness script worksheet approach. MedEdPORTAL. 2016;12:10445
    1. Durning SJ, LaRochelle J, Pangaro L, et al. Does the authenticity of preclinical teaching format affect subsequent clinical clerkship outcomes? A prospective randomized crossover trial. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(2):177–182.
    1. Posel N, McGee JB, Fleiszer DM. Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases. Med Teach. 2015;37(9):813–818.
    1. Houchens N, Harrod M, Fowler KE, Moody S, Saint S. How exemplary inpatient teaching physicians foster clinical reasoning. Am J Med. 2017;130(9):1113e1-1113.e8.
    1. Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med. 1994;69(11):883–885.
    1. Pottier P, Hardouin J-B, Hodges BD, et al. Exploring how students think: a new method combining think‐aloud and concept mapping protocols. Med Educ. 2010;44(9):926–935.
    1. Strowd R, Kwan A, Cruz T, Gamaldo C, Salas R. A guide to developing clinical reasoning skills in neurology: a focus on medical students. MedEdPORTAL. 2015;11:10163
    1. Dinardo D, Tilstra S, Painter T. Thinking out loud: using principles from “example based learning” in a clinical reasoning case conference format. Paper presented at: Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine: Academic Internal Medicine Week; March 18–21, 2018; San Antonio, TX.
    1. Durning SJ, Artino A, Boulet J, et al. The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a post-encounter form for evaluating clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):30–37.
    1. DiNardo D, Tilstra S, McNeil M, et al. Identification of facilitators and barriers to residents’ use of a clinical reasoning tool. Diagnosis (Berl). 2018;5(1):21–28.
    1. Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Goulet F, van der Vleuten C. The Script Concordance test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med. 2000;12(4):189–195.
    1. Hrynchak P, Takahashi SG, Nayer M. Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature review. Med Educ. 2014;48(9):870–883.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren