Peer training of community health workers to improve heart health among African American women

Robina Josiah Willock, Robert M Mayberry, Fengxia Yan, Pamela Daniels, Robina Josiah Willock, Robert M Mayberry, Fengxia Yan, Pamela Daniels

Abstract

Introduction: Training community health workers (CHWs) builds a workforce that is essential to addressing the chronic disease crisis. This article describes a highly replicable CHW training program that targets heart disease risk among African American women.

Background: African American women suffer disproportionately from heart disease mortality and morbidity. Well-trained CHWs are uniquely positioned to close this disparity gap. Method. We used a Learning Circle approach to train CHWs in heart health education. The curriculum blended web-based, self-directed learning and in-person peer coaching. CHWs learned through (a) peer-to-peer sharing, (b) problem solving and brainstorming, and (c) leadership and experiential activities. Training evaluation measures were CHWs' (a) self-confidence, (b) heart health knowledge, (c) satisfaction with training, (d) training retention, and (e) replication of training within 90 days after training.

Results: This training resulted in appreciable effects on four of five outcome measures. Heart health knowledge increased significantly among experienced CHWs (p = .011). CHWs were satisfied with training and retention was 100%. CHWs initiated and subsequently delivered 122 person hours of community heart health education and CHW training in their communities.

Discussion/conclusion: CHW heart health training using Learning Circles is a practical and replicable method of training CHWs and holds significant potential for building capacity in resource-poor community organizations.

Keywords: Black/African American; cardiovascular disease; chronic disease; health disparities; health education; lay health advisors/community health workers; minority health; workforce development.

© 2014 Society for Public Health Education.

Figures

Figure 1. Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of evaluation
Figure 1. Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of evaluation

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren