Achieving change in primary care--effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews

Rosa Lau, Fiona Stevenson, Bie Nio Ong, Krysia Dziedzic, Shaun Treweek, Sandra Eldridge, Hazel Everitt, Anne Kennedy, Nadeem Qureshi, Anne Rogers, Richard Peacock, Elizabeth Murray, Rosa Lau, Fiona Stevenson, Bie Nio Ong, Krysia Dziedzic, Shaun Treweek, Sandra Eldridge, Hazel Everitt, Anne Kennedy, Nadeem Qureshi, Anne Rogers, Richard Peacock, Elizabeth Murray

Abstract

Objective: To identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care.

Design: Systematic review of reviews.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were searched, from first publication until December 2013; the bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional reports.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Eligible reviews had to (1) examine effectiveness of single or multifaceted implementation strategies, (2) measure health professional practice or process outcomes and (3) include studies from predominantly primary care in developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles of potentially eligible reviews for inclusion.

Data synthesis: Extracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach.

Results: 91 reviews were included. The most commonly evaluated strategies were those targeted at the level of individual professionals, rather than those targeting organisations or context. These strategies (eg, audit and feedback, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders) on their own demonstrated a small to modest improvement (2-9%) in professional practice or behaviour with considerable variability in the observed effects. The effects of multifaceted strategies targeted at professionals were mixed and not necessarily more effective than single strategies alone. There was relatively little review evidence on implementation strategies at the levels of organisation and wider context. Evidence on cost-effectiveness was limited and data on costs of different strategies were scarce and/or of low quality.

Conclusions: There is a substantial literature on implementation strategies aimed at changing professional practices or behaviour. It remains unclear which implementation strategies are more likely to be effective than others and under what conditions. Future research should focus on identifying and assessing the effectiveness of strategies targeted at the wider context and organisational levels and examining the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies.

Prospero registration number: CRD42014009410.

Keywords: Implementation; PRIMARY CARE; Systematic review.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph illustrating median effects of single professional-level strategies alone versus no strategy or usual care. *Trials=inclusion of RCTs and quasi-experimental trial design; studies=inclusion of trials and non-trial design. CME, continuing medical education; RCT, randomised controlled trial.

References

    1. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 2008;299:211–13. 10.1001/jama.2007.26
    1. HM Treasury. A Review of UK Health Research Funding. December 2006. .
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    1. Jumaa PA. Hand hygiene: simple and complex. Int J Infect Dis 2005;9:3–14. 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.05.005
    1. Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A et al. . Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010;64:284–91. 10.1136/jech.2008.082743
    1. Harnden A, Lehman R. New primary care series: easily missed? BMJ 2009;338:b491 10.1136/bmj.b491
    1. Smith J, Holder H, Edwards N et al. . Securing the future of general practice: new models of primary care. Nuffield Trust and King's Fund, 2013.
    1. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci 2013;8:139 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139
    1. EPOC 2002. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group: Data Collection Checklist. EPOC resources for review authors Revised 2002. 2002. [].
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners (2007). The future direction of general practice, a roadmap. London: RCGP, 2007. .
    1. Mair FS, May C, O'Donnell C et al. . Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:357–64. 10.2471/BLT.11.099424
    1. Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A, Rashidian A et al. . Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD003030 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2
    1. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G et al. . Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:iii–iv, 1–72 10.3310/hta8060
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al. . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:W65–94. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
    1. Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN et al. . Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005548 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548
    1. Gardner B, Whittington C, McAteer J et al. . Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback. Soc Sci Med 2010;70:1618–25. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.039
    1. Dulko D. Audit and feedback as a clinical practice guideline implementation strategy: a model for acute care nurse practitioners. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2007;4:200–9. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00098.x
    1. Mugford M, Banfield P, O'Hanlon M. Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. BMJ 1991;303:398–402. 10.1136/bmj.303.6799.398
    1. Unverzagt S, Oemler M, Braun K et al. . Strategies for guideline implementation in primary care focusing on patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2014;31:247–66. 10.1093/fampra/cmt080
    1. Okelo SO, Butz AM, Sharma R et al. . Interventions to modify health care provider adherence to asthma guidelines: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2013;132:517–34. 10.1542/peds.2013-0779
    1. Schichtel M, Rose PW, Sellers C. Educational interventions for primary healthcare professionals to promote the early diagnosis of cancer: a systematic review. Educ Prim Care 2013; 24:274–90. 10.1080/14739879.2013.11494186
    1. Medves J, Godfrey C, Turner C et al. . Systematic review of practice guideline dissemination and implementation strategies for healthcare teams and team-based practice. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2010;8:79–89. 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00166.x
    1. Akbari A, Mayhew A, Al-Alawi MA et al. . Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(4):CD005471 10.1002/14651858.CD005471.pub2
    1. McKenna H, Ashton S, Keeney S. Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2004;41:369–78. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.10.008
    1. Weingarten SR, Henning JM, Badamgarav E et al. . Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ 2002;325:925 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.925
    1. Gross PA, Pujat D. Implementing practice guidelines for appropriate antimicrobial usage: a systematic review. Med Care 2001;39(8 Suppl 2):II55–69.
    1. Gill PS, Makela M, Vermeulen KM et al. . Changing doctor prescribing behaviour. Pharm World Sci 1999;21: 158–67. 10.1023/A:1008719129305
    1. Yano EM, Fink A, Hirsch SH et al. . Helping practices reach primary care goals. Lessons from the literature. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1146–56. 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430110051006
    1. Bywood PT, Lunnay B, Roche AM. Strategies for facilitating change in alcohol and other drugs (AOD) professional practice: a systematic review of the effectiveness of reminders and feedback. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008;27:548–58. 10.1080/09595230802245535
    1. Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2008;45:140–53. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.015
    1. Zwar N, Harris M, Griffiths R et al. . A systematic review of chronic disease management. Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW, 2006.
    1. Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1997;157:408–16.
    1. Balas EA, Boren SA, Brown GD et al. . Effect of physician profiling on utilization. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Gen Intern Med 1996;11:584–90. 10.1007/BF02599025
    1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S et al. . Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD000259 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
    1. Freudenstein U, Howe A. Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:995–1001.
    1. Smolders M, Laurant M, Roberge P et al. . Knowledge transfer and improvement of primary and ambulatory care for patients with anxiety. Can J Psychiatry 2008;53:277–93.
    1. Conroy M, Shannon W. Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1995;45:371–5.
    1. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA et al. . No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 1995;153:1423–31.
    1. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993;342:1317–22. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N
    1. Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Avorn J. Improving drug prescribing in primary care: a critical analysis of the experimental literature. Milbank Q 1989;67:268–317. 10.2307/3350142
    1. Pippalla RS, Riley DA, Chinburapa V. Influencing the prescribing behaviour of physicians: a metaevaluation. J Clin Pharm Ther 1995;20:189–98. 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1995.tb00648.x
    1. Nilsen P, Aalto M, Bendtsen P et al. . Effectiveness of strategies to implement brief alcohol intervention in primary healthcare. A systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care 2006; 24:5–15. 10.1080/02813430500475282
    1. Lomas J. Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health 1991;12:41–65. 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.000353
    1. Giguère A, Légaré F, Grimshaw J et al. . Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:CD004398.
    1. Qureshi N, Allen J, Hapgood R. A systematic review of educational outreach visits for non-prescribing interventions in general practice. Eur J Gen Pract 2002;8:31–6. 10.3109/13814780209160826
    1. Koch T, Iliffe S. Dementia diagnosis and management: a narrative review of changing practice. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e513–25. 10.3399/bjgp11X588493
    1. Lineker SC, Husted JA. Educational interventions for implementation of arthritis clinical practice guidelines in primary care: effects on health professional behavior. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1562–9. 10.3899/jrheum.100045
    1. Anderson P, Jane-Llopis E. How can we increase the involvement of primary health care in the treatment of tobacco dependence? A meta-analysis. Addiction 2004;99:299–312. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00672.x
    1. Beilby JJ, Silagy CA. Trials of providing costing information to general practitioners: a systematic review. Med J Aust 1997;167:89–92.
    1. O'Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G et al. . Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(4):CD000409.
    1. Thomas DC, Johnston B, Dunn K et al. . Continuing medical education, continuing professional development, and knowledge translation: improving care of older patients by practicing physicians. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:1610–18. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00879.x
    1. Cauffman JG, Forsyth RA, Clark VA et al. . Randomized controlled trials of continuing medical education: what makes them most effective? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002;22:214–21. 10.1002/chp.1340220405
    1. Davies A, O'Brien MA, Freemantle N et al. . Impact of formal continuing medical education do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 1999;282:867–74. 10.1001/jama.282.9.867
    1. Waddell DL. The effects of continuing education on nursing practice: a meta-analysis. J Contin Educ Nurs 1991;22:113–18.
    1. Beaudry JS. The effectiveness of continuing medical education: a quantitative synthesis. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1989;9:285–307. 10.1002/chp.4750090414
    1. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD et al. . Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1992;268:1111–17. 10.1001/jama.1992.03490090053014
    1. Gual A, Sabadini MB. Implementing alcohol disorders treatment throughout the community. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2011;24:203–7. 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283459256
    1. Glynn LG, Murphy AW, Smith SM et al. . Self-monitoring and other non-pharmacological interventions to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:e476–88. 10.3399/bjgp10X544113
    1. Perry M, Draskovic I, Lucassen P et al. . Effects of educational interventions on primary dementia care: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011;26:1–11. 10.1002/gps.2479
    1. Hulscher M, Wensing M, van der Weijden T et al. . Interventions to implement prevention in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(1):CD000362 10.1002/14651858.CD000362
    1. Gilbody S, Whitty P, Grimshaw J et al. . Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289:3145–51. 10.1001/jama.289.23.3145
    1. Flodgren G, Deane K, Dickinson HO et al. . Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD000984 10.1002/14651858.CD000984.pub2
    1. Gould DJ, Moralejo D, Drey N et al. . Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(9):CD005186 10.1002/14651858.CD005186.pub3
    1. Goodwin V, Jones-Hughes T, Thompson-Coon J et al. . Implementing the evidence for preventing falls among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review. J Safety Res 2011;42:443–51. 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.07.008
    1. Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G et al. . Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(8):CD000125 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub4
    1. Dexheimer JW, Talbot TR, Sanders DL et al. . Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:311–20. 10.1197/jamia.M2555
    1. Balas EA, Austin SM, Mitchell JA et al. . The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials. Arch Fam Med 1996;5:271–8. 10.1001/archfami.5.5.271
    1. Austin SM, Balas EA, Mitchell JA et al. . Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994:121–4.
    1. Van CJ, Kuhlthau KA, Bloom S et al. . Interventions to improve screening and follow-up in primary care: a systematic review of the evidence. Acad Pediatr 2012;12:269–82. 10.1016/j.acap.2012.02.004
    1. Nam S, Chesla C, Stotts NA et al. . Barriers to diabetes management: patient and provider factors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;93:1–9. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.02.002
    1. Bauer MS. A review of quantitative studies of adherence to mental health clinical practice guidelines. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2002;10:138–53. 10.1080/10673220216217
    1. Kupets R, Covens A. Strategies for the implementation of cervical and breast cancer screening of women by primary care physicians. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83:186–97. 10.1006/gyno.2001.6387
    1. Mandelblatt J, Kanetsky PA. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer. J Fam Pract 1995;40:162–71.
    1. Harvey EL, Glenny AM, Kirk SF et al. . An updated systematic review of interventions to improve health professionals’ management of obesity. Obes Rev 2002;3:45–55. 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2002.00053.x
    1. Vernon SW, McQueen A, Tiro JA et al. . Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:1023–39. 10.1093/jnci/djq223
    1. Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A et al. . The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3):CD001096 10.1002/14651858.CD001096.pub2
    1. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS et al. . Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:668–76. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00239
    1. Franx G, Dixon L, Wensing M et al. . Implementation strategies for collaborative primary care-mental health models. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2013;26:502–10. 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328363a69f
    1. Nagykaldi Z, Mold JW, Aspy CB. Practice facilitators: a review of the literature. Fam Med 2005;37:581–8.
    1. Thomas RE, Russell M, Lorenzetti D. Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(9):CD005188 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub2
    1. Langberg JM, Brinkman WB, Lichtenstein PK et al. . Interventions to promote the evidence-based care of children with ADHD in primary-care settings. Expert Rev Neurother 2009;9:477–87. 10.1586/ern.09.5
    1. Baskerville NB, Liddy C, Hogg W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:63–74. 10.1370/afm.1312
    1. Arroyave AM, Penaranda EK, Lewis CL. Organizational change: a way to increase colon, breast and cervical cancer screening in primary care practices. J Community Health 2011;36:281–8. 10.1007/s10900-010-9309-7
    1. Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ 2002;324:819–23. 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.819
    1. Van HP, De SD, Annemans L et al. . Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:247 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247
    1. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T et al. . Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med 2006;145:265–72. 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00006
    1. Town R, Kane R, Johnson P et al. . Economic incentives and physicians’ delivery of preventive care: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2005;28:234–40. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.013
    1. Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS et al. . Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2001;6:44–55. 10.1258/1355819011927198
    1. Chaix-Couturier C, Durand-Zaleski I, Jolly D et al. . Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues. Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12:133–42. 10.1093/intqhc/12.2.133
    1. Giuffrida A, Gosden T, Forland F et al. . Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(3):CD000531 10.1002/14651858.CD000531
    1. Scott A, Sivey P, Ait OD et al. . The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(9):CD008451 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2
    1. Baker R, Camosso SJ, Gillies C et al. . Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD005470 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2
    1. Parmelli E, Flodgren G, Schaafsma ME et al. . The effectiveness of strategies to change organisational culture to improve healthcare performance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(1):CD008315 10.1002/14651858.CD008315.pub2
    1. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM et al. . Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ 1998;317:465–8. 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465
    1. Curry LA, Linnander EL et al. . Organizational culture change in U.S. hospitals: a mixed methods longitudinal intervention study. Implement Sci 2015;10:29 10.1186/s13012-015-0218-0
    1. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR et al. . Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation. Implement Sci 2015;10:11 10.1186/s13012-014-0192-y
    1. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD et al. . Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995; 274:700–5. 10.1001/jama.1995.03530090032018
    1. Wensing M, van der Weijden T, Grol R. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective? Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:991–7.
    1. Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: MRC, 2000.
    1. Squires JE, Sullivan K, Eccles MP et al. . Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals’ behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews. Implement Sci 2014;9:152 10.1186/s13012-014-0152-6
    1. Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM et al. . Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci 2009;4:40 10.1186/1748-5908-4-40
    1. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ et al. . A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci 2015;10:21 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1
    1. Hoomans T, Severens JL. Economic evaluation of implementation strategies in health care. Implement Sci 2014;9:168 10.1186/s13012-014-0168-y
    1. Brusamento S, Legido-Quigley H, Panteli D et al. . Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to implement clinical guidelines for the management of chronic diseases at primary care level in EU Member States: a systematic review. Health Policy 2012;107:168–83. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.005
    1. Tooher R, Middleton P, Babidge W. Implementation of pressure ulcer guidelines: what constitutes a successful strategy? J Wound Care 2003;12:373–2. 10.12968/jowc.2003.12.10.26551
    1. Comino EJ, Davies GP, Krastev Y et al. . A systematic review of interventions to enhance access to best practice primary health care for chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:415 10.1186/1472-6963-12-415
    1. Boonacker CW, Hoes AW, Dikhoff MJ et al. . Interventions in health care professionals to improve treatment in children with upper respiratory tract infections. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:1113–21. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.008
    1. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ et al. . Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1821–33. 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821
    1. Gagnon MP, Légaré F, Labrecque M et al. . Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1):CD006093 10.1002/14651858.CD006093.pub2
    1. Williams EC, Johnson ML, Lapham GT et al. . Strategies to implement alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care settings: a structured literature review. Psychol Addict Behav 2011;25:206–14. 10.1037/a0022102
    1. Howe A, Ashton K, Hooper L. Effectiveness of educational interventions in primary care mental health: a qualitative systematic review. Prim Care Community Psychiatry 2006;11:167–77. 10.1185/135525707X183049
    1. Snell JL, Buck EL. Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Prev Med 1996;25:702–7. 10.1006/pmed.1996.0109
    1. Rawl SM, Menon U, Burness A et al. . Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review. Nurs Outlook 2012;60:172–81. 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren