Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling

S Lloyd, M Watson, B Waites, L Meyer, R Eeles, S Ebbs, A Tylee, S Lloyd, M Watson, B Waites, L Meyer, R Eeles, S Ebbs, A Tylee

Abstract

The present study set out to evaluate perceptions of risk, psychological morbidity and health behaviours in women with a family history of breast cancer who have attended genetic counselling and determine how these differ from general population risk women. Data were collected from 62 genetic counselees (cases) attending the Royal Marsden and Mayday University Hospital genetic counselling services and 62 matched GP attenders (controls). Levels of general psychological morbidity were found to be similar between cases and controls; however, cases reported significantly higher breast cancer-specific distress despite clinic attendance [mean (s.d.) total Impact of Event Scale score, 14.1 (14.3) cases; 2.4 (6.7) controls, P < 0.001]. Although cases perceived themselves to be more susceptible to breast cancer, many women failed correctly to recall risk figures provided by the clinic; 66% could not accurately recall their own lifetime chance. Clinics appeared to have a positive impact on preventive behaviours and cases tended to engage more regularly in breast self-examination (monthly, 66% of cases vs 47% of controls), although few differences were found between groups in terms of health beliefs. We conclude that counselees and GP controls showed considerable similarities on many of the outcome measures, and risk of breast cancer was not predictive of greater psychological morbidity; although cases were more vulnerable to cancer-specific distress. Despite genetic counselling, many cases continued to perceive their risk of breast cancer inaccurately.

References

    1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:183-203
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jul 7;85(13):1074-80
    1. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):168-74
    1. Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):934-8
    1. Lancet. 1995 Aug 26;346(8974):583
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Dec;57(6):1457-62
    1. Nature. 1995 Dec 21-28;378(6559):789-92
    1. J Abnorm Psychol. 1953 Jan;48(1):78-92
    1. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18
    1. Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;11(1):1-47
    1. Prev Med. 1985 May;14(3):358-71
    1. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1988 Mar-Apr;15(2):175-9
    1. Cancer Nurs. 1988 Feb;11(1):51-7
    1. Am J Med Genet. 1989 May;33(1):130-5
    1. Cancer. 1990 Oct 1;66(7):1613-20
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Feb;48(2):232-42
    1. Psychosomatics. 1991 Summer;32(3):324-36
    1. Br Med Bull. 1991 Apr;47(2):504-18
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Jan 1;84(1):24-30
    1. Psychosomatics. 1992 Spring;33(2):171-9
    1. Med Hypotheses. 1991 Dec;36(4):397-403
    1. J Med Genet. 1992 Oct;29(10):691-4
    1. Br J Cancer. 1993 Mar;67(3):612-4
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Apr;12(4):843-50

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren