Aerobic neuromuscular electrical stimulation--an emerging technology to improve haemoglobin A1c in type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a pilot study

Louis Crowe, Brian Caulfield, Louis Crowe, Brian Caulfield

Abstract

Objectives: A new generation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) devices can exercise aerobically at equivalent rates to voluntary exercise. Many with type 2 diabetes cannot or will not exercise sufficiently. The objective of this pilot investigation was to see (1) if it was an acceptable training modality for men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and (2) to assess effects on haemoglobin A1c levels.

Design, setting, participants and intervention: A case series of eight men with type 2 diabetes mellitus (aged 53±8; body mass index 32±5 5 kg/m(2)) trained with the NMES system for 1 h 6 times weekly for 8 weeks, unsupervised, at home. There were no other medication or lifestyle interventions. The aerobic NMES exercise system delivers a repeating set of four complex staggered pulses at high intensities (typically 100 mA+) through an array of eight thigh electrodes.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were changes in haemoglobin A1c and the responses in a questionnaire on participants' perceptions of the system. Body mass and composition were also measured before and after the NMES intervention period.

Results: All participants could use the system at a level that left them breathless and sweaty and with a heart rate over 120 beats per minute. Haemoglobin A1c levels improved by 0.8±0.7% from 7.4±1.3% (mean ± SD) to 6.6±1.0% (p=0.01). All participants considered the system suitable for people with diabetes, would recommend it and would continue to use it twice a week 'to maintain improvements'.

Conclusions: These results suggest that aerobic NMES may be acceptable and have a beneficial effect on haemoglobin A1c of some men with diabetes. The treatment may be of particular benefit in those who will not or cannot do adequate amounts of voluntary exercise. A randomised control trial is required for conclusive efficacy data.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Four large hydrogel electrodes are applied to the skin of each thigh using a neoprene wrap. The electrodes were pre-wired and mounted inside the wrap. The model's left leg is without the garment to illustrated electrode positioning.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simplified diagram of pulse pattern. Each pulse is represented by a different colour. The current passes between different sets of electrodes within each pulse. The electrodes are described by their position, that is, RUQ—right upper quadriceps electrode, RUH—right upper hamstring, RLQ—right lower quadriceps, etc. See also Figure 1 for picture of electrode positions. The pattern has four pulses; within this pattern, the pulses are separated by either 40 or 5 ms. For aerobic effect, the pattern is repeated five times per second. Each pulse has a different function and is further subdivided into timeslots. Differing electrode combinations are active during separate timeslots of a given pulse, for example, pulse 1, in red, is shared between the upper and lower quadriceps of both legs. By defining the timeslots, the upper quadriceps ‘see’ both a higher current intensity and a longer pulse duration than the lower electrodes. (This is not shown.) The second pulse, in blue, has five timeslots, and it targets the muscle bulk of the right leg. The third pulse, in green, follows 5 ms later; it is similar to the second pulse except it targets the muscle bulk of the left leg. Forty millisecond later, the fourth pulse, in black, spreads current between the hamstring electrodes.

References

    1. Crowe L, Caulfield B. Pushing out the limits of electrical stimulation. A case study in the aggressive use of an alternative to voluntary exercise. BMJ Case Reports 2011; doi:
    1. Crognale D, Crowe L, Devito G, et al. Neuro-muscular electrical stimulation training enhances maximal aerobic capacity in healthy physically active adults. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009:2137–40
    1. Banerjee P, Caulfield B, Crowe L, et al. Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength, peak VO2, and exercise capacity in patients with stable chronic heart failure. J Card Fail 2009;15:319–26
    1. Banerjee P, Caulfield B, Crowe L, et al. Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength and aerobic capacity in healthy sedentary adults. J Appl Physiol 2005;99:2307–11
    1. Caulfield B, Crowe L, Minogue C, et al. The use of electrical muscle stimulation to elicit a cardiovascular exercise response without joint loading: a case study. J Exerc Physiol 2004;7:84–8
    1. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. International Diabetes Federation: a consensus on Type 2 diabetes prevention. Diabet Med 2007;24:451–63
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 2009;52:17–30
    1. Korkiakangas EE, Alahuhta MA, Laitinen JH. Barriers to regular exercise among adults at high risk or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Promot Int 2009;24:416–27
    1. Ball K, Crawford D, Owen N. Too fat to exercise? Obesity as a barrier to physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000;24:331–3
    1. Hootman JM, Macera CA, Ham SA, et al. Physical activity levels among the general US adult population and in adults with and without arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:129–35
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation—United States, 2007–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59:1261–5 (accessed Dec 2011).
    1. Bolen J, Hootman J, Helmick CG, et al. Arthritis as a potential barrier to physical activity among adults with diabetes—United States, 2005 and 2007. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:486–9 (accessed 15 Jun 2010).
    1. Sallis JF, Hovell MF. Determinants of exercise behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1990;18:307–30
    1. Varo JJ, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, De Irala-Estevez J, et al. Distribution and determinants of sedentary lifestyles in the European Union. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:138–46
    1. Kimura T, Matsumoto K, Kameda N, et al. Percutaneous electrical muscle stimulation attenuates postprandial hyperglycemia in obese and pre-obese Japanese men. Int J Sports Health Sci 2010;8:1–6
    1. Poole RB, Harrold CP, Burridge JH, et al. Electrical muscle stimulation acutely mimics exercise in neurologically intact individuals but has limited clinical benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2005;7:344–51
    1. Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, et al. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1473–8
    1. Rose B, Lankisch M, Herder C, et al. Beneficial effects of external muscle stimulation on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2008;116:577–81
    1. Kempf K, Martin S. Hochfrequente externe Muskelstimulation verbessert signifikant die Symptome der diabetischen Neuropathie. gbo Zurich: Medizintechnik, 2010
    1. Kempf K, Martin S. High-frequency external muscle stimulation in the relief of symptomatic diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Stoffw Herz 2010;19:3–9
    1. Cohen RM.Holmes YR, Chenier TC, et al. Discordance between HbA1c and fructosamine: evidence for a glycosylation gap and its relation to diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 2003;26:163–7
    1. Thomas DE, Elliott EJ, Naughton GA. Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(3):CD002968.
    1. Alon G, Smith GV. Tolerance and conditioning to neuromuscular electrical stimulation within and between sessions and gender. J Sports Sci Med 2005;4:395–405
    1. Thomas N, Alder E, Leese G. Barriers to physical activity in patients with diabetes. Postgrad Med J 2004;80:287–91
    1. Gregory CM, Bickel CS. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 2005;85:358–64
    1. Gondin J, Brocca L, Bellinzona E, et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training induces atypical adaptations of the human skeletal muscle phenotype: a functional and proteomic analysis. J Appl Physiol 2011;110:433–50
    1. Crowe L, Caulfield B. Towards creating a super-stimulus to normalise glucose metabolism in the pre-diabetic; a case study in the feast-famine and activity-rest cycle. BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:
    1. Hamada T, Hayashi T, Kimura T, et al. Electrical stimulation of human lower extremities enhances energy consumption, carbohydrate oxidation, and whole body glucose uptake. J Appl Physiol 2004;96:911–16
    1. Sola-Penna M. Metabolic regulation by lactate. Life 2008;60:605–8
    1. Swain D, Franklin B. VO2 reserve and the minimal intensity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:152–7
    1. The Three Screen Report. First Quarter. The Nielson Company; 2009. (accessed Sept 2011).
    1. Brown W, Williams L, Ford J, et al. Identifying the energy gap: magnitude and determinants of 5-year weight gain in midage women. Obes Res 2005;13:1431–41
    1. Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, et al. Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 2003;289:1785–91
    1. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. (accessed Dec 2011).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren