Aerobic neuromuscular electrical stimulation--an emerging technology to improve haemoglobin A1c in type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a pilot study
Louis Crowe, Brian Caulfield, Louis Crowe, Brian Caulfield
Abstract
Objectives: A new generation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) devices can exercise aerobically at equivalent rates to voluntary exercise. Many with type 2 diabetes cannot or will not exercise sufficiently. The objective of this pilot investigation was to see (1) if it was an acceptable training modality for men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and (2) to assess effects on haemoglobin A1c levels.
Design, setting, participants and intervention: A case series of eight men with type 2 diabetes mellitus (aged 53±8; body mass index 32±5 5 kg/m(2)) trained with the NMES system for 1 h 6 times weekly for 8 weeks, unsupervised, at home. There were no other medication or lifestyle interventions. The aerobic NMES exercise system delivers a repeating set of four complex staggered pulses at high intensities (typically 100 mA+) through an array of eight thigh electrodes.
Outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were changes in haemoglobin A1c and the responses in a questionnaire on participants' perceptions of the system. Body mass and composition were also measured before and after the NMES intervention period.
Results: All participants could use the system at a level that left them breathless and sweaty and with a heart rate over 120 beats per minute. Haemoglobin A1c levels improved by 0.8±0.7% from 7.4±1.3% (mean ± SD) to 6.6±1.0% (p=0.01). All participants considered the system suitable for people with diabetes, would recommend it and would continue to use it twice a week 'to maintain improvements'.
Conclusions: These results suggest that aerobic NMES may be acceptable and have a beneficial effect on haemoglobin A1c of some men with diabetes. The treatment may be of particular benefit in those who will not or cannot do adequate amounts of voluntary exercise. A randomised control trial is required for conclusive efficacy data.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None.
Figures
References
- Crowe L, Caulfield B. Pushing out the limits of electrical stimulation. A case study in the aggressive use of an alternative to voluntary exercise. BMJ Case Reports 2011; doi:
- Crognale D, Crowe L, Devito G, et al. Neuro-muscular electrical stimulation training enhances maximal aerobic capacity in healthy physically active adults. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009:2137–40
- Banerjee P, Caulfield B, Crowe L, et al. Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength, peak VO2, and exercise capacity in patients with stable chronic heart failure. J Card Fail 2009;15:319–26
- Banerjee P, Caulfield B, Crowe L, et al. Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength and aerobic capacity in healthy sedentary adults. J Appl Physiol 2005;99:2307–11
- Caulfield B, Crowe L, Minogue C, et al. The use of electrical muscle stimulation to elicit a cardiovascular exercise response without joint loading: a case study. J Exerc Physiol 2004;7:84–8
- Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. International Diabetes Federation: a consensus on Type 2 diabetes prevention. Diabet Med 2007;24:451–63
- Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 2009;52:17–30
- Korkiakangas EE, Alahuhta MA, Laitinen JH. Barriers to regular exercise among adults at high risk or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Promot Int 2009;24:416–27
- Ball K, Crawford D, Owen N. Too fat to exercise? Obesity as a barrier to physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000;24:331–3
- Hootman JM, Macera CA, Ham SA, et al. Physical activity levels among the general US adult population and in adults with and without arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:129–35
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation—United States, 2007–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59:1261–5 (accessed Dec 2011).
- Bolen J, Hootman J, Helmick CG, et al. Arthritis as a potential barrier to physical activity among adults with diabetes—United States, 2005 and 2007. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:486–9 (accessed 15 Jun 2010).
- Sallis JF, Hovell MF. Determinants of exercise behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1990;18:307–30
- Varo JJ, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, De Irala-Estevez J, et al. Distribution and determinants of sedentary lifestyles in the European Union. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:138–46
- Kimura T, Matsumoto K, Kameda N, et al. Percutaneous electrical muscle stimulation attenuates postprandial hyperglycemia in obese and pre-obese Japanese men. Int J Sports Health Sci 2010;8:1–6
- Poole RB, Harrold CP, Burridge JH, et al. Electrical muscle stimulation acutely mimics exercise in neurologically intact individuals but has limited clinical benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2005;7:344–51
- Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, et al. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1473–8
- Rose B, Lankisch M, Herder C, et al. Beneficial effects of external muscle stimulation on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2008;116:577–81
- Kempf K, Martin S. Hochfrequente externe Muskelstimulation verbessert signifikant die Symptome der diabetischen Neuropathie. gbo Zurich: Medizintechnik, 2010
- Kempf K, Martin S. High-frequency external muscle stimulation in the relief of symptomatic diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Stoffw Herz 2010;19:3–9
- Cohen RM.Holmes YR, Chenier TC, et al. Discordance between HbA1c and fructosamine: evidence for a glycosylation gap and its relation to diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 2003;26:163–7
- Thomas DE, Elliott EJ, Naughton GA. Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(3):CD002968.
- Alon G, Smith GV. Tolerance and conditioning to neuromuscular electrical stimulation within and between sessions and gender. J Sports Sci Med 2005;4:395–405
- Thomas N, Alder E, Leese G. Barriers to physical activity in patients with diabetes. Postgrad Med J 2004;80:287–91
- Gregory CM, Bickel CS. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 2005;85:358–64
- Gondin J, Brocca L, Bellinzona E, et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training induces atypical adaptations of the human skeletal muscle phenotype: a functional and proteomic analysis. J Appl Physiol 2011;110:433–50
- Crowe L, Caulfield B. Towards creating a super-stimulus to normalise glucose metabolism in the pre-diabetic; a case study in the feast-famine and activity-rest cycle. BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:
- Hamada T, Hayashi T, Kimura T, et al. Electrical stimulation of human lower extremities enhances energy consumption, carbohydrate oxidation, and whole body glucose uptake. J Appl Physiol 2004;96:911–16
- Sola-Penna M. Metabolic regulation by lactate. Life 2008;60:605–8
- Swain D, Franklin B. VO2 reserve and the minimal intensity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:152–7
- The Three Screen Report. First Quarter. The Nielson Company; 2009. (accessed Sept 2011).
- Brown W, Williams L, Ford J, et al. Identifying the energy gap: magnitude and determinants of 5-year weight gain in midage women. Obes Res 2005;13:1431–41
- Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, et al. Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 2003;289:1785–91
- International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. (accessed Dec 2011).
Source: PubMed