Implementation of a trauma-informed, evidence-informed intervention for Latinx families experiencing interpersonal violence and child maltreatment: protocol for a pilot randomized control trial of SafeCare+®

Danielle L Fettes, Gregory A Aarons, Valerie Brew, Karla Ledesma, Jane Silovsky, Danielle L Fettes, Gregory A Aarons, Valerie Brew, Karla Ledesma, Jane Silovsky

Abstract

Background: A consistently demonstrated overlap exists between the occurrence of domestic violence and child maltreatment, yet these issues are historically addressed by distinct systems and programming. The randomized control trial pilot study presented in this article adapts, implements, and tests a new approach for addressing family violence for Latinx families with co-occurring risk for domestic violence and child maltreatment. In doing so, this pilot study addresses the clear need for collaboration between the two fields and focuses on Latinx families, who often face specific challenges regarding seeking and receiving needed services. The primary aim of the current study is a pilot implementation of SafeCare+®, an evidence-based parenting curriculum (SafeCare®) augmented with a healthy relationships curriculum (SafeCare+®). The objectives are a reduction of family violence, improved communication, and a healthy home environment for children in Latinx families with co-occurring domestic violence and child maltreatment.

Methods: This protocol outlines a feasibility, randomized control trial to examine the potential efficacy of SafeCare+. The pilot study is divided into two phases. Components of phase one involve developing a detailed implementation and evaluation plan, including a community needs assessment, determining screening and outcome measures, and assuring all components are culturally appropriate for the target population. Phase two implements the randomization of parents, who are involved in the child welfare system and referred for in-home parenting services, into SafeCare+ or SafeCare as usual. Participants complete assessments regarding mental health, provider-parent relationship, interpersonal violence experiences, and fidelity to the intervention. Analyses will focus on improvement on target outcomes for the intervention group, as well as comparison to the control group.

Discussion: This study will provide evidence on the feasibility and potential effectiveness of an early intervention program aimed at improving communication skills and mental health and reducing incidents of violence for Latinx parents who are involved with the child welfare service system. The findings of the study will inform the decision to progress to a full scale, definitive randomized control trial to test the effectiveness of an intervention, delivered as part of home visitation, for improving outcomes for families with histories of domestic violence.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03041558; registered 2 February, 2017-retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Child welfare; Domestic violence; Early intervention; Feasibility studies; Home visitation; Pilot projects.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© The Author(s) 2020.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SafeCare+ study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Logic model for the SafeCare+ pilot study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
SPIRIT figure for SafeCare+ trial for data collection timings

References

    1. Child Maltreatment 2017. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration on Children YaF, Children’s Bureau; 2019.
    1. Swenson CC, Brown EJ, Lutzker JR. Personality disorders in childhood and adolescence. In: Freeman IA, editor. Issues of maltreatment and abuse. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007. pp. 229–295.
    1. Fang X, Brown DS, Florence CS, Mercy JA. The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for prevention. Child Abuse Negl. 2012;36(2):156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.10.006.
    1. Peterson C, Florence C, Klevens J. The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States, 2015. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;86:178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.018.
    1. Wang C-T, Holton J. Total estimated cost of child abuse and neglect in the United States Chicago. Illinois: Prevent Child Abuse America; 2007.
    1. Smith SG, Zhang, X., Basile, K.C., Merrick, M.T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M., Chen, J. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 Data Brief In: Control NCfIPa, editor. 2018.
    1. McDonald R, Jouriles EN, Ramisetty-Mikler S, Caetano R, Green CE. Estimating the number of American children living in partner-violent families. J Fam Psychol. 2006;20(1):137–142. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.137.
    1. Herrenkohl TI, Sousa C, Tajima EA, Herrenkohl RC, Moylan CA. Intersection of child abuse and children’s exposure to domestic violence. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2008;9(2):84–99. doi: 10.1177/1524838008314797.
    1. McGuigan WM, Pratt CC. The predictive impact of domestic violence on three types of child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 2001;25(7):869–883. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00244-7.
    1. Cox CE, Kotch JB, Everson MD. A longitudinal study of modifying influences in the relationship between domestic violence and child maltreatment. J Fam Violence. 2003;18(1):5–17. doi: 10.1023/A:1021497213505.
    1. Schechter SK, J. Early childhood, domestic violence, and poverty: helping young children and their families. Iowa City: The University of Iowa, Work SoS; 2004.
    1. Briggs-Gowan MJ, Estabrook R, Henry D, Grasso DG, Burns J, McCarthy KJ, et al. Parsing dimensions of family violence exposure in early childhood: shared and specific contributions to emergent psychopathology and impairment. Child Abuse Negl. 2019;87:100–111. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.06.006.
    1. Knitzer J. Promoting resilience: helping young children and parents affected by substance abuse, domestic violence, and depression in the context of welfare reform: Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Poverty TNCfCi; 2000.
    1. Holt S, Buckley H, Whelan S. The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: a review of the literature. Child Abuse Negl. 2008;32(8):797–810. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.02.004.
    1. Mbilinyi LF, Edleson JL, Hagemeister AK, Beeman SK. What happens to children when their mothers are battered? Results from a four city anonymous telephone survey. J Fam Violence. 2007;22(5):309–317. doi: 10.1007/s10896-007-9087-x.
    1. Överlien C, Hydén M. Children’s actions when experiencing domestic violence. Childhood. 2009;16(4):479–496. doi: 10.1177/0907568209343757.
    1. Perilla JL, Bakeman R, Norris FH. Culture and domestic violence: the ecology of abused Latinas. Violence Vict. 1994;9(4):325–339. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.9.4.325.
    1. Cianelli R, Ferrer L, McElmurry BJ. HIV prevention and low-income Chilean women: machismo, marianismo and HIV misconceptions. Cult Health Sex. 2008;10(3):297–306. doi: 10.1080/13691050701861439.
    1. Fuchsel CLM, Murphy SB, Dufresne R. Domestic violence, culture, and relationship dynamics among immigrant Mexican women. Affilia. 2012;27(3):263–274. doi: 10.1177/0886109912452403.
    1. Edelson MG, Hokoda A, Ramos-Lira L. Differences in effects of domestic violence between Latina and non-Latina women. J Fam Violence. 2007;22(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10896-006-9051-1.
    1. Reina AS, Lohman BJ, Maldonado MM. “He said they’d deport me”: factors influencing domestic violence help-seeking practices among Latina immigrants. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(4):593–615. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505214.
    1. Bauer HM, Rodriguez MA, Quiroga SS, Flores-Ortiz YG. Barriers to health care for abused Latina and Asian immigrant women. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2000;11(1):33–44. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0590.
    1. Rivera J. Domestic violence against Latinas by Latino males: an analysis of race, national origin, and gender differentials. Boston Coll Third World Law J. 1994;14(2):231–257.
    1. Finno-Velasquez M, L. Fettes D, A. Aarons G, S. Hurlburt M. Cultural adaptation of an evidence-based home visitation programme: Latino clients’ experiences of service delivery during implementation. J Childrens Serv 2014;9(4):280-294.
    1. Hurlburt M, Aarons GA, Fettes D, Willging C, Gunderson L, Chaffin MJ. Interagency collaborative team model for capacity building to scale-up evidence-based practice. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;39:160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.005.
    1. Lutzker JR, Bigelow KM, Doctor RM, Kessler ML. Safety, health care, and bonding within an ecobehavioral approach to treating and preventing child abuse and neglect. J Fam Violence. 1998;13(2):163–185. doi: 10.1023/A:1022893607387.
    1. Bigelow KM, Lutzker JR. Using video to teach planned activities to parents reported for child abuse. Child Fam Behav Ther. 1998;20(4):1–14. doi: 10.1300/J019v20n04_01.
    1. Gershater-Molko RM, Lutzker JR, Wesch D. Project SafeCare: improving health, safety, and parenting skills in families reported for, and at-risk for child maltreatment. J Fam Violence. 2003;18(6):377–386. doi: 10.1023/A:1026219920902.
    1. Chaffin M, Hecht D, Bard D, Silovsky JF, Beasley WH. A statewide trial of the SafeCare home-based services model with parents in Child Protective Services. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):509–515. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1840.
    1. Sherin KM, Sinacore JM, Li XQ, Zitter RE, Shakil A. HITS: a short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Fam Med. 1998;30(7):508–512.
    1. Chaffin M, Hecht D, Aarons G, Fettes D, Hurlburt M, Ledesma K. EBT fidelity trajectories across training cohorts using the interagency collaborative team strategy. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2016;43(2):144–156. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0627-z.
    1. Straus MA, Douglas EM. A short form of the revised conflict tactics scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence Vict. 2004;19(5):507–520. doi: 10.1891/vivi.19.5.507.63686.
    1. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996;17(3):283–316. doi: 10.1177/019251396017003001.
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.
    1. Lopez FG, Morúa W, Rice KG. Factor structure, stability, and predictive validity of college students’ relationship self-efficacy beliefs. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2017;40(2):80–96. doi: 10.1080/07481756.2007.11909807.
    1. Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol. 1989;36(2):223–233. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223.
    1. Tracey TJ, Kokotovic AM. Factor structure of the working alliance inventory. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;1(3):207–210.
    1. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. Longitudinal data analysis. Hoboken: Wiley; 2006.
    1. McCulloch CE, Searle SR. Generalized, linear, and mixed models. New York: Wiley; 2001.
    1. Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 2002.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren